Trump Vetoed Israeli Plan to Kill Iran's Supreme Leader, US Official Tells AP
The Associated Press
President Donald Trump speaks during an event to sign a bill blocking California's rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, June 12, 2025, in Washington.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump rejected a plan presented by Israel to the U.S. to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter.
The Israelis informed the Trump administration in recent days that they had developed a credible plan to kill Khamenei.
After being briefed on the plan, the White House made clear to Israeli officials that Trump was opposed to the Israelis making the move, according to the official, who was not authorized to comment on the sensitive matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The Trump administration is desperate to keep Israel's military operation aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear program from exploding into an even more expansive conflict and saw the plan to kill Khamenei as a move that would enflame the conflict and potentially destabilize the region.
Asked about the plan during an interview on Fox News Channel's 'Special Report with Bret Baier,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly address whether the White House rejected the plan.
'But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do,' Netanyahu said. 'And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States.'
Netanyahu spokesperson Omer Dostri later called reports about the Israeli plan to kill Khamenei 'fake.'
Netanyahu in the Fox interview also said regime change 'could certainly be the result' of the conflict 'because the Iranian regime is very weak.'
Trump's rejection of the proposal was first reported by Reuters.
Meanwhile, Trump on Sunday issued a stark warning to Iran not to retaliate against U.S. targets in the Middle East.
Trump in an early morning social media posting said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. Iran, however, has said it would hold the U.S. — which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry — responsible for its backing of Israel.
'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before,' Trump said.
Hours later Trump took to social media again to predict 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal' and that it could come 'soon.'
But as he departed the White House on Sunday evening for the Group of Seven leaders summit in the Canadian Rockies, Trump was more tempered in comments to reporters about when the Israeli strikes and Iranian retaliation would wind down.
'I hope there is going to be a deal, and we'll see what happens, but sometimes they have to fight it out,' Trump said.
The conflict is expected to loom large during his talks with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the European Union.
The U.S. president said he has a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities 'just like I got India and Pakistan to' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation.
India struck targets inside Pakistan after militants in April massacred 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan has denied any links to the attackers. Following India's strikes in Pakistan, the two sides exchanged heavy fire along their de facto borders, followed by missile and drone strikes into each other's territories, mainly targeting military installations and airbases.
It was the most serious confrontation in decades between the countries. Trump on Sunday repeated his claim, disputed by India, that the two sides agreed to a ceasefire after he had offered to help both nations with trade if they agreed to de-escalate.
Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.
'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Trump posted. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!'
There's a divide in Trump world about how far the president should go in backing Israel.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and former Fox News host Tucker Carlson are among the prominent backers of Trump who have argued that voters supported Trump because he would not involve the nation in foreign conflicts.
GOP Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul praised Trump for having shown restraint and said he hoped the president's 'instincts will prevail.'
'So, I think it's going to be very hard to come out of this and have a negotiated settlement,' Paul told NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'I see more war and more carnage. And it's not the U.S.'s job to be involved in this war.'
In an interview on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' GOP South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said he preferred diplomatic efforts, but if diplomacy doesn't work Trump should 'go all in' on destroying Iran's nuclear program.
'If that means providing bombs, provide bombs,' he said. 'If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
G7 leaders arrive in Canada for summit that starts Monday
The leaders from the Group of Seven members have arrived in western Canada for their summit that starts on Monday. US tariffs, the situation in the Middle East and Russia's invasion of Ukraine will likely be on the agenda. The leaders are expected to discuss the global economic outlook on the first day. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who will attend, spoke to reporters on Sunday ahead of the meeting in Kananaskis. In an apparent reference to the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, she said: "Let us keep trade between us fair, predictable and open. All of us need to avoid protectionist measures. This is an important message that the G7 can send to the markets and to the world." Von der Leyen also expressed concern about the conflict between Israel and Iran, adding that "it will be a topic at G7 without any question." She reiterated the European Union's view that "Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." "A diplomatic solution remains the best way in the long run to address concerns about Iran's nuclear program." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is scheduled to join the G7 leaders on the second day of the summit. White House officials announced that Trump and Zelenskyy will hold one-on-one talks on the sidelines.
Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: A plea to stop Washington sticking its nose in U.S. Steel
Nippon Steel Corp.'s move to acquire U.S. Steel finally got the seal of approval from the U.S. government after it intervened and set conditions. We give high marks to the partnership agreed to by private-sector companies of Japan and the United States. The U.S. government needs to respect Nippon Steel's autonomous management and not meddle in it. Prior to winning the presidential election last November, Donald Trump vowed to block the acquisition. But he has since toned down his attitude and said he would allow 'investment' by Nippon Steel. Still, he expressed qualms about the Japanese company's goal of making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Nippon Steel made its intentions known about 18 months ago. The plan to make U.S. Steel a subsidiary was approved with the signing of a presidential order just before the deadline that revised one signed by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, to stop the acquisition. U.S. Steel is a noted corporation that at one time boasted the world's largest share of crude steel production. But it has fallen on hard times. Even if the U.S. government was trying to protect this symbol of U.S. industrialization from being controlled by foreign capital, the argument that an acquisition by a company from Japan, a U.S. ally, would create a risk in U.S. national security and in an important supply chain lacked logic. It was a mistake to try to push through protectionist policy. It is only right that the U.S. government did an about-face and allowed U.S. Steel to become a wholly owned subsidiary. As a condition for having its acquisition approved, Nippon Steel agreed to sign a national security agreement with the U.S. government. The U.S. side will have some influence over company management through the issuance of 'golden shares' to the U.S. government that grant it veto power over important management decisions. In addition to the 2 trillion yen ($13.8 billion) for the acquisition, Nippon Steel will also invest about 1.6 trillion yen on production facilities by 2028. The agreement appears to include wording on the composition of the U.S. Steel corporate board as well as production capacity in the United States. But using that agreement to flex its muscle will limit Nippon Steel's management freedom and perhaps thwart the rebuilding of U.S. Steel on the path to sustained growth. Concerns about the investment environment in the United States could lead other Japanese companies to take a more cautious stance about investing there. The interests of both Japan and the United States will not be served by such a development. Prior to approving the acquisition, Trump doubled the tariff rate on steel and aluminum to 50 percent. Trump seems to be trying to take credit for increased investment in the United States through his high tariff policy. But the acquisition plan was well under way before the increased tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Trying to claim that Nippon Steel's investment was the result of the tariff policy is a wishful boast. Trump also suddenly indicated that the 25-percent additional tariff on imported autos would be raised. That was a high-handed move that could deal a crippling blow to the Japanese economy. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump will soon meet for talks on the tariffs. Tokyo should not simply compromise just because the acquisition was approved but continue to seek a retraction of all the tariff measures. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 15
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump administration offers some details of how it would control U.S. Steel, but union raises concerns
President Donald Trump arrives to speak at U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plan on May 30, in West Mifflin, Pa. By JOSH BOAK and MARC LEVY President Donald Trump would have unique influence over the operations of U.S. Steel under the terms of what the White House calls an 'investment' being made by Japan-based Nippon Steel in the iconic American steelmaker. Administration officials over the past few days provided additional insight into the 'golden share' arrangement that the federal government made as a condition for supporting the deal. The Pittsburgh-based steel maker and Nippon Steel plan $11 billion in new investments by 2028 after indicating that they plan to move forward with the deal under the terms of a national security agreement that has the White House's approval. The White House has described the deal as a 'partnership' and an 'investment' by Nippon Steel in U.S. Steel, although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary in a nearly $15 billion offer it originally made in late 2023. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on social media on Saturday how the 'golden share' to be held by the president would operate, revealing that the White House is willing to insert itself aggressively into a private company's affairs even as it has simultaneously pledged to strip away government regulations so businesses can expand. Under the government's terms, it would be impossible without Trump's consent to relocate U.S. Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, change the name of the company, 'transfer production or jobs outside the United States,' shutter factories, or reincorporate the business overseas, among other powers held by the president. Lutnick also said it would require presidential approval to reduce or delay $14 billion in planned investments. 'The Golden Share held by the United States in U.S. Steel has powerful terms that directly benefit and protect America, Pennsylvania, the great steelworkers of U.S. Steel, and U.S. manufacturers that will have massively expanded access to domestically produced steel,' Lutnick posted on X. That $14 billion figure is higher than what the companies disclosed on Friday when Trump created a pathway for the investment with an executive order based on the terms of the national security agreement being accepted. Lawmakers from Pennsylvania say the higher figure includes the cost of an electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that Nippon Steel wants to build in the U.S., bringing the value of the deal to at least $28 billion. The president has the authority to name one of the corporate board's independent three directors and veto power over the other two choices, according to a person familiar with the terms of the agreement who insisted on anonymity to discuss them. The details of the board structure were first reported by The New York Times. Details of the agreement emerged as Trump was traveling to Alberta in Canada for the Group of Seven summit. Still, the full terms remain somewhat unclear. The companies have not made public the full terms of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel or the national security agreement with the federal government. On Sunday, the United Steelworkers, the labor union representing U.S. Steel employees, posted a letter raising questions about the deal forged by Trump, who during his run for the presidency had pledged to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel. The union said it was 'disappointed' that Trump 'has reversed course' and raised basic questions about the ownership structure of U.S. Steel. 'Neither the government nor the companies have publicly identified what all the terms of the proposed transaction are,' the letter said. 'Our labor agreement expires next year, on September 1, 2026, and the USW and its members are prepared to engage the new owners" of U.S. Steel "to obtain a fair contract.' If Trump has as much control of U.S. Steel as he has claimed, that could put him in the delicate position of negotiating the salary and benefits of unionized steelworkers going into midterm elections. As president, Joe Biden used his authority to block Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel on his way out of the White House after a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. After he was elected, Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement and ordered another review by the committee. That's when the idea of the 'golden share' emerged as a way to resolve national security concerns and protect American interests in domestic steel production. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel made a series of commitments. It gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest in U.S. Steel, promised to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
