
Three dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities.
'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.'
The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution.
'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said.
Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (R-Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.).
The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are project to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program —would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion.
Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill.
Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time.
'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
Bay Area farmworkers hope for action as President Trump promises ICE reform
HALF MOON BAY — In a post to Truth Social on Thursday, President Trump promised farmworkers that changes are coming to how ICE operations are conducted. Mr. Trump acknowledged in the post that people within the farming industry have stated that his administration's "aggressive policy on immigration" has led to the industry losing longtime workers, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." "This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!" Mr. Trump said. It's the first sign of hope for the immigrant community that has lived in fear since the raids began. Sandra Sencion is a farmworker program director with ALAS. It stands for Ayudandos Latinos a Soñar, which means helping Latinos to dream. The last few months, though, have been a nightmare for the immigrant community in Half Moon Bay. "These ICE raids are happening all around us and the fear that that could happen to us, regardless of whether you're documented or not," Sencion said. The farmworkers in Half Moon Bay worked through the pandemic and a mass shooting that killed seven people in 2023. They now worry about their families being torn apart. Sencion says they've had to do more outreach as more and more people need mental health and legal support. "We have a wait list for our mental health line and we are increasing our presence within our local farms and housing sites," she said. Some of the farms in Half Moon Bay are locking their gates so federal agents can't freely walk on their properties to take workers away. Sencion says the same is being done at the ALAS house to make sure people feel comfortable reaching out for help. She said many farmworkers have told her they just want to work to provide for their families. Now, they wait to see if Mr. Trump will make any changes to his immigration policy. "It's a message of hope to some extent to hear our president say something that is promising, but again, we're hoping that there's action behind that," Sencion said.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' protests are planned for North Texas. Here's how they will impact street closures
'No Kings Day' demonstrations are planned across North Texas this weekend to protest President Donald Trump and his administration's policies. On Saturday, June 14, demonstrations are planned in a number of cities in the Metroplex, including Dallas, Arlington and Fort Worth. These protests coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and a planned massive military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Gov. Greg Abbott said he will deploy National Guard troops and Texas Department of Public Safety officers across the state to 'to uphold law and order' during the planned protests. Most of these protests are taking place in parks or other public areas. Here's what to know about any planned street closures surrounding these events. ⚡ More trending stories from our newsroom: →What's the difference between TX law enforcement and the National Guard? →Can you get in trouble for not slowing down in a work zone in Texas? →How to stay safe at Texas protests Fort Worth's 'No Kings' protest will be from noon to 2 p.m. at Burk Burnett Park (501 W. 7th St.). The city told the Star-Telegram that Downtown Fort Worth Inc., who manages the park, has permitted a First Amendment Event on the property. Separately, a Downtown Fort Worth spokesperson confirmed this with the Star-Telegram and said there are no planned street closures around the event site. If anything changes leading up to the protest, residents can receive updates from the organization by texting 'Downtown Closures' to 817-904-4255. The city said it has not received any permit applications as of Thursday afternoon for any counter-protests to the 'No Kings' demonstration. Furthermore, the city said Fort Worth police are working closely with the community and its Intelligence Fusion Center to 'monitor all activity during any peaceful protests.' There is also a 'March of Dissent' event planned for downtown Fort Worth on Saturday morning. Arlington's 'No Kings' protest will be from 10 a.m. to noon at the Arlington Sub Courthouse (700 E. Abram St.) A city spokesperson told the Star-Telegram there are no planned street closures related to the protest. Burleson: 1 p.m.-3 p.m. at 100 NW John Jones Drive Dallas: Noon to 2 p.m. at Akard Plaza, 1500 Marilla St. Denton: 11 a.m.-1 p.m. at Denton Square, 110 W. Hickory St. Flower Mound: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Parker Square Gazebo, 1500 Cross Timbers Road Frisco: 9:30 a.m.-11 a.m. at FM 423 (both sides) between Main/King and Stonebrook, 155 Old Newman Road McKinney: 10 a.m.-noon, on the north side of Hwy. 380, west of Hwy. 75, 2025 N. Central Expressway
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court blocks ruling requiring Trump to hand National Guard back to California
The Brief An appeals court has blocked a federal judge's ruling requiring Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to the state of California. San Francisco judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling Thursday, calling Trump's deployment of the National Guard unconstitutional. Another hearing in the case is scheduled for June 17. LOS ANGELES - Hours after a federal judge ruled President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles was unconstitutional, an appeals court temporarily blocked the ruling Thursday night. National Guard troops have been in Los Angeles for a week after anti-ICE protests. Another hearing on the issue is scheduled for next week. What we know San Francisco federal judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling on Thursday, June 12. In his ruling, Breyer said that Trump overstepped his power and violated the Tenth Amendment by calling in the National Guard without Newsom's consent. The order required Trump to hand control of the troops back to Newsom by noon on Friday, June 13. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Breyer's order on Thursday night. Dig deeper Below is part of Breyer's ruling: "On June 6, 2025, the federal government initiated immigration raids across the City of Los Angeles. Protests swiftly followed, and some individuals involved in those protests were unruly and even violent. State and local law enforcement responded. The following day, President Trump ordered that members of the California National Guard be federalized, and thereupon assumed control of those forces. At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court must determine whether the President followed the congressionally mandated procedure for his actions. He did not. His actions were illegal-both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith." Prior to Thursday night's ruling, Trump took to Truth Social to blast Newsom for his handling of the weeklong anti-ICE protests: "Incompetent Gavin Newscum should have been THANKING me for the job we did in Los Angeles, rather than making sad excuses for the poor job he has done. If it weren't for me getting the National Guard into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now!" What they're saying Newsom praised Breyer's ruling, saying that the case was "a test of democracy, and today we passed the test." The other side The White House had called Breyer's order "unprecedented" and said it "puts our brave federal officials in danger." What's next The appeals court has set another hearing for June 17. The Source This report used court documents obtained by FOX 11 and information from the Associated Press.