logo
Trump's ‘energy emergency' means green light for Enbridge Line 5

Trump's ‘energy emergency' means green light for Enbridge Line 5

Yahoo26-03-2025

Mary Annette PemberICT
Six Michigan tribes have withdrawn from federal discussions over the controversial Enbridge Line 5 project after learning that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are fast-tracking approval for the massive oil tunnel under the Straits of Mackinac.
The escalation of the project follows an executive order declaring a 'national energy emergency' issued by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20, his first day in office.
On March 21, the six tribes — the Bay Mills Indian Community, Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi, and Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi — sent a letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office in Detroit stating their decision to withdraw from the agency's creation of the environmental impact statement for the oil tunnel.
SUPPORT INDIGENOUS JOURNALISM.
In the letter, tribal leaders noted that they had participated in the Corps' review process and meetings under the National Environmental Policy Act as cooperating agencies providing their input and expertise. But they said they were told at a March 20 meeting with the Corps that the agency is likely to issue an emergency permit to fast-track the Straits of Mackinac project.
Tribal leaders called the action 'unacceptable' in the letter.
"We participated in the process, we followed the rules, we provided the case law, we submitted the evidence, and we trusted that our voices and our treaty rights would be respected,' said Bay Mills Indian Community President Whitney Gravelle in a statement issued by Earth Justice, a nonprofit environmental law organization.
'Yet, once again, the federal government has cast us aside and failed us," Gravelle said in the statement.
In an interview with ICT, Gravelle noted that tribes have been providing input and expertise to the Corps since 2021.
'This is a Canadian pipeline running through Michigan for Canada. We are simply the highway that they are taking advantage of in order to have a shorter route,' Gravelle said. 'The executive order declaring a national emergency is intended to be used on fuel for the U.S. by the U.S. Line 5 doesn't meet that standard.'
In an email to ICT, Ryan Duffy, media spokesperson for Enbridge, said Line 5 is 'critical energy infrastructure.'
'We value our relationships with all the communities and community members in areas where Enbridge has assets,' Duffy said. 'As we continue to move closer to construction on the Great Lakes Tunnel Project, we remain committed to including tribes and tribal citizens in this incredibly important and consequential project and welcome constructive dialogue and engagement.'
He said the State of Michigan has already provided environmental permits for the project, and the Michigan Public Services Commission approved the new pipeline segment under the Straits of Mackinac.
'Line 5 is critical energy infrastructure,' Duffy said. 'Enbridge submitted its permit applications in April 2020 for the Great Lakes Tunnel, a project designed to make a safe pipeline safer while also ensuring the continued safe, secure, and affordable delivery of essential energy to the Great Lakes region …However, after nearly five years, the project still awaits action by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on an environmental impact statement and a permitting decision.'
Carrie Fox, public affairs specialist for the Corp's Detroit district, responded to ICT's request for comment with an email outlining the procedures for emergency permits.
'The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is continuing efforts to implement the January 20, 2025, Presidential Executive Order 14156 - Declaring a National Energy Emergency,' Fox said.
'During declared emergency events such as this national energy emergency, longstanding USACE regulations allow divisions to establish emergency permitting procedures to expedite the coordination efforts with federal, state, and tribal partners for comment,' Fox wrote. 'On 17 March, USACE Headquarters instructed division commanders to establish these procedures.
Once established, districts will post the procedures in a public notice. These procedures will cover applications for Department of the Army permits related to the energy activities covered by Executive Order 14156.'
'Fossil fuel subsidy in disguise'
Enbridge's Line 5 begins its 645-mile run in Superior, Wisconsin, at the company's manifold and runs through northern Wisconsin, parts of the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa reservation, east through Michigan's Upper Peninsula and under the Straits of Mackinac, before terminating in Sarnia, Ontario.
The line carries up to 540,000 barrels per day of light crude oil and synthetic crude, as well as natural gas liquids such as propane. About four miles of the line rest underwater on the lake bottom of the Straits of Mackinac, which connect Lake Michigan and Lake Huron.
In 2018 and 2019, the pipeline was struck by ship anchors in the straits' busy shipping lanes. Although no oil was spilled during these accidents, opponents note that Line 5 has leaked in other areas, releasing over 1 million gallons of oil in various spots in the past 50 years.
According to tribes and other critics of the project, a spill in the straits would have catastrophic effects on the environment, water, fish and wildlife, and would endanger tribal members' abilities to practice their subsistence ways of life protected under the Treaty of 1836.
In 2010, Enbridge's Line 6B ruptured, spilling 3.3 million gallons of tar sands oil into the Kalamazoo River.
The president's order states that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should take 'prompt and appropriate action' concerning the use of emergency Army Corps permits.
'The United States' ability to remain at the forefront of technological innovation depends on a reliable supply of energy and the integrity of our nation's electrical grid,' according to the executive order.
'There is no national energy emergency,' Debbie Chizewer, an Earth Justice attorney representing the Bay Mills tribe, told ICT. 'This is really a fossil fuel subsidy in disguise. The project doesn't add to American energy capacity because oil is already flowing through the pipeline.'
Looking ahead
Chizewer and Gravelle both noted that most of the product flowing though Line 5 originates and terminates in Canada.
Enbridge's Line 3, which originates in Hardisty, Ontario, carries petroleum products traveling east through Minnesota before terminating in the company's manifold in Superior, Wisconsin. Line 5 then carries the products through Wisconsin, Michigan and back to Canada in Sarnia.
Line 5 also supplies some propane to U.S. locations along its route through Michigan's Upper Peninsula.
Under the Biden administration, the Army Corps was preparing a draft Environmental Impact Statement after receiving more than 17,000 public comments on the tunnel project. An internal memo circulated in early January before Trump took office directed the agency to assess the risk of oil spills before approving the tunnel project, and to consider other alternatives in its review. The letter was written by former Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) Jaime Pinkham.
Gravelle noted that PInkham's memo has not been rescinded.
'So what we have now are two conflicting federal mandates,' Gravelle said.
Tribes will, however, continue to participate as consulting parties for the project under the National Historic Preservation Act, according to David Gover of the Pawnee and Choctaw tribes. He is an attorney with the Native American Rights Fund, which is representing the tribes.
'The emergency order essentially eliminates the tribes' opportunity to have a full consultation on the project,' he said.
Enbridge still needs permits from Michigan's Department of Environment and Great Lakes and Energy before going forward with the project, however, and still must go through Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's office. Whitmer has long been an opponent to the project, previously ordering the state's Department of Natural Resources to revoke the permit allowing Enbridge to operate the pipeline under the Straits of Mackinac.
According to Michigan Advance, attorneys for Whitmer and Michigan's Department of Natural Resources are currently looking to dismiss legal challenges from Enbridge.
'Uniquely, we have every single tribal nation in the state of Michigan standing up and saying the tunnel is a bad idea; it was a bad idea when it was first built in 1953 and it continues to be a bad idea now,' Gravelle said.
'How can we allow an oil and gas pipeline to run through the largest freshwater body resource in North America where 40 million people rely on it for drinking water on a daily basis?' she asked.
'It just doesn't make any sense.'
Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT's free newsletter. ICT, formerly Indian Country Today, is a nonprofit news organization that covers the Indigenous world with a daily digital platform and news broadcast with international viewership

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 50% tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum come into effect
Trump's 50% tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum come into effect

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 50% tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum come into effect

The US has doubled tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum imports to 50%, pressing ahead in the face of criticism from key trading partners with a measure that Donald Trump says is intended to revive the American industry. After imposing and rapidly lifting tariffs on much of the world, only to reduce them, Trump last week refocused on the global steel and aluminum markets – and the dominance of China. Related: Trump claimed 'tariffs are easy' – he's learning the hard way that's not the case Trump signed an executive order formalizing the move on Tuesday. Higher tariffs 'will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminum in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminum industries', the order said. The increase applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the US during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The rate for steel and aluminum imports from the UK – which does not rank among the top exporters of either metal to the US – will remain at 25% until at least 9 July. About a quarter of all steel used in the US is imported and data shows the increased levies will hit the closest US trading partners – Canada and Mexico – especially hard. They rank first and third respectively in steel shipment volumes to the US. The office of Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, said Canada was 'engaged in intensive and live negotiations to have these and other tariffs removed'. Mexico's economy minister, Marcelo Ebrard, reiterated that the tariffs were unsustainable and unfair, especially given that Mexico imports more steel from the US than it exports there. 'It makes no sense for the United States to levy a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,' he said, adding that Mexico would on Friday seek an exemption from the increase. Days after announcing his approval of the controversial takeover of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel, Trump unveiled plans for the rapid increase in tariffs on overseas steel and aluminum. 'Our steel and aluminum industries are coming back like never before,' Trump posted. 'This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum workers.' Senior EU officials are hoping the bloc can still win an exemption from the higher steel tariffs, with a crunch meeting between the EU trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, and US trade representative Jamieson Greer scheduled for Thursday in Paris. While a 50% tariff is seen as unsurvivable for exporters, sources in Brussels indicate it is unlikely that the EU will retaliate immediately, given the delicacy of talks around other tariffs imposed by Trump in recent months. The EU has the power to bring forward a €21bn package of tariffs on US exports, already agreed in April on the initial tariffs imposed by Trump on steel and aluminum. With Trump, the EU has a common cause, with Chinese oversupply being seen as one of the biggest drivers of the crisis engulfing the European steel industry, where declining demand has forced huge jobs losses among some of the biggest producers, including Germany's ThyssenKrupp Steel.

Former astronaut, federal minister Marc Garneau dies at 76
Former astronaut, federal minister Marc Garneau dies at 76

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former astronaut, federal minister Marc Garneau dies at 76

OTTAWA — Marc Garneau, the first Canadian in space who went on to become a high-profile federal politician, has died at 76 years old. MPs rose for a moment of silence in the House of Commons Wednesday evening to honour Garneau. He was an author and a pioneer in Canada's space program, serving as president of the Canadian Space Agency. In 1984, Garneau made history when he became the first Canadian to fly in space on shuttle mission STS-41G. The Canadian Space Agency website says Garneau conducted 10 Canadian experiments on space technology, space science and life sciences during the eight-day mission. Garneau made two other trips to space, on missions STS-77 and STS-97. Garneau later entered politics and was a Liberal member of Parliament representing a Montreal-area riding between 2008 and 2023. He held many cabinet positions in Justin Trudeau's government, including minister of foreign affairs and minister of transport. A statement from Garneau's wife, Pam Garneau, says he was sick near the end of his life but died peacefully. "Marc faced his final days with the same strength, clarity and grace that defined his life," she said. "We are especially grateful to the medical team who provided such dedicated and compassionate care during his short illness." Garneau was born in Quebec City and earned a bachelor of science degree in engineering physics at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ont. Several politicians and notable Canadians paid tribute to Garneau on social media. Former prime minister Justin Trudeau said it was with "much sadness" that he had learned about Garneau's passing. "I first met Marc as a schoolboy in the early 1980s," Trudeau said. "I was in awe of his service and his courage then, and continued to be as I had the privilege to serve alongside him in Parliament and in government. Marc truly embodied and exemplified Canadian greatness throughout his whole life." Astronaut Chris Hadfield said Garneau was his role model, mentor, longtime friend and "a brave and exemplary Canadian for us all." Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said Garneau "exceeded every expectation." "Canada has lost an exceptional person — not just an astronaut, but a true model of service and selflessness," Champagne said. Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said Garneau was "not only a remarkable Canadian and devoted public servant, but also a dear friend." Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said she was "heartbroken" to learn about Garneau's death. "Marc was a man of deep integrity, humility and quiet strength," she said. "A trailblazer, a mentor and a true statesman, he dedicated his life to serving Canada — with dignity, brilliance and grace." Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Garneau was a "great Canadian" and was "a trailblazer and proud to serve the country he loved." Garneau said in a recent interview with The Canadian Press that his three flights changed the way he saw Earth. "When you see that thin atmosphere and realize we're filling it with greenhouse gases and pollutants ...when you see these things, you realize, 'What are we doing?'" he said in 2024. "If we don't take care of this planet, there is nowhere else to go." Garneau said that, after flying in space, life was "not as intimidating." "It gave me a sense of confidence and it gave me confidence to move forward in life instead of playing it safe," he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press

Justice minister apologizes for comments about Indigenous veto over development projects
Justice minister apologizes for comments about Indigenous veto over development projects

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Justice minister apologizes for comments about Indigenous veto over development projects

OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser has apologized personally and publicly to the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations and on Wednesday attempted to do public damage control after saying the federal government believes its duty to consult and engage Indigenous Peoples does not mean those communities have a veto when it comes to green-lighting nation-building projects. Fraser, sounding a chastened note, told reporters his comments a day earlier 'caused hurt and potentially eroded a very precarious trust that has been built up over many years to respect the rights of Indigenous People in this country.' He said he should have 'rejected the premise of the question' that was asked by the Toronto Star, a day after the AFN, a national advocacy group for First Nations, warned the Carney government of its duty to seek the 'free, prior and informed consent' of Indigenous Peoples to expedite massive infrastructure projects, citing the principle enshrined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) in Canadian law and the Constitution. The Star asked Fraser what he and Prime Minister Mark Carney understand the legal principle means when it comes to these projects. The justice minister, who is a lawyer, cited international legal experts and jurisprudence, and said it entails a duty on the government to meaningfully consult, engage and accommodate Indigenous concerns, but it doesn't constitute a blanket veto power. The Star quoted the minister extensively Tuesday. On Wednesday, Fraser tried to walk back the damage he said was done by his comments after AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak reached out to him. However, Fraser did not back off the government's position — a position that has been consistent since Canada adopted its own law to interpret the UN declaration. 'I had a call last night after National Chief Woodhouse reached out expressing her frustration and I told her unequivocally that I wanted to apologize for some of the comments,' Fraser said, telling reporters nobody in government told him to publicly apologize. 'What I should have done when faced with the question that I received was rejecting (sic) the premise of the question,' Fraser said. 'The UN declaration when it comes to free, prior and informed consent, is about establishing a process based on respect and partnership as between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples. I think sometimes the conversation falls into a frankly dangerous trope that paints a false picture of Indigenous People as being anti-development somehow.' In fact, his Liberal caucus colleague, MP Marc Miller, a lawyer who served as Justin Trudeau's minister of Crown and Indigenous relations as well as minister of Indigenous services, told the Star in an interview that courts have consistently interpreted the UN declaration and Canadian law as not granting a veto. The courts have, however, set out a clear 'pathway' for governments and companies to follow in order to meaningfully consult, engage and accommodate Indigenous communities' concerns around resource developments. 'If UNDRIP had a veto in it, it is doubtful that a number of countries, including Canada, would have signed it in the first place,' Miller told the Star's Mark Ramzy. 'Now, the process of consultation is much broader than that, and depending on the quality and the impediment on the community in question, this can effectively turn into a community being able to prevent a pipeline from going through its community and depending on the project — but that is not a veto in all cases.' Miller said court decisions have established 'a road map for engagement with communities that is relatively sophisticated at this point. And the question for the federal government, is does it observe it or does it decide to cut corners? It cuts corners, it will find out, we will find out quite quickly through the court system that that will actually delay projects. So let's get it right the first time.' But, Miller added, 'to imply that UNDRIP in all cases gives a veto to every single community is to be inaccurate on what UNDRIP actually requires governments and states in question to do.' Fraser said essentially the same thing a day earlier, pointing to 'international commentary and the limited jurisprudence' that has interpreted the UN declaration to date. He said those indicate 'we do need to fully engage and to the extent there's a potential to have a more direct impact on Aboriginal and treaty rights, it demands a higher degree of engagement.' But, he said, experts have suggested 'that is not necessarily a blanket veto power.' 'But of course, we're in new territory here,' he said. 'Over the course of the next generation, I expect the courts are going to do some significant work, but hopefully a lot of that work is actually going to be done between governments and Indigenous Peoples themselves through engagement and conversations.' Fraser's initial comments were the first clear statement of how Carney's government will interpret the UN declaration and Canadian law when it comes to consulting Inuit, First Nations and Métis people about projects on lands over which they may hold treaty or constitutional land claims. It stood in contrast to how many Indigenous leaders view the Crown's legal obligation to consult them, many of whom argue it grants the power to consent to or deny economic development proposals. Canada adopted legislation and an action plan to implement the UN declaration under then-justice minister David Lametti, who is now principal secretary to Carney. The AFN had warned Carney in a letter released Monday of his legal obligations to consult and obtain the consent of affected communities when drawing up the legislation to fast-track projects, and when deciding on which projects will be designated 'nation-building' and qualify for expedited approvals. Without the 'free, prior and informed consent' of those communities, the AFN warned Carney's plan will be mired in conflict and litigation. On Monday, Woodhouse Nepinak told The Canadian Press that it is 'disheartening' when politicians make such comments, and said the government has made a series of missteps since her Thursday meeting with Carney. 'When the prime minister's trying to start a relationship with First Nations in a good way, it's disheartening when comments are made later, twice now actually this week,' she said, citing Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Rebecca Alty saying that work to fill the First Nations infrastructure gap won't qualify for Ottawa's push to fast-track what it calls 'nation-building' projects. Woodhouse Nepinak said she was then taken aback by Fraser's comments. 'He called to apologize,' she said. 'He needs to apologize to First Nations for those comments.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store