Ultratech Under Scanner In Cement Cartelisation Case
Fair trade regulator CCI has directed Aditya Birla firm UltraTech, which now owns south-based cement firm India Cements, along with two other makers, and their executives to submit financial documents after its Director General in its investigations found contravention of competition norms.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has also directed Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements to submit their audited financial statement, including balance sheet and profit and loss account, within eight weeks of the order.
It has directed UltraTech to submit the financial statements of its subsidiary India Cements for five years from FY15 to FY19, while Dalmia Bharat Cements and Shree Digvijay Cements for nine years, from FY11 to FY19.
Besides, CCI has also directed their executives to submit detailed financials and income tax records for five years, along with formal responses to the investigation report.
An email sent to UltraTech Cements and Dalmia Cement Bharat remained unanswered till the time of filing the story.
The CCI direction came over a complaint filed by ONGC alleging cartelisation in its tenders. Following this, the fair trade regulator had on November 18, 2020, directed its probe unit Director General to look into the issue.
The DG had submitted the report of its investigation on February 18, 2025, in which it found contraventions of the competition regulations.
It had found that Ultratech's subsidiary India Cements, along with Shree Digvijay Cement and Dalmia Cement, with a middleman named Umakant Agarwal, engaged in anti-competitive collusion.
Later, CCI on May 26, 2025, considered the investigation report and in a four-page order also directed the cement manufacturer to submit income derived from sales to alleged contraventions by the PSU.
The CCI notice also mentioned if there is non-furnishing of the financial details or incomplete/false information, within the time frame by the companies, then they would be liable under section 45 of the Act.
Earlier, in December 2024, UltraTech Cements had acquired 32.72 per cent stake from promoters and promoter group entities of India Cements Ltd. The Aditya Birla Group firm, which already had acquired a 22.77 per cent stake from the market, became the promoter of the Tamil Nadu-based company.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Jane Street vs Millennium: A US tech feud sparked India's biggest market probe
Jane Street market ban: SEBI has penalised Jane Street for allegedly manipulating Indian stock indices, particularly Bank Nifty, through extensive derivative positions, leading to significant losses for retail investors. The regulator has ordered the seizure of ₹4,844 crore in what could be its largest action against a foreign trading firm. Jane Street is now barred from the Indian securities market pending further investigation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What led to Sebi's probe against Jane Street? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What happens now? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has barred New York-based trading firm Jane Street from the securities market for allegedly manipulating stock indices using large derivative positions, mainly in the Bank Nifty, which caused losses to retail investors caught on the other side of the action is among the harshest taken by Sebi against a foreign trading firm of this size. The regulator has ordered the seizure of ₹4,844 crore ($570 million), calling it 'illegal gains' made by Jane Street. This could be the biggest seizure ever made by the market order applies to four entities linked to the Jane Street Group (JS Group)—JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments, Jane Street Singapore, and Jane Street Asia Trading. These entities are now prohibited from participating in the securities market, either directly or began its investigation after media reports surfaced about a legal dispute between Jane Street and rival Millennium Management in the United States. Jane Street had filed a case in a US court alleging that two of its former traders had stolen its proprietary trading strategy before joining Millennium. The firm claimed this strategy had helped generate nearly $1 billion in profits when used in India's derivatives market in is the largest derivatives market in the world, making up nearly 60% of the 7.3 billion global equity derivative trades recorded in April, as per data from the Futures Industry timing of Sebi's action also coincides with repeated warnings to retail investors about the risks involved in derivatives trading. A Sebi study published in January 2023 showed that nine out of ten individual traders in the equity futures and options segment lost an average of ₹1.1 lakh during FY22. Most of these losses were concentrated in the options segment.'While retail participation in index options trading on expiry day has moderated somewhat in recent times, around 90% of them continue to lose money,' a regulatory official said. 'There appears to be still too much concentration in short-term expiries and short-term trading. Extending maturities and nudging more long-term trading, hedging, and investments would be ideal for our ecosystem.'Jane Street has 21 days to respond to Sebi. The impounded gains must be placed in an escrow account with the regulator. While a full investigation will take time, Sebi has stopped short of imposing an indefinite ban. According to sources, strong checks have been put in place to ensure that the firm does not resume any activities that may violate market probe into Jane Street's India trades continues, as regulators examine the wider impact of the firm's strategies and possible breaches of trading earning extraordinary profits in a short time, Jane Street has drawn the attention of the Indian income tax department. The firm's method of using its companies in different countries to carry out varied trades and avoid paying tax is likely to be investigated to the income tax law, the structure used by Jane Street to allegedly manipulate markets could be seen as an 'impermissible avoidance arrangement.' The General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) defines this as any setup aimed only at avoiding tax or carried out in a way 'which are not ordinarily employed for bona fide purposes.'Jane Street's Indian companies took positions in cash and stock futures markets, while its Singapore and Hong Kong firms—both registered with Sebi as foreign portfolio investors (FPIs)—took large positions in equity options. This market has grown rapidly in recent of the profits were recorded in the Singapore-based FPI, which paid no tax on the income from futures and options because of the India-Singapore tax treaty. This treaty offers similar tax relief as the one between India and Mauritius. The Indian arms—JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments—took intra-day trades, buying in the morning and selling before the market closed. These trades likely influenced prices, while the offshore FPIs, often taking the opposite positions, earned large gains made by Jane Street Singapore and Jane Street Asia Trading, based in Hong Kong, were much higher than the possible losses or smaller profits reported by the Indian companies. Since the Indian entities are based in a jurisdiction where equity derivative profits are taxed at full rates—ranging from 30% to more than 40%—the arrangement resulted in the main income being routed through the tax-free Singapore though Hong Kong does not offer the same tax benefits as Singapore, it is possible the Hong Kong entity was used once the Singapore firm had reached its margin or internal exposure limits within the group.
India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
Spain eases visa rules to welcome students affected by US immigration crackdown
In response to tighter US immigration controls, Spain has stepped in with a new fast-track visa initiative called 'EduBridge to Spain' aimed at welcoming international students affected by the Trump administration's student visa move follows widespread reports of international students being denied entry into the United States due to tightened screening policies, especially social media vetting and halted visa government is now offering these students a smoother alternative to continuing their education without unnecessary PATH FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS Under the EduBridge to Spain programme, affected students can quickly transfer their academic progress from US universities to Spanish institutions. This includes smoother validation of previously completed coursework, recognition of existing qualifications, and simplified academic record programme spans a wide range of academic levels -- from high school and undergraduate studies to postgraduate education -- offering students the ability to shift at nearly any point in their academic VISA PROCESS AND WORK RIGHTSTo further support the move, Spain's Migration Ministry has ensured that its consular offices in the US will prioritise student visa applications. Once in Spain, police stations will also fast-track the issuance of Foreigner Identity Cards (TIE) for not only students but also professors and eligible students will be allowed to take up part-time employment, easing financial concerns and supporting a more integrated experience in IMMIGRATION LAW COULD COMPLICATE ENTRYHowever, the scheme is not without its hurdles. A new Spanish immigration law, which came into effect on 20 May, includes fresh restrictions on various visa types, including student these rules, students must meet more rigid timelines for submitting academic documents, provide proof of medical insurance and accommodation, and face a shorter timeframe for securing a residence to Apune (Association of American University Programmes in Spain), students face confusion around tuition payments as many Spanish universities only collect fees in September, while visa applicants are often required to pay FOR SCIENTISTS ALSO INCLUDEDBeyond students, Spain is actively encouraging US-based scientists impacted by the Trump administration's policies to relocate. Science and Innovation Minister Diana Morant announced 200,000 in additional funding for each project led by these efforts aim to make Spain a safe haven for academics and researchers who feel 'disregarded' under current US governance. The grants will support both research and relocation costs, strengthening Spain's innovation REMAINS A TOP CHOICE FOR STUDYAccording to the Open Doors website, Spain ranks third among the top destinations for American students, after the UK and Italy. On average, 20,000 students apply annually to pursue part of their studies in EduBridge to Spain, this number is expected to rise significantly, as more students reconsider their educational options amid geopolitical proactive approach underscores a broader shift in global student mobility. With streamlined systems, cross-border recognition, and employment access, Spain is emerging as a preferred alternative to the US for international education seekers.- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Retail trading at risk if proprietary giants like Jane St exit: Zerodha CEO
Zerodha founder and CEO Nithin Kamath has cautioned that retail trading activity could be impacted if proprietary trading firms like Jane Street, which contribute nearly 50 per cent of options trading volumes, scale back their participation in the market. This development could have negative implications for both exchanges and brokers, he added. "Prop trading firms like Jane Street account for nearly 50 per cent of options trading volumes. If they pull back which seems likely retail activity (~35 per cent) could take a hit too. So this could be bad news for both exchanges and brokers," Kamath said on X. "The next few days will be telling. F&O volumes might reveal just how reliant we are on these prop giants," he added. In an order released in the early hours of Friday, the market regulator found Jane Street (JS), a New York-based hedge fund, guilty of manipulating the indices by taking bets in the cash, and, futures and options markets simultaneously for making handsome gains. It has barred the hedge fund from accessing the market and impounded over Rs 4,843 crore in gains. The probe has found that JS made a profit of Rs 36,671 crore on a net basis during the probe period from January 2023 - May 2025. Kamath said that if the allegations against Jane Street are true, it's "blatant market manipulation" and despite warnings from the exchange, it continued. "The shocking part? They kept at it even after receiving warnings from the exchanges. Maybe this is what happens when you're used to the lenient U.S. regulatory regime. Think about the structure of U.S. markets: dark pools, payment for order flow, and other loopholes that allow hedge funds to make billions off retail investors. "None of these practices would be allowed in India, thanks to our regulators, You've got to hand it to Sebi for going after Jane Street," he added.
