logo
Operation Sindoor Strategic Success, Decisive Indian Victory, Says Modern War Institute's John Spencer

Operation Sindoor Strategic Success, Decisive Indian Victory, Says Modern War Institute's John Spencer

News1816-05-2025

Last Updated:
The operation wasn't just tactical success, says Spencer, but also 'a doctrinal execution under live fire'
Operation Sindoor met and exceeded its strategic aims—destroying terrorist infrastructure, demonstrating military superiority, restoring deterrence, and unveiling a new national security doctrine—says John W Spencer, a retired United States Army officer, researcher of urban warfare, and author.
'This was not symbolic force. It was decisive power, clearly applied," says Spencer. 'This wasn't just tactical success. It was doctrinal execution under live fire."
Spencer serves as the chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute.
During his military career, he was an infantry platoon leader and company commander, including two combat tours during the Iraq War. In Iraq, Spencer served during the initial invasion in 2003 and later in 2008 during the Iraq War troop surge and the Battle of Sadr City. He was also assigned to Ranger School, Joint Chiefs of Staff, etc. Later, he became a fellow with the chief of staff of the Strategic Studies Group, until he moved to the Modern War Institute (MWI).
According to him, the following strategic effects were achieved by India through Operation Sindoor:
1. A New Red Line Was Drawn—and Enforced: Terror attacks from Pakistani soil will now be met with military force. That's not a threat. It's precedent.
2. Military Superiority Demonstrated: India showcased its ability to strike any target in Pakistan at will—terror sites, drone coordination hubs, even airbases. Meanwhile, Pakistan was unable to penetrate a single defended area inside India. That is not parity. That is overwhelming superiority. And that is how real deterrence is established.
3. Restored Deterrence: India retaliated forcefully but stopped short of full war. The controlled escalation sent a clear deterrent signal: India will respond, and it controls the pace.
4. Asserted Strategic Independence: India handled this crisis without seeking international mediation. It enforced doctrine on sovereign terms, using sovereign means.
The halt in operations is not the end of Operation Sindoor, says Spencer. According to him, it is a pause. India holds the initiative: if provoked again, it will strike again.
'Operation Sindoor was a modern war—fought under the shadow of nuclear escalation, with global attention, and within a limited objective framework," Spencer says. 'And by every measure that matters, it was a strategic success—and a decisive Indian victory."
First Published:
May 17, 2025, 00:16 IST

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shashi Tharoor flags false equivalence with Pakistan on US mediation role – ‘this is about India versus terrorism'
Shashi Tharoor flags false equivalence with Pakistan on US mediation role – ‘this is about India versus terrorism'

Mint

time26 minutes ago

  • Mint

Shashi Tharoor flags false equivalence with Pakistan on US mediation role – ‘this is about India versus terrorism'

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has said having United States as a mediator between India and Pakistan would imply an equivalence which doesn't exist. "Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. You're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist, Tharoor said speaking at an event in Washington DC when asked if it is helpful to have the United States available as a mediator. Tharoor is part of all-party delegation traveling abroad as part of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi government's diplomatic outreach to highlight India's stand on terrorism following'Operation Sindoor'. 'There is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. There is no equivalence between a country that provides a safe haven to terrorism and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business,' the Congress MP said. Tharoor said that Modi government also received calls at high levels from the US government and India appreciated their concern and their interest. At the same time, he said, they must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side. "Because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis," he said. The Congress leader reiterated that India hit terror bases in Pakistan during Operation Tharoor while Pakistan hit civilains in retailiation since there are no terror bases in India. "There are no terror bases in India to hit. There are no terrorist organisations in India listed in the UN or the State Department anywhere else. So, what do you hit? You hit civilians, innocent people. That is the asymmetry of this particular conflict. We have tried not just to be precise and calibrated in our response, but we have tried systematically to signal we are not interested in war with Pakistan. We're not interested in attacking Pakistani civilians, ordinary people. This is about India versus terrorism," he said. As many as 26 people were killed and several others injured in the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on 22 April. Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. There is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. Key Takeaways Mediation by the US is viewed as inappropriate due to the lack of equivalence between India and Pakistan. Tharoor highlights the asymmetry in the conflict, stressing that India targets terror bases while Pakistan retaliates against civilians. The focus should remain on countering terrorism rather than establishing diplomatic parity.

'A Punching Bag?': Harsh Goenka's 'Justice' Post Gets Vijay Mallya's Thumbs-Up
'A Punching Bag?': Harsh Goenka's 'Justice' Post Gets Vijay Mallya's Thumbs-Up

News18

time33 minutes ago

  • News18

'A Punching Bag?': Harsh Goenka's 'Justice' Post Gets Vijay Mallya's Thumbs-Up

Last Updated: Goenka questioned why Mallya was still a "punching bag" despite his loan recovery and said justice must be fair. Mallya is accused of defaulting on loans worth Rs 9,000 crore. Business tycoon Harsh Goenka's recent social media post, where he questioned why fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya continues to be a 'political punching bag" despite the recovery of his loans, has reignited the debate surrounding one of India's most high-profile financial scandals. The RPG Enterprises Chairman acknowledged that Mallya had 'lived the high life" and defaulted on his loans, but stressed that his dues worth over Rs 9,000 crore had been settled. He emphasised that justice must be fair and not selective. 'Vijay Mallya lived the high life, yes. Defaulted, yes. Unlike most others, his ₹9,000+ crore dues are now reportedly settled. Meanwhile, bigger defaulters walk free with much fatter haircuts from banks. If dues remain, the banks should clearly say so. If not, why is he still a political punching bag? Justice must be fair, not selective," Goenka said on X. Vijay Mallya lived the high life, yes. Defaulted, yes. Unlike most others, his ₹9,000+ crore dues are now reportedly settled. Meanwhile, bigger defaulters walk free with much fatter haircuts from banks. If dues remain, the banks should clearly say so. If not, why is he still a…— Harsh Goenka (@hvgoenka) June 5, 2025 Mallya swiftly responded to Goenka's post, saying, 'Thank you Harsh. The Union Finance Ministry has confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered Rs 14,100 crores from me against a DRT judgement debt of Rs 6,203 crores. Why the blatant discrimination?" Thank you Harsh. The Union Finance Ministry has confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered Rs 14,100 crores from me against a DRT judgement debt of Rs 6,203 crores. Why the blatant discrimination ?— Vijay Mallya (@TheVijayMallya) June 5, 2025 'Vijay Mallya didn't repay out of goodwill. His assets were seized and auctioned after years of dodging Indian courts and living lavishly in the UK," another user said. Others agreed with Goenka's statement, saying Mallya had been unfairly targeted. Mallya is an accused in a bank loan default case of over Rs 9,000 crore from an SBI-led consortium, involving his defunct Kingfisher Airlines. He was accused of fraud and money laundering and fled the country in 2016. He has since lived in the UK while fighting his extradition to India. Last year, the Enforcement Directorate said it had recovered Rs 22,280 crores from various banking scams, from the high-profile names like Mehul Choksi, Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya and some fraudulent companies. In February, Mallya told the Karnataka High Court that the Rs 6,200 crore debt he owes to banks has been recovered 'multiple times over". 'According to an admitted statement, as of today, the recovery officer confirms that Rs 10,200 crore has been recovered. Additionally, the official liquidator states that the banks have regained their dues, and even the Finance Minister informed Parliament that Rs 14,000 crore has been recovered," he said at that time. The 69-year-old businessman was declared bankrupt in July 2021. He remains on bail in the UK while a 'confidential" legal matter believed to be related to an asylum application is resolved in connection with the unrelated extradition proceedings. A consortium of banks, led by SBI, won their court appeal in London to uphold a bankruptcy order against him in April.

'Women Wearing Less Are Like Politicians Who...': Kailash Vijayvargiya Draws Bizarre Comparison
'Women Wearing Less Are Like Politicians Who...': Kailash Vijayvargiya Draws Bizarre Comparison

News18

time33 minutes ago

  • News18

'Women Wearing Less Are Like Politicians Who...': Kailash Vijayvargiya Draws Bizarre Comparison

Last Updated: The MP Minister compared women wearing less clothes with politicians giving fewer speeches and called both of them 'lack of substance'. Senior BJP leader and Madhya Pradesh Cabinet Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya erupted a row after he made remarks on women's clothing during an event in Bhopal. 'I believe women should dress beautifully in Indian attire, as it is highly regarded in our culture. But, in some other countries, women who wear less clothes are often considered to be fashionable," he was heard saying. He further compared women wearing less clothes with politicians giving fewer speeches and called both of them 'lack of substance." 'To put it simply, women who wear less are like politicians who give fewer speeches; both seem to lack substance. I view women as goddesses, and they should wear good clothes. I don't like women or girls who wear revealing clothes, to the point where I refuse to take photos with them," he said. VIDEO | Here is what MP Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya (@KailashOnline) says on women who wear skimpy clothes: 'I believe women should dress beautifully in Indian attire, as it is highly regarded in our culture. But, in some other countries, women who wear less clothes are often… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 5, 2025 'Sometimes girls come to take selfies with me. I tell them, 'Beta, come in proper clothes next time, then we'll take a photo'," he added. Notably, this is not the only time he has made remarks related to the clothes of women. Even in 2022, while attending a Hanuman Jayanti event in Indore, the Madhya Pradesh Minister had said, 'I won't lie on Hanuman Jayanti… but girls these days wear such filthy clothes… We call women goddesses, but they don't appear that way… They look like Shurpanakha (a demoness from Hindu mythology). God has given you a beautiful body, at least wear decent clothes. Teach your children values". First Published:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store