‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it.
This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions.
Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago.
So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley.
The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction.
The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.''
Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5.
Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion.
'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5.
Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health.
Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means.
About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us.
To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees.
Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow.
People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest.
Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty.
To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account.
While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
38 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Veteran-Run Red State Gold: The Transparent Precious Metal Leaders
There are plenty of untrustworthy companies in the precious metals industry, but Red State Gold sets itself apart as a trusted leader. How? The brand's precious metals experts empower individuals with knowledge while providing reliable options for diversification with gold, silver, and other precious metals. Red State Gold's business is not just about the bottom line. With a passion for helping others achieve financial security, the company aims to maintain trust, integrity and excellence. Industry veterans and US military patriots founded Red State Gold when they saw a need for a transparent, ethical and cost-effective alternative in the precious metals industry. With a decade of combined industry experience, the founders offer a unique understanding of its challenges and opportunities. Half of the Red State Gold team comprises veterans, which translates to discipline, resilience and a commitment to excellence that results in unparalleled service. The group was born from a desire to make a meaningful impact in an industry that's often too complex and devoid of transparency. Red State Gold believes the team's veteran experience has been a cornerstone of the brand's success. The company noted, 'We take great pride in our proven track record of helping hundreds of Americans successfully diversify their portfolios, providing them with stability and confidence in their financial futures. These achievements reflect our unwavering commitment to our clients and their goals.' Red State Gold's Values Red State Gold is guided by principles of trust, integrity and transparency. The company is committed to ensuring that clients feel confident and supported as they navigate the complexities of investing and planning for retirement. Naturally, the industry poses many challenges to Red State Gold. However, the team's veteran background has taught the company's leaders to remain calm under pressure and work through them without breaking a sweat. One such hurdle has been navigating political unease and market volatility. The company takes pride in staying informed and adapting its strategies to provide stability and clarity during these uncertain times. Despite these challenges, Red State Gold has taken advantage of unique opportunities to collaborate with political and financial figures that align with the company's mission. Red State Gold is looking toward the future with goals to grow the brand into a trusted industry leader. The brand hopes to be recognized for its commitment to integrity, service and results. Red State Gold looks forward to expanding its reach to assist as many people as possible. The brand's primary goal is to help the most significant number of people achieve financial security and diversification. Red State Gold aspires to create a lasting impact, empowering individuals and families to secure their financial futures. Follow Red State Gold Group on Facebook and connect on LinkedIn to stay up-to-date on the latest from the group. You can learn more by filling out a contact form.


Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Do Americans support or oppose ICE? Here's what a poll found amid LA protests
Public opinion is hotly divided over Immigration And Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency responsible for handling deportations, according to new polling. In the latest YouGov/Economist poll, roughly equal shares of respondents expressed support for and opposition to ICE. And, while there is little appetite for abolishing the agency, most respondents think ICE agents should be required to adhere to certain practices. Here is a breakdown of the results from the poll, which comes after anti-ICE protests erupted in Los Angeles, California, leading President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops to the area. Favorability of ICE In the poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6 to 9 — a slim plurality of respondents, 45%, said they held a favorable view of ICE. Meanwhile, 43% said they had an unfavorable view. On this question, there was a yawning partisan divide, with 81% of Republicans holding a positive view and 79% of Democrats holding a negative view. Independents were about evenly split — 41% unfavorable vs. 40% favorable. Abolishing ICE? Despite this fierce divide, a sizable plurality of respondents, 45%, said they oppose abolishing ICE and replacing it with a different agency. Less than a third of respondents, 27%, said they would favor shutting down ICE. But, again, there were significant differences based on partisanship. Most Republicans, 69%, said they oppose abolishing ICE, while a plurality of Republicans, 47%, said they are in favor of this idea. A plurality of independents, 39%, oppose this. Uniforms and masks By and large, Americans favor requiring ICE agents to clearly identify themselves and refrain from hiding their identities, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More than two-thirds of respondents, 68%, said ICE officers should be required to wear uniforms when conducting operations. Just 18% opposed this. Further, a plurality of respondents, 47%, opposed allowing ICE officers to wear masks to conceal their identities during arrests. Thirty-nine percent said this should be allowed. In recent weeks, ICE agents have been documented carrying out operations in plain clothes and equipped with masks, according to the Houston Chronicle and Reuters. Anti-ICE protests A separate YouGov poll — conducted on June 9 with 4,231 U.S. adults — asked respondents about the anti-ICE protests that sprang up in Los Angeles during the first weekend of June, resulting in more than 50 arrests. Following the outbreak of demonstrations, Trump dispatched around 2,000 National Guard troops to the area. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now,' the president wrote on Truth Social on June 10. Trump also threatened to arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom for obstructing the federal government's immigration enforcement policies. Newsom responded by suing the Trump administration, arguing that the president has illegally federalized the California National Guard. 'This is a manufactured crisis,' Newsom wrote on X. '(Trump) is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' In the poll, a plurality of respondents, 45%, said they disapprove of the anti-ICE protests, while 36% said they approve of them. Most Republicans, 73%, and a plurality of independents, 41%, oppose them, while most Democrats, 58%, are in favor. That said, most respondents, 56%, believe state and local authorities should take the lead in responding to the protests. Just 25% said the federal government should organize the response. Most Democrats and independents — 72% and 56%, respectively — favor a state- and local-led response, while a plurality of Republicans, 46%, want the Trump administration to spearhead the response. Further, respondents were about evenly divided when it came to the nature of the Los Angeles protests, according to the poll, which has a margin of error of 2 percentage points. A slim plurality, 38%, said they are mostly peaceful, while 36% said they are mostly violent. Most Democrats, 64%, labeled the protests as mostly peaceful, while most Republicans, 66%, described them as mostly violent. Independents were about evenly split — 35% mostly peaceful vs. 33% mostly violent.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump: Military parade protesters will be met with ‘very big force'
President Trump on Tuesday warned potential protesters who are planning to attend Saturday's military parade in Washington, D.C., that they would be met with 'very big force.' 'If there's any protester wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'For those people that want to protest, they will be met with very big force. And I haven't even heard about a protest.' Protests are planned around the nation on Saturday to counter the military parade, which coincides with the Army's 250th anniversary. The event will feature tanks, flyovers and other military aircraft. Trump will deliver remarks on Saturday evening. The event also falls on his 79th birthday. Advocacy groups have organized 'No Kings' events that are pushing back on what they say is creeping authoritarianism. Organizers have said there is not a 'No Kings' event planned in Washington, D.C., however, though other counter-demonstrations are planned. Trump's comments warning protesters come as his administration has mobilized the National Guard and other troops in Los Angeles to crack down on protests taking place in the city against immigration raids. State and local officials have pushed back on the use of the National Guard, decrying it as an escalation. Trump and other Republicans have highlighted instances of violence, such as protesters burning cars and throwing chunks of curbs at police, to justify the extraordinary response. Democrats have largely condemned the violence while defending the right of Trump's critics to protest peacefully. 'Protest is a powerful tool – essential in the fight for justice,' Former Vice President Kamala Harris said in a statement on Sunday. 'I continue to support the millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms.' The administration has mobilized some 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 active duty Marines to Los Angeles, a move that the Pentagon said Tuesday will cost roughly $134 million.