
RFK builds his team of ‘renegades' amid friction between MAHA and traditional Trump allies
But on a recent morning, mingling among the marble columns was an eclectic group of outsiders new in town. Food influencers, organic farmers and anti-vaccine advocates were among those gathered for the official launch of the MAHA Institute, the latest incarnation of the Make America Healthy Again movement that has become a key facet of Washington in the second Trump administration.
Speakers took the stage to discuss medical freedom, school lunches, vaccine exemptions and above all, chronic illness. Farmers chatted about the importance of local produce but also the dangers of chemtrails in the sky. College students pitched a health startup built around the importance of 'touching grass.'
Speaking from the stage, Calley Means, a longtime ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s who is now advising the White House, noted the oddity of pairing the people and ideas behind MAHA with those in Donald Trump's MAGA movement.
'There's a lot of organizations, a lot of people in this room who four to eight years ago, would have thought it was crazy to vote for President Trump,' Means said. 'And I think many of those same people in 2024 felt like their vote for President Trump was the most important vote of their life.'
With Trump came Kennedy, who nearly three months into the job as HHS secretary has finally built out his leadership team filled with Covid-19 contrarians and self-styled 'renegades.' Together, with the added influence of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, they've begun a massive overhaul of the nearly $3 trillion agency — implementing deep cuts in medical research and sweeping layoffs that have led to the departure of some of the most highly trained specialists working in the federal government.
But agency shake-ups and new appointees have also begun to splinter the alliance between traditional Trump world allies and Kennedy's MAHA acolytes. Though it's early days, there is friction between the MAHA and MAGA camps, according to more than half a dozen current and former officials and people familiar with the conversations who declined to be named because they weren't authorized to speak on behalf of the health agency, or who feared retribution.
The White House bristled over the way Kennedy's team handled the measles outbreak in Texas and elsewhere this year. Meanwhile, Kennedy's powerful principal deputy chief of staff, Stefanie Spear, has cracked down on the way agency officials communicate publicly, insisting that she personally review statements and reports.
As for Kennedy's own leadership style, his oscillation between appeasing vaccine critics and placating public health officials has left people on both sides frustrated, multiple people familiar with the dynamics between the White House and HHS told CNN.
Cracks have also opened up within the MAHA movement itself. Tension spilled into public view this month as high-profile MAHA supporters railed against Trump's new pick for surgeon general, Calley Means' sister, Dr. Casey Means.
The holistic doctor has railed against the health care system's handling of chronic illnesses. But she has not discussed vaccine safety, and specifically Covid-19 vaccines, enough for some MAHA supporters.
Looming large is what many MAHA supporters — and Kennedy himself — have publicly described as years of dismissal and ostracization by the mainstream medical and scientific community. Now that they are in charge, their suspicion of the establishment has not abated.
'The number of actual, true MAHA supporters at the top of these agencies is maybe 75 people across an agency that has 60,000 employees,' Mark Gorton, MAHA Institute co-president and a tech entrepreneur, told the Willard ballroom. 'Their job is unbelievably daunting because these bureaucracies are highly resistant to change.'
But change is happening, buoyed by Kennedy's close circle of agency leaders and MAHA appointees.
According to one former official familiar with conversations inside HHS, despite being outnumbered, there is no question that it's the MAHA advocates who are now fully in charge of the government's health agencies.
'Anyone in power, who has any kind of control, is a MAHA person,' the former official said.
The MAHA movement is a key pillar of Trump's MAGA vision, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a statement. 'Secretary Kennedy is both trusted and empowered by President Trump to deliver on his directive to get to the bottom of America's chronic disease epidemic, and this priority is shared not just by the White House and HHS, but the entire Trump administration.'
HHS did not respond to a request for comment.
To hear Kennedy describe it, there has never been unity like this among the country's top health officials.
'We're friends. We go to lunch together; we stay at each other's homes; we vacation together,' Kennedy told Fox News this month, flanked by the heads of three of the biggest health agencies: Dr. Marty Makary, Food and Drug Administration commissioner; Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, National Institutes of Health director; and Dr. Mehmet Oz, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrator.
'We're aligned in our vision. Friendship is based upon shared values, and that's the strongest bond that holds people together,' the secretary said. 'You got, sitting here, four people who are all canceled during Covid. The entire leadership of this agency is renegades, juggernauts against convention, and who are trying to look for truth, no matter what the cost.'
As he said, each of Kennedy's juggernauts became prominent critics of the government's Covid-19 response during shutdowns and vaccination efforts. It's a leadership group 'made for TV,' one former Trump health official told CNN.
Oz, known better by his TV moniker Dr. Oz, was already a public figure and adviser to Trump when the pandemic struck. He soon campaigned for reopening schools and touted hydroxychloroquine, without evidence, as an effective treatment for Covid-19 infection.
Bhattacharya was an early advocate of ending broad shutdowns, co-authoring an October 2020 paper that argued most young, healthy people could safely mingle and achieve herd immunity against the virus.
And while surgeon and author Makary supported certain public health measures during the pandemic, including early shutdowns and masking, his public opposition to vaccine mandates and skepticism of booster shots increasingly brought him into the circle of Covid-19 critics.
Each has been tasked with reorganizing their respective agencies and reorienting them toward a MAHA vision while satisfying cuts directed by DOGE, a sometimes discombobulated combination that has resulted in eliminating programs, research and staff.
Makary launched FDA initiatives to remove certain food dyes and reassess vaccine reviews. Bhattacharya is charged with leading Kennedy's massive autism research effort but also reworking the $48 billion NIH into merged groups with less funding. Oz has taken up the campaign for more artificial intelligence in health care outreach and defended potential Medicaid access requirements.
Yet outside the jovial unity of the country's top health officials, tensions are brewing about the assembly's commitment to MAHA goals. The debate broke open this month when Trump pulled Dr. Janette Nesheiwat for surgeon general, and tapped Casey Means to fill the role.
'The new Surgeon General has never called for the Covid shots to be pulled off the market. That's why she was picked,' Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, founder of Americans for Health Freedom, wrote on X. 'Kennedy is powerless.'
Nicole Shanahan, Kennedy's former running mate in his 2024 independent presidential bid, also questioned the choice, suggesting on X that the HHS secretary may be 'reporting to someone regularly who is controlling his decisions (and it isn't President Trump).'
More recently, Shanahan took more precise aim at Kennedy's MAHA moves thus far, targeting food dyes but not — in her mind — putting sufficient pressure on issues including Covid-19 vaccines. 'Sure, we can make Fruit Loops great again, but let's not overlook the bigger issues—glyphosate and mRNA,' she wrote on X.
The blowback has led Kennedy himself to step in and defend Means, a holistic medicine doctor who rose to prominence after she and her brother linked up with the MAHA movement and Kennedy's presidential campaign.
'Appointing Casey Means as US Surgeon General is like appointing someone who dropped out of West Point as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,' Steve Kirsch, an anti-Covid vaccine advocate and tech entrepreneur, wrote on X the afternoon of May 10.
Five hours later, Kirsch posted his change of heart: 'I've talked to RFK and now support her despite my initial reservations.'
Outside of layoffs and reassignments at HHS, droves of federal employees have left the agency, several citing frustrations with the new leadership and Kennedy's chief of staff, Spear, a former environmental journalist who joined Kennedy's presidential campaign as press secretary.
Spear told staff in meetings that all external communications, including responses to press but also routine reports such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's weekly mortality updates or articles submitted by the NIH to research journals, would need to be reviewed by her, according to four people familiar with the meetings.
Spear also controls the communications and information that Kennedy receives, according to those people.
'She's probably one of the biggest challenges of him getting feedback of any kind, information from the team,' said a former official who recently left the agency. 'Everything is filtered through her.'
The slowdown on communications left White House officials frustrated with HHS' early response to the ongoing measles outbreak, that person and others familiar with the conversations said.
White House officials would call HHS staff asking about the measles response, only to be told that Spear was handling it, the former officials said. There are now more than 1,000 measles cases across 30 states, according to CDC figures. Kennedy told congressional committees last week that 'we've handled this measles outbreak better than any other nation.'
Frustrations with Kennedy's assembled leadership and the health agency overhaul have only exacerbated the flood of experts leaving HHS.
For instance, so many people have left the agency's legal office that there is anxiety about whether HHS has the staff to man the looming battles with Harvard University over frozen research grants, the former official and another person familiar said.
It is 'an utter disaster,' said the person familiar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China Urges Firms to Avoid Nvidia H20 Chips After Trump Resumes Sales
(Bloomberg) -- Beijing has urged local companies to avoid using Nvidia Corp.'s H20 processors, particularly for government-related purposes, complicating the chipmaker's return to China after the Trump administration reversed an effective US ban on such sales. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park Over the past few weeks, Chinese authorities have sent notices to a range of firms discouraging use of the less-advanced semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The guidance was particularly strong against the use of H20s for any government or national security-related work by state enterprises or private companies, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is sensitive. The letters didn't, however, constitute an outright ban on H20 use, according to the people. Industry analysts broadly agree that Chinese companies still covet those chips, which perform quite well in certain crucial AI applications. President Donald Trump said Monday that the processor 'still has a market' in the Asian country despite also calling it 'obsolete.' Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. both recently secured Washington's approval to resume lower-end AI chip sales to China, on the controversial and legally questionable condition that they give the US government a 15% cut of the related revenue. But even with Trump's team on board, the two companies face the challenge that their Chinese customers are under Beijing's pressure to purchase domestic chips instead. Beijing's overall push affects AI accelerators from AMD in addition to Nvidia, one of the people said, though it's unclear whether any letters specifically mentioned AMD's MI308 chip. Shares of Chinese AI chip designer Cambricon Technologies Corp. surged to their daily limit of 20% on the news of China's guidance, leading a rally in peers such as Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Beijing's stance could limit Trump's ability to turn his export control about-face into a windfall for government coffers, a deal that highlighted his administration's transactional approach to national security policies long treated as nonnegotiable. Still, Chinese companies may not be ready to jump ship to local semiconductors. 'Chips from domestic manufacturers are improving dramatically in quality, but they might not be as versatile for specific workloads that China's domestic AI industry hopes to focus on,' said Homin Lee, a senior macro strategist at Lombard Odier in Singapore. Lee added that he anticipates 'strong' demand for the chips the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell. Rosenblatt Securities analyst Kevin Cassidy said he doesn't anticipate that Nvidia's processor sales to China will be affected because 'Chinese companies are going to want to use the best chips available.' Nvidia and AMD's chips are superior to local alternatives, he said. Beijing asked companies about that issue in some of its letters, according to one of the people, posing questions such as why they buy Nvidia H20 chips over local versions, whether that's a necessary choice given domestic options, and whether they've found any security concerns in the Nvidia hardware. The notices coincide with state media reports that cast doubt on the security and reliability of H20 processors. Chinese regulators have raised those concerns directly with Nvidia, which has repeatedly denied that its chips contain such vulnerabilities. The Financial Times reported that some Chinese companies are planning to decrease orders of Nvidia chips in response to the letters. Right now, the people said, China's most stringent chip guidance is limited to sensitive applications, a situation that bears similarities to the way Beijing restricted Tesla Inc. vehicles and Apple Inc. iPhones in certain institutions and locations over security concerns. China's government also at one point barred the use of Micron Technology Inc. chips in critical infrastructure. It's possible that Beijing may extend its heavier-handed Nvidia and AMD guidance to a wider range of settings, according to one person with direct knowledge of the deliberations, who said that those conversations are in early stages. AMD declined to comment on Beijing's notices, while Nvidia said in a statement that 'the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure.' China has ample supplies of domestic chips, Nvidia said, and 'won't and never has relied on American chips for government operations.' China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Cyberspace Administration of China didn't respond to faxed requests for comment on this story, which is based on interviews with more than a half-dozen people familiar with Beijing's policy discussions. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. The Chinese government's posture raises questions about the Trump administration's explanation for why the US is allowing those exports mere months after effectively banning such sales. Multiple senior US officials have said their policy reversal was the result of trade talks with China, but Beijing has publicly indicated that the resumed H20 shipments weren't part of any bilateral deal. China's recent notices to companies suggest that the Asian country may not have sought such a concession from Washington in the first place. Beijing's concerns are twofold. For starters, Chinese officials are worried that Nvidia chips could have location-tracking and remote-shutdown capabilities — a suggestion that Nvidia has vehemently denied. Trump officials are actively exploring whether location tracking could be used to help curtail suspected smuggling of restricted components into China, and lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require location verification for advanced AI chips. Second, Beijing is intensely focused on developing its domestic chip capabilities, and wants Chinese companies to shift away from Western chips in favor of local offerings. Officials have previously urged Chinese firms to choose domestic semiconductors over Nvidia H20 processors, Bloomberg reported last September, and have introduced energy efficiency standards that the H20 chip doesn't meet. Nvidia designed the H20 chip specifically for Chinese customers to abide by years of US restrictions on sales of its more advanced hardware, curbs designed to limit Beijing's access to AI that could benefit the Chinese military. The H20 chip has less computational power than Nvidia's top offerings, but its strong memory bandwidth is quite well suited to the inference stage of AI development, when models recognize patterns and draw conclusions. That's made it a desirable product to companies like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. in China, where domestic chip champion Huawei Technologies Co. is struggling to produce enough advanced components to meet market demand. By one estimate from Biden officials — who considered but did not implement controls on H20 sales — losing access to that Nvidia chip would make it three to six times more expensive for Chinese companies to run inference on advanced AI models. 'Beijing appears to be using regulatory uncertainty to create a captive market sufficiently sized to absorb Huawei's supply, while still allowing purchases of H20s to meet actual demands,' said Lennart Heim, an AI-focused researcher at RAND, of China's push for companies to avoid American AI chips. 'This signals that domestic alternatives remain inadequate even as China pressures foreign suppliers.' In his remarks Monday, Trump said China's Huawei already offers chips comparable to the Nvidia H20, echoing previous remarks by officials in his administration who've defended the decision to resume H20 exports partly on those grounds. The US should keep the Chinese AI ecosystem reliant on less-advanced American technology for as long as possible, these officials say, in order to deprive Huawei of the revenue and know-how that would come from a broader customer base. Other administration officials have strongly objected to that logic, Bloomberg has reported, arguing that resuming H20 exports will only embolden China's tech champions and bolster the country's overall computing power. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other Trump officials have also claimed that the H20 move was part of a deal to improve American access to Chinese rare-earth minerals — despite the Trump team's previous assertions that such an arrangement wasn't on the table. 'As the Chinese deliver their magnets, then the H20s will come off,' Lutnick said last month. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in late July that the magnet issue had been 'solved.' The first Nvidia H20 and AMD MI308 licenses arrived a bit over a week after Bessent's declaration — after Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang met with the president and both companies agreed to share their China revenue with the US government. --With assistance from Yanping Li, Sangmi Cha and Emily Forgash. (Updates with additional analyst commentary in ninth paragraph.) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is redistricting? What to know in Tennessee amid Trump-led effort in Texas
Texas's redistricting battle has spilled across state lines, drawing national attention and involving lawmakers from beyond its borders. In an effort to block a vote on a proposed congressional map that could give Republicans five additional seats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, dozens of Democratic lawmakers fled the state. In response, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ordered their arrest, though it's unclear how Texas law enforcement might coordinate with authorities in other states to carry out the order. As of Aug. 5, more than 50 of Texas' 67 Democratic legislators had fled the state, USA TODAY reported. The following day, on Aug. 6, former President Barack Obama weighed in, calling the Republican-led redistricting effort 'a power grab that undermines our democracy.' Here's what to know about the redistricting fight in Texas and how the process works in Tennessee. More: Texas Democrats fled the state to oppose GOP redistricting. Why this one stayed behind. What is redistricting? Redistricting is the process of redrawing the boundaries of electoral districts, such as those for Congress and state legislatures, in each state. The process normally happens every 10 years after the U.S. Census to ensure each district has roughly the same number of people, so every vote carries equal weight. It affects congressional, state legislative districts and sometimes local districts. However, in a break from tradition, President Donald Trump encouraged Texas Republicans to begin redistricting mid-decade. During an Aug. 5 appearance on CNBC, he argued that Republicans 'are entitled to five more seats' in Texas due to his 2024 election win in the state. Each state is responsible for redrawing its district boundaries to reflect population changes and maintain equal representation across its allotted number of congressional seats. According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, redistricting has been "highly contentious" throughout American history. In the U.S., redistricting is mostly handled by state legislatures, making it a highly political process. Unlike many other countries that use independent, non-partisan commissions, the U.S. approach often leads to public distrust and partisan conflict. Because redistricting can shape which party holds power and how communities — especially minority groups — are represented, it's a major source of tension and debate. How Trump-led redistricting push in Texas is extending beyond state lines In July, Trump proposed a Texas redistricting plan that would yield five new Republican seats. The move was met with sharp criticism from Texas Democrats in Congress who labeled the move a "threat to democracy." If Trump's proposal moves forward, Republicans could gain additional U.S. House seats in Texas, potentially helping them preserve their narrow majority in the 2026 midterm elections. The plan would give the GOP a chance to flip key districts and strengthen their hold on Congress. On Aug. 4, several Democratic lawmakers fled Texas to prevent Republicans from reaching the quorum needed to vote on redrawing the state's 38 congressional districts. The Republican State Leadership Committee criticized the move, accusing the absent legislators of 'neglecting their responsibility,' reported USA TODAY. Many of the lawmakers traveled to the Chicago area, while others went to Boston, Massachusetts, and Albany, New York. Although Abbott ordered state law enforcement to arrest the Democrats who left, it remains unclear how Texas authorities could coordinate with out-of-state law enforcement to carry out the arrests. Abbott said the order is meant to enforce civil arrest warrants issued earlier that day by Republican lawmakers in an 85–6 vote. These warrants, however, only apply within Texas state lines. Democratic governors including Gavin Newsom of California, Kathy Hochul of New York and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois have signaled pursuing their own redistricting efforts, moves that could strengthen Democratic representation and escalate partisan tensions. How does redistricting work in Tennessee? In Tennessee, congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn by the state legislature. Following the 2020 census, Tennessee retained its nine seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, the same number it held after the 2010 census, according to Ballotpedia. On Feb,. 6, 2022, Gov. Bill Lee signed new congressional maps into law, approving a proposal passed by both chambers of the Tennessee legislature. The new map split Davidson County into three separate congressional districts, a move that diluted the county's Democratic and minority voting power, as previously reported by The Tennessean. Former U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Nashville, called the redistricting a 'crisis' for the city. 'Gerrymandering is an extinction event for the political life of Nashville,' he said. A group of Tennessee voters, including former state Sen. Brenda Gilmore, D-Nashville, later sued over the maps, alleging the redistricting effort intentionally discriminated against Black voters by diluting the voting power of communities of color. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2024 by a three judge panel, the Nashville Banner reported. Contributing: USA TODAY Diana Leyva covers trending news and service journalism for the Tennessean. Contact her at Dleyva@ or follow her on X at @_leyvadiana This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Texas redistricting battle: What to know about practice in Tennessee Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"America, You Are In Grave Danger": The Internet Is VERY Worried About Donald Trump's Disturbing Latest Move
The American public has grown increasingly concerned about President Donald Trump's moves toward authoritarianism and autocracy as he positions himself as being above the law and frequently mentions not leaving office at the end of his Constitutionally-granted second and final term. During a press conference on Monday morning, Trump announced a sweeping plan by his administration to increase its control over law enforcement in the United States capital city of Washington, DC. Washington, DC, is the capital city and the federal district of the US, but is not an incorporated state or part of one. Jurisdiction over DC belongs to Congress. He started the press conference with a comment on how crowded the room is, saying they need a ballroom instead. Attorney General Pam Bondi grinned along. Trump launches into the topic of the press conference. "And we're here for a very serious purpose. Very serious purpose. Something is out of control, but we're gonna put it in control very quickly, like we did on the southern border," he said. "I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor. And worse." Related: "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're gonna take our capital back," Trump said. "We're taking it back." He announced his plan: "Under the authorities vested in me as the president of the United States, I'm officially invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act — you know what that is — and placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control." "In addition, I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order, and public safety in Washington, DC and they're gonna be allowed to do their job properly," Trump continued. He then directly addressed the journalists in the room about the supposed crime hotbed of DC, saying, "You people are victims of it, too." President Trump then said that "The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Colombia, Mexico City, some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on Earth," as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth nodded along. "The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled," Trump said. "Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate probably ever." "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs, and homeless people. And we're not gonna let it happen anymore. We're not gonna take it," Trump told the crowd. He then repeated that the problem would be treated like the southern border, which he said "nobody comes to" anymore. For clarity, the Justice Department reported early this year that violent crime in Washington, DC, is down 35% from 2023. According to the DC Metropolitan Police Department, the very agency that Trump is seeking to federalize, violent crime is currently down 26% year-over-year. "We are not experiencing a spike in crime," DC mayor Muriel Bowser told MSNBC on Sunday. "In fact, we're watching our crime numbers go down." Related: Richard Stengel, author and former government official under President Barack Obama, said that, "Throughout history, autocrats use a false pretext to impose government control over local law enforcement as a prelude to a more national takeover." People quickly hopped on Reddit's r/politics to discuss the CNBC article about Trump's announcement (you can watch the full press conference here). This is what some of the over 3,000 commenters had to say: 1."Federalizing the DC Police under fake numbers... Literally watching fascism unfold before our eyes, people. It's past time to get pissed." —thedrizztman 2."I thought he said he couldn't deploy the National Guard on January 6? So now we know he could have, but didn't because it was his people." —swiftfoot_hiker 3."This is the big red flashing sign of fascism for anyone still wondering." —ImperatorUniversum1 Related: 4."Every word out of this MF'er's mouth is a LIE. EVERY WORD. Taking over DC is to keep protestors out because this administration's next actions will be brutal." —mhouse2001 5."Martial law in motion. MF didn't even bother to stage a Reichstag fire." —alloutofchewingum 6."Here we fucking go. And sweet Jesus, it's only August of year one..." —KingMario05 7."This is the death of the republic we're watching. Temporary takeovers have a very long history of becoming permanent. We're so fucked." —Violent_Mud_Butt 8."So, he could have done this to put down the insurrection at the Capitol?" —aeppelcyning 9."This is a pretext for something. His excuse is the homeless — what I really think he's preparing for are protests or maybe even riots. Maybe connected to the upcoming 'peace talks' with Russia, or the Epstein scandal." —rainghost 10."So that's it. No more freedom or rule of law in the US. And all the flag-waving Trump supporters don't care. Not a peep from them." —Large-Phase9732 11."So I assume DC residents won't be able to vote ever again." —V_T_H Related: 12."Full fucking stop. Yes, this is a distraction attempt from Epstein, among other things, but this is a pilot program for doing this in other major cities around America. This is the next step in a full fascist takeover of this country. But hey, eggs are... I mean, gas is... I mean, Kamala's laugh." —spqr2001 13."We are going to find out if the military is going to uphold their oath to defend us from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Trump is the biggest domestic terrorist I've seen in this country in my lifetime." —Ol_Turd_Fergy 14."That's it folks. Democracy in the US is now over. What a shameful country." —boringfantasy 15."Authoritarianism it is then, I guess." —Jonny_Segment 16."Correct me if I'm wrong, but I could have sworn that Trump had no authority to do this. I mean, that's what he said for January 6. He said that the Speaker of the House needs to make this call. Could he have been lying?" —dydski 17."Is this about homeless people? What is this about? Those National Guard are gonna be real sad when they realize a ton of the homeless individuals they are arresting are vets." —Resident_Standard437 finally, "America, you are in grave danger. An authoritarian is seizing power over the police, based on a made-up emergency. This is a precursor to stealing the elections. It's the only thing left between them and ruling forever. They are stealing our democracy and do not plan to give it back. And all of you are silent. The republic is dying, rapidly and right before our eyes, and nothing is being done to stop it." —kevendo So, what do you think? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: