
Ancestral remains should no longer be displayed in UK museums, say MPs
The public display of human remains in the UK, including the ancient Egyptian mummies in the British Museum, is offensive and should be stopped, according to a group of MPs.
A report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Afrikan Reparations (APPG-AR) said it should become an offence to sell ancestral remains or publicly display them without consent.
The report, Laying Ancestors to Rest, which is primarily concerned with African ancestral remains, said the possession by museums and universities of body parts brought to the UK as a result of enslavement and colonialism caused profound distress to their descendants, diaspora communities and countries of origin.
It calls for human remains, which include bones, skeletons, skin, hair and tissue incorporated into cultural artefacts, to be repatriated to their countries of origin wherever possible. The law should be changed to allow national museums, such as the Victoria and Albert Museum, the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum, to remove, or 'deaccession', remains in their permanent collections.
MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the chair of the APPG-AR, said the report's recommendations would help address the racial injustice wrought by the colonial trade in human remains.
'Putting human remains on display is unethical, especially when no consent has been given,' she added. 'I think removing the display of these items ultimately changes the culture, goes some way to look at them with some form of respect.'
There has been growing ethical debate in recent years over the display of Egyptian pharaoh's mummies, with many in the museum sector now referring to them as mummified persons as a mark of respect, although they remain popular attractions.
Ribeiro-Addy said: 'I would like people to imagine taking the remains of our monarchs to another country and putting them on display. Even if they kept them in their coffins, would we think that was acceptable?'
Currently, anyone can possess, buy and sell human body parts as long as they were not acquired illegally, and they are not used for transplants, only for decoration. But the APPG-AR proposes that the sale of human remains should be outlawed on the grounds that they are not commercial objects but human beings.
'We've seen foetus earrings, we've seen foetuses in jars, the spine of a six-year-old being used as a handbag, the thigh bone of someone being fashioned into a cane, and all of these things are allowed to happen because they've altered them for art,' said Ribeiro-Addy.
The report calls on the government to amend the Human Tissue Act 2004, which regulates the acquisition, storage, use and disposal of bodies, organs and tissue, to cover remains more than 100 years old.
Iben Bo, the author of the policy brief, said the act currently failed to take into account that ancestral remains held in the UK were looted from Africa. For example, she said Egyptian mummified persons were excavated and brought back to Britain, for racist pseudoscientific research.
'African diaspora communities expressed disgust with ancestral remains [being] on display because the museum space is not constructed as a cemetery where you go to pay your respects. There's noise and children running around,' said Bo, the lead research consultant of the African Ancestral Remains project.
Zaki El-Salahi, a member of the Sudanese community in Edinburgh, said he was shocked when he first saw body parts of his ancestors in the Anatomical Museum in the University of Edinburgh and is now part of an academic group seeking to address the institution's links to slavery and colonialism. The remains were taken by British colonisers after the Battle of Omdurman in 1898, in which British commanders used early machine guns and artillery to inflict thousands of casualties on lightly armed enemies.
He said: 'It was very much that kind of deep human threat response, which was for me, fight and freeze. It was that there was something deeply wrong here, a huge injustice, connecting the city that I've lived in for 18 years to my family's home town.'
Under the APPG-AR's proposals, museums, universities and other institutions would require a licence to store ancestral remains, and could not display them except for religious purposes or unless they obtained appropriate consent.
The report also suggests creating a memorial or burial site in the UK for ancestral remains which cannot be returned because their exact origins have been destroyed owing to colonial violence.
A British Museum spokesperson said: 'The museum is mindful of ethical obligations and closely follows the guidance set out by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport and the Human Tissue Act 2004, which ensures that human remains held in its care are always treated and displayed with respect and dignity.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
Shattered Lands: Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia by Sam Dalrymple review: 'alert to the details'
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... To convey the scope and subtlety of Sam Dalrymple's book, rather than refer readers to the subtitle – 'Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia' – it is better, I think, to sketch the outline of stories which encapsulate its capacity to fray and unpick preconceptions. Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru in conversation at the All-India Congress committee meeting at Bombay, 1946 | Getty Images In 1929-31 Gandhi travelled the breadth of 'British India'; from Aden (now in Yemen) to Rangoon (now in Myanmar, formerly Burma). In an interview he conducts, Dalrymple records that Mohammad Zaul Hassan says 'I was born in India, grew up in Bangladesh, became a citizen of Pakistan, now I'm British'. Salman Rushdie may have given the Partition of 14-15 August 1947 an almost mythic significance in his Booker winning Midnight's Children, but it is clear from this book that the whole situation was far, far more complex than a singular event. The message is more mess than messianic moment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Even in introducing his five partitions, Dalrymple is precise. The first is the partition of Burma from India; linked to both Bamar separatism and Hindu concerns about the integrity of the holy and ancient 'Bharat'. But, as he notes, the Straits Settlement and the Somaliland Protectorate occurred beforehand (in 1867 and 1898): the five here have been chosen not just for being post-World War One (which saw the dismantling of the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian Empires), but after the introduction of Indian Empire passports. It is ironic that this bureaucratic formality went hand in hand with its own disintegration. Sign up to our FREE Arts & Culture newsletter at The second partition was the ongoing divestment of the Arabian Peninsular states (including Aden). The third, which created West and East Pakistan, is the one that is now most associated with 'Partition', although the fourth – the partition of Princely India, with some 565 entities, including Jammu and Kashmir, Hyderabad, and Mysore, deciding whether to ally with Pakistan or India – is perhaps the most significant in terms of power dynamics. Finally, there is the 1971 secession of East Pakistan to become Bangladesh. This vast amount of material is handled admirably, particularly since Dalrymple keeps the hypotheticals in full view at the same time. None of the outcomes was pre-ordained or inevitable, and the contingencies are as informative. There are reasons why Bhutan, Nepal and Oman kept their independence while Sikkim, Nagaland and Junagadh did not. Both Nehru and Aung San contemplated the possibility of an Asiatic Federation, including Sri Lanka as well. The levels of brinksmanship are astonishing – one possible outcome, since 1974, has been nuclear, yet even without that, mass displacement, starvation and old fashioned brutality had done more than enough. Dalrymple, incidentally, should be commended for being very careful about the contested use of the word genocide. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The nuancing of imperial history has been more of the most welcome features of modern historiography. On one hand, the subcontinent shows the ideological assertions of almost primal historicity. The definition of an ideal and ancient Hindu 'Bharat' both coalesces and excludes; even Pakistan's name, coined by Rahmat Ali and originally 'Pakstan', was both a partial acronym of Panjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh and Baluchistan and a reference to the Persian word for pure. Some of these ideas are novelised in Gurnaik Johal's Saraswati, a fiction which might be slightly over-determined, but in its Calvino-esque braiding of stories is markedly more ambitious than most debuts. The insistence on aboriginal unity is offset with political theoretical problems about the right to separate: if secession is good enough for one area, why not for another? We are accustomed here to such arguments being deployed in terms of, say, Shetlandic or Orcadian independence. On the subcontinent this was exacerbated in the Princely States, where, for example, Jammu and Kashmir had a Muslim majority population and a Hindu ruler, Maharajah Hari Singh; while Hyderabad had a Hindu majority population and a Muslim ruler, the Nizam. It was in Kashmir that a Scottish officer, William Brown, decided to mutiny to prevent the areas, particularly Gilgit province, joining India. With 'three bottles of gin inside us', he and Jock Mathieson 'became uncontrollably hilarious… [and] created a terrific disturbance', raised the Pakistan flag and saw off the emergent 'United States of Gilgit'. Neighbouring Hunza and Nagar toyed, it was claimed, with succession to Russia instead. Despite the immensity of the canvas, Dalrymple is alert to the telling detail and the revealing anecdote. Although I particularly liked the monkeys purportedly trained to throw hand grenades, Dalrymple cleverly has his cake and eats it with such material. It is too good to not include the Nawab of Junagadh, with his 800 dogs, each with their own servant, and the ostentatiously lavish wedding for his favourite Roshana, to a Labrador called Bobby, even if, as he points it, it is not true. Of course, such orientalism is essentially a literary phenomenon, and the fact that such stories were told tells is more than the stark reality. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dalrymple is especially good at providing pen portraits of the key players – Jinna, Nehru and Aung San, as well as Gandhi, Menon, the Mountbattens and less well known figures like Naga nationalist Zapu Phizo. These state-level players are supplemented by written and oral people's histories. It is always an incomprehensible irony to me that we indulge in so much phony nostalgia for Empire in this county, and know so little of the Empire. As Kipling said, 'What do they know of England who only England know?' There ought to be a mammoth, epic, television series: but more The Hollow Crown rather than The Crown, please.

The National
2 days ago
- The National
'Good case' Israel breached international law with Madleen seizure
On Monday, Israel imprisoned 12 crew members on board the vessel that was sailing along the Egyptian coast and heading towards Gaza to deliver aid. It is understood that the Madleen was captured in international waters some 200 kilometres (120 miles) from Gaza. Heidi Matthews, a professor specialising in international criminal law at York University in Toronto, Canada, said that as the naval blockade on Gaza is 'unlawful', there are several points of law that the Israeli forces breached by capturing the Madleen. READ MORE: LIVE: Gaza Freedom Flotilla, Madleen tracker and updates Matthews explained that there are two specific conditions which allow countries to enforce a blockade in international waters. First, if a vessel is making an 'effective contribution to opposing forces', for example, if it had weapons on board. Second, if it was posing an 'imminent and overwhelming threat' to Israel, that would allow them to 'invoke self defence on the high seas'. Matthews explained: 'Obviously, neither of these conditions have been met in these circumstances. 'So because of that, intercepting the vessel and taking custody of the crew members is not the enforcement of a lawful blockade, as Israel is claiming.' The Madleen, which carried campaigner Greta Thunberg and French member of the European Parliament Rima Hassan, was sailing under the UK red ensign, meaning it was under UK jurisdiction while in international waters. 'I think there's a good case that these actions, specifically the detention of crew members could constitute crimes against humanity, specifically unlawful confinement and unlawful appropriation of property, as well as an attack against civilians as such,' Matthews (below) added. (Image: Heidi Matthews) 'Others have made the case that could constitute a war crime too.' Mitchell pointed out that Israel's response to the capture of the vessel, such as deeming it a 'selfie yacht' and releasing pictures of Thunberg being handed a sandwich, were intended to undermine the mission as a 'silly thing'. However, she added that it was clearly being 'treated as though it were a threat' by the deployment of Israeli forces. Matthews added: 'Therefore arguably bringing in war crimes and in terms of crimes against humanity here like the way that would work, this is a little technical, but because the UK is a state party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and Israel is currently conducting a widespread or systematic attack against the civilian population of Gaza, intercepting this vessel on the high seas would trigger the territorial jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, and again, a couple of those crimes against humanity that I mentioned.' She added that the UK Government should be thinking about the incident 'in terms of international criminal law and the law of war' and that it should 'be acting accordingly'. The National have repeatedly pushed the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) for a response following the crew being detained on Monday. READ MORE: Labour Government 'must protect' UK-flagged Madleen aid ship After refusing to respond for hours, they directed our journalists to a BBC live blog with comments from the Prime Minister's spokesperson who said they wanted Israel to resolve the situation 'safely with restraint, in line with international humanitarian law'. Earlier, Israel was preparing to hold the 12 unlawfully detained activists in separate cells in Givon Prison in Ramla, according to local media. Israel Katz, Israel's defence minister, said that he had instructed the IDF to show the crew 'video of the horrors of the October 7 massacre when they arrive at the port of Ashdod'. Matthews said the UK should consider taking a case to the International Criminal Court (ICC). However, she noted the attack the Israeli navy committed in 2010 on the Mavi Marmara, a flagship of a flotilla crewed by pro-Palestinian activists who were attempting to deliver 10,000 tonnes of aid to Gaza. (Image: PA) Israeli forces attacked the boat, which like the Madleen (above) was trying to breach the blockade on Gaza, leading to the death of nine people, and leaving a further 50 injured. The UN Human Rights Council found that Israel's military had broken international laws by taking 'disproportionate action'. Prosecutors at the ICC declined to open an investigation into the alleged war crimes that took place during the attack. Matthews said it was 'unfortunate' the case didn't proceed as it may have 'acted as a deterrent'. READ MORE: LBC spark fury with pro-Israel report on seizure of Madleen Gaza ship 'The Madleen itself has obviously captured global attention, right? And so the purpose was always to do that,' she explained. 'Given the amount of media attention, I wasn't expecting them to actually sink the ship. "Instead, they're trying to create this alternative narrative where a military intersection is actually not an attack, but some kind of rescue mission.' She added: 'The battle is really over framing.'


North Wales Chronicle
2 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Claire Hughes MP was gifted ticket to the BAFTA Games Awards
Ms Hughes, who was elected last July, has declared the ticket on her register of financial interests. This states that, on April 8, the UK Interactive Entertainment Association Ltd gifted the ticket, valued at £700, which she accepted the same day. The BAFTA Games Awards, which were this year held on April 8 and hosted by comedian Phil Wang, celebrates achievements in the video game industry in the last 12 months. Ms Hughes' Labour colleague, Warrington North MP Charlotte Nichols, was also gifted hospitality at the event, also worth £700. Ms Nichols stated in her own register of financial interests that this was 'in my capacity as chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on video games and e-sports". Ms Hughes is not a member of this APPG. All of the other items on Ms Hughes' register of financial interests date back to last year. These include a £10,000 donation from Labour Together Ltd, which was 'to support campaign activities leading up to the general election'. Ms Hughes was approached for further comment by the Pioneer. She posted on her Facebook page this afternoon: "Wales is starting to become a significant player in the global gaming landscape. But I want North Wales to have a much bigger slice of the pie. "At the start of Easter recess, I attended the BAFTA Games Awards celebrating the best of the UK games industry with UK Interactive Entertainment. "I'm not a gamer myself. As someone who previously worked in the sector, though, I recognise the massive value of the sector and opportunity for growth; the video games sector is bigger than the music and film sectors combined, contributing almost £7bn a year to UK GVA. "Recent growth in video games in Wales is thanks partly to support from Welsh Government including the Games Scale Up Fund for Wales, which last week announced a total of £850,000 funding support for Wales-based developers via Creative Wales. "But with the creative industries highlighted as one of the key growth areas in the UK Government's upcoming Industrial Strategy, we could be doing much more to encourage young people to consider a career in immersive entertainment, and to support up-and-coming businesses to thrive. "We have brilliant opportunities for people to gain the skills to build a career in the industry in our area - Coleg Llandrillo have long offered highly respected courses in 3D arts and games development, and the recent investment in a state-of-the-art new campus in Bangor makes it clear the Welsh Government is serious about putting pounds behind promises. "I hope that in future years, we will see games made in Wales featured at the gaming BAFTAs. More than that, though - I want more young people in Bangor Aberconwy knowing that a career in video games is up for grabs. "I'll be doing more on this over the summer, including workshops for school-leavers and an industry roundtable. If this is something you're interested in being part of, get in touch."