logo
Ancestral remains should no longer be displayed in UK museums, say MPs

Ancestral remains should no longer be displayed in UK museums, say MPs

The Guardian12-03-2025

The public display of human remains in the UK, including the ancient Egyptian mummies in the British Museum, is offensive and should be stopped, according to a group of MPs.
A report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Afrikan Reparations (APPG-AR) said it should become an offence to sell ancestral remains or publicly display them without consent.
The report, Laying Ancestors to Rest, which is primarily concerned with African ancestral remains, said the possession by museums and universities of body parts brought to the UK as a result of enslavement and colonialism caused profound distress to their descendants, diaspora communities and countries of origin.
It calls for human remains, which include bones, skeletons, skin, hair and tissue incorporated into cultural artefacts, to be repatriated to their countries of origin wherever possible. The law should be changed to allow national museums, such as the Victoria and Albert Museum, the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum, to remove, or 'deaccession', remains in their permanent collections.
MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the chair of the APPG-AR, said the report's recommendations would help address the racial injustice wrought by the colonial trade in human remains.
'Putting human remains on display is unethical, especially when no consent has been given,' she added. 'I think removing the display of these items ultimately changes the culture, goes some way to look at them with some form of respect.'
There has been growing ethical debate in recent years over the display of Egyptian pharaoh's mummies, with many in the museum sector now referring to them as mummified persons as a mark of respect, although they remain popular attractions.
Ribeiro-Addy said: 'I would like people to imagine taking the remains of our monarchs to another country and putting them on display. Even if they kept them in their coffins, would we think that was acceptable?'
Currently, anyone can possess, buy and sell human body parts as long as they were not acquired illegally, and they are not used for transplants, only for decoration. But the APPG-AR proposes that the sale of human remains should be outlawed on the grounds that they are not commercial objects but human beings.
'We've seen foetus earrings, we've seen foetuses in jars, the spine of a six-year-old being used as a handbag, the thigh bone of someone being fashioned into a cane, and all of these things are allowed to happen because they've altered them for art,' said Ribeiro-Addy.
The report calls on the government to amend the Human Tissue Act 2004, which regulates the acquisition, storage, use and disposal of bodies, organs and tissue, to cover remains more than 100 years old.
Iben Bo, the author of the policy brief, said the act currently failed to take into account that ancestral remains held in the UK were looted from Africa. For example, she said Egyptian mummified persons were excavated and brought back to Britain, for racist pseudoscientific research.
'African diaspora communities expressed disgust with ancestral remains [being] on display because the museum space is not constructed as a cemetery where you go to pay your respects. There's noise and children running around,' said Bo, the lead research consultant of the African Ancestral Remains project.
Zaki El-Salahi, a member of the Sudanese community in Edinburgh, said he was shocked when he first saw body parts of his ancestors in the Anatomical Museum in the University of Edinburgh and is now part of an academic group seeking to address the institution's links to slavery and colonialism. The remains were taken by British colonisers after the Battle of Omdurman in 1898, in which British commanders used early machine guns and artillery to inflict thousands of casualties on lightly armed enemies.
He said: 'It was very much that kind of deep human threat response, which was for me, fight and freeze. It was that there was something deeply wrong here, a huge injustice, connecting the city that I've lived in for 18 years to my family's home town.'
Under the APPG-AR's proposals, museums, universities and other institutions would require a licence to store ancestral remains, and could not display them except for religious purposes or unless they obtained appropriate consent.
The report also suggests creating a memorial or burial site in the UK for ancestral remains which cannot be returned because their exact origins have been destroyed owing to colonial violence.
A British Museum spokesperson said: 'The museum is mindful of ethical obligations and closely follows the guidance set out by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport and the Human Tissue Act 2004, which ensures that human remains held in its care are always treated and displayed with respect and dignity.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's new travel ban set to come in to effect on Monday
Trump's new travel ban set to come in to effect on Monday

ITV News

time12 hours ago

  • ITV News

Trump's new travel ban set to come in to effect on Monday

President Trump's new travel ban is set to come in to effect on Monday, restricting travel to the US from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. The move comes amid growing tensions in the US as Donald Trump continues delivering on his election promise to increase immigration enforcement. The order banning travel from certain countries was signed by Trump on Wednesday and applies to citizens from: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also increases travel restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees. They had hoped to one day bring their niece to the US to join them - from Monday that will no longer be possible as Afghanistan joins a list of 12 countries restricted from travelling to America. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said, referring to the country's Taliban rulers. 'We didn't think about this travel ban.' The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. "We don't want them," says Donald Trump as he signs the travel restrictions executive order. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. US officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organisation. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

Israel vows to stop aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg from reaching Gaza
Israel vows to stop aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg from reaching Gaza

NBC News

time19 hours ago

  • NBC News

Israel vows to stop aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg from reaching Gaza

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has vowed to block an aid vessel carrying Greta Thunberg and other activists from reaching Gaza, by 'any means necessary.' The "Madleen" departed Sicily last Sunday, aiming to breach Israel's naval blockade on Gaza, deliver humanitarian aid, and draw attention to the worsening humanitarian crisis in the enclave. According to a live tracker on board the vessel, it was sailing north of the Egyptian coastal city of Rosetta on Sunday morning, roughly 300 miles from Gaza. Katz said Sunday that he had instructed the Israel Defense Forces to 'prevent the 'Madelaine' hate flotilla from reaching the shores of Gaza." 'To the anti-Semitic Greta and her fellow Hamas propaganda spokespeople, I say clearly: You should turn back — because you will not reach Gaza,' he posted on Telegram. 'Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or aid terrorist organizations — at sea, in the air and on land.' Among those on board the ship are " Game of Thrones" actor Liam Cunningham and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament of Palestinian descent, who has been barred from entering Israel over her opposition to its military campaign in Gaza. 'We are doing this because, no matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying,' Thunberg said last week. 'Because the moment we stop trying is when we lose our humanity. And no matter how dangerous this mission is, it's not even near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the live-streamed genocide.' Israel has adamantly rejected allegations of genocide. following warnings of rising starvation in the enclave, in mid-May, Israel began to allow basic aid into Gaza, lifting an almost three-month complete blockade the entry of food, medicine and other vital supplies. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was tasked with distributing aid in the enclave as part of a new U.S.- and Israel-backed plan, but its first two weeks in operation have been marred by controversy. Health officials say that dozens of Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid at GHF distribution points. And experts have warned that Gaza is at risk of famine if more aid is not brought in. A previous attempt by the Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza failed last month after one of its ships was struck by two drones in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel for the attack, which damaged the vessel's bow. The Israeli government says the blockade is an attempt to pressure Hamas to release hostages it took during the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, terror attacks, in which some 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage, marking a major escalation in a decadeslong conflict. Since then, more than 54,000 people, including thousands of children, have been killed in Gaza, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry in the enclave, which has been run by Hamas since 2007.

George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal long-term' loan deal that will send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece
George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal long-term' loan deal that will send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece

Daily Mail​

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal long-term' loan deal that will send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece

George Osborne is negotiating a 'reciprocal loan deal' that would send the Elgin Marbles back to Greece. The former chancellor, now the chairman of the British Museum, is understood to be discussions with Greek government over a deal that would return the marbles to Athens on a long-term basis. As part of the deal, Athens would provide the museum with ancient Greek artefacts, many of which have never been shown in the UK. Importantly, the British Museum would not give up its legal ownership of the sculptures, which would require a change in the law. The deal is to hoped to come into effect later this decade when the British Museum closes for refurbishment as part of the upcoming redevelopment of the Bloomsbury site in London. Sources, however, have told the Times that no deal has been finalised and an announcement is not expected in the near future.. The marbles, also known as The Parthenon Sculptures, are a series of Ancient Greek sculptures created between 447BC and 432BC by Greek architect Phidias. After standing for 2,000 years, the Acropolis was for the most part destroyed as the Ottoman Empire - who at the time ruled Greece - became embroiled in a war with Venice. The remaining sculptures were removed from the ruins of the Parthenon by Lord Elgin, then British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, and brought to Britain between 1802 and 1812. In 1816, the marbles were handed over to the care of the British Museum, where they have remained ever since. Talks between the British Museum and Greece over the return of the Elgin marbles have been ongoing since 2021. A spokesman for the Prime Minister said that the 'care and management' of the sculptures was a matter for the British Museum and a long-term loan deal would not need explicit government approval. It has been claimed that, while Labour won't change a law that stops the British Museum permanently handing back the artefacts, Sir Keir would allow the 'loan' of some of the carvings to Athens. The fifth-century BC Parthenon sculptures were moved from Athens between 1801 to 1812 by the Earl of Elgin, when it was still part of the Ottoman Empire. The empire was crumbling at the time, with Greece securing independence in the following decades. The peer, who was the British ambassador, planned to set up a private museum before transferring them to the British Museum. Greece insists the artefacts were obtained illegally by Lord Elgin, but the UK is adamant that Lord Elgin had the permission of the Ottoman authorities. A 1963 law prevents the British Museum from permanently disposing of key items from its collection, although it would not stop a loan deal. It has been reported by the Critic magazine that Osborne has already agreed to give the Elgin Marbles to Greece as part of a permanent loan deal. Since the greek government still claims legal ownership of the sculptures, it was 'extremely unlikely that they would ever return to Britain', the report added. In responde, the museum said that talks has not advances sinc late last year when the PM hosted Greek counterpart Kyriakos Mitsotakis at No10. A No 10 spokesman said also denied reports of an imminent deal. 'It remains the case that decisions relating to the management of the Parthenon sculptures are a matter for the trustees of the British Museum, which is operationally independent of the government,' the spokesman said. 'We have no plans to change the law that would allow the permanent loan of the Elgin Marbles.' When asked about the deal, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said she had 'never been someone who thought we should send the Elgin Marbles back'. A Greek official involved in the talks said the deal would need to see the marbles being transferred for an 'extended period; not 50 or 100 years, nor one or two years'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store