Stereophonic: all the sex, drugs, tears and boredom of true rock 'n' roll
The Fleetwood Mac model is the only one you can use to tell the story of a fictional band these days, because there are two women at its core, they're allies, and they both write songs: all the problems of the Seventies rock world are sidestepped right there. And so, in Stereophonic, we watch five men and women, Brits and Americans – all of whom could potentially be shagging each other, though some are also married to each other – slinking around looking dazzling, making a Rumours-style masterpiece, in the wondrous days when everything was brown.
Arriving from Broadway fizzing with five-star energy, the show looks just like Amazon Prime's Daisy Jones and the Six, which was carried along by Elvis's astonishing granddaughter Riley Keough. But the challenges chosen by the writer David Adjimi, who took five years to do this script, are more eccentric: how to make two of the dullest settings – the windowless recording studio, and the circular, drug-fuelled diatribe – into something you actually want to see.
The play is set entirely behind the mixing desk, over a period that should have been a month and ended up a year, and it asks the question I have always wondered about: how the hell is this setting conducive to creativity? The music starts and is instantly stopped, because there's not enough EQ on the mike, because people are arguing, and because each day begins with every band member completely trashed from the night before. The coffee machine is broken, but coke's the 'same thing', and the 'bag', as it's referred to, is a character of its own – around 2lbs of white powder swung about like a medieval mace. My throat tickled from the smell of earthy faux fags onstage.
The problem with fictional bands has always been portraying songwriting and recording on stage or screen. It is impossible to make it interesting, unless it's Get Back and you're the Beatles. It is an internal wonder, a mental process: too often directors resort to what I call the 'Hey guys, what do you think of this' moment, when a deathless hit emerges in three spontaneous chords.
Stereophonic is more realistic than this, and its realism is the heart of its success – at one point, six days' of studio time are given over to getting the sound of a snare right. The realism extends to a script that I found fresh in ways I can't fully explain. The characters – high, emotionally wounded, or giddy with cabin fever – talk nonsense as well as sense, and Adjimi exploits the originality in coke-fuelled language: bassist Reg is a 'sad man in a blanket'; English toff drummer Simon is trying to clean him up but, equally stoned, proposes going home to make dinner and try out his grandmother's recipe of a 'chicken smashed by a brick'.
Band members start a speech in puffed up arrogance or make a desperate bid for creative independence – then find their ideas derailing mid flow, and shrink back and forth between self-expression and conformity in a way that feels truly psychological. At the heart of the web is the coercive singer-guitarist Peter (Jack Riddiford) – the Lindsay Buckingham to Diana's Stevie Nicks: she, played by Lucy Karczewski, has five songs on the album, more than anyone else, but her husband can't handle it, and whenever she presents something, he stares off with hate into the middle distance. He sold her guitar seven years ago ('I was going to learn it!' she sobs) and she's never had anything to do with her hands: all Peter can suggest is a Nicksian wave of the fingers.
Arcade Fire's Will Butler, who wrote the music, probably wishes he'd been working in the Seventies – many musicians do. I thought Stereophonic was an immersive album experience, a kind of West End gimmick, and I was looking forward to it, but the music is more incidental than that, though it fleshes out in increasingly long studio sessions as the album gets written, flopping or firing up depending on what kind of day they're having. It's quite a thing to see the cast playing their instruments live: vocal takes are done in real time and laid on backing tracks right there in front of you. The real star is probably Eli Gelb, who plays the engineer schlub Grover, with a voice like Jonah Hill. He got the gig pretending he'd worked for the Eagles: his partner, the gnome-like Charlie, is only there because he's 'cousins with the main Doobie Brother'. Together, backs to the audience, all tight buttocks and flared jeans, they provide bemused commentary on the peacocks behind the glass. In the unseen outside world, the band's previous album goes to number one. 'I think we're really famous,' says someone. It doesn't look that great from here.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
[See also: The search for queer cinema]
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘The King Lear in I Am the Walrus? That came from John Cage': Paul McCartney on the Beatles' debt to great avant-garde composers
It is a sunny October afternoon and I am sitting in a long wood-panelled hallway in an old converted townhouse in London waiting to be called into the office of Paul McCartney. I am dressed in my best clothes and trying not to let nerves get the better of me. I am here to ask him about an aspect of his career that is rarely discussed but which, I believe, helped cement his reputation as a world-conquering compositional force and which made the Beatles the most interesting and influential band of all time. In the mid-1960s, as well as topping the charts, turning a generation of teenage girls hysterical and finding themselves the focus of obsessive media attention, the Beatles were also engaged with, and educating themselves about, the work of classical music's most audacious and important composers. McCartney watched the communist and free improviser Cornelius Cardew play the prepared piano at the Royal College of Art in London. He saw Karlheinz Stockhausen deliver an address about the development of synthesised sound. And he went to meet Delia Derbyshire ('She was in a shed at the bottom of her garden full of machines') to ask if she wanted to write an electronic score for Yesterday. He attended a lecture by the Italian composer and electronic experimentalist Luciano Berio, who later arranged a series of songs by the Beatles for his first wife, the mezzo-soprano Cathy Berberian. The Beatles, McCartney tells me, also took their cue from the 1956 piece Radio Music by John Cage for one of the band's most famous songs: 'Cage had a piece that started at one end of the radio's range,' he says, 'and he just turned the knob and went through to the end, scrolling randomly through all the stations. I brought that idea to I Am the Walrus. I said, 'It's got to be random.' We ended up landing on some Shakespeare – King Lear. It was lovely having that spoken word at that moment. And that came from Cage.' On a purple velvet sofa in his office, McCartney talks to me with the same irrepressible energy that has driven his contribution to music for more than 60 years. He also has a very endearing way of never assuming knowledge and very politely checks, for instance, that I know about his friend, John. 'You know, John Lennon?' (I do.) And did I know the Beatles had 'this song called Yesterday?' (I did). He seems delighted to talk less about his own achievements and more about the people who helped broaden his scope. Two men who certainly did that were French composer-engineers Pierre Henry and Pierre Schaeffer who, in the late 1940s and early 1950s, pioneered a style of composition called musique concrète. Working in Parisian studios set up for propaganda broadcasts during the second world war, the pair used turntables and tape machines to forge an entirely original method of composing which, in line with French movements in art and philosophy at the time, sought to deconstruct established ideas and build from scratch a new means of making music. This was iconoclasm driven by an erosion of trust in a ruling class that had led millions to their deaths during two brutal international conflicts. Schaeffer and Henry recorded natural or found sounds on to magnetic tape – the bark of a dog, the whistle or chugging of a train, a cackling voice – and then, using tape machines to slow down, speed up or reverse the original sound, they created collages of altered or 'manipulated' recordings that are completely bewildering and mesmeric. Our ear is lured by that which is familiar and then unsettled by its abstraction. The suggestion is that all is not what it seems – the very essence of psychedelia. 'Not everything we see is clear and figurative,' McCartney says to me, pointing to a Willem de Kooning painting next to us on the wall. 'Sometimes when you're asleep or you rub your eye, you see an abstract: your mind knows about it. We know about this stuff. It was the same with music. We were messing around, but our minds could still accept it because it was something that we already kind of knew anyway. Even though we were in another lane to more classical composers, we were kind of equal in that we also wanted freedom.' After buying a pair of his own Brenell tape machines, McCartney set about looping and spooling these ideas into the work he had to do for 'his day job'. He describes the recording of Tomorrow Never Knows, 'which was shaping up to be kind of a far-out Beatles song'. McCartney remembers carrying a plastic bag full of tape loops – on which he'd recorded various sounds at home – to Abbey Road during sessions for Revolver. 'I set up the tape machines to create popping, whirring and dissolving sounds all mixed together. There could have been a guitar solo in it – straightforward or wacky – but when you put the tape loops in, they take it to another place because when they play, you get all these kind of happy accidents. They're unpredictable and that suited that track. We used those tricks to get the effect we wanted.' The result is a myriad of strange musical textures and meditative drones, a sonic vacuum into which all our troubling thoughts and feelings are swallowed up and disappear. It's a big part of what made the Beatles as colourful as the recreational substances that were so popular at the time. It's also the alchemical element in their work that helped put them in a different league, in terms of their legacy and influence. Eventually John Lennon also procured a pair of Brenell machines and entered new realms of experimentalism. This produced the hypnotic track Revolution 9: 'John was fascinated and he loved the craziness of it,' McCartney says. He, meanwhile, preferred to use these new studio gadgets 'in a controlled way', working within the pop-song format, cherrypicking interesting stylistic elements and twisting them into the Beatles' established song-writing template. Together the pair fashioned a new, intelligent and avant garde-informed kind of pop music – a reminder, as if we need it, of the magic of the Lennon-McCartney partnership. The push and pull of two genius creatives working together to upend the status quo. 'You think, 'Oh well our audience wants a pop song,'' McCartney says. 'And then you might read about William Burroughs using the cut-up technique and you think, 'Well, he had an audience, and his audience liked what he did.' And eventually we decided that our audiences would come along with us, rather than it being down to us to feed them a conventional diet.' My quest into the roots of this trippy magic in the Beatles' music is just one of many explorations I made into the way the 20th century's most innovative pop musicians borrowed from the classical avant garde, for my book Everything We Do Is Music. In it, I draw a line from John Cale's drone in the Velvet Underground to the extraordinary Indian classical-inspired sounds in music by La Monte Young; and connect the blistering microtonality of Polish sonorism to the angst-ridden rock of Radiohead. The feminist philosophies of Pauline Oliveros formed a blueprint for techno, meanwhile, and US composers such as Edgard Varèse, John Cage, Steve Reich and Philip Glass found ways to reflect the energy and freneticism of the urban metropolis in their work. In each case, I found that artists on both sides of the pop/classical divide reached across it, disregarding those things that usually separate us – education, class, nationality, gender – to do something epochal. At the end of our conversation, I ask McCartney if he ever felt restricted by the expectations of fans, or limited by his schooling and background. Actually, he says, he always felt a real sense of freedom to engage with the open-minded atmosphere of the time. This was largely thanks to his late wife Linda. 'She used to say, 'It's allowed.' And that lit up the skies for me. I'd think, 'Yeah, it's allowed.'' Everything We Do is Music by Elizabeth Alker (Faber & Faber, £20) is published on 28 August. To support the Guardian, order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Hegseth and RFK Jr do push-up and pull-up challenge with Marines
Robert F Kennedy Jr and Pete Hegseth engaged in a workout challenge to encourage Americans to become more physically fit. The 'Pete and Bobby Challenge' involved completing 50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups within a 10-minute timeframe. The challenge, held at the Department of Defence, saw Hegseth finish in 5 minutes and 25 seconds, with RFK Jr completing it shortly after. Both participants expressed their hope that Americans would take up the challenge to foster a 'healthy fighting force' and 'make America healthy again'. Watch the video in full above.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
New 'raw and real' Tommy Fury documentary shows Love Islander during 'worst year of his life'
New 'raw and real' Tommy Fury documentary shows Love Islander during 'worst year of his life' The former Love Islander and boxer has let the cameras in to his life for a 'raw and real' depiction of the behind the scenes of being Tommy Fury. The BBC will be airing the six part documentary series following Tommy during the tumultuous time. (Image: (Photo by)) Boxer Tommy Fury rose to fame after appearing on the ITV reality show Love Island in 2019, where he met his fiancée Molly Mae Hague. The pair took over the internet becoming 'couple goals' for the British public as they showed off their glamorous life as well as their happy family with their daughter Bambi. Although, they haven't had an easy ride, as the couple split in 2024 following rumours and speculation. It was later revealed in Molly's Amazon Prime documentary Behind It All, that their relationship took a turn following Tommy's alcohol reliance. The pair reunited during the second release of Molly's documentary, and have kept their relationship rather private since. Now, Tommy has released his own documentary with BBC Three which he has said shows the 'raw and real side of the 'worst year of his life'. For the latest TV and showbiz gossip sign up to our newsletter . Tommy: The Good. The Bad. The Fury will air tonight, August 19 on BBC Three and BBC iPlayer. In the six part documentary the boxer is said to "open up about his life, legacy and battle to prove his worth - inside the ring and out of it." He told the BBC his reason for creating the documentary. He said: "I was really going through a tough time, and I just thought if there's any time to document this, it would be now. I want people not just to see all the great stuff that they see like winning fights on TV or living the life on Instagram. "I want people to see me going through a difficult time as well. Because that's real life. I wanted the documentary to be raw and real, and that's exactly what you've got." Article continues below Tommy described 2024 as the worst year of his life, having needed hand surgery as well as his extremely public break up. He explained: "2024 was awful. I started last January with a hand surgery and since then it just from went from bad to worse. I had my problems with alcohol, I was absent from the ring, I had problems in my private life and just lost touch with myself. "2025 is completely different. Already this year we've managed to make an amazing documentary. I've had my comeback fight. I'm back in the ring and back being active. My private life has never been better. And yeah, everything is just a complete opposite of 2024." The boxer believes that his initial injury is what started his difficult year, and is what was the root of the majority of his problems "both inside and outside the ring". He continued: "But I've come so far and I've done a full turn. I've gone from having nothing in my life, to living in a house alone, going through the toughest time of my life, to now having everything back and feeling myself again. I'm back in the gym and back training. I'm back in shape. My family's there and I've come full circle. I couldn't be any happier. "In terms of my family life, everything is private now between me and Molly, and we're in the happiest place possible. And that's all that anyone needs to know! Everyone's entitled to a private life and so right now we're going to live our private life, because we haven't had that since we were 19 or 20 years old. "It's all been lived out in front of a camera or on the front page of a newspaper. So now, going forward, we're finally going to take that private time." Tommy Fury proposed to Molly-Mae in July 2023 on a cliff in Ibiza (Image: Instagram/@mollymae) The boxer opened up about their relationship on BBC Breakfast, this morning, August 19. He said: "Because to be a great father you've got to be a great partner too, and you know rolling in drunk and doing all sorts of stuff, no-one wants to be around that and I can't blame - you know what's happened has happened. "I'd have done the same thing. Who wants to be around that? But at the end of the day, that's not who I am anymore." Article continues below You can watch Tommy: The Good. The Bad. The Fury on BBC Three from 9pm, Tuesday, August 19. The first two episodes will be broadcasted on the channel tonight, however if you want to binge the series all six parts are now on BBC iPlayer here.
