Trump says both sides violate ceasefire, tells Israel: ‘Do not drop those bombs'
[WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL] US President Donald Trump accused both Israel and Iran of violating a ceasefire on Tuesday (Jun 24) hours after he announced it, expressing particular frustration with Israel which had announced major new strikes on Teheran.
'Israel. Do not drop those bombs. If you do it it is a major violation. Bring your pilots home, now!' Trump wrote on Truth Social shortly after he left the White House for a trip to a Nato summit in The Hague.
Before boarding, he told reporters he was 'not happy' with either side for violating the truce, particularly with Israel.
'I've got to get Israel to calm down now,' Trump said as he left the White House. 'Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I've never seen before, the biggest load that we've seen.'
Iran and Israel had been fighting 'so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing,' he said before turning away from cameras and heading to his helicopter.
Earlier, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz had said he had ordered the military to mount new strikes on targets in Teheran in response to what he said were Iranian missiles fired in a 'blatant violation' of the ceasefire.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Iran denied launching any missiles and said Israel's attacks had continued for an hour and a half beyond the time the ceasefire was meant to start.
Despite the initial violations, in both countries, the wider Middle East and around the world there was palpable sense of relief that a path out of war had been charted, 12 days after Israel launched it with a surprise attack, and two days after Trump joined in with strikes on Iranian nuclear targets.
'We're happy, very happy. Who mediated or how it happened doesn't matter. The war is over. It never should have started in the first place,' Reza Sharifi, 38, heading back to Teheran from Rasht on the Caspian Sea where he had relocated with his family to escape strikes on the capital, told Reuters by telephone.
Arik Daimant, a software engineer in Tel Aviv, said: 'Regrettably, it's a bit too late for me and my family, because our house back here was totally destroyed in the recent bombings last Sunday. But as they say: 'better late than never', and I hope this ceasefire is a new beginning.'
Trump had announced the ceasefire with a post on Truth Social: 'THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!' REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
How Netanyahu's move against Iran gives him room to manoeuvre on Gaza
Amid widespread enthusiasm in Israel for his actions against Tehran, Mr Netanyahu's polling numbers are higher than at almost any point since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS How Netanyahu's move against Iran gives him room to manoeuvre on Gaza JERUSALEM – For 18 months, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has avoided ending the war in the Gaza Strip. In part, it risked collapsing his coalition government, prompting early elections that polls suggested he would lose. Now, after striking Iran and persuading the United States to hit its prized nuclear sites, Mr Netanyahu is in a much more comfortable position. Amid widespread enthusiasm in Israel for his actions against Tehran, Mr Netanyahu's polling numbers are higher than at almost any point since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. If his government collapsed tomorrow, Mr Netanyahu would now stand a reasonable chance of reelection. And that has spurred hope in Israel that Mr Netanyahu could now override his coalition's concerns and show greater flexibility over Gaza. 'He's at the strongest he's been for years,' said Mr Mitchell Barak, a political analyst who was an adviser to Mr Netanyahu before he became prime minister. 'When you're that strong, you can make that deal, you can end the war in Gaza – and not be afraid that your government is going to collapse or that you're going to be thrown out of office,' Mr Barak added. For now, Mr Netanyahu has given no public hint of a change of heart over Gaza. For months, he has refused to end the war unless Hamas first surrenders and its leadership leaves for exile – terms that Hamas has rejected. Asked for comment on June 24, Mr Netanyahu's office said in a statement that those demands remained in place. 'Hamas is the only obstacle to ending the war,' the statement said. 'It must release all the hostages, surrender, give up control of Gaza, and get out. The choice is theirs.' Still, analysts and allies of Mr Netanyahu noted that he now has the political capital to change course, as he basks in the glory of the Iran campaign. In a sign Mr Netanyahu may be more open to talks, the Israeli representatives at the Gaza ceasefire talks have now been given a broader mandate to negotiate, according to a senior member of Mr Netanyahu's coalition, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. In a statement issued on June 24, Mr Netanyahu's government reeled off a list of achievements in the 12-day conflict with Iran. It said Israel had blunted the threat of Iran's nuclear program, and its ballistic missile arsenal had killed hundreds of its paramilitary forces and destroyed several targets associated with the Iranian leadership in the heart of Tehran. In reality, the scale of the damage to the nuclear program has yet to be determined, amid uncertainty about the whereabouts of Iran's stocks of enriched uranium. In Israel, those details now seem to matter less than the optics of the situation. Even the prime minister's fiercest critics have praised his boldness and ingenuity in persuading President Donald Trump to join the attack. Reports in the Israeli news media speculated that Mr Netanyahu might soon end the war in Gaza, call a snap election and campaign on the strength of his victory over Iran. Such a move would likely involve the return of dozens of Israelis still held in Gaza, both dead and alive. Comments from Mr Netanyahu's hard-line coalition partners suggested that he may still face resistance to a deal in Gaza that ends the war without Hamas' removal. Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said in a statement that Israel must now return 'with all our strength to Gaza, to complete the task – to destroy Hamas and return our hostages'. For that reason, analysts said, Mr Netanyahu may still wait to strike a deal with Hamas until after the Israeli parliament closes in late July for a recess of nearly three months. Under most circumstances, that would prevent lawmakers from voting for the government's collapse until they return from the summer break, giving Mr Netanyahu a few more months in power. 'His achievements in Iran definitely give him the political capital he needs for the next election, and he could definitely now risk his government falling,' said Israeli political commentator Tal Shalev. 'But I'm not sure he wants such a swift election, so he might wait until the summer recess before making any moves in Gaza,' she added. Even if Mr Netanyahu softens his position, Hamas could slow or block negotiations as it did during key moments in the 2024 talks. Its leaders are considered unlikely to go into exile, an Israeli demand that is unlikely to soften. But Mr Netanyahu may now be more flexible over the biggest obstacle of all: the demand for a permanent truce. Hamas wants a complete end to hostilities, allowing it to survive the war as an influential force in Gaza. Israel wants only a temporary deal, allowing it to return to battle – as Israel did in March when it collapsed an earlier truce. Now some analysts think Mr Netanyahu can show more flexibility since it will no longer seem to Israelis that he is acting from a position of weakness. After presiding over Israel's deadliest military disaster, when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7, 2023, Mr Netanyahu's reputation as a guardian of Israeli security was shattered. After inflicting painful blows against Iran – as well as its Lebanese ally, Hezbollah, in 2024 – the prime minister has burnished his security credentials once more. 'He's been trying to distance himself as far as possible from the failure of Oct 7, hoping to get to the next elections with a different story to tell,' Ms Shalev said. 'The Iran campaign definitely gives him a new story to tell.' Still, it is not certain if the sheen of Mr Netanyahu's success will endure beyond the summer. If Iran races to rebuild its nuclear program, or if Israel and the United States' strikes have proved less effective than they first appeared, then the prime minister's victory narrative might not survive. That is comparable to what happened after the Yom Kippur War in 1973 against Egypt and Syria, according to Dr Neta Oren, an Israeli political expert who wrote her doctoral thesis on the effects of major events on Israeli public opinion. The Yom Kippur War is often compared to the current one in Gaza because it also began with Israeli military failure, before Israeli troops regained the initiative and advanced to within a few dozen miles of both Cairo and Damascus, Syria. 'By the end of the Yom Kippur War, Israel was actually very successful, but the war was soon remembered as a failure,' Dr Oren said. 'We could see the same result with Netanyahu in the future,' said Dr Oren, the author of the book Israel Under Netanyahu. 'Today, the Israeli media presents the Iran campaign as a victory, but in the long run, we just don't know how it will be perceived,' she added. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, urges it to by US crude
US President Donald Trump (left) gestures as he arrives at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport to attend the Nato summit in The Hague on June 24. PHOTO: AFP Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, urges it to by US crude US President Donald Trump said on June 24 that China can continue to purchase Iranian oil after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, a move that the White House clarified did not indicate a relaxation of US sanctions. 'China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the US, also,' he said in a post on Truth Social, just days after he ordered US bombings of three Iranian nuclear sites. He was drawing attention to no attempts by Iran so far to close the Strait of Hormuz to oil tankers, as a closure would have been hard for China, the world's top importer of Iranian oil, a senior White House official told Reuters. 'The president continues to call on China and all countries to import our state-of-the-art oil rather than import Iranian oil in violation of US sanctions,' the official said. After the ceasefire announcement, Mr Trump's comments on China were another bearish signal for oil prices, which fell nearly 6 per cent. Any relaxation of sanctions enforcement on Iran would mark a US policy shift after Mr Trump said in February he was re-imposing maximum pressure on Iran, aiming to drive its oil exports to zero, over its nuclear programme and funding of militants across the Middle East. He imposed waves of Iran-related sanctions on several of China's so-called independent 'teapot' refineries and port terminal operators for purchases of Iranian oil. 'President Trump's greenlight for China to keep buying Iranian oil reflects a return to lax enforcement standards,' said Scott Modell, a former CIA officer, now CEO of Rapidan Energy Group. In addition to not enforcing sanctions, Mr Trump could suspend or waive sanctions imposed by executive order or under authorities a president is granted in laws passed by Congress. He will likely not waive sanctions ahead of coming rounds of US-Iran nuclear talks, Mr Modell said. The measures provide leverage given Tehran's demand that any deal includes lifting them permanently. Mr Jeremy Paner, a partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed lawfirm, said if Mr Trump chooses to suspend Iran oil-related sanctions, it would require lots of work between agencies. The Treasury would need to issue licences, and the State Department would have to issue waivers, which require Congressional notification. 'Flashed the Glock' China has long opposed what it has called Washington's 'abuse of illegal unilateral sanctions'. China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Mr Trump's post. Larger purchases of Iranian oil by China and other consumers could upset US ally Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter. The impact of US sanctions on Iran's exports, however, has been limited since Mr Trump's first administration when he cracked down harder on Tehran. Mr Trump has 'flashed the Glock' this year with sanctions on Chinese trading companies and terminals, but the results have been far more 'minimum pressure' than maximum, Mr Modell said. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters that Mr Trump had signalled what he wanted to happen and that his administration is focused on delivering that. She would not say what the process would entail. 'But clearly we are focused on making sure that (the) guiding hand of President Trump prevails and moves this government forward, so we will have to wait and see when it comes to what that ends up looking like,' she said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
28 minutes ago
- Business Times
Oil trades on fear, not just barrels, as geopolitics and prediction markets take hold
[SINGAPORE] When even Goldman Sachs is tracking crypto-based prediction platform Polymarket to get a read on the risks facing oil markets, you know something's shifted. On Monday (Jun 23), Goldman Sachs warned that Brent could hit US$110 a barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is blocked, citing Polymarket, showing how even prediction markets with low liquidity may be shaping sentiment. But while some are treating this Manhattan-based market platform as a new kind of geopolitical barometer, others like Singapore continue to keep its doors shut on grounds that it's an illegal gambling site. Regardless of where one stands, it says a lot about how oil is being traded. Less than a fortnight since Israel's airstrikes on Iran, markets appear to be not just reacting to fundamentals (supply and demand) but also probabilities. At the heart of the oil markets' guessing game is whether Iran will move to shut down Strait of Hormuz – one of the world's most important waterways for fossil fuel transportation, particularly oil and liquefied natural gas. Over the weekend, Iran's Parliament reportedly approved its closure. On Monday morning, Polymarket showed a 43 per cent chance that Iran would close the waterway before July. By evening, that probability had nearly halved and on Tuesday morning (Asia time), it plunged below 5 per cent after US President Donald Trump announced a 'complete and total' ceasefire between Israel and Iran. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The odds are likely to shift again to reflect the volatile times. Oil prices have been swinging wildly. Iran's latest move, firing six missiles at US bases in Qatar, should have pushed prices up, but instead they slumped. The reason? The Strait of Hormuz remains open, and crude is still flowing. This suggests that traders are no longer just chiefly reacting to supply but are also trying to read intent. History shows that during extended Middle East flare-ups, fear alone has added US$20 to US$30 a barrel – proof that sentiment can outmuscle fundamentals when geopolitics takes centre stage. That's not to say fundamentals have left the building altogether. There remain key factors that could blunt some of the upward pressure in the commodity's prices. For one, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies (Opec+) has room to pump more, suggesting that the oil cartel has both the capacity and motivation to respond if prices rise too fast. Global inventories aren't exactly scraping the bottom either while slowing economies are weakening energy demand. Iran pumps about 3.4 million barrels of oil a day and still exports a significant volume of oil despite US sanctions, with much of it flowing to China. That trade keeps its economy afloat but also limits its ability to escalate. Closing the Strait of Hormuz would risk cutting off its own revenue lifeline. This is what makes its next move hard to predict. Teheran has the capability to cause chaos, but also every reason to show restraint. A prolonged oil rally is bad news for rate-cut expectations, especially in Asia where policymakers were hoping for some breathing room. If oil prices climb to US$110 to US$120 a barrel (under pundits' high-risk scenario) and stay there for over three months, analysts warn Asia could face a 'stagflationary shock'. In that scenario, central banks may be forced to tighten policy instead of easing, worsening the slowdown. We've seen how that story plays out. And this may be the fear factor keeping markets on tenterhooks.
