Stoke-on-Trent ex-school site used for pitches may be developed
The site of a school which closed 30 years ago is set to be earmarked for development, despite opposition from hundreds of people.The former Ball Green High School is one of 11 pieces of land owned by Stoke-on-Trent City Council which the authority wants to declare surplus and include in its local plan.The playing fields on the land off Bemersley Road, which lies in the green belt, have been used as football pitches since the school was demolished. More than 440 people have signed a petition asking for the site to be retained for public use. A council report said it was being considered "for various future uses" as part of a wider scheme.
And the report to the council's cabinet about the 11 sites states declaring land surplus did not mean a decision had been taken on its future.Instead it allowed officers to investigate different uses for the land.The local plan will guide development in the city over the next 15 years, including earmarking sites for homes.The government has set the city council a housing requirement of 948 homes a year, about twice what is currently delivered.
While most of the 11 sites are set to be earmarked for housing, the high school site is part of the Chatterley Whitfield Development Project which considers various future uses. Baddeley, Milton and Norton councillor Dave Evans started the petition and said the council should develop brownfields sites and not build on greenbelt land. "Once you start taking bits of land out of the green belt you get the sort of urban sprawl that the green belt is meant to stop," he said."The Redhills Road site in Milton desperately needs to be developed so the contamination of the land can be dealt with."Chris Robinson, cabinet member for housing, planning and governance, said the sites' future will be discussed at a cabinet meeting on 24 June. He said they were aware of the petition and would listen to residents' views and other stakeholders before making any decisions."The council currently owns around 500 buildings and pieces of land, all of which cost a significant amount to maintain, and many are no longer needed. "Reviewing these sites is an important part of our plans to save money, run more efficiently and unlock new opportunities for communities."We are committed to making better use of brownfield land and provide more homes for local people."
Where are the 11 potential local plan sites?
Bilton Street – BoothenBooth Street – BoothenPower Grove – Longton and Meir Hay SouthBengry Road – Lightwood North and NormacotEaves Lane – Abbey HultonCaverswall Lane – Meir ParkCentral Business District (Smithfield) – Etruria and HanleyWoodhead Road – Abbey HultonBrookwood Drive – Meir NorthCanal Lane, Westport Lane – BurslemBall Green – Baddeley, Milton and Norton
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Parents SHOULD be fined for taking children on holiday during term time says LEE BOYCE - here's three ideas to help families have a cheaper break
For a while, there has been a war brewing at the school gates. It involves parents who feel they can only afford a holiday with children if they do it during term time and the Government and councils, which can fine them for doing just that. Last year, nearly half a million school holiday fines were dished out in England, according to the Department for Education. That was up 24 per cent on the previous year and has tripled within a decade. Last August, these fines became even stronger. The minimum fine for parents who take their children out of school in term time without permission went up to £80 per parent and failure to pay within 21 days doubled to £160. With the increase in numbers fined and the cost comes angst from parents, who let's face it, do deserve a break. Now, the situation is set to be debated in Parliament. That's because a petition urging the right for parents to remove kids from school for 10 days has amassed nearly 200,000 signatures. The petition reads: 'We're seeking reform to the punitive policy for term time leave that disproportionately impacts families that are already under immense pressure and criminalises parents that we think are making choices in the best interests of their families. No family should face criminal convictions.' It then adds: 'We are calling for reform of legislation on taking children out of school urgently.' That amount of time, in my opinion, is extreme. It'll also fail to garner sympathy from the generation above who will say: we never had this problem in our day. Although ask many of today's parents and they will definitely remember their own parents taking them out of school on the odd occasion. But growing numbers of families say the cost of a holiday during the summer peak is a problem. I know the pain. With a daughter in year one of primary school, I was braced for pricier holidays – but have been taken aback by just how much more expensive trips are. As someone, who before children would push for a March break and a September one, the difference in cost is astonishing. However, it is a simple case of supply and demand – that's how the world of money and services work. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has previously vowed to tackle the 'epidemic of school absence'. Some of the problem involves persistent absence, child mental health issues, unofficial home schooling, but a large chunk is linked to holidays. This in turn is connected to schools being shut during the Covid pandemic, with teacher strikes soon after. The former head of Ofsted, Amanda Spielman, saying the social contract between parents and schools was broken. And in its response to the petition, the Government said: 'We are determined to break down barriers to opportunity by supporting every child to achieve and thrive at school, working with parents and protecting children's right to education. On holidays in particular, we understand that some parents wish to avoid peak periods. 'However, the school year is structured in such a way as to provide plenty of time throughout the year for holidays outside of term-time, and schools also have considerable flexibility to plan term dates themselves, and hold inset days and other occasional days at less busy times of the year.' A recent survey suggested more than half of families are prepared to take child out of school during term time to save money, despite the risk of a fine. Many just absorb any potential fine to the cost of the trip, and still argue they save money. That's certainly the vibe I get from many parents at my daughter's school and from family members and friends. My personal viewpoint is that holidays are vitally important for families to properly bond, have quality time together and also, typically, children learn from them. Not everything is taught in a classroom. That might be picking up some of the local lingo, getting confident in the swimming pool, visiting historical sites, making friendships with other children and even playing games like Uno with plenty of laughter and happiness with parents, who are often juggling work commitments, and don't always give their children every oodle of attention required. So then you might be surprised to learn I refuse to take my daughter out of school during term time. That's because ultimately, I don't think it sets a good example for life; that you can simply take time off when you want. It's also not great for teachers who are then responsible for your child to play catch-up. I do understand though the need for a holiday and not paying over the odds. But there is also an element where parents should take responsibility and plan. For example, we're heading to Centre Parcs this Friday for a long weekend. Have we had to remortgage? No. We saw there were two inset days in the school calendar more than a year ago, and booked at a very good price well in advance at a place where our children can try new experiences and activities. We also set a reminder for when flights to Barbados were available for the October 2025 half-term, booked a hotel on with free cancellation and managed to get the entire trip for the week, in a 4* hotel with interconnecting rooms for £4,000 for four of us a year in advance. That would be nearly double if booked now. Three ideas to fix school holidays It's clear something needs to change to help appease parents, keep headteachers calm and stop the truancy - and I fully understand not all families can afford a £4,000 holiday. Here's three potential options: 1. Give each child two sabbaticals during their primary school life, and two in secondary school. Parents must book it with at least three months' notice and take with them any learning materials from the teacher to keep children them on track. 2. Reduce the summer holidays by a week and let parents bolt it on to October, February or May half-term dates as they see fit. This will help smooth out demand and give parents the option to go away, cheaper, without the guilt and need to manipulate the system. 3. The Government starts a scheme where families are given a free return train ticket to use in any of the breaks from school to anywhere they choose in Britain once a year. This would help boost the UK economy with more people choosing to holiday at home, be greener and give our children more of a flavour of the beautiful spots that are on our doorstep, but have been overlooked for somewhere more exotic because of price. How would you solve the problem of children being taken out of school during term time? Get in touch: editor@
Leader Live
25 minutes ago
- Leader Live
David Lammy heads to US for crisis talks over Israel-Iran conflict
Mr Lammy and US secretary of state Mr Rubio will discuss the situation in the Middle East on Thursday evening. Iran and Israel continued striking each other's territory overnight as the crisis deepened. We currently advise against all travel to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. If you are a British national in Israel or the OPTs, you should register your presence to receive updates ⤵️ — Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (@FCDOGovUK) June 16, 2025 A hospital in southern Israel was hit by a missile, while a heavy water facility in Iran was targeted in the latest blow against Tehran's nuclear programme. Mr Lammy's meeting in Washington comes amid speculation US involvement could require the use of the UK-controlled Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. But UK Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, something which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. .@POTUS on dismantling Iran's Fordow nuclear facility: "We're the only ones that have the capability to do it, but that doesn't mean I'm going to do it — at all." — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 18, 2025 Energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh told Times Radio: 'Legal advice is for the Prime Minister, and I think that's where it will stay and you can understand why I won't comment on that. 'But what I will say is that we have a Prime Minister who is a lawyer and a human rights lawyer, he will obviously do everything that is in accord with international law.' She said Sir Keir Starmer was acting as a 'cool, calm head, to urge all partners around the negotiating table and to find a diplomatic route out of this'. But shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'I don't think we can hide behind legal advice at a time of crisis and national security when we have to work alongside our biggest ally in the world, the United States, when they look to us for potentially… setting out operational activities through our own military bases.' She said the Conservative Party would support British involvement in military action against Iran if it was deemed necessary. Iran long has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% and far in excess of the levels required for power stations. Dame Priti told Good Morning Britain: 'While we want peace in the region, we're crystal clear that Iran should not be able to obtain nuclear weapons. 'And if the Government judges that such action is necessary to avoid that then we would absolutely support the Government if it deemed it necessary to ensure that we can defend our country, our citizens and effectively a lot of our strategic equities in the Middle East region.' She also told the programme that the Government needs to 'step up' support for Britons stranded in Israel after the airspace was closed. 'I think the current Government's response is not sufficient and if families of embassy staff and personnel are being evacuated then I think the same facilities must be extended to our citizens,' she said. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of embassy staff from Israel based on a specific assessment of the risks they face, but has not advised British nationals. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. The UK Government has pointed out that land borders with Jordan and Egypt remain open, and consular teams are in position to provide assistance to British nationals who choose to leave Israel by land. Middle East minister Hamish Falconer said: 'Our first job is to keep British nationals safe, and our dedicated teams in the region are working around the clock to do this. 'We are asking all British nationals in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories to register their presence so that we can share our updates with them and make sure we're giving them the best advice possible.'
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Durham Reform UK councillors reviewing net zero commitments
Durham's Reform UK councillors are reviewing current council net zero policies before making any decisions about their election campaigning, the party told voters it would scrap net zero and energy levies to save households hundreds of pounds per opposition councillor asked the new administration at a recent meeting whether it would continue the previously agreed council ambition to reduce its carbon Karen Allison said efficiencies and savings had been identified and it was also requesting the council "consider the creation of mining production, transportation, and disposal at end of life of renewable technologies". Mark Wilkes, former climate change cabinet member and Liberal Democrat councillor, praised the work of the local authority's low carbon said: "Can cabinet confirm that it is committed to continuing the amazing work of the low carbon team in cutting emissions and improving the environment across County Durham and saving millions of pounds for this council, and indeed doing so much more?"Allison, portfolio holder for neighbourhoods and environment, explained the new administration wished to make an informed decision so it had "an accurate picture" of how successful the work had been."We are currently reviewing the claims of carbon reduction within County Durham, while requesting council consider the creation of mining production, transportation, and disposal at end of life of renewable technologies," she said the party was hoping to announce a decision soon, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS)."We take the environment seriously and are already discussing projects that include forestation, protecting wildlife, and biodiversity, and also how renewable energy technology may impact our local environment, which often gets overlooked," she zero means no longer adding to the total amount of greenhouse gases in the year, the council - which was ran by a coalition - won an environmental award after cutting its annual carbon footprint by 50,000 tonnes over 15 years. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
