
Special HC bench to hear afresh plea against Maratha reservation from July 18
The interim order passed last year, whereby applications for admissions to educational institutions or jobs at government authorities taking benefit of the impugned Act will be subject to further orders in the present proceedings shall continue.
Mumbai, Jun 11 (PTI) The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said it would hear afresh the pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the law providing Maratha reservation from July 18.
The 2024 law, which provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community that constitutes nearly one-third of Maharashtra's population, had been at the forefront of political discourse last year during the Lok Sabha and assembly elections.
Last year, a full bench headed by former high court Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya had commenced hearing into a bunch of petitions challenging the law on the ground that the Maratha community was not a backward one that requires benefits of reservation.
The pleas also claimed that Maharashtra has already crossed the 50 per cent cap on reservation.
However, the hearing came to a standstill after CJ Upadhyaya was transferred to Delhi High Court in January this year.
On May 14, the Supreme Court directed the Bombay High Court to constitute a special bench and urgently hear the matter.
In March last year, when the petitions against the reservation were filed, the HC in an interim order said that applications for NEET 2024 admission to undergraduate medical courses, wherein a 10 per cent reservation granted to members of the Maratha community is applicable, will be subject to further orders in the pleas challenging the law.
On April 16, 2024, the full bench also clarified that till further orders, any applications for admissions to educational institutions or jobs at government authorities taking benefit of the impugned Act will be subject to further orders in the present proceedings.
The SEBC Act was passed on February 20 last year.
It was formulated by the then chief minister Eknath Shinde-led government based on a report of the retired Justice Sunil Shukre-led Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) that found 'exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations exist' to grant reservation to Maratha community in excess of 50 per cent total reservation in the state.
Thereafter, petitions also challenged Shukre's appointment as MSBCC chairperson.
In December 2018, a batch of petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the earlier SEBC Act of 2018 that granted Marathas 16 per cent reservation in government jobs and education.
In June 2018, the HC upheld the 2018 Act but reduced the quota to 12 per cent in education and 13 per cent in government jobs.
This was challenged in the apex court, which in May 2021 struck down the entire Act.
A review petition filed by the Maharashtra government was also rejected by the Supreme Court in May 2023. PTI SP NP
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka: Regional Commissioner disqualifies Hassan Mayor as councillor
The Regional Commissioner of Mysuru division has issued an order disqualifying Chandre Gowda, Hassan Mayor, as councillor over allegations of violating the Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act. Ramesh D.S., the Regional Commissioner, issued the order on Thursday, August 14, disqualifying Mr. Gowda as the councillor. Mr. Gowda was elected to the Hassan City Municipal Council on a JD(S) ticket. He was elected as president of the council in August 2024. His party had instructed him to vacate the post after six months to give the opportunity to another member of the party. As he refused to obey the direction, the JD(S) members moved a no-confidence motion against Mr. Gowda. He retained the post with the support of Congress and BJP members on April 29 this year. He had thanked Preetham Gowda, former BJP MLA, and Shreyas M. Patil, Congress MP, on the occasion. JD(S) party's senior leader and former minister H.D. Revanna had stated that the party would fight for Mr. Gowda's disqualification as he did not obey the the party's whip during the no-confidence motion. Mr. Revanna also claimed that the Congress and the BJP had an alliance in Hassan, while the BJP had alliance with the JD(S) outside.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Plea to implement Right to Public Services Act disposed of
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a public interest litigation petition that sought a direction to the State to implement the Right to Public Services Act in Tamil Nadu to ensure efficient and time bound delivery of public services. The court was hearing the petition filed in 2021 by K. Gurunathan. The petitioner had sought a direction to the State government to implement the Right to Public Services Act in Tamil Nadu to reduce corruption, increase transparency and public accountability. The petitioner submitted that the Right to Public Services Act had been passed in Rajasthan, Kerala and Gujarat. However, no such Act has been passed in Tamil Nadu. The State submitted that as per a G.O. issued in 2025 by the Human Resources Management Department, the grievance petitions submitted by the people will be disposed of in 30 days. In the event of submitting any petition, it will be considered and decided by the authorities concerned within the time limit as prescribed in the G.O., it was submitted. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and G. Arul Murugan took into account the submission made by the State. The court disposed of the petition.


Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Registrar of Societies can't act as postman to forward enquiry report as received: Karnataka HC
Justice Suraj Govindaraj said that in terms of clause (3) in section 25(2)(C)(iii) of the Karnataka Societies Registration (KSR) Act, the registrar of societies has to apply his mind, accept the report and then forward it to the society.