logo
France probes 2012 reporters' deaths in Syria as crime against humanity

France probes 2012 reporters' deaths in Syria as crime against humanity

Local France19-02-2025
Prominent US journalist Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik were killed by an explosion in the east of the war-torn country in what a US court later ruled was an 'unconscionable' attack that targeted journalists on the orders of the Syrian government.
The French judiciary had been treating the alleged attack as a potential war crime, but on December 17th widened the investigation to a possible crime against humanity, a charge for which French courts claim universal jurisdiction regardless of location or nationalities involved.
The anti-terror prosecutors' office told AFP that new evidence pointed to, 'the execution of a concerted plan against a group of civilians, including journalists, activists and defenders of human rights, as part of a wide-ranging or systematic attack'.
Colvin – a renowned war correspondent whose career was celebrated in a Golden Globe-nominated film A Private War – was killed in the Syrian army's shelling of the Baba Amr Media Center in Homs on February 22nd, 2012.
The federal court in the US capital, which in 2019 ordered Syria to pay $302.5million over her death, said in its verdict that Syrian military and intelligence had tracked the broadcasts of Colvin and other journalists covering the siege of Homs to the media centre.
They then targeted it in an artillery barrage that killed Colvin and Ochlik.
French investigators also believe that both were 'deliberately targeted'.
In addition, they told AFP, they extended the probe to cover suspected Syrian government 'persecution' of civilians, including Colvin and Ochlik, as well as British photographer Paul Conroy and French reporter Edith Bouvier – who were wounded in the attack – and Syrian translator Wael Omar, as well as 'other inhumane acts' committed against Bouvier.
One of Bouvier's lawyers, Matthieu Bagard, said the new probe, 'opens the door to treat a certain number of procedures against journalists in armed conflict zones as crimes against humanity'.
His lawyer colleague, Marie Dose, called the shift in the investigation, 'a great step forwards for war reporters'.
And Scott Gilmore, lawyer for the journalist's sister Cathleen Colvin, told AFP: 'The Colvin family calls on the new Syrian government to cooperate with international investigators to hold the perpetrators of atrocities like the murder of Marie Colvin accountable.'
Clemence Bectarte, a lawyer for Ochlik's family, said she now expected judges to issue arrest warrants, 'for the high-ranking political and military officials whose involvement has been established'.
In March 2012, France opened a probe for murder into the death of Ochlik and for attempted murder over the injury of Bouvier, both French nationals.
The probe was widened into potential war crimes in October 2014, and in 2016 non-French plaintiffs joined the legal action.
'This wasn't a case of us being in the wrong place at the wrong time,' said Bouvier in 2013. 'We were deliberately targeted.'
In 2016, then-Syrian president Bashar al-Assad claimed that Colvin was 'responsible' for her own death.
'It's a war and she came illegally to Syria,' he said, accusing the reporter of working 'with the terrorists'.
The battle of Homs, Syria's third city, was part of a civil war triggered by the repression of a 2011 revolt against Assad's government.
Colvin, who was 56 and working for The Sunday Times when she died, was known for her fearless reporting and signature black eye patch which she wore after losing sight in one eye in an explosion during Sri Lanka's civil war.
Assad was ousted in December after rebels led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) Islamist group seized control of Damascus, ending more than 50 years of his family's rule.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky and Trump express hope for talks with Putin on ending Russia-Ukraine war
Zelensky and Trump express hope for talks with Putin on ending Russia-Ukraine war

LeMonde

time2 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Zelensky and Trump express hope for talks with Putin on ending Russia-Ukraine war

President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Donald Trump expressed hope that critical talks between Ukrainian and European leaders at the White House on Monday, August 18, could lead to trilateral talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring an end to Russia's war on Ukraine. "If everything works out today, we'll have a trilat," Trump said, referring to possible three-way talks among Zelensky, Putin and Trump. "We're going to work with Russia, we're going to work with Ukraine." Zelensky also expressed openness to trilateral talks. "We are ready for trilateral," Zelensky said at the start of his meeting with Trump. "I think this is very good." Trump also said he plans to talk to Putin after his meetings with Zelensky and European leaders. After one-on-one talks, Trump and Zelensky are scheduled to gather with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Trump said that he and Zelensky would be discussing potential security guarantees for Ukraine with the European leaders. "They want to give protection," Trump said of European allies. "They feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with it. I think it's very important." Monday's hastily assembled meeting comes after Trump met with Putin on Friday and has said that the onus is now on Zelensky to agree to concessions that he said could end the war. The European leaders were left out of that summit, and they want to safeguard Ukraine and the continent from any widening aggression from Moscow. Many arrived at the White House with the explicit goal of protecting Ukraine's interests in a rare show of diplomatic force. By coming as a group, they hope to avoid debacles like Zelensky's February meeting in the Oval Office, where Trump chastised the Ukrainian leader for not showing enough gratitude for US military aid. On the table for discussion are possible NATO-like security guarantees that Ukraine would need for any peace with Russia to be durable. Putin opposes Ukraine joining NATO outright, yet Trump's team claims the Russian leader is open to allies agreeing to defend Ukraine if it comes under attack.

Trump says 'big day' ahead as Zelenskyy arrives for Washington meeting
Trump says 'big day' ahead as Zelenskyy arrives for Washington meeting

Euronews

time7 hours ago

  • Euronews

Trump says 'big day' ahead as Zelenskyy arrives for Washington meeting

US President Donald Trump hailed what he said was a "big day" Monday as his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies all arrived in the US capital for a major meeting on ending Russia's war in Ukraine. The Washington talks follow a summit Trump held with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska last Friday. After the meeting between the two heads of state, Trump revealed that negotiations over a possible ceasefire have been pushed aside with a view to finding a quick peace deal, as Moscow's all-out war continues well into its fourth year. However, this has led to concerns over possible concessions made to the Russian side, which is believed to have reiterated its maximalist demands, including asking for full control over four Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson -- and retaining the illegally annexed Crimea, mobilising Kyiv's European supporters gathered around the "Coalition of the Willing". The list of those expected to be in the room on Monday includes German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte will also be in attendance. Follow our live blog below as Euronews' journalists from around Europe bring you the latest updates on the talks in the US capital:

These are the most common myths around the EU's new EES system
These are the most common myths around the EU's new EES system

Euronews

time9 hours ago

  • Euronews

These are the most common myths around the EU's new EES system

As the October launch of the six-month rollout of the EU's entry-exit system (EES) approaches, a number of myths and misconceptions about what it really means for travellers have surfaced. While some claim that non-EU travellers will need to prove their travel insurance, others believe that the EES is being implemented as punishment for Brexit. But how much of the speculation is trueand which claims are myths? We took a look at some of the most common misconceptions. Myth: British travellers will need to prove their medical insurance Recently, Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform UK party, claimed that UK travellers would need to prove that they have travel insurance. Many UK travellers currently rely on the Global Health Insurance Card (GHIC), which is provided by the NHS for free. Though it doesn't replace travel insurance, it allows access to medically necessary treatment in EU countries and Switzerland at either the same cost as residents or for free. The suggestion that travel insurance could become mandatory when the EES is introduced has sparked concerns, especially among older travellers and those with pre-existing conditions, as policies for these groups can be prohibitively expensive. The European Commission has since confirmed to UK newspaper The Independent that no proof of travel insurance would be required. The EES does not change entry requirements for British travellers to the EU and wider Schengen area, but they will still have to adhere to post-Brexit rules. These include justifying the purpose of their travel, showing that they have enough funds for the duration of their trip and proof of booked accommodation. They may also need to show evidence of a round-trip ticket back to the UK or of onward travel to a country where they are certain to be allowed entry. Myth: British travellers will need to apply for a new visa when the EES system is implemented Non-EU travellers, who are from visa-exempt countries like the UK, still won't need to apply for a visa for short stays when the EES system is introduced. Short stays are classified as up to 90 days within a 180-day period. This is because the EES will only register entry and exit data electronically at EU borders, for non-EU citizens travelling to the Schengen Area. It is designed to digitally register entry and exit data to identify people who overstay their visa, improve border security and replace the manual passport stamping process. It doesn't change visa policies or mean one will be required where it was not previously needed. It is easy to confuse with the European Travel Information and Authorisation System or ETIAS, which will be introduced from late 2026 onwards. This will be required for visa-exempt travellers entering the Schengen Area, including British nationals, but it isn't a visa. It is a visa waiver system similar to the US ESTA, and the online system is intended to be a quick, online pre-travel authorisation process. Myth: The EES is retribution for Brexit Some British travellers have expressed concerns that the new EES system is being implemented mainly as retribution towards the UK for Brexit. However, the EES is an EU-wide effort to streamline and automate border control for all non-EU visitors, not just UK citizens. This is mainly to ensure that the current Schengen travel rules, such as the 90-day short stay limit, are being followed properly. In fact, the EES was being planned well before Brexit took place, with the UK also taking part in this planning while still a member of the EU. The UK also introduced its own border control system, the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA), from April 2025. This is a digital travel permission, linked to your passport, not a visa or guarantee of entry. Visitors of countries who don't currently require a visa for short-stays, including transit and tourism, need an ETA, as well as citizens of countries which require an ETA before travelling. Depending on their nationality, travellers transiting through the UK will also usually need an ETA, especially if they are passing through border control. With an ETA, travellers can make multiple trips to the UK for up to six months within a two-year period, or until their passports expire, whichever happens first. It requires travellers from visa-exempt countries, including EU citizens, to apply for pre-travel approval before entering the UK. Myth: The EES applies to everyone, EU citizens included The EES system will only apply to non-EU citizens, both from visa-exempt countries, as well as from third-party countries, who are travelling for short stays to or from the Schengen Area. EU citizens, as well as those with long-term visas and residence permits from a country in the Schengen Area, will not be affected by the EES system, according to the European Union. Non-EU nationals who are travelling to Europe for studies, research, training, pupil exchange schemes, voluntary service, au-pairing or educational projects will not be impacted by the EES as well. Similarly, people who have obtained certain border check privileges, as well as people exempt from border checks, such as cross-border workers and heads of state, will not have to go through the EES system, among other exempt categories. Myth: The EES will mean extra border fees The EES itself does not require any additional fees to be paid at the border. When the ETIAS is introduced from 2026 onwards, travellers from non-EU countries will have to pay a fee of around €20 per person for travel authorisation. This approval will stay valid for 3 years, or until your passport expires. Travellers under the age of 18 and over the age of 70 are exempt from this payment, as are family members of EU citizens or of non-EU nationals who have the right to move freely throughout the EU. The ETIAS fee was recently raised from €7 to €20 and is still under review, due to concerns that it may disproportionately increase costs for travellers, especially families. Myth: Border crossings will become more complicated with the EES Some travellers and experts have expressed concerns that the EES system may make border crossings at busy European airports even longer and more chaotic than they are now. While some initial delays may be experienced as travellers and border staff get used to the new system, in the long run, the EES is intended to make border control much smoother and more efficient. This will mainly be achieved by replacing manual passport stamps, as well as automating biometric systems like facial recognition and fingerprint collections. The EU is exploring the implementation of pre-registration systems and self-service kiosks at some borders to help speed up the processing of travellers and reduce waiting times. Myth: The EES will record and store all personal information As instances of data privacy and security breaches grow, there have also been concerns about the EES potentially storing all personal information about travellers from non-EU countries. The EES system will only record travel and biometric-specific information about visitors, such as facial scans, fingerprints, entry/exit dates and passport details. It will not track other personal information and details, such as activities and daily movements within the EU. The data it collects will be governed by strict EU data protection regulations with clear limits on access, how long it can be held for and its use. Its purpose is to ensure that travellers are meeting the 90-day rule for short stays and are not overstaying within the Schengen Area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store