
Can Supplements Actually Boost Your Immune System?
And if you've ever felt tempted to try them, you're far from alone: Recent research suggests that millions of Americans have used dietary supplements for those supposed benefits.
The new study was published last week in JAMA Network Open and included more than 15,000 participants. It found that about one in nine U.S. residents used supplements to enhance their immune systems between January 2017 and March 2020.
'It comes up all the time,' said Dr. Michael Ben-Aderet, the associate medical director of hospital epidemiology at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles who wasn't involved with the study. 'There's really this sense of people trying to optimize their health.'
Many people also used the supplements without a doctor's recommendation, the researchers found. But infectious disease doctors, researchers, and supplement experts say there isn't much evidence that these products actually help.
What does the science say?
Supplements claiming to support immunity often contain vitamins and minerals necessary for the immune system. So it isn't unreasonable to believe that these products could help you sidestep common viral infections or lessen symptoms once you've become sick.
In fact, some nutrients such as vitamins A, C, D and zinc are needed to protect against germs, and deficiencies in them raise your risk of becoming sick, said Dr. Mahtab Jafari, a professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of California, Irvine.
However, most people in the United States get the vitamins and minerals they need through a balanced diet, said Dr. Ben-Aderet. For those people, there isn't compelling evidence that supplements are useful, he added.
There are thousands of supplements claiming to help the immune system. Some contain just one vitamin or mineral, and others are packed with a hodgepodge of ingredients. Vitamin D, vitamin C and zinc are among the most studied and prevalent ingredients, experts said, and the benefits still aren't conclusive.
Research suggesting that vitamin D supplements treat viral infections like the common cold or reduce the risk of them is inconsistent. A 2020 review found that the supplements didn't protect against viruses in people with normal or high levels of vitamin D. A 2021 review involving nearly 50,000 participants, however, found that vitamin D supplements slightly reduced the risk of acute respiratory infections. (But the review involved authors who have received funding from supplement companies.)
The evidence is similarly unconvincing for vitamin C and zinc. A 2013 review from the Cochrane Library involving more than 11,000 participants found that vitamin C supplements failed to reduce the risk of catching a cold in the general population, though it sometimes shortened how long the illness lasted. And a 2024 Cochrane review involving more than 8,000 participants found that zinc supplements did next to nothing to prevent the common cold, though it may have reduced duration.
Plants like elderberry and echinacea are also used in immune system supplements. But unlike vitamins and minerals, botanicals aren't essential for immune health, and there's even less reliable research on whether they help prevent or treat common viruses, said Dr. Jen Wall Forrester, senior medical director of infection prevention at UC Health in Cincinnati.
'I wish there was a magic bullet,' she said, but immunity is complex, and supplements are unlikely to single-handedly change how it works.
Why don't we know if they help?
It's hard to firmly state the benefits of immune system supplements because there are few high-quality randomized clinical trials, the gold standard of medical research, assessing their effectiveness, said Dr. Pieter Cohen, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School who studies dietary supplement safety.
And dietary supplements aren't approved by the Food and Drug Administration before hitting the market. This means companies can sell products containing ingredients that haven't been rigorously tested to offer benefits, Dr. Cohen said, and they generally don't have to prove to the F.D.A. that their products contain what they claim.
A 2022 study analyzing 30 supplements marketed to support the immune system found that more than half had inaccurate labels, 13 were misbranded and nine contained ingredients not listed on the label.
What's the bottom line?
'You need to have a really healthy dose of skepticism when you're pulling something off the shelf,' Dr. Ben-Aderet said.
But if you want to give supplements a try, check for high-quality third-party seals of approval from organizations such as U.S. Pharmacopeia or NSF, which test the quality of dietary supplements, Dr. Jafari said. Also scan the F.D.A.'s website to see if the agency has ever issued a warning letter to the supplement company for misleading claims or poor manufacturing, she added.
And talk to a health care provider before taking supplements. They can test your blood for deficiencies, inform you of side effects and unsafe dosages, and let you know whether some supplements could dangerously interact with medications you take, Dr. Wall Forrester said.
If your doctor says the supplement you want to try is generally safe, you 'could just try it out,' Dr. Wall Forrester said, 'but you might be wasting your money.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
4 minutes ago
- New York Post
Lots of Americans think they have this allergy — but only 1% really do
You've been itching to avoid this antibiotic — maybe for no reason. Penicillin was discovered in 1928 by a Scottish bacteriologist. The medication has since become a common treatment for a range of bacterial infections, including strep throat, pneumonia, skin infections and certain urinary tract infections. But not everyone can tolerate penicillin. People allergic to the drug may suffer hives, itchy skin, a rash or, in severe cases, a potentially life-threatening reaction known as anaphylaxis upon exposure. Advertisement 4 A penicillin allergy can lead to a rash or hives if exposed to the drug. Image'in – These patients may struggle to breathe, feel dizzy or experience facial swelling. The good news is that penicillin allergies are far less common than once believed. Advertisement Studies have shown that over 90% of people who report a penicillin allergy aren't actually allergic when tested. Less than 1% of Americans are truly allergic. 'Incorrectly being labeled as allergic to penicillin can prevent you from getting the most appropriate, safest treatment for an infection,' Dr. Elizabeth W. Covington, an associate clinical professor of pharmacy at Auburn University, recently wrote in The Conversation. 4 Penicillin is used to treat strep throat, pneumonia, skin infections and certain urinary tract infections. luchschenF – 'It can also put you at an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, which is when an antibiotic no longer works against bacteria,' she added. Advertisement Those reporting penicillin allergies are often treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, which target lots of different types of bacteria. Covington noted that this puts helpful bacteria in the cross-hairs, potentially paving the way for the survival and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. 'Broad-spectrum antibiotics … aren't always the best fit and can have more side effects' than penicillin, she said. 'What's more, your medical bills could end up higher due to using more expensive drugs.' Advertisement People tend to get mislabeled as allergic to penicillin if they have a rash, nausea, diarrhea or headaches after taking an antibiotic as a child, Covington reported. But those reactions can be common side effects of antibiotics or triggered by the illness itself. 4 In severe cases, a person with a penicillin allergy may suffer throat swelling. SKT Studio – 'People also often assume penicillin allergies run in families, but having a relative with an allergy doesn't mean you're allergic — it's not hereditary,' Covington said in The Conversation. 'Finally, about 80% of patients with a true penicillin allergy will lose the allergy after about 10 years,' she continued. 'That means even if you used to be allergic to this antibiotic, you might not be anymore, depending on the timing of your reaction.' How to tell if you're allergic to penicillin Talk with a doctor or pharmacist about any symptoms you have after taking antibiotics. Be sure to note when the reaction began, whether treatment was needed and what happened with subsequent attempts at taking similar drugs. Advertisement 'In many cases, this interview is enough to determine you aren't allergic,' Covington said. 'But sometimes, further testing may be recommended.' 4 An immunologist performs a skin prick allergy test on a woman's arm. Microgen – Penicillin skin testing typically involves putting a small amount of penicillin solution on the forearm and pricking or scratching the skin to let the solution enter. Then you're observed to see if you develop redness or raised bumps. Advertisement If the skin test is negative, an immunologist may administer a small oral dose of the drug and monitor you for signs of a reaction. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center said the skin and oral testing typically takes 90 minutes to two hours. The NYC-based cancer hospital suggests wearing a short-sleeved shirt for the test, which allows for easy access to your arm, and eating a meal or snack beforehand to prevent cramping, gas and bloating.


Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States With Highest Rates of Organ Donor Registrations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The percentage of Americans who register as organ donors at state motor vehicle agencies fluctuates widely across the country, data obtained by Newsweek reveals. Colorado recorded the highest organ donor designation rate nationwide in 2023 — with 66.2 percent of residents affirming their choice when given the opportunity to register their decision at state DMVs, followed by South Dakota and Iowa. The lowest rates were reported in California, Georgia and Mississippi, according to the most recent available data from Donate Life America, a nonprofit that manages the National Donate Life Registry. Due to variability in registry data-cleaning practices regarding removal of deceased individuals from databases, the percentage of residents registered in each state can be misleading. DLA officials instead consider the donor designation rate as a "more accurate" metric, spokeswoman Hilary Kleine told Newsweek. "This measures the percentage of people that say yes when presented with the registration opportunity at their state DMV in a given year," Kleine said. The national donor designation rate in 2023 based on state reported data was 47.4 percent, Kleine said, adding that the Virginia-based national nonprofit is currently finalizing 2024 state data. Read more Thousands more remove themselves from organ donor registries Thousands more remove themselves from organ donor registries Some state agencies did not provide complete donor designation rate data for 2023, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona and Arkansas. Indiana and the District of Columbia, meanwhile, reported rates of 67.6 percent and 51.6 percent, respectively, in 2022, DLA internal figures show. Donor designation rates from 19 states were not supplied by relevant local agencies in 2023, including the Delaware Department of Transportation and the Michigan Department of State, DLA's data shows. Texas, for example, does not report its donor designation rate to Donate Life America, according to Chad Carroll, executive director of Donate Life Texas, which manages the state's official organ, eye and tissue donor registry. "We are currently refining our data collection process with our state Department of Motor Vehicles to more accurately report that number," Carroll told Newsweek in an email Thursday. Roughly 64 percent of Texans indicate "yes" when asked to register as an organ donor, including a current list of more than 15 million residents, Carroll said. That total number appears to be eclipsed only by California, where more than 19.7 million people are registered, according to Donate Life California's website. California has roughly 8 million more residents than Texas. The donor designation rate in California stood at 31.3 percent in 2023, but has dipped to 27.75 percent during the first half of this year, Donate Life California officials told Newsweek Thursday. From California to Texas to Colorado, thousands of people have removed themselves from donor registries following federal scrutiny and in-depth reporting by the New York Times on problems within the nation's organ transplant system. Medical staff at a hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, pause for a moment of silence prior to organ procurement surgery on June 15, 2023. Medical staff at a hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, pause for a moment of silence prior to organ procurement surgery on June 15, 2023. AP Photo/Mark Humphrey The Department of Health and Human Services vowed to overhaul organ procurement and transplant policy late last month following an investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration that revealed disturbing practices, including instances of where patients "showed signs of life," HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. "The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable," Kennedy said on July 21. "The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves." More than 103,000 men, women and children are currently on the national transplant waiting list and roughly 13 people die every day as they await operations, according to the Heath Resources and Services Administration's website. Roughly 90 percent of U.S. adults support organ donation, but just 60 percent are registered as donors, a 2019 federal survey found. The overwhelming majority of patients on the nation's waiting list as of September need kidneys, followed by those awaiting a healthy liver or heart.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI-powered brain implant restores speech in paralysis patient after 18 years
Eighteen years after a brainstem stroke left her with near-total paralysis, Ann Johnson heard her voice again, thanks to a brain-computer interface (BCI) that decodes speech directly from brain activity. Johnson, then 30, was a high school teacher and coach in Saskatchewan, Canada, when the 2005 stroke caused locked-in syndrome, a rare condition in which a person remains conscious but unable to speak or move. Since then, she has communicated using an eye-tracking system at just 14 words per minute, a far from natural conversational speed of about 160 words per minute. In 2022, she became the third participant in a clinical trial led by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and UC San Francisco aimed at restoring speech for people with severe paralysis. The team used a neuroprosthesis that records signals from the speech motor cortex, bypassing damaged neural pathways to produce audible words. Turning thought into voice The device relies on an implant placed over the brain's speech production area. When Johnson attempts to speak, the implant detects neural activity and sends the signals to a connected computer. An AI decoder then translates these signals into text, speech, or facial animation on a digital avatar. Originally, the system used sequence-to-sequence AI models that required an entire sentence before producing output, creating an eight-second delay. In March 2025, the team reported in Nature Neuroscience that they had switched to a streaming architecture, allowing near-real-time translation with just a one-second delay. To personalize the experience, researchers recreated Johnson's voice from a recording of her 2004 wedding speech. She also selected an avatar to match her appearance, which can mimic facial expressions such as smiling or frowning. Engineering for everyday use Lead researchers Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Gopala Anumanchipalli (UC Berkeley), neurosurgeon Edward Chang (UCSF), and Berkeley Ph.D. student Kaylo Littlejohn say the goal is to make neuroprostheses 'plug-and-play,' turning them from experimental systems into standard clinical tools. Future improvements could include wireless implants, eliminating the need for direct computer connections, and photorealistic avatars for more natural interactions. The team envisions digital 'clones' that replicate not just a user's voice but also their conversational style and visual cues. The breakthrough could help a relatively small but highly vulnerable population, including people who lose the ability to speak due to stroke, ALS, or injury, reclaim faster, more natural communication. Researchers emphasize that the system only works when the participant intentionally tries to speak, preserving user agency and privacy. For Johnson, the trial was life-changing. 'I want patients to see me and to know their lives are not over now,' she said in a statement to UCSF. She hopes to one day work as a counselor in a rehabilitation center, using a neuroprosthesis to talk with clients. With latency down to about a second and ongoing advances in AI modeling, the researchers believe practical, real-time speech restoration could arrive within just a few years, reshaping how technology gives voice to those who have lost their own. Solve the daily Crossword