US regulators move forward on controversial policy change that could pose risks to human health: 'By then it'll be too late'
As The New Lede reported in early May, the EPA announced the proposed registration of cyclobutrifluram, a chemical designed to control pests and diseases in crops such as soybeans, lettuce, cotton, and ornamental plants, per an April EPA news release.
Developed by Syngenta, the chemical is being marketed as the active ingredient in the agritech company's new product Tymirium, which is intended to protect plants from parasitic nematodes and fungal diseases.
"It will give farmers the freedom to maximize their yields without having to compromise on sustainability," Jon Parr, then-president of global crop protection at Syngenta, said in a 2020 statement.
However, environmental groups have urged the EPA to reject the registration of cyclobutrifluram, citing concerns about potential long-term health and ecological impacts since the chemical falls into the PFAS category. This group of chemicals is known to accumulate in human bodies and the environment for decades, possibly centuries.
While the EPA says it didn't find any risks to human health or threats to animals when the chemical was used in line with directions, the agency opened a portal for public comments and will consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service before making a final decision.
The New Lede reported that opponents of the chemical are concerned its registration will be approved anyway.
"We're quickly returning to the age of the 1960s and 1970s, when really persistent pesticides, like DDT, were in wide use," Nathan Donley, the Center for Biological Diversity's environmental health science director, told the outlet. "The legacy of impacts of what the EPA's currently approving won't be known for decades. By then it'll be too late."
PFAS have been called "forever chemicals" because natural processes do not easily break them down. They can persist in the environment long after contamination and in human bodies long after exposure.
The chemicals have been linked to a slew of health problems, including increased cholesterol, reproductive issues, an increased risk of cancers, and developmental delays. In ecosystems, they can pose similar risks to wildlife and can harm habitats by contaminating air, water, soil, and food sources.
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
While the EPA designated two widely used PFAS — PFOA and PFOS — as hazardous substances in 2024 and banned 12 PFAS chemicals from nonfood pesticide products in 2022, the agency appears to support approval of this new PFAS-containing pesticide ingredient, according to an April memorandum.
Given that PFAS compounds have been detected on around 4,000 farms across the U.S., and many fertilizers used to grow our food contain these chemicals, approving a pesticide that includes them could further contaminate food supplies.
Environmental groups such as Toxic Free North Carolina and the Environmental Protection Network submitted petitions to the EPA expressing opposition to the registration of cyclobutrifluram.
In its public comment, science, regulatory, and advocacy manager Sara Grantham wrote on behalf of the organization Beyond Pesticides, "PFAS should be banned from all products, and no new chemicals should be approved for use that fall into this class."
While the period for public comment appears to have closed, residents may still consider sharing their opinions on the matter with elected officials and voicing support for pro-environment policies that protect human health and fragile habitats.
In the meantime, lawmakers in Maryland are considering a sweeping ban on over 1,000 pesticides that contain forever chemicals, and environmental groups in the United Kingdom are urging the government to ban PFAS-containing pesticides after a study found the substances on numerous fruits and vegetables.
Those who wish to mitigate their exposure to PFAS and pesticides now might consider buying organic produce or even growing their own fruits and vegetables, which may come with the added benefits of higher nutrient levels and lower grocery costs. Avoiding certain consumer goods, such as nonstick cookware, can also help reduce household PFAS exposures.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Which states' air quality are most impacted by Canadian wildfires? See map.
As wildfires spread across Canada, air quality in the U.S. continues to be impacted, and people sensitive to air pollution could face "serious health effects," according to a government website that tracks air quality in the United States. There are 59 uncontrolled wildfires and 108 controlled wildfires across Canada as of Wednesday, July 30, the country's National Wildland Fire Situation Report said on its website. To date this year, there have been 3,582 fires. Fires have burned nearly 1.5 million acres since the start of 2025, according to the country's report. The smoke floating over the border shared between America and Canada is now impacting air quality in states as far south as Texas, AirNow's data shows. The EPA has declared the air quality in states near the Canadian border as "unhealthy or "unhealthy for sensitive groups." See maps and impacted states. See map of Canadian wildfires See map of US wildfires and smoke Which states are most affected by the Canadian fires? As of 9 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 5, areas in the following states are "Unhealthy for sensitive groups," according to AirNow: Montana Wisconsin Michigan Indiana Ohio New York Pennsylvania New Jersey Connecticut Massachusetts Vermont New Hampshire Maine People with pre-existing medical conditions, like asthma, will be more sensitive to conditions that are deemed "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups." "Members of sensitive groups may experience health effects," according to AirNow. 'Unhealthy' air quality States' air quality is measured by the EPA's U.S. Air Quality Index, according to AirNow's website. Values with an index of 151 to 200 are deemed unhealthy for all. As of 9 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 5, areas in the following states have been deemed unhealthy, according to AirNow's air quality map: Wisconsin Michigan Vermont "Some members of the general public may experience health effects," AirNow states on its website. However, "members of sensitive groups may experience more serious health effects." To learn if your area's air quality is affected by the wildfires, visit AirNow's interactive map. Side effects of inhaling wildfire smoke Wildfire smoke can irritate one's eyes, nose, and throat and cause the following symptoms: Coughing Chest tightness Shortness of breath Dizziness Fatigue Particulate matter (PM) is one of the main components of wildfire smoke, comprised of small particles of solids or liquids suspended in the air, USA TODAY previously reported. According to Yale Medicine, the particles can be 10 micrometers, PM 10, or as small as 2.5 micrometers, PM 2.5, and the smaller one poses a lot of health risks. PM 2.5 is so tiny that it can easily pass people's usual defense mechanisms and go deep into their lungs. Not only can it damage lung function, but it can also pass into the bloodstream and travel to other organs. The following is linked to exposure to the PM 2.5: Heart attack Stroke Lung cancer Decline in cognitive function Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Air quality map shows US states most impacted by Canadian wildfires
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Which states' air quality are most impacted by Canadian wildfires? See map.
As wildfires spread across Canada, air quality in the U.S. continues to be impacted, and people sensitive to air pollution could face "serious health effects," according to a government website that tracks air quality in the United States. There are 59 uncontrolled wildfires and 108 controlled wildfires across Canada as of Wednesday, July 30, the country's National Wildland Fire Situation Report said on its website. To date this year, there have been 3,582 fires. Fires have burned nearly 1.5 million acres since the start of 2025, according to the country's report. The smoke floating over the border shared between America and Canada is now impacting air quality in states as far south as Texas, AirNow's data shows. The EPA has declared the air quality in states near the Canadian border as "unhealthy or "unhealthy for sensitive groups." See maps and impacted states. See map of Canadian wildfires See map of US wildfires and smoke Which states are most affected by the Canadian fires? As of 9 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 5, areas in the following states are "Unhealthy for sensitive groups," according to AirNow: People with pre-existing medical conditions, like asthma, will be more sensitive to conditions that are deemed "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups." "Members of sensitive groups may experience health effects," according to AirNow. 'Unhealthy' air quality States' air quality is measured by the EPA's U.S. Air Quality Index, according to AirNow's website. Values with an index of 151 to 200 are deemed unhealthy for all. As of 9 a.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 5, areas in the following states have been deemed unhealthy, according to AirNow's air quality map: "Some members of the general public may experience health effects," AirNow states on its website. However, "members of sensitive groups may experience more serious health effects." To learn if your area's air quality is affected by the wildfires, visit AirNow's interactive map. Side effects of inhaling wildfire smoke Wildfire smoke can irritate one's eyes, nose, and throat and cause the following symptoms: Particulate matter (PM) is one of the main components of wildfire smoke, comprised of small particles of solids or liquids suspended in the air, USA TODAY previously reported. According to Yale Medicine, the particles can be 10 micrometers, PM 10, or as small as 2.5 micrometers, PM 2.5, and the smaller one poses a lot of health risks. PM 2.5 is so tiny that it can easily pass people's usual defense mechanisms and go deep into their lungs. Not only can it damage lung function, but it can also pass into the bloodstream and travel to other organs. The following is linked to exposure to the PM 2.5: Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
These Common Chemicals Could Be Harming Your Liver
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new review has found that exposure to particular chemicals can, when combined, enhance damage to the liver. The researchers of the July 2025 review, published in Toxicological Sciences, found that both alcohol and PFAS chemicals—a group of widely-used compounds—damage the liver in similar ways. This could be "causing fat buildup, inflammation, and oxidative stress," Vasilis Vasiliou, one of the authors of the review, and chair and professor of environmental health sciences at Yale School of Public Health, told Newsweek. While alcohol is a well-established cause of liver disease, PFAS chemicals may "act as a 'second hit,' especially in people who already drink alcohol or have other liver risk factors," he added. PFAS chemicals, also known as "forever chemicals" or Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Group 1 carcinogen—with studies since finding the chemicals can cause a wide range of effects on public health. These chemicals can be found across various industries and consumer products, from nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing and stain-resistant furniture, to food packaging and even smartwatch wristbands. They can also be found in drinking water sources across the country. According to the review's researchers, detectable levels of PFAS chemicals have been found in over 98 percent of the human population. Meanwhile, more than half of all Americans drink alcohol—with 17 percent binge drinking, meaning, for women, they have four or more drinks on one occasion, while for men, they have five or more drinks, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data. Per the CDC's data, 6 percent also drink heavily, meaning, for women, they have eight or more drinks in a week and for men, they have 15 or more drinks. According to the review's researchers, while global consumption of alcohol has been decreasing since 2010, in the U.S. there has been an increase in consumption, meaning it is now nearly double the global average. File photo: A gastroenterologist doctor explaining liver and gallbladder problems using an anatomical model to a patient during a clinic visit. File photo: A gastroenterologist doctor explaining liver and gallbladder problems using an anatomical model to a patient during a clinic visit. peakSTOCK/Getty Images What The Review Found When people are exposed to both alcohol and PFAS chemicals, these "effects can add up or even multiply, leading to more serious liver injury," Vasiliou said. He added that vulnerable populations, or those with limited health care access, are particularly at risk. "Our review suggests that PFAS exposure may worsen the damage already caused by alcohol, raising the risk of progression from fatty liver to more severe conditions like cirrhosis or liver cancer," he said. The review noted that around two million deaths a year are estimated to occur due to advanced liver disease, predominantly cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with alcohol consumption being a significant risk factor for these conditions. Alcohol contributed to nearly half of all cirrhosis deaths and over 150,000 new cases of liver cancer globally in 2016. "The findings are not unexpected," Dr. Suthat Liangpunsakul, a professor of medicine and of biochemistry and molecular biology at the Indiana University School of Medicine, told Newsweek. "Both alcohol and PFAS have independently been shown to affect the liver through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, lipid dysregulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction," Liangpunsakul said. "Given these overlapping pathways, the possibility that combined exposures may exacerbate liver injury is a reasonable hypothesis," he added. Liangpunsakul said the study therefore "brings together existing evidence in a way that highlights the need for further investigation." It adds to the "body of literature suggesting that multiple exposures, including lifestyle and environmental factors, can interact in complex ways to affect liver health," he said. However, "further research, particularly in human populations, will be important to better characterize these interactions and their potential clinical implications," he added. Vasiliou said that he and the other researchers in the laboratory are continuing to investigate the impact of PFAS chemicals on the liver in animal models and intend to expand research to human studies. In this photo illustration, water flows from a tap on July 06, 2023 in San Anselmo, California. In 2023, a study by the US Geological Survey found that nearly half of the tap water in... In this photo illustration, water flows from a tap on July 06, 2023 in San Anselmo, California. In 2023, a study by the US Geological Survey found that nearly half of the tap water in the United States was contaminated with "forever chemicals," considered dangerous to human health. More/Getty Images How PFAS Chemicals And Alcohol Could Harm The Liver PFAS chemicals may harm the liver by "disturbing fat metabolism, damaging mitochondria, increasing oxidative stress, and triggering inflammation," Vasiliou said, adding these were many of the same processes affected by alcohol. Liangpunsakul also said that PFAS chemicals "can accumulate in the liver" and cause the same problems mentioned by Vasiliou. Meanwhile, "alcohol has long-established and well-characterized hepatotoxic effects, particularly in the setting of chronic use," Liangpunsakul said. Therefore, the "real danger lies in their combined impact," Vasiliou said. "Together, they can accelerate liver damage in ways that neither might do alone." Liangpunsakul said that it is difficult to compare the "relative toxicity" of alcohol and PFAS, "as they operate under different exposure contexts and time courses." However, based on the review, he said that "PFAS may contribute additional stress to the liver, particularly in individuals with other risk factors such as alcohol use." While PFAS chemicals are in a wide range of everyday products, the most common way people are exposed to PFAS chemicals is through ingestion, Vasiliou said. "PFAS often enter our bodies through contaminated drinking water; food, especially fish [and] meat; fast-food packaging; and household products like nonstick cookware or stain-resistant fabrics," he said. Once ingested, PFAS chemicals can "circulate in the blood and accumulate in the liver, where they can persist for years due to their resistance to breakdown," he added. Those who are also occupationally exposed to the chemicals due to their work, such as firefighters or factory workers, may also "inhale PFAS or absorb them through the skin," he said. How Could The Research Shape The Treatment of Liver Disease? Liangpunsakul said the review highlights a growing area of scientific interest—"how environmental exposures might interact with more traditional risk factors like alcohol." He said that while "it is too early to say how this will influence clinical practice," the findings "may help guide future research into liver disease progression and its multifactorial drivers." "Improved understanding of co-exposures could eventually contribute to more refined risk assessment strategies," he added. The research also suggests that increasing awareness on individual PFAS exposure may become an important part of maintaining health. "For people with liver risk factors, such as alcohol abuse use or obesity, minimizing PFAS exposure could be especially important," Vasiliou said. However, "avoiding PFAS completely is difficult because they are so widespread, but people can take steps to reduce exposure," he added. He said individuals can use PFAS-free cookware and personal care products, filter drinking water with systems certified to remove PFAS, and check local advisories about contaminated water or fish. On a broader level, Vasiliou said that "stronger policies and better regulation are needed to reduce PFAS in our environment." Reference Arthur D Stem, Ricardo Scheufen Tieghi, Vaia Lida Chatzi, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Damaskini Valvi, David C Thompson, Vasilis Vasiliou, (2025). Synergistic Toxicity in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease and PFAS Exposure, Toxicological Sciences,
