
Why Europe's Far Right Will Keep Gaining Ground
And yet, the first 10 years of the far right's rise have amounted to a 'yes, but' decade. In Germany, the Alternative for Germany party has steadily expanded its regional and federal influence, but all other major parties still treat political collaboration with it as taboo. In France, the populist Marine Le Pen has shown she can reach the second round of presidential elections, but has been unable to claim victory. In Italy, Giorgia Meloni in 2022 became the first anti-immigrant populist to win a big European election, but her strong cooperation with Brussels and consistent support for Ukraine has helped her defy far-right stereotypes. In the U.K., Brexit champion Nigel Farage might now be polling in first place, but that's still some distance from winning the next general elections in 2029.
Centrist governments have also emerged this year after elections in Germany and Romania, despite a rise in support for the far right. Meanwhile, the Dutch government, led by the far-right Party for Freedom, collapsed in June, and the Austrian Freedom Party has failed to form a ruling coalition despite winning elections in September.
For now, E.U. institutions are holding up fine. Pro-E.U. parties continue to dominate politics in Brussels and the risk that Euroskeptics can create gridlock remains low. In the European Parliament, the centrist coalition that backed Ursula von der Leyen for a second term as European Commission President will hold together despite growing tensions. In the European Council, just four of 27 members (Hungary, Slovakia, Italy, and the Czech Republic) are led by nationalist governments. But Brussels has finally managed to limit the ability of far-right governments to shift E.U. policies, and Meloni and Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala cooperate closely with von der Leyen.
All that said, the next few years will offer big opportunities from Europe's anti-migrant, Euroskeptic far right. Questions about economic resilience and stubbornly high prices remain the main sources of economic anxiety for voters. Even as immigration policies have been tightened and the number of asylum seekers in Europe has fallen, the long-term presence of migrants amid stagnating economies will continue to feed voter anger. The economic pressures applied by Donald Trump's trade war compound public frustration with their current governments. In short, there's no reason to believe far-right parties and politicians will fall silent or fail to score future political gains at the expense of beleaguered centrist establishments.
Two years from now, far-right parties will have their best-ever shot at capitalizing on mounting voter anger with national elections in France, Italy, Spain, and Poland. In France, though Le Pen is currently barred from seeking the presidency following an embezzlement conviction in March, her National Rally party could finally sweep to power in the heart of Europe. In Italy, Meloni will face pressure to adopt more Euroskeptic positions on high-profile issues in the run-up to elections. In Spain, the center-right Popular Party will likely lead the next government but could be forced to welcome the far-right Vox into a coalition for the first time. In Poland, steadily eroding support for Prime Minister Donald Tusk could pave the way for a return of right-wing nationalist parties to power there. The far-right Karol Nawrocki has already prevailed in the June presidential elections, and he will take office in August.
Taken together, these developments would shift the balance of power in the populists' favor, transforming how the E.U. defines its values and its interests. The potential fallout—whether on the rule of law, security and economic matters, internal borders, dealing with an expansionist Russia, or even the future of the E.U. itself—remains grave.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Dozens of protesters swarm Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand's NYC offices to ‘let Gaza live'
Scores of screaming pro-Palestine protesters descended on the New York City offices of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Friday. Activists from Jewish Voices for Peace were spotted occupying the Manhattan office building donning t-shirts with 'let Gaza live' emblazoned across them. Advertisement Several protesters could be seen being ziptied and led away by NYPD cops, footage shot by Fox News showed. It wasn't immediately clear how many arrests were made.


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Slovenia becomes first EU nation to ban weapons to Israel
1 of 3 | On Friday, the government of Slovenia's Prime Minister Dr. Robert Golob (pictured Sept. 2024 at the UN in New York CIty) signed-off on its decision to prohibit the "export and transit of military weapons and equipment from or through the Republic of Slovenia to Israel, as well as the import of such goods from Israel into the Republic of Slovenia." Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Slovenia on Friday imposed a ban on all weapons trading with Israel becoming the first European country to do so over the growing humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave in Israel's ongoing war. Its government said in a statement that at the initiative of Prime Minister Robert Golob, Slovenia signed off on its decision that prohibits "the export and transit of military weapons and equipment from or through the Republic of Slovenia to Israel, as well as the import of such goods from Israel into the Republic of Slovenia." It added that Israel's actions had constituted "serious violations of international humanitarian law" and that Slovenia would prepare "some more national measures" in the "coming weeks," according to the statement. The prime minister's decision, according to the Slovenian government, stems from a promise to "act independent" if the EU "failed to adopt concrete measures" by July. "Due to internal disagreements and lack of unity, the European Union is currently unable to fulfil this task," the statement said in part. On Monday, a European Commission proposal to partly suspend EU weaponry aid to Israel was blocked as Sweden became the most recent to apply pressure over trade. Nearly 70% of Israel's arsenal is imported from the United States with Germany its second-biggest supplier and Italy at third. Slovenian officials have repeatedly called for a cease-fire and its government increased aid delivery to the war-torn territory. On Friday, it said people in Gaza are dying "because humanitarian aid is systematically denied to them. They are dying under the rubble, without access to drinking water, food and basic healthcare." Slovenia's government called it a "complete denial of humanitarian access" and a "conscious prevention of basic conditions for survival." Last year in June, Slovenia became one of the first in Europe to recognize Palestine as a state. Israel has exported more than $560 million in weaponry since October 2023 when Iran's terror syndicate attacked and took Israeli hostages. Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands have since either restricted or halted exports. This week, the Dutch government banned Israel's national security minister and finance chief from its borders. The foreign ministers of Britain and 28 other nations including Canada, France, Italy and Australia recently issued a joint statement saying Israel's ongoing war with Hamas in Gaza had "reached new depths" and "must end now." Qatar in March called on international leaders to bring Israel's nuclear facilities under the watch of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Chile's president has sharply criticized Israel's military actions in Gaza as the South American nation seeks to replace Israel as Chile's primary arms supplier. Golob visited the United States last year prior in October prior to November's presidential election. "It is the duty of every responsible state to act," the Slovenian leader's statement continued. "Even if this means taking a step ahead of others."

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Italy Can Fast-Track Deportation of Illegal Immigrants but Must Allow Legal Review: EU Court
People disembark from the Italian navy ship Libra that arrived in Albania as part of a deal with Italy to process thousands of asylum-seekers stopped near Italian waters, in Shengjin, Albania, on Oct. 16, 2024. People disembark from the Italian navy ship Libra that arrived in Albania as part of a deal with Italy to process thousands of asylum-seekers stopped near Italian waters, in Shengjin, Albania, on Oct. 16, 2024. Florion Goga/Reuters The European Union's top court ruled on Friday that Italy can fast-track the deportation of illegal immigrants to countries it designates as safe, but said those designations must be subject to judicial scrutiny to ensure asylum decisions can be challenged. The ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) came in response to a case involving two Bangladeshi nationals who were rescued at sea by Italian authorities last year. Italy rejected their asylum applications, citing Bangladesh's designation as a safe country of origin under a legislative act passed by the Italian government in October 2024. The two men were later transferred to a detention facility in Albania under a 2023 bilateral agreement between Rome and Tirana. The deal allows up to 3,000 migrants intercepted at sea each month to be relocated to Albania, where their asylum claims are processed by Italian officials. Those not granted protection may be returned to their countries of origin. Story continues below advertisement The fast-track system, along with the relocation of asylum seekers to Albania, was introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government as part of broader efforts to curb illegal immigration. Meloni considers the protocol central to her administration's immigration policy. A previous CJEU ruling in an unrelated case had already limited how countries could interpret the 'safe country' concept, ruling that a nation cannot be considered safe if even part of its territory poses danger to certain individuals. In the current case, the two Bangladeshi men appealed to a Rome court, which asked the CJEU to clarify how countries are designated safe and what legal checks are required. The referring court said Italy's 2024 law doesn't explain how it chose which countries are safe, making it hard for those seeking asylum or judges to question those decisions. The CJEU said that the information used to decide whether a country is safe must be available to both asylum seekers and judges, so they can fully review the decision. Courts can also use their own reliable sources, as long as both sides are allowed to respond. Story continues below advertisement Responding to the CJEU ruling on X, Meloni said it weakens policies aimed at countering mass illegal immigration and defending national borders. 'The decision of the EU Court of Justice regarding the designation of safe countries of origin for illegal migrants is surprising,' she said. 'Once again, the judiciary, this time at the European level, claims authority over areas that do not belong to it, in the face of responsibilities that are political in nature.' Meloni said that the ruling prioritizes the decisions made by national judges over decisions made by parliament. 'Thus, for example, when it comes to identifying so-called safe countries, it gives precedence to the decision of the national judge—even if based on private sources—over the outcome of complex investigations carried out by the competent ministries and evaluated by the sovereign Parliament,' she said. Story continues below advertisement Ilaria Salis, a European Parliament deputy from Italy's Greens and Left Alliance party, criticized the Meloni government on Friday. 'There was no need for a ruling from the European Court to understand that the Meloni government's colonial-style Albanian venture is an abuse of power,' she said. She said the government overstepped its powers in what she described as a 'stubborn crusade' against judicial authority. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni speaks in London on March 2, continues below advertisement EU Migration Pact The CJEU ruling was issued just months before the The CJEU ruling was issued just months before the EU's Pact on Migration and Asylum comes into full effect. It will allow member states to strike agreements with non-EU states to handle asylum claims extraterritorially, potentially setting up processing centers in North Africa or beyond. 'It is noteworthy that this is happening just a few months before the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum comes into force, a Pact that introduces stricter rules, including with regard to the criteria for identifying such countries,' Meloni said. 'For the ten months remaining before the European Pact becomes operational, the Italian government will continue to seek every possible solution, technical or regulatory, to protect the safety of its citizens.' In April, the EU announced that nationals from seven countries, including Bangladesh, Colombia, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, India, and Kosovo, are unlikely to gain asylum status in Europe, as these countries have been designated 'safe third countries.' Illegal immigrants from those countries will be fast-tracked for quicker deportation, the EU said. Since the start of 2025, 36,557 illegal immigrants have entered Italy, up from 33,781 during the same period last year, but down from 89,165 in 2023, according to Italy's Interior Ministry. Most of the arrivals in 2025 have been from Bangladesh, Eritrea, Egypt, Pakistan, and Ethiopia.