
Why Forest shouldn't feel bad about taking Crystal Palace's Europa League place
The Crystal Palace chairman's unhappiness is partly fuelled by an understandable sense of injustice at his club's demotion to the Conference League from the Europa League, after being found in breach of UEFA's multi-club ownership rules.
Advertisement
In one of his interviews, Parish speculated that Nottingham Forest, the club who are set to benefit from this punishment, surely don't actually want to benefit from it.
'I know Forest are a fantastic club,' he told Sky Sports. 'They have a black swan event that got them into the European Cup. They won it. That enabled them to qualify again and win it again. These things have an incredible effect on football teams.
'You get your one shot. This is our one shot at the Europa League in 164 years. I can't believe that a football club with that story, with that history, very similar to ours, would really want to be a part of taking this away from us.
'A lot of Forest fans have reached out to me and said they don't want to get access to the tournament this way.
'I genuinely feel most right-minded football supporters would think that the right thing is for us to be in the competition.'
While there's no reason to doubt that Parish has heard from some magnanimous Forest supporters, who do believe that entry into the higher competition for their side would feel hollow, it's probably fair to say they're in the minority.
And if any of those fans are feeling pangs of guilt, or that they have unfairly benefited from another club's misfortune and will somehow not be able to enjoy a potential Europa League campaign because it hasn't been 'earned'… well, they shouldn't worry about that.
It's tough not to feel enormous sympathy for the Crystal Palace fans, who may have been dreaming of trips to Rome and Porto and booking hotels for the final in Istanbul, and who haven't experienced European football since the Intertoto Cup in 1999. This won't spoil the glorious day when they beat Manchester City and won the FA Cup back in May, but it takes the edge off.
Equally, the Crystal Palace coaching staff and players, who worked hard to achieve the greatest moment in the club's history, but also the greatest moment in most of their careers. Again, this won't spoil that day, but part of the reward has been taken away: it's a little like getting a promotion at work but not the pay rise.
Advertisement
But the more Parish speaks, the less and less sympathy you have for him, the others in charge of the club, and perhaps even Palace as an institution.
One of the reasons Palace are in this mess is that, by Parish's own admission, they missed several emails from UEFA reminding them of the rules. That's pretty laughable, even before you consider that the address they provided to receive crucial updates about rules and regulations was 'info@cpfc.co.uk'. That's the address you give to cranks complaining there's 13 per cent less meat in the pies than last season, or to journalists whose irritating questions you don't actually want to answer. Not for anything, you know, important.
Furthermore, the football finance writer Kieran Maguire reported last week that the Premier League had circulated details to all club secretaries regarding the change in regulations, as far back as October 2024, specifically referencing multi-club ownership considerations.
This email was sent by the Football Association to all Premier League club secretaries in October 2024 advising them of changes to rules relating to UEFA Multi Club ownership rules.
It would be difficult for a Premier Leagueclub to deny they receive emails from the FA. pic.twitter.com/g2GJB22ri8
— Kieran Maguire (@KieranMaguire) July 13, 2025
Of course it 'feels' unfair that the Palace players, coaches and fans will be denied something that they have earned on the pitch. It is unfortunate timing that Palace qualified for Europe in the year that UEFA belatedly decided to enforce their rules more stridently, having also expelled Irish Cup winners Drogheda United for similar reasons.
It is a nonsense that UEFA can say, with a straight face, that it's fine for Red Bull Salzburg and RB Leipzig to play each other but not Lyon and Palace. Equally, had Forest and Olympiacos been in the same competition, it's ludicrous that owner Evangelos Marinakis placing his shares in a 'blind trust' would have convinced anyone that he wasn't in charge of both clubs.
But at the same time, it highlights how easy it was for Palace and Parish to avoid all of this. It's not Forest's problem that they can't keep up with their admin.
It's not the first time that one team has benefited from another being kicked out of a competition. At the most extreme end, Denmark won the European Championship in 1992 after Yugoslavia were expelled from the competition. Clearly, the reason for the disqualification in that case — a devastating civil war — cannot be compared to this situation.
Advertisement
But there have been more comparable examples. In the FA Cup last season, Barnsley beat Horsham in the first round but were subsequently expelled for fielding an ineligible player: Horsham did not sheepishly decline the chance to go through in their place. LAFC weren't among the initial qualifiers for this year's Club World Cup, but gladly took their spot (via a playoff) when Club Leon were barred over multi-club ownership violations.
Going back a little way, to the 1996-97 Premier League, Middlesbrough would have avoided relegation were it not for a three-point penalty imposed for not fulfilling a fixture. Coventry City, the team who survived as a result, presumably did not feel too bad about benefiting.
This is all subject to a prospective appeal from Palace to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which is expected to come at some point soon. If that succeeds and Palace are restored to the higher competition, it would be tricky for Forest to complain too much.
But if things remain as they are, any sense that Forest should feel bad about stepping up as a result of Palace's carelessness is misguided.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
22 G/A walking out the door – why Joao Pedro must smash career best this season
Football is a game of fine margins, both within games and in seasons. A few goals here and there give or take away a few crucial points. And those crucial points mean positions at the end of the season. Scoring a few more and conceding a couple fewer may not seem like a lot, but it can be the difference between winning the title or not, or qualifying for the Champions League or not. Chelsea look to score more; concede fewer with new additions Joao Pedro warms up for Chelsea. (Photo by) Enzo Maresca's team only need to tweak a few things to swing things in their favour, and a lot of their transfer activity this summer should be focused on those marginal gains. Pundit CFCCentral made that exact point on the London is Blue podcast this week, looking at the business we've done so far: 'We can improve on the Premier League goals we scored last season at 64. The season before that, under Mauricio Pochettino we scored 77. Joao Pedro hasn't crossed 5 non-penalty goals in his [top flight] senior career so far. You demand he's going to make double digits if he's going to be a regular starter.' You can see him speaking in the clip embedded here: Joao Pedro will have to step up right away Joao Pedro looks ready to make that jump – but he will have to, as a lot of last season's goal and assist providers have left or are leaving: 'There's 10 G/A from Madueke [leaving], 7 G/A from Sancho… 5 from Nkunku. Those are numbers that you cannot maintain, you can build upon, and then go from 64 to goals to maybe closer to 65, 67.' Jamie Gittens and Estevao Willian are also coming in to take up the slack – but they're less experienced than the players they're replacing, and we can't necessarily count on them to hit the ground running. JP looked superb in the Club World Cup, but as the most experienced new addition we will need him to shine right away to avoid taking a step back in attack.


New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Nottingham Forest's Danilo set for Botafogo transfer
Brazilian midfielder Danilo is set to leave Nottingham Forest to sign for Botafogo. The clubs have agreed a fee in the region of €25million (£21.7m; $29.1m) for the 24-year-old. Danilo appeared set to join Lyon earlier in the summer after a similar deal was agreed with Forest, but the uncertainty over which division the French side would be playing in scuppered the deal. Lyon were initially demoted to Ligue 2 over financial irregularities, before an appeal restored them to the top tier earlier this month. Danilo has now agreed a four-year contract upon returning to his home country, two and a half years after joining Forest from Palmeiras. He initially had a big impact at the City Ground, scoring crucial goals as Forest avoided relegation at the end of the 2022-23 Premier League season, but his form was less consistent the following season, and his 2024-25 campaign was significantly hampered after suffering a serious ankle injury just six minutes into the first game. Advertisement Danilo was out for just over five months, by which time Elliot Anderson had established himself as Forest's main man in midfield, and the Brazilian was never able to cement a place in the side after that. This deal is the latest in a series of transfers between Forest and clubs part-owned by Eagle Football, founded by American John Textor. Orel Mangala and Moussa Niakhate moved to Lyon in 2024, while earlier this summer, striker Igor Jesus and defender Jair Cunha moved to the City Ground from Botafogo.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Report – Jorge Mendes Offers Inter Milan & AC Milan Stars To Barcelona
Jorge Mendes has reportedly offered Inter Milan's Denzel Dumfries and AC Milan's Rafael Leao to Barcelona. This according to Spanish transfer reporter David Ibanez, via FCInterNews. He reports that the two Serie A stars were the main names to come up in a recent meeting between Mendes and Barcelona. Barcelona recently held a meeting with super-agent Jorge Mendes. The Portuguese agent had been working on a contract extension for Barcelona wonderkid Lamine Yamal. And, having secured their teenage star winger's future with a new deal, the Blaugranas also held some other transfer talks with Mendes. Mendes Offers Dumfries & Leao To Barcelona According to Spanish transfer reports David Ibanez, there were two names in particular that came up in the discussions between Barcelona and Mendes. Both from Serie A. One was that of Inter wingback Denzel Dumfries. Moreover, Dumfries reportedly has a release clause in his contract with Inter, active until the end of the month. And Barcelona do have an interest in signing a right-back. They have little depth in the position behind Jules Kounde. Therefore, Dumfries is one name that could be attractive to Barcelona. Another position that the Spanish champions are aiming to strengthen in this summer is on the left flank. And Mendes suggested the possibility of Barcelona signing another of his clients. Coincidentally, it was Rafael Leao, who plays for Inter's city rivals AC Milan.