Trump-Putin meeting: After months strengthening its hand, Ukraine is back to square one
Ukraine
feels like it is back at square one with
Donald Trump
.
Since he began his second stint as US president in January, Kyiv has tried to win over Trump through flattery – lauding him as the only leader who can make
Russia
end its invasion – and the promise of profit from preferential access to Ukraine's rare earths and other commodities, joint arms production and other economic schemes.
Regardless, the scenario that Ukraine and Europe feared is now scheduled for Friday in Alaska: a summit between Trump and Russian president
Vladimir Putin
at which their future security will be discussed without them being at the table.
Trump's boast that he would need just one day to end Europe's biggest war in 80 years made clear that he had no interest in the complexities of a war that is Ukraine's latest attempt to escape the repressive Russian rule that has bound it for centuries.
READ MORE
His 90-minute call with Putin in February was the first contact between US and Russian leaders since the Kremlin launched its full invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and underlined Trump's conviction that he could get a deal without any help from Ukrainian and European leaders who were not even told in advance about the talk.
That conversation led swiftly to a meeting in Saudi Arabia between senior US and Russian officials. To Ukraine's insistence that it should be invited to talks on how to end the war, Trump said: 'You should have never started it, you could have made a deal.'
When Ukrainian president
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
said that Trump seemed to be living in a Russian 'disinformation bubble', the US president lashed out at him as 'a dictator' who had 'better move fast' or he 'won't have a country left'.
Their meeting in the White House a week later was a disaster. Talks that were supposed to soothe tempers became a shouting match, as Zelenskiy pressed the US to give Ukraine security guarantees and take a tougher line on Russia, and Trump and his vice-president, JD Vance, accused their guest of being ungrateful, disrespectful and of 'gambling with world war three'.
'You're either going to make a deal or we are out and if we're out, you'll fight it out,' Trump told him. 'You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now.'
It was a brutal reality check for Zelenskiy and Ukraine. He had started the meeting by showing his host photographs of Ukrainian soldiers emerging emaciated from Russian captivity. But Trump didn't want to see that. Nor did he want to talk about who really started the war, or about the atrocities committed by Russia in places such as Bucha, or the devastation of eastern Ukraine or the millions driven from their homes.
He wanted to talk about 'the cards' and who held them.
So Ukraine set about strengthening its hand. In mid-March it agreed immediately to adhere to a US call for a 30-day ceasefire if Russia did the same. At the end of April, Kyiv and Washington signed a landmark deal to give the US preferential access to Ukraine's natural resources and fund investment in its reconstruction.
At the same time, Europe was also trying to speak Trump's language. If with Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, European leaders had spoken of US support for Ukraine and its continued leadership of Nato in terms of shared values, historical ties and cherished alliances, now they framed them in terms of profit.
Trump agreed last month to keep supplying weapons for Ukraine as long as they were paid for by Nato states. The Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Sweden have already pledged more than $1 billion (€860 million) to the scheme, which works to counter Trump's frequent complaint that the US is routinely 'ripped off' by European countries.
Trump was getting his way with Ukraine and Europe – but not with Russia.
Putin rejected a ceasefire and only intensified his air strikes on Ukrainian cities, as his invasion force continued to make slow but steady progress in eastern Ukraine.
The Kremlin said there could be no compromise on certain issues: Ukraine must accept the permanent occupation of five regions that Russian troops now fully or partly control; abandon its hopes of joining Nato; and bow to other constraints on its sovereignty, including on the future size of its armed forces.
Finally, Trump's patience with Putin seemed to be wearing thin. He said he was 'very disappointed' with the Russian leader, called his military's bombing of civilian targets 'disgusting' and gave Moscow a deadline of August 8th to agree a ceasefire or face 'severe' US tariffs on its goods and on imports from countries – including China – that buy huge quantities of the discounted oil that helps replenish Moscow's war chest.
The day before the deadline, the Kremlin said Putin was ready to meet Trump. Last Friday's deadline passed without any punitive tariffs being announced. A doubling of tariffs on India unveiled last Wednesday – in part for its continued purchases of Russian fuel – does not take effect until August 27th, allowing plenty of time for it to be revoked if this Friday's summit brings results.
The arrangement is a clear victory for Putin. Simply by agreeing to meet Trump – without offering a single concession – he defused the tariff threat, brushed off the White House's 'ultimatum', and secured his first summit with a US leader on American soil since 2007. Trump was also quick to dismiss reports that he had insisted on Zelenskiy also being part of the Alaska summit.
Trump's invitation also makes a mockery of the warrant issued for Putin's arrest by the
International Criminal Court
over Russia's forced deportation of thousands of Ukrainian children; neither Russia nor the US recognise the court.
Just as Trump's surprise call to Putin back in February panicked Ukraine and Europe into closer co-operation, so the announcement of the Alaska summit triggered a weekend of somewhat frantic diplomacy.
British foreign secretary David Lammy hosted a meeting of top European and Ukrainian security advisers on Saturday that was also attended by Vance, who claimed, without offering evidence, that the summit was 'a major breakthrough for American diplomacy'.
He also repeated the kind of rhetoric that so strained US relations with its erstwhile allies six months ago – almost blaming Ukraine and European countries for Russia's continued war of invasion and occupation: 'If you care so much about this conflict, you should be willing to play a more direct and more substantial way in funding this war yourself.'
Zelenskiy still hopes for a late invitation to Alaska, and says Ukraine wants peace but will never sign away territory to the invader. European leaders, meanwhile, demand a say in any talks on ending the war and reshaping continental security.
But do they have 'the cards'? Putin can offer Trump a deal on Ukraine, vast investment opportunities in Russia, far more rare earths and other commodities than Kyiv could provide, and the kind of grand geopolitical pacts on issues such as nuclear disarmament that would appeal to Trump's belief that he is one of history's great leaders.
Ukraine fears the price it might have to pay for the overweening ambition of Trump, America's self-declared 'president of peace'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
23 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
David McNamara: Are economic statistics still trustworthy?
The firing of a little-known labour statistician by US President Donald Trump has brought to the fore an ongoing debate amongst economists — that is, whether macro statistics are becoming unreliable as the response rates to key surveys decline. In the US, major revisions to the benchmark payroll jobs survey are quite common and are typically shrugged off by investors and grumpy forecasters, whose models then require tweaking. In some cases, the revisions can completely shift the narrative of an economy, as was the case when US payrolls were recently revised sharply lower for May and June, precipitating a fall in interest rate expectations and a decline in the dollar. Response rates to this key survey have fallen sharply to 30-40% at present from as high as 70% in the period before the pandemic. However, despite President Trump's assertions of political bias, the revisions in the past few years to the payroll survey have been in both directions, with few signs of bias in the data. Nonetheless, covid appears to have left a lasting impact on the ability of statisticians to collect data across the world, with another example being the UK's labour force survey, which the Office for National Statistics has placed a large health warning on. The response rate to this survey has fallen from a pre-covid rate of 50% to just 10% at present. While the revisions in the US payrolls survey still appear to be random, the UK survey is demonstrating what economists might call 'systematic error'. In the absence of robust national statistics, a new cottage industry of private labour market data has emerged, which policymakers in the Bank of England, who have been struggling to get a gauge on wages and inflation, now rely on. In Ireland, the concentration of a small number of very large multinationals often renders initial estimates of GDP useless, but we have also seen large revisions to our labour force survey, including the sharp upward revision in unemployment recently. Emerging 'frontier' series, which use administrative data rather than relying on surveys, might become more reliable and prevalent in the future. For example, a new payroll employment series pulls data directly from the Revenue's PAYE system in Ireland, which gives a timelier estimate of the number of employee numbers. This series has been signalling a cooling of Irish jobs growth in 2025, which the official labour force survey might now belatedly show when the latest revisions are published later this week. The key takeaway is that economies are becoming more complex and harder to measure in real-time, with emerging trends such as AI having the potential to upend how we live and work in the years to come. Spare a thought for the beleaguered statistician in an ever-changing world. David McNamara is Chief Economist with AIB
Irish Examiner
23 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
US envoy to discuss Israel ceasefire as Lebanon commits to disarming Hezbollah
The US special envoy to Lebanon said that his team would discuss the long-term cessation of hostilities with Israel after Beirut endorsed a US-backed plan for the Hezbollah militant group to disarm. Tom Barrack, following a meeting with Lebanese president Joseph Aoun, also said Washington would seek an economic proposal for post-war reconstruction in the country, after months of shuttle diplomacy between the US and Lebanon. Mr Barrack is also set to meet with prime minister Nawaf Salam and speaker Nabih Berri, who often negotiates on behalf of Hezbollah with Washington. 'I think the Lebanese government has done their part. They've taken the first step,' said Mr Barrack, who is also the US ambassador to Turkey. 'Now what we need is for Israel to comply with that equal handshake.' Lebanese president Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency press office via AP) Lebanon's decision last week to support a plan to disarm Hezbollah angered the Iran-backed group and its allies, who believe Israel's military should first withdraw from the five hilltops it has occupied in southern Lebanon since the end of its 14-month war with Hezbollah last November and stop launching almost daily airstrikes in the country. Naim Kassem, Hezbollah's secretary-general, has vowed to fight efforts to disarm the group, sowing fears of civil unrest in the country. Mr Barrack warned Hezbollah that it will have 'missed an opportunity' if it does not back the calls for it to disarm. Mr Aoun and Mr Salam both want to disarm Hezbollah and other non-state armed groups, and have demanded Israel halt its attacks and withdraw from the country. Mr Aoun said he wants to increase funding for Lebanon's cash-strapped military to bolster its capacity. He also wants to raise money from international donors to help rebuild the country. The World Bank estimates that Hezbollah and Israel's months-long war in late 2024 cost 11.1 billion dollars in damages and economic losses as large swaths of southern and eastern Lebanon were battered. The country has also faced a crippling economic crisis since 2019.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Three killed in Russian strikes on Kharkiv, say Ukrainian officials
A Russian air attack overnight on a residential area in Kharkiv killed three people, including a toddler, and injured 17, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday, as the United States presses Kyiv to take a quick deal to end a war Moscow started. A drone attack killed the two-year-old boy in Ukraine's second-largest city early on Monday, after a ballistic missile strike the previous night, Oleh Synehubov, the governor of the wider Kharkiv region, said on messaging app Telegram. The number of the injured from the Kharkiv attack was 'continuously increasing', Synehubov added. Also on Telegram, Mayor Ihor Terekhov said two more were killed and 17 injured in both attacks, among them six children aged from six to 17. READ MORE 'A woman has just been rescued from under the rubble: she is alive,' Terekhov said in a post early on Monday, warning that more might be trapped under the rubble. Ukraine's foreign minister said on Monday that Russia continued to kill civilians despite peace efforts ahead of the meeting between the Ukrainian and American presidents. 'Russia is a murderous war machine that Ukraine is holding back. And it must be stopped through transatlantic unity and pressure,' Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, wrote on X about Russia's Monday attack on Kharkiv. Kharkiv, in northeastern Ukraine near the border with Russia, has been the target of regular Russian drone and missile attacks since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. The earlier ballistic missile strike on the city shattered about 1,000 windows, Synehubov said. Some residents had to be evacuated, Ukraine's state emergency service said on Telegram. Reuters witnesses saw medics attending to residents on a street and rescuers inspecting damage in residential buildings. Two people were injured in Russia's strikes on the adjacent region of Sumy that also damaged at least a dozen homes and an educational institution, authorities said. 'The enemy continues to deliberately target civilian infrastructure in the Sumy region — treacherously, at night,' Oleh Hryhorov, the head of the regional administration, said on Telegram. Ukraine's air force downed 88 drones and recorded hits in 25 locations across six regions of the country, according to a statement posted by the air force on Telegram. Reuters could not independently verify the weapons used by Russia. There was no immediate comment from Moscow. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes, but thousands of people have died, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. US president Donald Trump, who hosted Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday for talks aimed at ending the war, has urged Kyiv to make a deal with Moscow, stating, 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not'. Meanwhile, the death toll from an unexplained blast last week at a production facility in Russia's Ryazan region has jumped to at least 20 dead with another 134 people injured, local emergency services said on Monday. Pavel Malkov, governor of the Ryazan region that lies just southeast of Moscow, said on Friday that the incident had been triggered by a fire breaking out inside a workshop at the factory. But it was unclear from Russian media reports what caused the fire or what exactly the factory was producing. Official Russian sources gave no details beyond efforts to find and treat the injured. 'As of August 18th, 20 people died as a result of the emergency incident,' the local emergency service headquarters said in a post on Telegram. 'There are 134 injured, of which 31 patients are in hospitals in Ryazan and Moscow, while 103 patients are undergoing outpatient treatment.'
