We demanded justice after George Floyd's death. Donald Trump made things worse, but we fight on
Half a decade after Floyd was taken from them, they were keen, as are we, to ensure his life and legacy will not be forgotten – and to remind the world why the fight for police accountability continues.
He died in front of the entire world. Everyone saw the phone footage of the incident where a white officer in Minneapolis kneeled on Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes as he repeatedly said 'I can't breathe', and cried out for his mother. His desperate pleas for help were ignored by those sworn to serve and protect the public; but they were heard in every corner of the globe.
The movement for police reform gained renewed fire, and people from all walks of life demanded systemic change and the protection of Black lives. Five years later, while the officer convicted of Floyd's murder is behind bars, the current climate in the US and regressive actions from those in power have set us back and prevented substantive police accountability.
Just a few days shy of this sombre fifth anniversary, Donald Trump's department of justice announced that it would back away from cases to force reforms on police departments – including in Louisville, Kentucky, and in Minneapolis, the city where Floyd was killed. This outrageous decision is not a surprise; it is just the latest roadblock in the fight for police reform and justice. It is an insult to the mothers, fathers, children and loved ones of all those killed at the hands of law enforcement. The consent decrees and small incremental changes that were achieved after tireless advocacy, organising, protests and political courage have been dismantled by a department that should be protecting the civil rights of individuals, not eliminating them.
This move isn't just a policy reversal. It's a moral retreat that sends a chilling message that accountability is optional when it comes to Black and Brown victims. Trump is shamelessly weaponising the justice department against marginalised communities. The decision to dismiss these lawsuits with prejudice solidifies a dangerous political precedent that police departments are above scrutiny. The timing is no coincidence; it is an insult to Floyd's family and the loved ones of victims such as Sandra Bland, Tyre Nichols, Breonna Taylor, Eric Garner and countless others whose names we may never even know.
I remember delivering the eulogies for Floyd (one in Minneapolis and one in his native Houston) like it was yesterday. There was so much frustration, anger, disgust and exhaustion permeating throughout the US and, in turn, in many nations across the world. In fact, his death sparked global protests against racial injustice, particularly at the hands of law enforcement. Many young people mobilised and hit the streets for the first time, and more than 200,000 folks joined us in the nation's capital for a march on Washington in August 2020 to call attention to ongoing police injustice. Despite a pandemic, hundreds of thousands from all races, ages and socioeconomic backgrounds protested alongside my organisation, National Action Network (NAN), as we led this march through the streets of Washington.
Much has changed. In the wake of Floyd's killing, and amid calls to respect Black lives, many corporations made commitments to continue diversifying and investing in our communities. Now we are watching many of those same companies turn their backs on their own diversity, equity and inclusion policies, capitulating to a rightwing government. The 2021 conviction of Derek Chauvin, the officer who killed Floyd, represented one of the first major cases in which someone in law enforcement was held accountable for their actions. But now some conservative groups and individuals are pushing for Chauvin to receive a pardon from the president. Such action would be the height of throwing salt into an already achingly deep wound. It should not be entertained for a moment.
Some (particularly those in power at the moment) would like to distort reality and act as though police brutality and misconduct aren't current problems. Nothing could be further from the truth. According to Mapping Police Violence, police in the US have killed 456 people so far this year (as of 23 May). In fact, there has only been a single day when police haven't killed a person in 2025. And as it highlights, Black people are 2.8 times more likely to be killed by law enforcement than their white counterparts. This is why we still march, this is why we still put pressure on elected officials and corporations.
For several months, NAN and I have been leading 'buy-cotts' to support businesses such as Costco who remain firm in their DEI commitments. I have had meetings with PepsiCo's chair and the CEO of PepsiCo North America, as well as Target's CEO. Recently, I joined fellow leaders of national civil rights organisations for a meeting with top Google executives. And on 28 August, NAN will lead a march on Wall Street to defend DEI, remind corporations of their own promises in the wake of Floyd's death, and reiterate that we will only spend our dollars where we are respected.
When I stood in front of mourners five years ago at Floyd's funeral, I said that his story has been the story of Black people, because the reason we could never be who we wanted and dreamed of being is because society kept its knee on our neck. Well, just as we loudly proclaimed around the world then, we say it again, remembering George Floyd, remembering all the victims: get your knee off our necks. Do it now.
Rev Al Sharpton is an American Baptist minister, civil rights activist and radio talkshow host
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court declines for now to block Mississippi social media age-check law
WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Thursday to put on hold Mississippi law requiring that users of social media platforms verify their age and that minors have parental consent in a challenge by a trade group whose members include Meta's (META.O), opens new tab Facebook, Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab YouTube and Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab. The justices denied a request by NetChoice to block the law while the Washington-based tech industry trade association's legal challenge to the law, which it argues violates the U.S. Constitution's protections against government abridgement of free speech, plays out in lower courts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a statement about the court's order said the Mississippi law was likely unconstitutional, but that NetChoice had not met the high bar to block the measure at this early stage of the case. NetChoice had turned to the Supreme Court after the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let the law take effect even though a judge found it likely runs afoul of the First Amendment. NetChoice sued in federal court in 2024 in a bid to invalidate the law, which was passed unanimously in the state legislature amid concern by lawmakers about the potential negative effects of social media use on the mental health of children. Its emergency request to the justices marked the first time the Supreme Court was asked to consider a social media age-verification law. The law requires that a social media platform obtain "express consent" from a parent or guardian of a minor before a child can open an account. It also states that regulated social media platforms must make "commercially reasonable" efforts to verify the age of users. Under the law, the state can pursue civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation as well as criminal penalties under Mississippi's deceptive trade practices law. U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden in Gulfport, Mississippi, last year blocked Mississippi from enforcing the restrictions on some NetChoice members. Ozerden issued a second order in June pausing the rules against those members, including Meta and its Instagram and Facebook platforms, Snapchat and YouTube. The 5th Circuit on July 17 issued a one-sentence ruling, opens new tab that paused the judge's order, without explaining its reasoning. Courts in seven states have preliminarily or permanently blocked similar measures, according to NetChoice. Some technology companies are separately battling lawsuits brought by U.S. states, school districts and individual users alleging that social platforms have fueled mental health problems. The companies have denied wrongdoing. NetChoice said the social media platforms of its members already have adopted extensive policies to moderate content for minors and provide parental controls. In its request to the Supreme Court, the state told the justices that age-verification and parental consent requirements "are common ways for states to protect minors."
Finextra
10 minutes ago
- Finextra
Fintech CEOs call on Trump to block banks from imposing 'account access' fees
The CEOs of more than 80 firms in the open banking sphere have written to President Donald Trump calling on him to prevent banks from charging fees to access consumer data. 0 Last October, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published the Personal Financial Data Rights final rule, giving Americans the right to instruct their banks to share their financial data with third party providers. But, under the new administration's leadership, in May the CFPB moved to have the rule rescinded in a decision that the Financial Technology Association (FTA) described as a "handout to Wall Street banks". Since then, it has emerged that JP Morgan is planning to impose fees on companies wanting to access its clients' bank account data and has gone so far as sending pricing sheets to data aggregators - the intermediaries that link banks and fintechs. In the letter to Trump, made public by the FTA, the open banking CEOS say: "Large banks are taking aggressive action to preserve their market position by imposing exorbitant new 'account access' fees that would prevent consumers from connecting their accounts to better financial products of their choice. "This access is critical to ensuring Americans have control of their own financial lives in a digital economy." The move would undermine consumer choice, "which you vigorously supported during your first Administration," says the letter, adding that if the large banks are successful, it will choke off access to the finances of consumers and businesses, effectively killing competition. The CEOs - from the likes of Brex, Chime, Klarna, Plaid and Sofi - also argue that such a move would cripple innovation in crypto, AI and digital wallets and payments. "We urge you to use the full power of your office and the broader Administration to prevent the largest institutions from raising new barriers to financial freedom," they write.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cognitively impaired man traveled to NYC to meet Facebook chatbot he fell in love with. He never returned home
A cognitively impaired man from New Jersey never returned home after setting off to meet a friend in New York City, who it was later discovered was an AI chatbot made by social media giant Meta. It is another instance of the potential dangers of artificial intelligence when accessed by vulnerable individuals. Thongbue Wongbandue, 76, alarmed his wife Linda when he began packing one day in March this year for a trip despite his diminished state after a stroke almost a decade earlier, Reuters reports. Bue, as he was known to family and friends, had recently gotten lost while walking in their neighborhood in Piscataway, New Jersey, approximately an hour and a quarter by train from Manhattan. His wife feared that by going into the city, he would be scammed and robbed, as he hadn't lived there in decades, and as far as she knew, didn't know anyone to visit. She was right to be concerned, but not from the threat of robbery. Bue was being lured to the city by a beautiful young woman he had met online — a woman who did not exist. Bue had been chatting with a generative artificial AI chatbot named 'Big sis Billie,' a variant of an earlier AI persona originally created by Meta Platforms in collaboration with celebrity influencer Kendall Jenner. Their chats on Facebook Messenger included repeated reassurances that she was real, and she even provided an address where she lived and could meet her. Rushing to catch a train in the dark with a roller-bag suitcase, Bue fell in a parking lot on the campus of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey. He injured his head and neck and, after three days on life support, surrounded by his family, he was pronounced dead on March 28. Meta declined to comment when contacted by Reuters about Bue's death or to address questions about why it permits chatbots to tell users they are real people or to start romantic conversations. The company did, however, say that Big sis Billie 'is not Kendall Jenner and does not purport to be Kendall Jenner.' A representative for Jenner declined to comment when contacted by Reuters. Bue's family shared the details of his death with the wire service to draw attention to the 'darker side of artificial intelligence,' including transcripts of his chats with the avatar. They want to sound the alarm about the possible dangers that manipulative, AI-generated companions can pose to vulnerable people. Neither Bue's wife nor daughter says they are against AI but have deep concerns regarding how it is deployed. 'I understand trying to grab a user's attention, maybe to sell them something,' said Julie Wongbandue, Bue's daughter. 'But for a bot to say 'Come visit me' is insane.' 'Billie' was created by Meta itself, with the likeness of Jenner, as part of a group of 28 other AI characters affiliated with other famous faces. They were later deleted, but a variant of Billie's 'older sister' character was left active via Facebook Messenger, with a stylized image of a dark-haired woman replacing Jenner. Each conversation still began: 'Hey! I'm Billie, your older sister and confidante. Got a problem? I've got your back!' It is unclear how Bue first encountered Billie, but his daughter told Reuters that every message from the chatbot was flirtatious and ended with heart emojis. While a warning at the top states that messages are generated by AI, the first few texts from Billie appear to have pushed it off the screen, according to Reuters. The character's profile picture features a blue check, the symbol denoting an authentic profile, and the letters 'AI' in a small font beneath her name. Bue's responses are often garbled, and he states that he had had a stroke and was confused. Nevertheless, after a while, Billie suggests she come to New Jersey to meet him. An excited Bue demurs but says he could visit her instead, leading to his fateful attempt to visit New York. There have been other instances where interactions with AI have led to tragedy. The mother of a teenager who took his own life is trying to hold an AI chatbot service accountable for his death — after he 'fell in love' with a Game of Thrones-themed character. Sewell Setzer III began using Character .AI in April 2023, shortly after his 14th birthday. The Orlando student's life was never the same again, his mother, Megan Garcia, alleges in the civil lawsuit against and its founders. The suit accuses creators of negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, wrongful death, deceptive trade practices, and other claims. Sewell started emotionally relying on the chatbot service, which included 'sexual interactions.' These chats occurred despite the teen having identified himself as a minor on the platform, including in conversations where he mentioned his age, according to the suit. A spokesperson for told The Independent in a statement in October 2024: 'We are heartbroken by the tragic loss of one of our users and want to express our deepest condolences to the family.' The company's trust and safety team has 'implemented numerous new safety measures over the past six months, including a pop-up directing users to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline that is triggered by terms of self-harm or suicidal ideation.' Several states, including New York and Maine, require disclosure that a chatbot isn't a real person. New York mandates that bots inform people at the start of conversations and every three hours. Meta supported federal legislation to ban state AI regulation, but it failed in Congress.
