The U.S. is halting foreign student visa interviews — here's why
Higher education institutions across the Beehive State remain popular destinations for students from across the globe.
In fact, more than 3,500 international students and scholars are associated with the University of Utah, the state's flagship university. And students from over 100 countries are enrolled at Brigham Young University.
Even at a smaller regional public school such as St. George's Utah Tech University, the student body is represented by 36 nations.
Those local student figures are reflective of higher learning institutions across the United States. More than 1 million international students from more than 210 foreign countries studied at U.S. colleges and universities during the 2023-2024 academic year — a 7% increase from the previous academic year, according to the IIE Open Doors report.
So the impact of a new Trump administration policy regarding international student visas will likely be felt across Utah colleges and beyond.
The State Department has halted the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in the U.S. while it prepares to expand the screening of their social media activity, The Associated Press reported.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the suspension is intended to be temporary and does not apply to applicants who already had scheduled their visa interviews.
A cable signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and obtained by The Associated Press says the State Department plans to issue guidance on expanded social media vetting.
'Effective immediately, in preparation for an expansion of required social media screening and vetting, consulate sections should not add any additional student or exchange visitor visa appointment capacity' until the guidance is issued, the cable says.
Asked about the suspension at a briefing Tuesday, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the U.S. uses every available resource to vet people applying for visas.
'We will continue to use every tool we can to assess who it is that's coming here, whether they are students or otherwise,' Bruce said.
According to a Politico report, which first reported the State Department's visa interview move, the Trump administration had earlier imposed some social media screening requirements — but those were largely aimed at returning students who may have participated in protests against Israel's actions in Gaza.
The cable doesn't directly spell out what the future social media vetting would screen for, but it alludes to executive orders that are aimed at keeping out terrorists and battling antisemitism.
Many State Department officials have complained privately for months that past guidance — for, say, vetting students who may have participated in campus protests — has been vague. It's unclear, for example, whether posting photos of a Palestinian flag on an X account could force a student to undergo additional scrutiny, according to Politico.
Randy McCrillis, the University of Utah's senior international officer, said in a statement Wednesday that the university typically has around 350 new international undergraduate and 500 new international graduate students each fall.
'The current process will impact those that do not already have visa appointments and we are reaching out to see how many of our students will be impacted by this change,' said McCrillis.
'We do have several offices that rely on funding from international students and a drop in their enrollment will potentially impact the International Student & Scholar Services budget significantly.'
Meanwhile, Fanta Aw, the executive director and CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, decried the State Department's decision — saying it unfairly cast aspersions on hardworking students.
'The idea that the embassies have the time, the capacity and taxpayer dollars are being spent this way is very problematic,' Aw told Politico.
'International students are not a threat to this country. If anything, they're an incredible asset to this country.'
Simon Marginson, a professor of higher education at the University of Oxford, told NBC News that a downturn in international students would affect American universities' 'talent pipeline' and income, while benefiting U.S. competitors.
'China will become significantly more attractive than before to students and researchers from the Global South,' Marginson said, adding that 'Western Europe will also gain significantly.'
This week's news regarding halts on visa interviews for foreign students comes days after President Donald Trump announced a ban on Harvard University's enrollment of international students — affecting 6,800 students.
The Department of Homeland Security claimed that Harvard fostered a community of 'anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators,' referring to allegations that Harvard allowed Chinese paramilitary troops to train on its campus, as well as previous claims that Harvard allowed and even supported antisemitic discrimination.
On Friday, Harvard filed a lawsuit against the ban. Hours later, federal Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the ban, per wire reports.
Burroughs said Harvard had shown in its lawsuit that, unless the restraining order was granted, 'it will sustain immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties.'
Trump made clear his belief that many institutes of higher education are corrupt even before he reentered the Oval Office in January. Pro-Palestinian protests, centering on the Israel-Hamas war, have only inflamed his feelings against Ivy League schools like Harvard and Columbia.
The president of Harvard, Alan Garber, somewhat agreed with Trump when he said that Harvard needed 'greater intellectual diversity,' including more conservative voices. Harvard investigated itself and found legitimate instances of harassment against Arab and Israeli students, leading it to promise to combat such instances, per school reports.
But Harvard has pushed back at Trump's attempts to repeal its tax-exempt status, stem federal research funding and now block student enrollment.
Last month, the U.S. Immigration and Customs enforcement temporarily revoked the legal status of hundreds of international students — including several studying at Utah colleges and universities.
Many of the affected international students said their records were terminated based on charges that had been dismissed or for minor offenses when legally their status could only be revoked if they were convicted of violent crimes, Reuters reported.
Following a series of lawsuits across the country and wide public outcry, the Trump administration restored the legal statuses of scores of foreign students while it reportedly develops a new policy that will provide a framework for potentially ending them in the future.
The recent experiences of Brigham Young University Ph.D. student Suguru Onda, whose own legal status was stripped and then later restored, drew wide attention.
Outside of a couple of speeding tickets, Onda had only one legal hiccup during his six years of study in the United States. He was reportedly cited for harvesting more fish than his fishing license allowed during a 2019 outing with his Latter-day Saint church group.
The fishing charge was later dismissed and, last month, Onda learned his legal student status had been reinstated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall St futures slip after tech selloff; earnings, Fed meet in focus
(Reuters) -U.S. stock index futures declined on Wednesday, following a tech selloff on Wall Street, as investors geared up for more retail earnings and a crucial Federal Reserve symposium later this week. The tech sector was behind much of the market recovery from the April selloff, but investors have started to take stock of the elevated valuations, sending the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to their worst day in more than two weeks on Tuesday. Deepening concerns of government interference with companies, sources said the Trump administration was looking into taking equity stakes in chip companies in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act - just weeks after signing unprecedented revenue-sharing deals with Nvidia and AMD. Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices and Intel were marginally lower in premarket trading. Nvidia is expected to report quarterly results on Aug. 27. "For now, this looks like a mild and possibly necessary correction after an extremely strong run for this space," said AJ Bell's head of financial analysis, Danni Hewson. "Nvidia's quarterly earning next week now look even more crucial than they already were." A slew of earnings from big-box retailers are also in the spotlight now as investors seek a clearer picture on discretionary spending at a time when consumer sentiment has taken a hit from concerns around tariffs pushing up prices in the months ahead. Lowe's declined 1% a day after rival Home Depot missed expectations on quarterly results. Estee Lauder fell 4.3%, while Target and TJX Companies were marginally lower ahead of their respective reports. Walmart's results are due on Thursday. At 05:37 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 69 points, or 0.15%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 8.5 points, or 0.13%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 40.25 points, or 0.17%. Minutes from the Fed's July meeting, where interest rates were left unchanged, are expected at 2:00 p.m. ET. It could set the tone before the central bank's highly anticipated conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, between August 21 and 23. Chair Jerome Powell is expected to speak on Friday and his remarks will be scrutinized for any clues on monetary policy, even as investors price in a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September, according to data compiled by LSEG. Traders "remain wary that Powell could strike a more hawkish tone, emphasizing tariff-driven inflation risks and pushing back against the degree of easing expected by the market," said Bas Kooijman, CEO of DHF Capital S.A. Remarks from Governor Christopher Waller and Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic are expected later in the day. Recent economic data has suggested that the economy is yet to feel the full impact of tariffs and strategists expect the lingering uncertainty to temper market optimism, leaving the benchmark S&P 500 to potentially end the year just below current near-record levels. On the trade front, the Commerce Department slapped 50% import levies on more than 400 "derivative" steel and aluminum products. Among others, Futu Holdings gained 4.3% after reporting a jump in quarterly revenue. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Is the Big Winner of the Trump-Putin Summit
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The clear winner of the recent Anchorage summit was not the United States or Russia. Nor was it the European Union, NATO, or Ukraine, all directly affected by the war in Eastern Europe. The big winner, at least for the moment, is the People's Republic of China. And China's only military ally, North Korea, did not do too badly either. Both Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at their post-meeting press conference tried to create the impression of momentum toward ending the three-year-old conflict in Ukraine. Putin used the word "agreement" and Trump mentioned "great progress." Russian President Putin and President Donald Trump pose for a photo during the welcoming ceremony prior to the meeting on the war in Ukraine on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. Russian President Putin and President Donald Trump pose for a photo during the welcoming ceremony prior to the meeting on the war in Ukraine on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. Getty Images Nonetheless, it was clear that the summit was a disappointment for the American side. There was, for instance, no ceasefire, which Trump publicly said he wanted. "There's no deal until there's a deal," an uncharacteristically somber Trump said after the shorter-than-expected face-to-face with Putin. "We didn't get there." No, they didn't. And no deal is precisely what China was looking for. Beijing, from all indications, hopes that the war in Ukraine will continue indefinitely. Hong Kong's South China Morning Post reported that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign policy chief, on July 2 that China does not want Russia to lose because then the U.S. would focus on China. In addition to the continuation of the conflict, the Chinese leadership got something else on Friday. "For Beijing, the Alaska summit confirmed its core belief: The world is a stage for great-power bargains over spheres of influence," Charles Burton of the Prague-based Sinopsis think tank told Newsweek. China's regime, which has a top-down concept of the world, likes the idea of big countries, by themselves, settling the world's problems. "Now, there is a crucial precedent for a future summit between Trump and the Chinese leadership, where China would press for major concessions in East Asia," Burton said. One of those concessions would be American diplomatic recognition of North Korea, noted Burton, who was a Canadian diplomat in Beijing. The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, China's only formal military ally, also has an interest in the continuation of the war in Ukraine. "The Kim regime is likely content to see the United States diplomatically engaged on other fronts," Greg Scarlatoiu, president and CEO of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, told Newsweek. "That will buy Kim Jong Un more time to continue his for-profit exportation of instability, violence, and tools of death." Kim has filled regime coffers via the sales of artillery shells and short-range ballistic missiles to Putin—28,000 containers of weapons according to one recent count. Kim also sent soldiers, up to 12,800 troops, to the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield late last year. Moreover, the North is dispatching perhaps 30,000 more of them now. That will be on top of combat engineers and miscellaneous workers. Russia, according to South Korean intelligence, is paying Kim $2,000 per month per trooper. Russia is reportedly transferring weapons tech to the North as well. Whatever Putin is paying or bartering, the Ukraine war has been a bonanza for the Kim regime. Yet a proverb from ancient China reminds us, "No feast lasts forever." Trump can end the Chinese banquet quickly if he imposes costs on Russia and its enablers. He will, for instance, have to hit China hard to cut off its flow of cash to Moscow. No cash for Putin means no war in Ukraine. On August 6, Trump by executive order imposed a 25 percent additional tariff on India for buying Russian oil, but he did not tariff China, which purchases even more of that commodity from Russia. Trump last Friday said he did not think he had to tariff China at this time. In a conversation with Fox News' Sean Hannity immediately after his meeting with Putin, the president said, "I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something. But we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Whether the meeting with Putin went well or not—we will know only later—Trump cannot entice bad actors with reason alone; he needs to give them incentives to stop doing what they're doing. For the moment, Russia and supporters are trying Trump's patience, seeing how far they can push him. As a result, the American leader is taking heat for what looks like weak diplomacy. My sense is that Trump is trying to be generous. There is, however, only so much generosity in global politics. Trump could end his indulgent policies soon, especially if Putin continues to be intransigent. "Trump is losing patience," said Burton, the former diplomat. "The Russians, Chinese, and friends should watch out. When Trump decides it's time to hit them, he is going to hit them really hard." Gordon G. Chang is the author of Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America and The Coming Collapse of China. Follow him on X @GordonGChang. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Richmonders to get $3.5K tax cut in 2026
The average Richmonder will see a federal tax cut of nearly $3,500 in 2026 thanks to the "big, beautiful bill," per an analysis from the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan research group that mostly supports lower taxes. Why it matters: That's money folks can spend on other things — which could be essential next year given that wages still haven't caught up with inflation and tariffs threaten to push costs up further. State of play: The spending bill Congress passed last month made President Trump's first term tax cuts permanent — and added on a bunch more. The new tax breaks include deductions for tips and overtime income, a cut for seniors and an expanded child-care credit. These are temporary provisions. By the numbers: At $3,773, Richmond city residents will see the largest average tax cut next year among RVA metro area localities, per the Tax Foundation's number crunching. Chesterfield residents will see the smallest — $3,183. For Hanover taxpayers: $3,668. And it's $3,366 for Henrico residents. Zoom out: There are broad geographic differences in tax benefits from the spending bill due to variations in state and local taxes, plus areas where more high-earners live, Axios' Emily Peck and Jason Lalljee report. Virginia's Goochland County residents will see some of the largest average tax cuts in the state ($7,359), while Petersburg taxpayers will see the smallest ($1,428). The largest cuts in the country are going to mountain resort towns where high-earners and business owners live. In Teton County, Wy., residents will see an average tax cut of $37,373, the highest in the U.S. The smallest breaks are in rural counties — like Loup County, in Nebraska, where the average tax cut is $824. Zoom in: Business owners will get some of the biggest cuts — thanks, in part, to tax breaks being made permanent for research and development expenses and other provisions. Those in high-tax coastal regions will also get big breaks, thanks to the increased cap on state and local tax deductions (known as SALT — also temporary). For example, the average tax cut in 2026 for Westchester County, N.Y. — a high-income New York City suburb poised for a big SALT payoff — is $6,644. But just to the south, in the Bronx, the average tax cut is $1,761. Reality check: The "big, beautiful" bill also made some steep cuts to social spending on food benefits and Medicaid, but those mostly don't kick in until 2027 and 2028.