Ishiba faces a fresh money scandal
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, the prime minister's spokesperson, told a press conference the same day that Ishiba's office has explained to the magazine that it "has been properly handling political funds in accordance with laws and regulations and making income and expenditure reports" on them.
According to the magazine article, the supporter said he annually paid millions of yen to buy fundraising party tickets between 2003 and 2014 and also gave the Ishiba campaign cash multiple times when he ran for the presidency of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party. The man also said the total amount of money he gave to the Ishiba side is estimated to top at least ¥30 million ($208,000).
In the wake of the fresh money scandal hitting Ishiba, Yoshihiko Noda, leader of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, expressed his willingness to seek the prime minister's explanation before the House of Representatives' political ethics council.
"We need to clarify it thoroughly," Noda said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kyodo News
2 hours ago
- Kyodo News
LDP to gauge lawmakers' support on whether PM Ishiba should be replaced
TOKYO - Japan's ruling party plans to gauge the support of its members in writing on whether it should hold an earlier than scheduled leadership race, a party lawmaker said Tuesday, as incumbent Shigeru Ishiba faces calls to step down following poor showings in recent elections. The Liberal Democratic Party's election panel met to discuss the details of how a presidential election could be called in the middle of an incumbent's term. It has never held such a race based on existing party rules, but Ishiba's defiance to stay on as Japanese leader has led the party to consider the option. "It's an issue that should be dealt with speedily", Ichiro Aizawa, who heads the election panel, told reporters after the meeting. A party leadership election can be held if the move is supported by the majority, or 172, of lawmakers and local chapter executives, according to the party's rules. Ishiba, who became LDP president and prime minister last year, can also run. The LDP decided in early August that its election panel could go ahead with the process of checking whether its members support the idea of holding an earlier-than-scheduled presidential race. Ishiba, whose current three-year term ends in September 2027, has been seeking to deflect mounting pressure from fellow LDP lawmakers and local chapters demanding that he resign, after the ruling coalition lost its majority in the House of Councillors in the July 20 election. With the coalition already a minority in the more powerful House of Representatives, this means that support from the opposition camp is required to pass any bills and budgets. The timing for the LDP to start soliciting views on a presidential election will hinge on its ongoing internal probe into why it suffered its worst upper house election loss in years. Secretary General Hiroshi Moriyama, the LDP's No. 2, has said the review will be completed by the end of August.
The Mainichi
3 hours ago
- The Mainichi
LDP to gauge lawmakers' support on whether PM Ishiba should be replaced
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan's ruling party plans to gauge the support of its members in writing on whether it should hold an earlier than scheduled leadership race, a party lawmaker said Tuesday, as incumbent Shigeru Ishiba faces calls to step down following poor showings in recent elections. The Liberal Democratic Party's election panel met to discuss the details of how a presidential election could be called in the middle of an incumbent's term. It has never held such a race based on existing party rules, but Ishiba's defiance to stay on as Japanese leader has led the party to consider the option. "It's an issue that should be dealt with speedily", Ichiro Aizawa, who heads the election panel, told reporters after the meeting. A party leadership election can be held if the move is supported by the majority, or 172, of lawmakers and local chapter executives, according to the party's rules. Ishiba, who became LDP president and prime minister last year, can also run. The LDP decided in early August that its election panel could go ahead with the process of checking whether its members support the idea of holding an earlier-than-scheduled presidential race. Ishiba, whose current three-year term ends in September 2027, has been seeking to deflect mounting pressure from fellow LDP lawmakers and local chapters demanding that he resign, after the ruling coalition lost its majority in the House of Councillors in the July 20 election. With the coalition already a minority in the more powerful House of Representatives, this means that support from the opposition camp is required to pass any bills and budgets. The timing for the LDP to start soliciting views on a presidential election will hinge on its ongoing internal probe into why it suffered its worst upper house election loss in years. Secretary General Hiroshi Moriyama, the LDP's No. 2, has said the review will be completed by the end of August.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Demystifying the manufacturing success of China
Chinese manufacturing has come a long way — and by some measures, it is stronger than ever. Whereas foreign-invested enterprises were the driving force behind China's manufacturing exports 20 years ago, most of these firms are now leaving China, having lost their market share to domestic competitors. And these dominant Chinese companies are not limited to the low-value-added production of the past. They are global leaders in many high-tech industries, such as semiconductors and electric vehicles, where they hold an absolute price advantage. Today's China is reminiscent of Japan and South Korea in their heyday. In the 1970s, Japan was producing high-tech products, including home appliances and automobiles, that outperformed American alternatives. And in the 1990s, South Korea emerged as a powerhouse in the electronics and automobile industries. The difference is that the per capita gross domestic product of Japan in the 1970s and South Korea in the 1990s was approaching half that of the United States, but China's per capita GDP, in nominal terms, amounts to less than 16% of America's today ($13,300, compared to $85,800). The obvious question is how a country with such low per capita GDP has managed to reach the technological frontier in so many sectors. Another, perhaps more interesting question is how China manages to keep the prices of the cutting-edge technologies it produces so low. In both cases, an important part of the answer is China's massive scale. If a country with a huge population can deliver high-quality education to its people, it will eventually accumulate disproportionate human capital. Such a country will learn more readily from advanced economies and develop its own innovative capacity earlier in its development. Though China had little trade with the West during the Mao era, it had a large contingent of elites who had studied at Western universities prior to the establishment of the People's Republic. This group played an extremely important role in advancing China's scientific research and technology sector, helping to industrialize the economy with technical assistance from the Soviet Union. More importantly, China successfully established a modern basic education system in the 1950s, making it free for all Chinese children despite the country's high levels of extreme poverty and also restructured its higher-education system. Most of China's prestigious universities at the time had been established by Western religious institutions and missionary groups during the late Qing Dynasty (which ended in 1911) and the early Republic of China period (1911-1949). But under Mao, China embraced the Soviet model of higher education, which emphasized vocational and technical training, with a special focus on science and engineering. Unlike the Western model, which emphasized liberal education, the Soviet system aimed to produce specialists with practical qualifications. Over the last 40 years, China has retained this basic model and made it increasingly accessible. Since the government's 1999 decision to expand university enrollment, the annual number of university graduates has surged from 1 million in 1999 to 12 million today, roughly half of whom hold degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics. Today, China has nearly five times as many STEM graduates as the U.S. and seven times as many engineers. This explains why, unlike American consumers, Chinese consumers enjoy effective, affordable and widely available after-sales and maintenance services on the products they purchase, from electronics to EVs. China has also seen the value of learning from the West, sending more than 6 million students to foreign universities over the last 40 years, the majority of whom have returned to China after completing their studies. This has contributed substantially to China's manufacturing catch-up, especially over the last two decades. But education was just part of the equation. China's 1979 decision to allow local firms to establish joint ventures with foreign companies led to technological upgrading in a broad range of sectors. Crucially, as China built up increasingly advanced manufacturing capabilities, it also developed supply chains and supporting infrastructure. Today, China's manufacturing sector depends on a robust network of suppliers, innovators, manufacturers and logistics providers. China's government has played a vital role in building and nurturing this ecosystem. But, contrary to the prevailing impression in the West, this is not an exclusively — or even primarily — top-down process. China is composed of 31 provinces, around 300 prefecture-level cities and about 2,800 counties and cities, and at every level, governments compete with one another to promote growth and industrial development. While the central government sets priorities, any policy it introduces to support specific industries functions, in practice, as a horizontal competition policy. This economic strategy — made possible by China's massive scale — has been essential to the rapid development and continued competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing. Zhang Jun, dean of the School of Economics at Fudan University, is director of the China Center for Economic Studies, a Shanghai-based think tank. © Project Syndicate, 2025
