Banning teens from using social media a ‘blunt instrument', health professionals told
Erin Wolfe (17), a fifth-year student from Kilmallock, Co Limerick, is well aware of the hazards of social media. 'I know myself and my friend group, we've all dealt with different things. There's a lot of things that people will mock you for.' But, she says, 'people do use it for good, so they shouldn't cut it off for everyone'.
Speaking in the wake of fresh calls to ban teenagers from social media, the secondary school pupil said: 'There's people out here and they're making decisions, and they don't have an iPhone, they don't have a smartphone, they have a landline, and they're calling all these big shots, and they don't know social media.'
She was in Dublin on Friday at the launch of a position paper by the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland's faculty of paediatrics on 'Engaging in Online Activity: Prioritising and Protecting the Physical and Mental Health of Children and Young People'
.
The paper calls for a number of actions, including regulations to hold platforms accountable, public awareness and parental support, and added resources for health professionals dealing with impacts of social media use.
READ MORE
Dr Judith Meehan, consultant paediatrician and co-author of this paper, said: 'We recognise the benefits of online platforms in enabling connection, education and self-expression but we cannot ignore or underestimate the negative health impacts we are seeing among children and young people.'
Some of the negative impacts of online activity include anxiety, depression, self-harm, negative body image, disordered eating, unhealthy food consumption, poor sleep, risk of obesity, cyberbullying and a reduction in self-esteem, social wellbeing and happiness.
'I think education, first of all, has a key role to play in terms of knowing how to safely navigate that world,' said Dr Meehan, adding: 'We welcome the establishment of the Government Online Health Taskforce and Coimisiún na Meán's commitment to child safety in the enforcement of the Digital Services Act.'
On Thursday, in the Dáil, Tánaiste Simon Harris responded to a question from Independent TD Paul Gogarty, in which he described the high numbers of children using social media as a 'ticking time bomb'.
Mr Harris said he believed Ireland should follow Australia's legislative change and seriously consider banning those under the age of 16 from using social media.
[
Online safety commissioner 'deeply concerned' at rise of AI-generated child sex-abuse images
Opens in new window
]
Asked about the proposal, Dr Meehan said 'a ban is a very blunt instrument. I've no doubt that the taskforce are going to be looking at that, and I'd say Simon Harris will wait for the report of the taskforce.'
She said: 'We need the Government to step up and enforce mandatory regulation and get these powerful platforms to step up and moderate some of their harmful content, enforce age verification measures and ethically design platforms so that they're minimising excessive use.'
She said: 'In clinics all around the country, paediatricians are seeing teenagers who are struggling, and their struggles are heavily linked to their online activity, and this isn't guesswork, there is a huge amount of evidence.'
One example is the US Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which found an association between screen time and worsening mental health, increased behavioural problems, decreased academic performance and poorer sleep, but heightened quality of peer relationships.
Some reviews have found that the duration or frequency of social media use was more consistently linked with anxiety and depression in girls compared with boys.
'We certainly don't want to appear to be anti-technology, anti- the digital world. I mean, it's a phenomenal world in terms of its benefits, and it is here to stay. It's really a societal collective responsibility, young people, parents, social media companies, government, policy, healthcare providers. Everybody needs to take responsibility for it,' said Dr Meehan.
When asked what one piece of advice she would give to a fellow 17-year-old trying to navigate social media, Erin said: 'Not everything you're going to read is true, and not everything online is real.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ireland's plan to weaken legal protections for waterways will push many of them beyond recovery
If I went to my doctor with a cancerous tumour that was treatable and curable, and he shrugged it off and told me to accept it – knowing that without treatment, it would eventually kill me – I'd think he had lost his mind. Yet this is how the Irish State plans to treat some of our most treasured rivers, lakes and estuaries. According to a proposal from the Department of Housing , certain iconic stretches of waters on the likes of the Shannon, Boyne and Blackwater rivers will no longer be viewed as needing restoration. Instead, they will face a future as engineered channels. In the 1980s and '90s, Europeans began to recognise that their rivers were in severe decline due to decades of neglect. Naturally meandering waterways were straightened, drained and dammed; chemicals, pesticides and untreated sewage poured into them unchecked. The problem was cross-border: the Danube, which flows through 10 countries, became saturated with pollution. In 1986, a fire at a chemical warehouse near Basle, Switzerland, caused the Rhine river to turn red with mercury and dyes, as vast amounts of toxic waste flowed hundreds of kilometres downstream into Germany and the Netherlands. Drinking water supplies were shut off, and aquatic life, such as European eels, was decimated. What was clear was that Europe needed a unified, legally binding approach to water protection that set out common rules, clear responsibilities and shared goals. By 2000, a plan was in place that aimed to safeguard waterways not only for aquatic life but also as a source of drinking water, transport and leisure for humans. This law, known as the Water Framework Directive, has a clear objective: to ensure all waterbodies reach at least 'good status', meaning they are clean, healthy and safe for swimming and drinking. Built into the plan is a legal recognition that some waterbodies, especially in highly industrialised countries such as Germany, have been altered so extensively that returning them to their natural state would be impossible or potentially harmful to human interests and security. These are placed in a special category, called 'heavily modified water bodies', and are legally exempt from the requirement to achieve 'good' status. They include reservoirs supplying drinking water, canals designed for navigation or drainage, urban rivers confined within concrete channels or culverts, ports, harbours and rivers drained for agricultural use. READ MORE While they cannot be used as dumping grounds for pollutants, the law accepts that these waters will never be restored or naturalised. For that reason, the principle guiding 'heavily modified' designation should be balanced and factor in whether it serves the widest possible interest: their number should be kept to a minimum, and where ongoing engineering and management is necessary – for example, in a reservoir or port – they must deliver significant benefit to the public. Ireland has 33 heavily modified water bodies, including Poulaphouca reservoir, which provides drinking water to Dublin; Cork Harbour for industrial activity; and New Ross Port in Wexford, run by the council as a transport route. But under the department's proposal, released in March, this number will increase by 1,312 per cent. It includes 122 waterbodies that run through some of Ireland's unique natural areas. It includes stretches of the Nore, Brosna, Maigue, Liffey, Fergus, Mulkear and Carrowbeg rivers; lakes such as Lough Corrib and Lough Derg; and estuaries like Lower Suir. [ Pollution on the Liffey: Algal blooms at Blessington a threat to Dublin's drinking water Opens in new window ] Why does the State want to all but give up on these waters? The problem stems from a law dating back to 1945, the Arterial Drainage Act, which gives the State sweeping powers to carry out large-scale drainage works, such as deepening, widening, dredging and straightening. Eighty years ago – when we knew nothing about climate warming – the law was viewed as progressive; today it clashes with the Water Framework Directive because this extent of drainage causes severe damage, irreversibly stripping rivers of their natural life and course. Ireland cannot abide by one law with the other. As long as these waters are drained, they will never meet the standards set by EU water law. Reservoirs, ports, canals and harbours must be operational, and as such, designating them as 'heavily modified' is in the public interest, as their functional demands cannot be fulfilled while simultaneously attempting restoration. But in the future, who'll benefit from the continual dredging of the Clare river in Galway, once one of our most natural rivers and now, in many parts, a canalised channel? Or the river Brosna, whose waters followed a meandering course through Offaly before its curves were straightened and its channel deepened? And how is it justified in the public interest, given that drainage makes our towns and cities more – not less – vulnerable to flash flooding? Instead of reshaping drainage policy so that it's fit for the critical challenges we face – not least, the chaotic mix of water shortages and drought, extreme weather events and rapidly warming waters – what's proposed is simply remove these waters from any hope of being restored to full health. Never before have our waterways needed climate and nature-proofed policies more. Our waters are warming at levels never seen before – for example, in Lough Feeagh in Mayo, the heat in the water has been above the long-term average (recorded since 1960) since January. Sea temperatures have soared. This is the future for which we need to rapidly prepare. Under the Nature Restoration Law, we're required to restore at least 20 per cent of our land and sea areas by 2030, increasing to 90 per cent by 2050. That includes rewetting organic soils, like those at the headwaters of the river Boyne, which are currently drained. Instead of giving up on our waters and relegating them to a lower standard – all for the sake of an outdated, 80-year-old law – now is the time to put energy into nature-based solutions, which are proven to be effective and cheap as a way to reduce flood risk, improve soil health and meet climate, nature and water goals without abandoning the land. We can't ignore the facts: our waterways are facing immense pressure, and some are already critically ill. Even if our only concern was water security, the urgent need for restoration is clear. This proposal to weaken their legal protections will only speed up their deterioration. Across Ireland, communities are volunteering to revive the life in their local waters. If this legal loophole is allowed, their efforts will be in vain. In effect, the State would be like a doctor unfit to practice – turning its back on the patient instead of providing care. As a result, many of our most treasured rivers and lakes will, without question, slip beyond recovery.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
HSE was aware of report on allegations of toxic culture and waiting list irregularities, CHI tells Minister
The Health Service Executive was made aware of a controversial report containing allegations about a toxic work culture and potential irregularities in the operation of schemes to tackle waiting lists, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) has told the Minister for Health . The Irish Times understands CHI, which runs children's hospitals in Dublin, said the contents of an internal report on issues in one of its hospitals had been 'discussed' with a senior HSE executive. CHI maintained in correspondence with Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill that the report had been raised as part of performance review meetings. The assertion was made last week as part of a submission to the Minister, who had asked questions about the background to the internal report. CHI did not reply to a series of questions submitted by The Irish Times about the internal report. READ MORE The report was drawn up by Children's Health Ireland in late 2021 and early 2022 but never published. The document caused consternation in Government after parts were first revealed by the Sunday Times a fortnight ago. HSE chief executive Bernard Gloster , who took up office in 2023, said he had never been told about the document. He described the allegations in the CHI report as 'absolutely shocking'. The HSE this week referred the report to gardaí. The report raised questions over whether a series of clinics run by a consultant at CHI on Saturdays for patients on waiting lists were necessary. It said the consultant had been paid an additional €35,800 under the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), which buys care for patients on long public waiting lists. [ CHI consultant at centre of review did not fulfil on-call hours for three years due to 'health issues' Opens in new window ] The Irish Times reported this week that the CHI document maintained that there were 'significant concerns relating to the prudent and beneficial management of NTPF funding and lack of oversight of access initiatives which are ultimately not in keeping with the memorandum of understanding between CHI and the NTPF'. The report also said Children's Health Ireland had a 'broken culture – created by dysfunctional relationships and challenging behaviours'. The National Treatment Purchase Fund said that on learning of the allegations a fortnight ago, it suspended, pending a review, arrangements at CHI – known as insourcing – that saw hospitals and staff receive additional payments for treating patients on waiting lists outside core working hours. The Department of Health said on Friday that it believed NTPF funding for waiting list initiatives at Children's Health Ireland would recommence imminently. The NTPF said it took the issues around insourcing raised by the Children's Health Ireland report very seriously and was working closely with the department and HSE on this matter. 'It is completely unacceptable that there would be any misuse of public money and that children would wait longer for surgery when the whole purpose of the National Treatment Purchase Fund is to ensure faster access to treatment for public patients. The NTPF will fully reserve its position in relation to any proven misuse of public money and explore all options for restitution while ensuring public patients get the treatment they deserve.' It said that following initial reports about the CHI internal report, it immediately placed a temporary pause on all insourcing work with the children's hospital group 'while it initiated a review of this work to gather the necessary assurances regarding compliance, value for money and appropriate use of funding mechanisms'. 'This work is ongoing at the highest level with CHI to obtain and review these assurances. The intention is that the temporary pause will be lifted as soon as the NTPF is satisfied with the assurances given by CHI in this review so as to minimise any disruption to children and their families.' It said media reports that claimed 'thousands' of children would face surgery delays due to this pause were inaccurate, ill-informed and very disappointing to read.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Sleep Room by Jon Stock: Could an Irish version of this frightening scandal in British psychiatry yet emerge?
The Sleep Room. A Very British Medical Scandal Author : Jon Stock ISBN-13 : 978-0349128894 Publisher : Bridge Street Press Guideline Price : £25 Day and night no longer held any meaning for the inhabitants of the Sleep Room at The Royal Waterloo Hospital in London in the 1960s. They were all women, most being treated without their consent and spending weeks at a time in a state of deep sleep induced by a cocktail of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication, sedatives and electroconvulsive therapy. They were roused every six hours by nurses and taken to the bathroom, had their vital signs checked, were administered enemas, drugs and ECT, and returned to their beds. These women had one thing in common: they were all under the care of the eminent psychiatrist Dr William Sargent. Sargent was one of the most influential psychiatrists in postwar British society. He was appointed Physician in Charge of the Department of Psychological Medicine at St Thomas', one of the world's most prestigious teaching hospitals. He occupied other positions of considerable influence and impact. Sargent was lauded by many of his peers and he was a frequent contributor to the BBC and newspapers. He died in 1988. READ MORE It appears that Sargent's raison d'être was to treat mental health conditions by physical means. The brutal treatment regime at the Sleep Room was his brainchild and a manifestation of his near obsession to utilise physical interventions to treat mental distress. It is also a chilling manifestation of his unfettered power and the acquiescence of the medical establishment around him. Jon Stock in The Sleep Room captures this tyranny in a gripping manner. Stock has written several psychological thrillers; his writing here, however, is constrained in the best sense. There is a dignity and sensitivity embedded in Stock's accounts of the women's stories that make up this scandal. Several chapters explicitly focus on individual women who were often involuntary inhabitants of the Sleep Room. Each of these chapters is titled using the woman's name. The actor Celia Imrie is one; she was just 14 when she began her de facto incarceration in the Sleep Room as a 'treatment' for anorexia. Sargent offered the alluring promise of reprogramming the human mind, an offering that in the Cold War era was of immense interest to the CIA and M15. Stock goes into great detail concerning Sargent's somewhat tentative links to these organisations, describing a fascinating episode concerning a non-consensual trial of LSD as a potential 'truth drug'. However, at times I felt that this was almost a separate story and detracted somewhat from the brutal impact Sargent had on the lives of his patients. Stock reveals a frightening scandal at the heart of the British medical establishment, a scandal that crossed class divides, had international reach, appears to have been facilitated by the establishment for decades and has had the most debilitating impact on the women involved. While reading, I couldn't help wondering if Sargent's obsession with physical treatment of mental illness had reached Irish shores, and if there is a Sleep Room scandal yet to emerge here. Paul D'Alton is a clinical psychologist and associate professor of psychology at UCD
