logo
A Gen Zer swears by a LinkedIn trick that helped him be among the first to apply for roles. Experts say he's onto something.

A Gen Zer swears by a LinkedIn trick that helped him be among the first to apply for roles. Experts say he's onto something.

Being among the first to apply for a job can increase your chances for success. A LinkedIn trick helped a Gen Zer in tech beat the rush of other applicants.
In 2018, when Michael Yan was a freshman computer science major at Stanford University, he wanted a competitive edge when applying to internships. After searching for his desired job and using LinkedIn's feature that sorts roles posted in the last day, he tweaked the website URL — changing the numbers at the end so he'd only see posts from the last hour instead of the last 24 hours.
"It was extremely helpful in shortlisting jobs that were posted recently that I could basically prioritize applying to," Yan, 25, told Business Insider.
Yan said this trick helped him focus on the newest job postings, and he thinks it was one of the reasons he landed internships after his first two years in college. During his sophomore year, in 2019, he was offered internships at Microsoft and Meta — and accepted the latter.
In 2020, Yan dropped out of Stanford to start Simplify, which offers an AI copilot that aims to help people find and apply for jobs. He said applying early remains one of his top tips for job seekers.
Hundreds of Americans have told BI that they've struggled to find work in the last year. While the unemployment rate remains low compared to historical levels, businesses are hiring at nearly the lowest rate since 2013, excluding a temporary dip in 2020. In response to these challenges, some Americans are looking for ways to stand out. Career experts from LinkedIn, Indeed, and ZipRecruiter told Business Insider that applying to jobs early could give candidates an edge in today's challenging job market.
When asked about Yan's job filter trick, LinkedIn told BI that keyword and search filter restrictions frustrate some job seekers, but that the company was working to reduce those limitations.
Applying early could "change your odds"
There are several perks to being among the early wave of job applicants.
Andrew McCaskill, a LinkedIn career expert, suggested that job seekers set up alerts for specific types of roles so they can apply quickly after the listing goes live. He added that applying to a job on LinkedIn within the first 10 minutes of receiving an alert can increase a person's chances of hearing back from the company by up to four times.
"Being among the first to apply, especially for jobs you really want or are super qualified for, should certainly be part of a job search strategy," he said.
Sam DeMase, a career expert at ZipRecruiter, agreed and added that some employers close job postings after receiving a certain number of applications, which can happen fast. When possible, she recommends applying within three days of a job being posted.
"Employers are more likely to interview, extend an offer to, and hire earlier applicants, so moving fast can literally change your odds," she said.
DeMase said applying early could be particularly important for entry-level positions, which tend to see a large number of applicants. She added that roles at startups and in the retail and customer service sectors tend to be filled fairly quickly.
Jennifer Herrity, a career trends expert at Indeed, said that an early application can demonstrate enthusiasm and promptness, and that it's best to apply to a job no more than a week or two after it's been posted.
To be sure, the timing of an application is only one factor in a job search. The career experts Business Insider spoke with said job seekers shouldn't sacrifice application quality just to be early. They added that applicants should tailor their résumés for each role and ensure the positions they apply for match their skills and experience.
"More important than applying quickly — whether that's within 24 hours or one hour — is that you're a good fit for the job you're applying to, and that your application shows you off in the best light," McCaskill said.
Have you landed a new job in the last year and are open to sharing your story? Please fill out this quick Google Form.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SNAP user's testimony causes backlash, cruel feedback
SNAP user's testimony causes backlash, cruel feedback

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

SNAP user's testimony causes backlash, cruel feedback

After President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the House, it introduced new fears for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to survive. The bill proposed an estimated $300 billion in cuts to SNAP over the next decade. If that portion of the bill passes the Senate as it is currently written, it would leave 12.6% of Americans potentially unable to afford shelter and food. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The way it currently works is that states would begin to pay at least 5% of food benefit costs, and up to 25% if they have higher error rates, forcing states to choose between raising taxes, cutting other programs, or limiting SNAP access, per the Food Research & Access Center. Related: Scott Galloway sends bold statement on Social Security, US economy Republican senators pushed back hard on the cuts, leading to June 10 reports that the SNAP changes were being scaled down. The reworked plan cuts the state penalty for error from 25% to 15%, but Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told Politico that they are "still negotiating." Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota took to social media on June 11 to share a video she surely thought would be of help to advocate for keeping SNAP intact. But her efforts have backfired. The video Klobuchar shared is of a SNAP recipient named Felecia talking about her experience as a mother of four living on SNAP benefits. Klobuchar said, "Today, we heard from Felecia, a single mom of four who works up to three jobs at a time to make ends meet. She counts on SNAP to help put food on the table. This is who Republicans in Congress are trying to take food away from. Listen to her story." In the video, Felecia says, "I would like to tell you my story on how SNAP benefit has helped me," becoming visibly emotional. "When I had my oldest daughter 21 years ago, I was working three jobs," Felecia said. "One job alone, I had to pay childcare. Another one to pay food, which wasn't enough. And one to pay the bills, and I still struggled alive." Related: Social Security income tax deduction hits major roadblock Felecia went on to say that she now has a full-time job as a bus monitor, but she only gets paid once a month, which is why she still needs SNAP. "By the time I get my bills paid, I have nothing left to pay for food and other basic needs. If it wasn't for SNAP benefits, I wouldn't be able to feed my children," she said. The comments on the video exploded, causing it to rake in 75,000 views and make the terms "SNAP" and "Felecia" go viral on X. But instead of garnering empathy, it achieved the opposite effect. People in the thread savagely attacked the mother of four, mostly with comments about her weight. "I'm not saying take her SNAP benefits, but what I'm saying is she doesn't need as much as she's getting," X user currermell said. "Either she's eating it all and her kids are already going hungry, or the handouts meant to sustain her life are having the opposite effect." Related: Walmart issues urgent message about the alarming cost of food "Do you know how many calories it takes to look like her? She's doing fine," X user Rafester said. Some opted to attack Felecia's relationship choices instead of her weight, saying, "Why does she have 4 children and no husband? Life choices matter. Sorry but 4 unplanned pregnancies and no partner present is absolute nonsense," X user fictitiousfruit said. A few rare voices in the thread abstained from insults. "Not a single person wants SNAP taken away from Felecia. Every single person wants SNAP revoked for people who aren't trying or aren't contributing to the country they take advantage of," user Zac DiSalvo said. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

School board to take up multiple improvement projects
School board to take up multiple improvement projects

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

School board to take up multiple improvement projects

OTTUMWA — The Ottumwa Community School District Board of Education is expected to address several improvement projects at various buildings in the district, as well as technology renewals during Monday's meeting at Career Campus. One of the bigger-ticket improvement items includes awarding a contract to Bi-State Contracting at the cost of $196,270 for renovations to the wrestling room, backstage dressing rooms, two classrooms and the teachers' lounge as part of the high school's comprehensive renovation project. The board will also take up a bid with Musco Lighting for $65,000 for lighting at the Fourth Street entrance parking lot at Schafer Stadium, as well as a bid for future at Eisenhower Elementary School for just over $43,000. The school board is also expected to approve contract renewals with Powerschool and ParentSquare communication tools. Also during the meeting, the board has a recommendation to appoint a candidate to serve the remainder of Jeremy Weller's term. Weller resigned from the board last month after taking the role as the district's security and safety coordinator; his seat will be filled until November, as it is one of three seats that will be on the ballot. The meeting begins at 6 p.m.

Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix
Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix

Scott Galloway, the podcaster and New York University professor, explained his view on June 13 that the last significant battle in the streaming industry was a showdown between Netflix and Hollywood - and Netflix emerged victorious. By expanding production globally, taking advantage of broadband technology, and capitalizing on inexpensive funding, Netflix (NFLX) was able to make large-scale investments similar to Amazon's strategy, Galloway explained, leaving competitors unable to keep pace. The outcome? A major shift in value from traditional studios and entertainment talent to Netflix's investors and subscribers. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Netflix's newest version operates as more than just a subscription-based platform - it now combines both subscriptions and advertising in its business model. And nearly 94 million people have chosen Netflix's ad-supported plan since it was introduced fewer than three years ago, according to Galloway. Netflix has proven itself to be a master of adaptation in the media landscape. It started as a mail-order DVD business, toppling the giant Blockbuster. Then it evolved into a streaming powerhouse, upending Hollywood's dominance. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Now, after a decade without major changes, Netflix is transforming once more, Galloway wrote. The company is introducing AI-driven content recommendations, mobile-friendly vertical videos, and a refreshed visual design to take on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. And once again, the streaming service faces a new challenge. Shutterstock Having won the last streaming war, Netflix now confronts a new threat, Galloway explained in his "No Mercy / No Malice" newsletter. In fact, this prominent challenger is in the ring with all streaming services. "The next streaming war?" Galloway wrote. "YouTube takes on the world." "This year, more people in the U.S. watched YouTube on TVs than on mobile devices - a first," he continued. "YouTube is now the No. 1 distributor of TV content, according to Nielsen. And for the past three months, YouTube registered the largest share of TV viewing (12%) among media companies; Netflix accounted for 7.5%." More on the U.S. economy: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security YouTube is essentially public access television scaled to the internet, but with vastly superior production quality, observed Galloway. His Markets podcast co-host Ed Elson notes that Gen Z sees YouTube - owned by Alphabet (GOOGL) - as an algorithm-driven force shifting influence away from established brands and toward individual creators. The biggest disruptor to Hollywood, Galloway argues, isn't Netflix chairman's Reed Hastings - it's MrBeast, the YouTube star who has perfected parasocial relationships. In 2023 alone, MrBeast amassed over a billion hours of watch time, surpassing the top Netflix shows. "But just as individual content creators disrupted Hollywood, AI may disrupt content creators," Galloway wrote. While Netflix is expected to invest around $18 billion in content this year, YouTube effectively operates with a content budget of zero, instead sharing ad revenue with its creators. MrBeast has revealed that producing a single video typically costs him $2.5 million. Yet in a striking shift, an AI-generated muzak channel recently surpassed him, becoming the fastest-growing channel on YouTube this month. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy Galloway argues that the rise of Netflix, YouTube and the competition for streaming audiences has cost us something vital: a shared cultural experience. In 1983, the final episode of M.A.S.H. was a national event, drawing 106 million viewers - nearly half of America, he recalls. By contrast, last year's most-watched scripted TV finale, "Yellowstone," reached just 13 million people, a mere 4% of the country. The shift from scheduled programming to unlimited, on-demand content has fragmented American culture, Galloway suggests - and this fact reflects the loss of two key societal pillars: collective experiences and a shared identity. "Without shared stories, we don't laugh together, love/hate the same heroes/villains, or believe in the same facts when we argue," Galloway wrote. "We lose our empathy, our ability to see each other as human." "It's hard to demonize someone you watched 'Cheers' with every Thursday night; it's easy to hate someone whose cultural references are completely foreign to your feed." Related: Scott Galloway makes major prediction on world economy; 401(k) impact seen The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store