Court retraces steps of Cradock Four
Premium
By Riaan Marais - 03 June 2025
From the hill in the suburb of Bergsig, overlooking Nxuba, state security services had an uninterrupted view of Lingelihle Township — particularly the home of political activist Matthew Goniwe.
It was from that hill where they continuously monitored the movements of the Cradock Four, and in 1985 slowly formulated their sinister plans to have Goniwe and his comrades, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkhonto and Sicelo Mhlauli, eliminated...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
National Dialogue an opportunity to address climate change
People's lives have been disrupted by climate change and the National Dialogue is the platform to raise this. Photo: File Over the past four years, regions like the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal have endured catastrophic flooding, resulting in loss of life, destruction of homes and damage to infrastructure. The National Dialogue provides a platform to address the pressing environmental problems that confront our nation. The dialogue aims to foster unity, address problems and shape South Africa's future through inclusive conversations. It will involve various sectors of society, including government, political parties, civil society, business, labour and local leaders. It is imperative that we seize this opportunity to hold the government accountable in charting a course for a more sustainable and resilient future. The frequency and severity of climate-induced disasters have underscored a glaring gap in our preparedness and response mechanisms. Local governments, despite their best efforts, have struggled to implement effective adaptation strategies and early warning systems. Yet, without the proper capacity, budgeting and planning, local governments are going to continue to fail their citizens. In May, the The National Dialogue is an ideal forum to foster understanding and collaboration among all stakeholders in addressing climate change. Stakeholders must call for the remaining provisions of the Climate Change Act to be enacted swiftly. In this context, the role of the National Dialogue cannot be overstated. This situation calls for a robust, coordinated response from the national government, led by the department of forestry, fisheries and the environment, which is responsible for developing enabling legislation and regulation at national level. Support should come from others such as the department of co-operative governance and traditional affairs, which co-ordinates responses at provincial and local level; the treasury, which must allocate sufficient budget for investments in disaster preparedness, infrastructure and capacity building; and local people, whose knowledge can be integrated across agencies to strengthen early warning systems. Moreover, it is crucial to address the broader systemic issues that exacerbate vulnerability to climate change. This includes re-evaluating our relationship with the fossil fuel industries, which continue to operate in ways that may contravene our international commitments, particularly in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. The recent advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) underscores the need for decisive action in this regard. Presenting the 133-page document in By curbing the operations of fossil fuel companies and promoting sustainable energy solutions, South Africa can align its national policies with global environmental standards. All it takes is political will. To move forward, the government, through the forestry, fisheries and the environment department, must prioritise comprehensive climate strategies at the local level through robust adaptation regulations that integrate local input and scientific expertise. This approach will not only enhance South Africa's adaptive capacity but also demonstrate its commitment to fulfilling its international obligations as articulated by the By doing so, South Africa can position itself as a leader in climate action, paving the way for a more equitable and resilient future. The National Dialogue represents a moment for South Africans to articulate their experiences of the effects of climate change, through open and honest discussions with the state and other stakeholders, with the objective of developing a 'whole of society' approach to mitigating and adapting to climate change. Allan Basajjasubi is a senior programme officer for the Affirming Rights Stream at .
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Two days left for Gayton McKenzie to respond to K-word allegations
Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy The South African Human Rights Commission ( The commission confirmed that it had received complaints from political parties and members of the public after the posts, published from 2011 to 2017, circulated on X earlier this month. The content drew public outrage and renewed calls for McKenzie's removal from the cabinet. In a statement, the SAHRC said the posts amounted to a prima facie violation of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and that McKenzie's conduct was inconsistent with the ethical standards expected of a cabinet minister and member of parliament. 'After assessment of the contents, the commission is of the view that utterances made by Minister McKenzie are prima facie violations of the provisions of the Equality Act,' it said. The commission has issued McKenzie, who leads the Patriotic Alliance, with an allegation letter, setting out remedial measures and requiring a response. If he refuses to comply, the matter will be referred to the Equality Court under the SA Human Rights Commission Act read with the Equality Act. It has given the minister until 20 August to respond to the allegations. The proposed measures include deleting the offending posts, issuing a public apology in consultation with the commission, undergoing sensitivity training, and making a donation to a charity. SAHRC spokesperson Wisani Baloyi said the body had considered the wording of the posts, the circumstances under which they were made, and their potential effect on the dignity of others. 'We believe there is prima facie evidence of a violation of the Equality Act,' he said. The commission also used the opportunity to remind the public that the right to freedom of expression is not absolute. It warned against using hate speech under the guise of free speech protections, citing the Equality Act and the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Act. 'The commission calls on everyone in the country to uphold the principles enshrined in the constitution, including human dignity, equality and non-discrimination,' it said. McKenzie has rejected the allegations, insisting he has never used the K-word. Speaking to news channel 'I can't ask for forgiveness for something I didn't do. Why am I asking for forgiveness for some of the nonsense things I said about guys and swearing at some guys, not racism. I won't apologise,' he said. 'Why would I apologise for something I didn't do? Even if the president says I must apologise for racism, I will not, because I wasn't racist. Must I be so desperate for a job that I start apologising for stuff? No. I'm another type of guy.' McKenzie has also dismissed the controversy as politically motivated, accusing the 'I can never be guilty of racism. Try some other takedown, but never racism,' he said. 'What you see here, they fear me, they have been calling me ibhantinti [prisoner], I mustn't be here, then every time I beat them in the by-elections, where is Bhantinti and all? Now they found racism, what racism? How can I be racist my brother me?' said the convicted criminal turned politician. The resurfacing of the posts and the commission's decision to investigate have prompted sharp reactions across the political spectrum. ActionSA, which lodged a complaint with the SAHRC, welcomed the investigation. 'We maintain that South Africa cannot have a sitting cabinet minister who holds such views, whether past or present, without being held to account,' ActionSA MP Alan He said the SAHRC's action was appropriate. 'No cabinet minister can be allowed to casually use racial slurs and walk away without consequence.' Last week, the EFF called for McKenzie's immediate dismissal from the cabinet. 'A minister entrusted with national identity and cultural diversity cannot be tainted by such racist conduct,' the party said. The EFF argued that past incidents should serve as a benchmark for how such matters are handled, referencing the case of Renaldo Gouws, who was expelled from the Democratic Alliance and resigned from parliament after his racist remarks also resurfaced. 'The dismissal of Renaldo Gouws for his racist utterances set a firm precedent: individuals who demean black people should not occupy leadership roles, particularly in spaces that require engagement with diverse communities,' the EFF said in a statement. 'McKenzie's comments carry the same weight, if not more, as they come from a coloured man using the language of oppression against black people.' The party also accused McKenzie of inconsistency and hypocrisy after he recently slammed a podcast over derogatory comments against coloured people. 'It is also the height of hypocrisy for McKenzie to demand accountability from others. He himself harbours the same hateful attitudes. Recently, when podcasters on 'Open Chats' made offensive remarks about cColoured people, calling them 'incestuous' and 'crazy', McKenzie expressed outrage, opened a case against them, and demanded a public apology,' the EFF said.
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
National Dialogue gains inclusion as activists step in after foundations exit
(Graphic: John McCann) Despite hurdles, including several legacy foundations and political parties boycotting last week's convention to initiate the National Dialogue on resolving South Africa's problems, organisers and participants insist the initiative remains on track. Last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the National Dialogue was a credible programme that would 'launch a million conversations' across South Africa, where people would 'meet to talk about what worries them, what gives them hope and how they think their lives and our country can be better'. On Monday, convention committee spokesperson Zwoitwaho Nevhutalu described the discussions during last week's forum as 'vibrant', saying the He noted how delegates had resisted moves that might exclude citizens unable to attend the two-day convention, telling the Mail & Guardian : 'It was actually humbling how activists did not want to use their privilege at being at the convention to usurp leadership.' The National Dialogue is part of Ramaphosa's attempt to forge a new social compact after his ANC lost its electoral majority in the 2024 general elections, forcing it into a coalition government with nine other political parties, including the Democratic Alliance (DA). The DA is boycotting the dialogue, describing it as an Nevhutalu said the willingness of activists to hold space for excluded voices was a key marker of the convention's spirit. 'What we picked up from the dialogue is that South Africans are very stressed and it is an opportune moment for leaders to engage in discussions,' he said, pushing back against what he called the 'misrepresentation' of the process by those opposed to it. 'All we will do is collate the information and make sure it arrives at the highest level, which is the second convention.' Civil society organisations appear to be stepping into the gaps left by the foundations' withdrawal. Member of the convention committee Nonkululeko Mntambo said the exits opened more space for citizens and grassroots networks. 'When the foundations left the leadership of the subcommittees, the social mobilisation and trauma and healing fell to the grassroots people who were already mobilised,' Mntambo said. 'Many experts have since been discovered who would otherwise not have been in the forefront.' But she stressed that the process is not without risks. 'The dialogue has to address security issues and ensure participants are well trained, for a citizen-led process to be successful. We are dialoguing with people who have very different values and backgrounds.' The trust deficit between the government and citizens, created by years of unmet promises, complicates efforts to build consensus, Mntambo said, adding that the convention showed spatial, gender and racial divides which the dialogue seeks to address. 'Getting people to the convention was difficult as some were coming from different parts of South Africa — from townships and villages,' she noted. Bongani Kupe, the special project manager at the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, said the legacy movements were talking to civil society about how to take the project back from the government and political parties. 'We didn't participate in [last week's] gathering but we cannot leave this important project to people who don't understand its meaning and impact in the citizenry defining the South Africa we want,' Kupe said. He said South Africans had lost faith in democracy, pointing to the declining number of voters who cast ballots in the 2024 elections. 'Our aim is to deal with all aspects affecting the country and there are no holy cows. The dialogue should cover even the most uncomfortable topics that will shape the future of this country.'
