‘Farage is a snake-oil salesman': The unions left reeling by Reform's working-class surge
When Unite, Labour's biggest union backer, ran a private poll of its members before last year's general election, the results were eye-opening.
Although Labour led, union chiefs were alarmed to discover growing support for Nigel Farage's Reform.
'People vote against things that are in their own interest – it's a trick, and it's a clever trick, of the populist Right,' argues a senior Unite insider, describing it as an example of 'very wealthy people plugging into the zeitgeist of workers'.
They add: 'Is Reform a friend to workers? No.'
While Unite sought to keep the poll results private, it was an early sign that something was shifting among its membership.
Reform's popularity was crystallised last week when it gained more than 600 local council seats, handing power to a party that rejects workers' rights reforms and is pushing for a Doge-style crackdown on waste.
Given the party's bold ambitions, union bosses are unsurprisingly rattled.
'We have anecdotal evidence of people leaving unions and joining Reform instead,' claims one party insider.
Farage, a former City trader, has spent months courting voters who were traditionally on the Left, notably using Reform's local election launch rally at JCB earlier this year to declare that he was 'on the side of working people'.
He reiterated that message in a working men's club in Durham a month later. Reform, he said, was now 'the party of working people' and was parking its 'tanks' on Labour's lawn in Red Wall areas.
However, union bosses believe it is a message that masks his true anti-worker sentiment.
Christina McAnea, Unison's chief, last week urged staff at Reform-controlled councils to join the UK's biggest union in order to protect themselves from Farage's planned war on waste.
Specifically, this was in response to the Reform's leader's plan to replicate Elon Musk's controversial cost-cutting department in the US.
In a sign of what's to come, Farage has argued that some council workers should seek 'alternative careers very, very quickly'.
Since Reform's triumph in the local elections, the party has submitted 3,000 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to root out examples of waste in councils, specifically targeting diversity, climate change and 'nanny-state' initiatives.
However, as well as vowing to slash jobs in these areas, Farage has also opposed the incoming Employment Rights Bill, which is set to hand unions greater powers, and pledged to crack down on home working.
All of which has put Reform on a collision course with union activists on the Left.
Yet even this has not dampened Reform's popularity among workers, many of whom have been won over after losing faith in mainstream politics.
Farage's appearance at British Steel's Scunthorpe steelworks last month only strengthened this support, as he threw his weight behind attempts to save the plant.
Despite capturing the headlines and drawing local attention, one leading union figure said Farage's appearance left most members 'horrified'.
Even so, there's a growing concern in senior union circles that the workers whom they believe are under threat from Reform's politics are also being lured away.
As a result, union chiefs are creating a game plan to tackle both Farage and their own members.
'Farage is the ultimate snake-oil salesman,' Ms McAnea argued last week, days after she urged council workers to sign up to protect themselves from planned cuts.
Tackling Reform's rise was a major focus at a recent lunch hosted by the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, which represents almost 200,000 civil servants.
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has also been holding political strategy meetings and promoting clips on social media of workers asking why Farage wants them to lose their jobs.
Paul Nowak, the head of the TUC, is one of many leading the fight against Farage.
'Farage is a political fraud – he cosplays as a working-class champion but he's on the side of billionaires and bad bosses,' he says.
'Let's be clear. Farage doesn't give a damn about British industry or British workers. If he did, he wouldn't have hit the campaign trail for Donald Trump.
'And he wouldn't have voted against the Employment Rights Bill, which will ban exploitative zero-hours contracts and end 'fire and rehire' [practices], at every stage in Parliament.
'Farage and Reform aren't on the side of working people – they'll jump on any bandwagon they can to exploit division.'
His concerns echo the views of those across the union movement, where bosses fear that Reform's threats to workers' rights are being overlooked by disillusioned employees desperate for change.
Gawain Little, the general secretary of the General Federation of Trade Unions, is another union chief who believes the party merely claims 'to be the friend of workers to get votes', reiterating how Farage has opposed the Government's flagship workers' rights reforms.
'I would expect nothing else from a privately educated millionaire,' he adds.
In response, a Reform UK spokesman said that 'instead of attacking us with smears', unions should 'try and understand why so many of their members are supporting us'.
Indeed, even highly critical union leaders can't deny that Reform is gaining ground, with many saying it should serve as a much-needed wake-up call for Labour.
'The anger that has driven many working people to vote Reform is real and we have every right to be angry,' says Little. 'For decades, we have seen falling living standards, cuts to public services and the break-up of our communities.
'It is up to this Labour Government to offer an alternative that puts money in the pockets of working people.
'If Labour fail to deliver for working people, [Reform] will reap the rewards at the ballot box, and fakers like Farage will be the beneficiaries.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
MN government return to office order kicks in as shutdown layoffs loom
Gov. Tim Walz's order for state employees to return to the office at least half-time went into effect this week as Minnesota government workers started receiving warnings of potential layoffs if the Legislature fails to pass a budget by the end of June. Parking lots around the state Capitol complex appeared slightly fuller than usual Monday as the requirement kicked in for the main offices of some agencies based in St. Paul, though many agencies won't have to return to the office more until later this summer. John Wilson, an economist with the state Department of Transportation, said he had already been working at the office most days, but his office has gotten much busier. Work hasn't changed much for Wilson for now. But the prospect of temporary layoffs next month looms over his head. He's worked for MnDOT for 15 years and remembers the 20-day government shutdown in 2011, when the GOP-controlled Legislature and Democratic-Farmer-Labor Gov. Mark Dayton couldn't reach an agreement on the budget. 'Everybody says, well, you know, there's no sign it will come to that, but I remember it felt like that last time,' Wilson said. ' I certainly wouldn't place my bets now.' The Department of Transportation is one of many state agencies that will run out of funding after June 30. It's been two weeks since state lawmakers ended the regular legislative session without passing all of a roughly $66 billion two-year budget. Areas that make up two-thirds of the budget — Health, Human Services and K-12 Education don't have new funding yet either. However, corrections and public safety budget bills have been passed. Legislative leaders from the DFL majority Senate and the House tied between the DFL and Republicans say a final budget is close and could pass in a special session by the end of the week. Most conversations have been happening in private meetings, though lawmakers have provided signed agreements for big spending areas like education and health. It comes after several delays. When the regular session ended on May 20, House DFL Leader Melissa Hortman said she hoped to get a budget done before layoff notices went out. But the process has already started. Minnesota has already told 700 employees that they could be temporarily out of a job a month from now if the Legislature doesn't pass a new two-year budget, according to Patrick Hogan, a spokesman with Minnesota Management and Budget. The first group to get notices was represented by the Minnesota Nurses Association, and more could follow. If there isn't any action by June 9, thousands more will receive messages, according to MMB. The Minnesota Association of Professional Employees, which represents around 18,000 state employees, opposes the return to office order and is holding informational rallies at the Capitol on Tuesday and Wednesday this week as it continues to negotiate a new contract with the state. MAPE, which has said a strike is not off the table over the return to work order, also called on state leaders to overcome 'political gridlock' and pass a budget amid continued uncertainty about funding at the federal level as well. 'These notices may be conditional, but the harm is real. Workers will have to prepare for lost income, disrupted lives and a government shutdown that would impact every Minnesotan who relies on public services,' union president Megan Dayton said in a recent statement. 'We hoped our elected officials in Minnesota would serve as a barrier to the dysfunction and chaos coming out of Washington.' MAPE has said it's concerned about disruptions to families who have adjusted to flexible schedules and caring for children at home. They're also concerned about whether there will be enough office space after years of remote work. Agencies, including the Department of Human Services, Health and Revenue, have gotten exemptions to the June 1 return date. This spring, Walz ordered government workers to report to the office at least 50% of the time if they live within 50 miles of their workplace in a move that state employee unions claimed caught them by surprise. Originally, the range was 75 miles, but the governor reduced the distance in April. Around 60% of state employees already worked in person and did so throughout the pandemic, according to the governor's office. The state has about 50,000 employees. The governor has said his order aims to boost 'collaboration' and help state agencies build better organizational cultures. The move is also supported by businesses in downtown St. Paul, who say they've struggled from the post-pandemic shift in work styles. It's yet to be seen just how much the return to office order will affect downtown, but St. Paul Downtown Alliance president Joe Spencer said businesses are excited to have more workers back. 'There are a lot of great things about working in downtown, especially in the summertime,' he said. 'So, hopefully, they find a welcome reception, and they indeed feel our enthusiasm to have them back in the office.' Ramsey County: Economic Development Authority to allow flexibility on housing projects Special session looms as Minnesota lawmakers narrow remaining budget obstacles Letters: St. Paul should take care of what it has before spending on new things Derrick Thompson's trial begins in deaths of 5 women Letters: Stop with the antisemitism


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California gun ban still alive. For now
A divided U.S. Supreme Court on Monday allowed states to continue to ban semiautomatic AR-15-style rifles, which can be fired repeatedly without reloading and are owned by millions of Americans. But the issue is far from settled. Only two of the nine justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented from the court's decision to deny review of a federal appeals court ruling in September that upheld Maryland's AR-15 ban, similar to laws in California and seven other states. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh, another member of the court's conservative majority, said in a separate opinion that the appeals court ruling was 'questionable' and the Supreme Court 'should and presumably will address the AR-15 issue soon.' Thomas, in a dissent joined by Alito, said tens of millions of Americans own AR-15s, and an 'overwhelming majority … do so for lawful purposes.' And in a separate case, the court denied a challenge to a Rhode Island law, similar to California's, that bans possession of gun magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Justices Thomas, Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. The actions reflect the uncertain status of gun-control laws since the court's 6-3 ruling in 2022 that said Americans have a constitutional right to carry concealed firearms in public. Thomas, in the majority opinion, said any restrictions on owning or carrying guns could be upheld only if they were 'consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearms regulation,' dating back to the nation's founding. Based on that ruling, many state gun laws have been overturned, and California has narrowed, though not repealed, its restrictions on carrying guns in public. But the Supreme Court appeared to move in a different direction last June when it ruled 8-1, with only Thomas dissenting, that the government could ban gun ownership by domestic abusers who have attacked or threatened someone in their household. It was the court's first direct ruling on guns since 2022. Kavanaugh's opinion suggested that reviewing bans on semiautomatics or other widely used weapons may be next for the court, despite Monday's denial. 'We are disappointed that some members of the Supreme Court did not have the judicial courage to do their most important job and enforce the Constitution,' said the Firearms Policy Coalition, a gun-advocacy nonprofit based in Sacramento. 'We are more resolved than ever to fight forward and eliminate these immoral bans throughout the nation, whatever and however long it takes.' The group urged the Trump administration to join a future legal challenge. The administration did not file arguments in the Maryland case, but President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to review all firearms policies of President Joe Biden's administration and 'protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.' David Pucino, legal director of the San Francisco-based Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, was relieved by Monday's Supreme Court action. 'Courts have repeatedly upheld laws limiting access to highly dangerous weapons,' Pucino said in a statement. 'They are proven measures that protect families and reduce gun violence.' The court left intact a 9-5 ruling in September by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia upholding Maryland's AR-15 ban. The appeals court had rejected a challenge to the law in 2017, then was ordered by the Supreme Court to reconsider it under the standards of the 2022 ruling. The semiautomatic rifles are 'military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense,' Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, wrote in the appeals court's majority opinion. A California appeals court gave similar reasons in 2023 for upholding the state's ban on many AR-15-style rifles, which has also been allowed to stand by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Under California's ban, semiautomatic rifles with fixed ammunition magazines — bullet chambers that require disassembly of the firearm to swap them out — can't hold more than 10 rounds. Those with detachable magazines, which enable swift reloading, can't have any of a number of additional features, such as pistol grips. In other states, the weapons are sometimes sold with forced-reset triggers, which pull the trigger back after each shot, allowing rapid refiring. Trump's Justice Department agreed last month to allow their sale under federal law, withdrawing the government's previous classification of the weapons as illegal machine guns. But California Attorney General Rob Bonta said Monday he has notified law enforcement agencies that the triggers are still prohibited by state law. In dissent from the 4th Circuit ruling, Judge Julius Richardson, a Trump appointee, said 20% of all firearms sold in the United States are AR-15s. 'Maryland's ban cannot pass constitutional muster as it prohibits the possession of arms commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,' Richardson said. Maryland's law contains similar restrictions to those in the California ban. It also limits some features and bans semiautomatic rifles that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The Maryland case is Snope v. Brown, 24-203. The Rhode Island case is Ocean State Tactical v. Rhode Island, 24-131.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mel B Gushes About Her Return to ‘America's Got Talent': ‘This Feels Like a Triumph'
Mel B couldn't be more excited to be back at the judges' table on America's Got Talent after a seven-year absence. 'We're pulling out all the stops,' she says of the upcoming 20th season. Her return — alongside Simon Cowell, Howie Mandel and Sofía Vergara — is an emotional one: The 49-year-old Spice Girls singer (real name: Melanie Brown) was still dealing with the fallout of a messy divorce from ex Stephen Belafonte when she stepped away in 2018, and she's done a lot of healing since then. 'In my final year on AGT, I was not in a good place,' says the mom of three (she shares Phoenix, 26, with Jimmy Gulzar, Angel, 18, with Eddie Murphy and Madison, 13, with Stephen). 'So, this feels like a triumph for me. There is hope. You can piece your life back together with the support of good people around you.' Here, she talks to Life & Style's Fortune Benatar about her wedding plans with her hairdresser fiancé Rory McPhee and the latest on a Spice Girls reunion tour. You've said you were going through a rough time toward the end of your last stint on the show. What has your healing process been like? MB: It has involved a lot of hard work. I had to resolve issues with my family — as I was isolated from them for so long — and be totally honest with myself and others. [Back then] AGT represented a safe place. I could put on a Mel B mask and enjoy myself. How are you feeling now? MB: I see this current chapter in my life as a continuation of the work I've done. You don't just recover overnight. Tell us about your fellow panelists. MB: I love to play pranks with Howie. Sofía has been a revelation. She's so gorgeous, but she's also incredibly warm and really, really funny. Simon and I have known each other since he turned the Spice Girls down when we tried to get him to sign us. I love reminding him of that! You're turning 50 on May 29, 2025. Any party plans or goals for the year? MB: My goal for the year is to be happy and to do what I love, and AGT is part of that. I've made no plans, but I think there may be a little surprise in store for me! How has Rory changed your view on love? MB: Rory enabled me to trust a man and believe in kindness again. It was a slow romance, because I wasn't looking for a partner. He's a family friend — the best friend of my cousin — so he's known me and my family all his life. Tell us about your wedding. MB: We're getting married at St. Paul's Cathedral in London, where Princess Diana was married. I'm allowed to be married there because I was awarded an MBE [Member of the Order of the British Empire] by the late Queen [Elizabeth II] for my services to survivors of abuse and abused women. We've had many meetings with the dean and the bishop and have talked about the spiritual and religious importance of marriage and why we want to be married. I can promise my wedding will be a very happy day.