Trump's Third Term ‘Campaign' Begins in Chelsea NYC: Cyborgs, Amazing Glutes, and the Dawn of American Dystopia
- Daniel Edwards's 'Project 29' Anchors Opposing Visions: The Trump Era in Art -
NEW YORK, N.Y., May 20, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — This spring, New York's Chelsea Gallery District becomes the launch pad for a dystopian spectacle masquerading as a campaign rollout. 'Opposing Visions: The Trump Era in Art' unveils its provocative centerpiece: 'Project 29,' a monumental sculpture by Daniel Edwards that dares to imagine a third term for Donald Trump – not through ballots, but through biotech, belief, and brute spectacle.
Edwards's grotesque yet mesmerizing creation features Trump's severed head, preserved in a translucent life-support bubble, affixed to the chest of a dual-headed cyborg hybrid of Elon Musk and RFK Jr. This hulking figure—part flesh, part machine—embodies the bizarre fusion of authoritarian allure, tech worship, and a presidency that refuses to fade.
'Project 29' draws on Musk's real-world ventures—Neuralink, SpaceX, and the Optimus robot—to envision a Trump presidency not sanctioned by the Constitution, but sustained by fringe science, techno-utopian delusion, and public belief in its promise. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. assumes the role of Secretary of Health and Human Services, portrayed as uniquely 'qualified' to oversee the preservation and vitality of the artificially sustained presidential head.
'The work explores what happens when a presidency pushes beyond legal, ethical, and rational limits by any means necessary—and how a willing public embraces even the most extreme measures to keep their leader in power,' explains Edwards.
The biomechanical figure is clad in a sculpted harness and high-tech thong styled after the Tesla logo, with its gleaming posterior boldly displayed.
'I sculpted the gluteal forms with the same reverence one might bring to the Lincoln Memorial,' Edwards says. 'Regrettably, I may have given the monster just enough majesty to win a primary.' Among younger audiences, the figure's physique might simply be described as having a 'gyatt.'
'Project 29' serves as a stark emblem of the present—a testament to the unsettling reality that the dystopia once feared has begun to unfold. In its outstretched hand, the Musk/RFK Jr. hybrid grips an American flag reimagined as a spear—no longer a symbol of unity, but a relic of a fractured nation. Referencing the flag-wielding intruders of January 6, 2021, the pose evokes a dystopian nationalism turned inward, where sacred symbols are no longer upheld but brandished, hollowed, and weaponized.
At the figure's feet stands a 'resurrected' Peanut the squirrel, referencing a 2024 incident in which New York officials euthanized a squirrel suspected of rabies. MAGA outrage of government overreach—and a viral post from Musk—transformed the animal into an unlikely folk hero. For Post-Internet artist XVALA, also featured in the exhibition, Peanut became 'part monument, part meme, part relic.'
XVALA's contribution – a gold-plated bronze MAGA hat designed for ceremonial display atop the Resolute Desk – offers a reverent counterpoint. 'It's not a joke,' he insists. 'It's the most culturally significant headwear of the 21st century. It deserves preservation, not parody.' Where Edwards skewers Trump's afterlife with dystopian satire, XVALA treats the MAGA movement as revolutionary heritage. For him, this exhibition is not parody—it is prophecy.
'Project 29' marks, in XVALA's view, the true launch of Trump's third-term campaign. Edwards, by contrast, relishes the opportunity to ridicule that very notion in sculptural form. The tension between the two animates the exhibit's volatile core.
Providing a grounding presence is artist Jarva Land, whose pen-and-ink courtroom sketches—drawn during Trump's ongoing legal battles—capture the raw theater of justice. 'I draw to see, not to judge,' Land says. Her work, restrained yet piercing, offers an unfiltered view of a nation on trial.
'Opposing Visions' is a kaleidoscope of ideological extremes – from far-left critique to far-right veneration – united by a refusal to offer easy answers.
We invite you to experience 'Opposing Visions: The Trump Era in Art' at the Iconoclast Room, located in the West Chelsea Building at 526 W 26th Street, Room 511, New York, NY.
The exhibition runs from May 26–31, 2025, with special events throughout the week, including a sneak preview on Tuesday, a press opportunity on Wednesday morning, and an Artists' Reception on Friday evening from 5 to 8 p.m. Join us to explore this provocative and timely body of work in the heart of Chelsea's gallery district.
For press inquiries, interview requests, or additional information, please contact Daniel Edwards at [email protected] or call (646) 657-8028. Our artists are available for interviews, panels, and public appearances. We look forward to welcoming you.
ICONOCLAST ROOM: https://www.iconoclastroom.com/
IMAGE LINKS FOR MEDIA:
[1] https://www.Send2Press.com/300dpi/25-0519-s2p-edwards-maganaut-01-300dpi.jpg
[2] https://www.Send2Press.com/300dpi/25-0519-s2p-edwards-maganaut-02-300dpi.jpg
CAPTION: Daniel Edwards, Project 29: The MAGAnaut, 2024. Mixed media sculpture. 'Trump's severed head, suspended in a life-support orb, is grafted onto a dual-bodied cyborg formed from Elon Musk and RFK Jr.'
[3] https://www.Send2Press.com/300dpi/25-0519-s2p-xvala-gooldhat-300dpi.jpg
CAPTION: XVALA, The Gold MAGA Hat, 2023. 24-karat gold-plated bronze. 'A hyperreal cast of an authentic Trump-signed MAGA hat, laser-scanned, 3D printed and transformed into a gilded political relic.'
Images are copyrighted by the artists noted. Rights granted for reproduction by legitimate media, with proper attribution. Underlying works shown in images are Copr. © by the artist(s) noted. All other reproduction rights reserved.
NEWS SOURCE: Daniel Edwards
Keywords: Fine Art and Artists, artist sculptor Daniel Edwards, Iconoclast Room, XVALA, fine art, Donald Trump, RFK Jr., gallery, satire, Elon Musk, artist Jarva Land, NEW YORK, N.Y.
This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Daniel Edwards) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P126306 APNF0325A
To view the original version, visit: https://www.send2press.com/wire/trumps-third-term-campaign-begins-in-chelsea-nyc-cyborgs-amazing-glutes-and-the-dawn-of-american-dystopia/
© 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA.
RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT.
Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Unanimously Greenlights Lawsuit Over FBI's Botched Raid
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday that an Atlanta family whose home was mistakenly raided by the FBI in 2017 can move forward with their lawsuit, granting them a new day in court. The decision stems from a pre-dawn incident in which an FBI SWAT team broke down the family's front door, deployed a flashbang grenade, and pointed weapons at Trina Martin, her then-boyfriend Toi Cliatt, and her 7-year-old son—only to realize moments later they had entered the wrong house. Although the agents quickly apologized and relocated to the correct address—blaming a GPS error for the mistake—Martin and Cliatt were left with emotional trauma and a damaged home. Their lawsuit against the federal government, alleging assault, false arrest, and other claims, was initially dismissed by lower courts. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the agents were protected under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which prioritizes federal law over state law. But Martin's legal team, backed by advocacy groups across the political spectrum, appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that such protections should not shield federal agents from accountability in clear cases of harm. The Court's decision reverses the lower rulings and revives a debate on law enforcement oversight and federal immunity. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns
The spectacular falling out last week between U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire who became one of his closest aides, put the spotlight on two dangerous developments affecting U.S. national security. The breakup provided Schadenfreude to the two men's critics and delivered entertainment value to social media audiences across the world. But it also revealed crucial vulnerabilities deriving from the ways in which important elements of U.S. military and intelligence operations, among others, have been personalized in both men's hands. While this is particularly alarming for the U.S., its repercussions extend beyond U.S. borders, to U.S. allies and others. When the world's most powerful man and the world's wealthiest entrepreneur started lobbing verbal missiles at each other from the social media platforms they each own, the crossfire included threats with serious geopolitical consequences. It may have looked like a high-profile schoolyard scuffle, but the two people involved are so powerful that the clash was far more consequential. It all started when Musk blasted Trump's massive budget bill currently making its way through Congress. If approved, the legislation would add trillions of dollars to the national debt. That was anathema to Musk, whose ostensible role in the Trump administration was to strengthen the government's finances. He initially vowed to slash $2 trillion in spending, later lowering his sights to $1 trillion. Ultimately the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cut less than $200 million, and by some estimates it produced more costs than savings. Still, Musk lambasted the budget bill, and when Trump criticized him for that, it unleashed the furies, with Musk going as far as suggesting Trump should be impeached. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. Among the many threats the erstwhile allies traded was a warning Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that '[t]he easiest way to save money … is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' to which Musk responded on his X platform that his SpaceX company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' The U.S. depends on the Dragon to send astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station, making it no small threat. Focusing on just these two posts, we can see the danger. First, there's the deeply alarming fact that Trump openly threatened to use the power of the presidency to exact personal revenge. We've seen this many times already since he returned to the presidency less than five months ago, but it's an undemocratic, corrupt practice that may be routine in dictatorships but should be unacceptable in solid democracies. Over the weekend, Trump once again threatened to use the power of his office against Musk, warning of 'very serious consequences' if Musk opted to fund Democratic candidates in next year's midterm congressional elections. In other words, he would use his office for political retribution, another affront against democracy. In addition to canceling contracts, as he suggested on Thursday when the war of words started, Trump could also unleash regulators on Musk's firms. As president, Trump's duty is to make decisions in the national interest. If the contracts made sense before the falling out, they should still make sense after it. But the contracts were actually deeply troubling before, and the dispute and threats highlight just how dangerously dependent the U.S., as well as other countries, have become on companies controlled by a single individual, and a volatile one with a troubling ideology at that. Musk retracted his threats to decommission Dragon, but the mere mention of the possibility alarmed NASA and shocked the space travel community. As mentioned, without Dragon, the U.S. has no way to send its astronauts and supplies to the ISS for now, as an alternative built by Boeing proved unreliable. But the threat to shut down Dragon is minimal compared to other off switches on Musk's console. The Pentagon and the entire U.S. security apparatus have become perilously dependent on Musk's companies. In addition to its contracts for the ISS, SpaceX carries out the overwhelming majority of all satellite launches around the globe, including those of military and intelligence satellites. Then there's the SpaceX subsidiary Starlink and its military version Starshield, both of which have become indispensable communications platforms, and not only for the United States. In 2022, when Russia launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine, Musk provided Starlink equipment to Kyiv, allowing Ukrainian troops to access the internet and communicate with each other and their commanders. A large part of the cost of that arrangement is borne by the Pentagon. The dangers of relying on Musk's company for such a fundamental function in the midst of an active war was already becoming evident when Musk started echoing Russian talking points. Then, a recently published biography of Musk claimed that when the Ukrainians asked for Starlink support in 2022 as part of an operation in Russian-occupied Crimea, Musk refused, saying that attacking the illegally annexed territory was 'going too far.' The revelation raised red flags at the Pentagon, where officials started speaking about the risk represented by Musk's ability to simply deny access to his products in the midst of a conflict. And yet, despite urgent calls by military officials for competitors to provide alternatives, few viable options have emerged. The Boeing space vehicle for taking astronauts to the ISS was a disappointment, and Eutelsat, a Franco-British competitor of Starlink, has launched only 600 satellites compared to Musk's 7,000, which represents the majority of the satellites orbiting Earth. What's more, Eutelsat's user equipment is more cumbersome. This March, while he was still working closely with Trump, Musk posted that 'Ukraine will inevitably lose' the war and noted ominously that Kyiv's 'entire front line would collapse' if he turned Starlink off. That's a not-so-veiled warning about Musk's power to cause havoc not only for Ukraine but for all of Starlink's users, of which the U.S. government is the biggest. The U.S. has a reported $22 billion in federal contracts with SpaceX. Musk already controls the launching of spy satellites as well as much of the communications systems the U.S. uses and would use should it go to war. If Trump launches construction of his promised missile shield, the Golden Dome, Musk would be a major player. This risky dependence on Musk is not the reason Trump has threatened to abuse his presidency against his former friend. That is all about revenge. But the U.S. should do everything in its power to ensure it can carry out its policies and objectives without being at the mercy of any single individual or company, even if that was not something Trump was concerned about before he had a reason to punish Musk. The acrimonious breakup, while entertaining, has also delivered two important warnings. It showed that Trump's use of his office for personal vendettas has become a regular, openly deployed practice in this presidency. And it has provided an urgent reminder that the U.S. and other countries have become dangerously dependent on the unpredictable and untrustworthy Musk. Frida Ghitis is WPR's senior columnist and a contributor to CNN and The Washington Post. Her WPR column appears every Thursday. You can follow her on Twitter and Threads at @fridaghitis. The post The Trump-Musk Feud Revealed Two Massive National Security Concerns appeared first on World Politics Review.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
I served in the Marines. Sending them to Los Angeles is wrong.
I'm a naval corpsman and combat veteran who spent my enlistment service with the Marine Corps. I wore the uniform with pride — not for personal recognition and not out of political alignment but to serve a greater purpose: upholding the Constitution of the United States. I've been in combat zones. I understand the realities of armed conflict and the weight of decisions made in that environment. The oath I took — like the oath taken by countless others — was not a short-term commitment. It didn't end when my deployment was over or I returned my uniform. Our pledges remain active and still guide our responsibilities as citizens and former service members.
