logo
Fed-up Notting Hill residents have painted their colourful terraced homes black to get rid of selfie-taking influencers

Fed-up Notting Hill residents have painted their colourful terraced homes black to get rid of selfie-taking influencers

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Fed up Notting Hill residents have painted their famous colourful houses black in a bid to stop 'rude' selfie-taking tourists and influencers from posing outside.
Homeowners on Lancaster Road - located just metres away from Portobello Road Market in west London - say they are constantly swamped with people taking photos in front of their properties.
They claim influencers stand right outside their doors to get the perfect shot with some even undergoing multiple outfit changes.
Meanwhile, it's claimed that brazen tourists will enjoy lunchtime picnics on their doorsteps and often peer through their windows 'forgetting that people actually live there'.
As a result, two houses on the road have ditched their previous bright exterior - in the hopes that black walls are 'less Instagrammable' - and will therefore stop people coming there.
Previously, a purple and pink home sat either side of an already-black house but now they have joined forces with their neighbour.
A 'quiet zone' sign has also been put up - and one property further down the street has even strung a rope across their front steps.
One resident, who did not want to be named, said: 'Our house was actually originally black and the others weren't.
'But the other two decided to join us a couple months ago as we all agree that black houses don't look good on social media.
'I understand why people take photos - because of how it looks - but it just gets so packed.
'We can have hundreds of people on the street at once and it's a residential road - we're not able to cater to tourists.
'I think people just forget that people live here. So the hope with painting the houses black is that tourists will relax a bit. It's been working a little bit so far, to be fair.'
The resident said he didn't expect the remaining houses on the street to also ditch their colourful paint but said it might be necessary if the problem continues.
He said: 'We obviously want our neighbours to do whatever they want, but if this doesn't work, and we all have to go one colour to get it to stop, then hopefully as a street we can join together and do that.'
Another resident, who also wished to anonymous, said: 'My family moved in about a month ago and the previous owner painted it black just before because they were fed-up with how many people stop out front.
'It gets crazy. People get on the steps and take loads of photos. On the weekends, there can be hundreds of people.
Tourists taking photographs on Lancaster road where Notting Hill residents paint famous colourful houses black in bid to put off influencers and stop 'disruptive overtourism'
'It's not Londoners, it's mainly tourists. But it just gets stressful. I know my parents hate it.
'The hope with the black houses is that it's less picturesque. They basically want to attract less attention.'
A resident in the third black house did not want to talk today explaining that the point of the colour change had been to 'get rid of the attention' and 'not draw more people here'.
Two tourists who were on Lancaster Road today were Clancy Carroll and Georgia Densley, who were visiting London from Australia.
They said the decision to paint the houses black was 'a downer'.
They said: 'I mean people are drawn here because of the street being iconic and colourful, right?
'It's a tourist spot and surely tourism is good for the local economy. It's a bit of a downer to paint the houses black. We're not fans of that.
'But to be honest, it probably won't work. If the rest are still colourful, people will come here - and if they all paint their homes black, it will become: 'Let's go see the street of all black houses'.
'It hasn't stopped us.'
Residents are now campaigning to try and get other colourful properties on the street to follow suit.
A letter circulated among homeowners urges them to 'consider' repainting to discourage tourists and influencers.
Titled 'Addressing tourist impact on our street', it reads: 'As many of you have noticed, our section of the street has become an increasingly popular spot for social media tourists, drawn by the vibrant colours of our homes.
'While it's great to see appreciation for our street, the constant crowds, noise, litter and lack of privacy caused by people sitting on our stairs are starting to take a toll on our daily lives.'
The letter goes on to claim that 'disruptive tourism' has meant residents have faced 'rental challenges' - and 'estate agents have confirmed it is negatively affecting the price of our properties'.
It continues: 'As a possible solution, three households, nos [redacted] have decided to repaint their homes this spring in more neutral tones to help reduce the visual pull for tourists.
'If more of us consider collectively doing the same, we may be able to restore some peace and privacy to our community.'
Meanwhile, other homeowners explained that they had previously painted their houses more neutral colours, also in the hope of becoming less appealing to tourists and influencers.
George Hencken, who has lived in Notting Hill for 29 years, said: 'Our home used to be pink but we painted it grey around seven years ago.
'The point was to be an unphotogenic colour.
'But the thing is, and something those who have painted their homes black will soon find out, is that even if people aren't using their house as a photo backdrop - they'll still be here.
'They'll be having their picnic lunch in their doorway, sheltering outside when it's raining, and even changing outfit on their front steps.
'And Instagram and TikTok are having this effect all over the world. I know that there's a cafe in Japan, with a backdrop of Mount Fuji, which has had to close because of it.
'And over the years I've only had one tourist say to me, 'You must get so sick of it'.
'With lots of the others - there's just this sense of arrogance and entitlement.'
Ms Hencken explained that what frustrated her most was that none of the tourists or influencers seemed to have any idea of Notting Hill's history.
She said: 'This area used to be a proud rebel corner in west London. Yes, there are expensive houses, but this street also has a lot of social housing.
'They don't know the history.
'Ever since Richard Curtis made that stupid film every American banker or rich guy from Switzerland who spends a few months here, when asked where they want to live, says: "Oh, my wife likes that film".
'It's changing the area. Our doorsteps used to be social places. We'd sit out here and chat to friends and neighbours.
'But now you can't do that. If you do, any random person thinks they can come and sit here too.'
Another local, whose home is beige, also thought the colour would ward people off but found the most effective thing is placing a rope in front of his steps.
He said: 'Our home is beige so it's not as bad as some of the more colourful ones - but the most effective thing is these straps we have now.
'I know the green house has seen a huge drop since putting theirs there.
'Because it does get ridiculous. Before, we had people posing on our steps - which obviously set my dog off.
'They'd even have picnics there. It's just rude.
'With Instagrammers, it's always the same kind of people. You can spot them.. Lots of Italians - which I can because I'm Italian.
'As for the tourists, I mean, it's the people are coming here for pretty photos instead of going somewhere of note. They're not going to the British Museum.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform Civil War: Now Richard Tice says chairman who quit was WRONG to oppose burka ban
Reform Civil War: Now Richard Tice says chairman who quit was WRONG to oppose burka ban

Daily Mail​

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Reform Civil War: Now Richard Tice says chairman who quit was WRONG to oppose burka ban

Nigel Farage 's deputy has said he is 'enormously sad' that Reform's chairman resigned – but insisted he was wrong to oppose a burka ban. Richard Tice said Zia Yusuf, who plunged Reform into chaos after resigning on Thursday, had worked 'incredibly hard' and helped the party win hundreds of council seats in last month's local elections. But he insisted that banning the burka was right because the Islamic veil is 'a repressive item of clothing'. However, Downing Street said Sir Keir Starmer did not support a ban, with a spokesman saying: 'This Government does not believe in mandating what people should or shouldn't wear in public.' Mr Yusuf's departure came just hours after he hit out at one of Reform's own MPs for a 'dumb' question in the House of Commons about banning the burka. He publicly questioned why Sarah Pochin, Reform's recently elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby, had challenged Sir Keir about the issue in the Commons on Wednesday when a ban is not official party policy. In a post on X/Twitter on Thursday morning, he said: 'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' By the evening he had resigned, saying he no longer felt that working with Mr Farage to try to win the next election was 'a good use of my time'. Asked about his departure yesterday, Mr Tice, Reform's deputy leader, said: 'I'm enormously sad that Zia has resigned. He's worked incredibly hard. I've sent him a message of thanks.' Asked if he agreed with Mr Yusuf that the party should not pledge to ban the burka, he added: 'No, I don't. 'The reality is that I think it is right that we should have a debate about whether or not the burka is appropriate in a nation that's founded in Christianity, where women are equal citizens and should not be viewed as second-class citizens. 'If we're a great democracy that believes in free speech, let's have a calm and respectful debate.' Asked by the BBC Radio 4's Today programme if he supported a ban, he added: 'Yeah, I'm pretty concerned about whether or not the burka is essentially a sort of repressive item of clothing, whether women have the choice.' Wearing face-covering clothes is currently banned in seven European countries – France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria and Bulgaria – while other countries have enacted partial bans. His resignation comes after Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe was kicked out of Reform in March for criticising Mr Farage's leadership. Mr Yusuf also clashed with Mr Lowe and said he made verbal threats of violence against him. Mr Lowe always denied the allegations and was later cleared by Scotland Yard after Mr Yusuf reported the incident. Labour and SNP 'terrified' after Reform's poll surge By David Churchill, Chief Political Correspondent Reform claimed Labour and the SNP were in a 'coalition of the terrified' after the party notched up a staggering 26 per cent of the vote in a Scottish by-election. Reform deputy leader, Richard Tice made the jibe yesterday after coming third in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election. While Labour's candidate Davy Russell won the contest with 8,559 votes (31.6 per cent), the SNP came second with 7,957 (29.4 per cent). This was followed by Reform with 7,088 (26.2 per cent), meaning they came within 1,500 votes of winning. The leading pollster professor Sir John Curtice said the result showed Reform also posed a serious threat to Labour north of the border. Last week, SNP Scottish First Minister John Swinney accused Reform leader Nigel Farage of being 'fundamentally racist'.

Surge in support for Reform in by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, warns expert
Surge in support for Reform in by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, warns expert

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Surge in support for Reform in by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, warns expert

A SURGE in support for Reform in a hotly-contested by-election puts Labour seriously under threat, an expert has warned. Nigel Farage's party finished a close third with more than 26 per cent of the vote narrowly behind both Labour and the SNP in the ballot in Hamilton, Scotland. The party said it was a 'remarkable' turnaround picking up 7,088 compared to just 58 votes in the constituency in 2021 as it attempted to win its first seat in Holyrood. Election guru John Curtice said it would be a 'serious misreading' to believe that Labour had turned round its election fortunes, with the Scottish elections next May. He told the BBC: 'Reform are making the political weather north of the border, as indeed they are south of the border.' Reform deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP.' The performance came just hours after Zia Yusuf resigned as party chair plunging the party into chaos following a row about banning burqas. In a parting shot, he said he no longer believed trying to get Nigel Farage elected as PM was a 'good use of my time'. Mr Yusuf's shock resignation - just weeks after masterminding their local elections triumph - came after an internal row about banning the burqa. The multi-millionaire ex-businessman had attacked the party's newest MP Sarah Pochin as 'dumb' for asking Sir Keir Starmer to outlaw the Muslim face covering in the Commons. But insiders said tensions at the top of Reform had been brewing for some time, with the chairman feeling increasingly sidelined. In a statement, Mr Yusuf said: 'Eleven months ago I became Chairman of Reform. Watch moment Nigel Farage makes back door exit as Reform UK leader dodges protesters in Scotland 'I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' 2

STEPHEN DAISLEY: Baillie grinned like the cat who got the cream...and sent the milkman to A&E
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Baillie grinned like the cat who got the cream...and sent the milkman to A&E

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

STEPHEN DAISLEY: Baillie grinned like the cat who got the cream...and sent the milkman to A&E

With its astonishing victory in the Hamilton by-election, Scottish Labour becomes the first recorded case of resurrection from the dead in more than 2,000 years. No one predicted this. Not the pollsters, nor the pundits; not the bookies, nor the broadcasters. Anyone who says otherwise is telling big fat porkies. Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was staying SNP or there was going to be an upset for Reform. And while Richard Tice didn't look upset necessarily, you'd have been hard-pressed to guess his party had received one in every four votes cast in a staunchly left-wing seat it had never contested before. The Reform deputy leader's mind might have been on other matters. Earlier in the day, his party chairman Zia Yusuf quit amid an internal spat on the merits of banning the burqa. Hacks ambushed Tice at the count demanding his views. It's not every day South Lanarkshire Council HQ hosts an impromptu debate on Islamic theology. The man of the night, though, was Davy Russell. Up there on the dais with the other candidates, the bloke just beamed. He is what you'd get if you asked ChatGPT for a Lanarkshire granda: ruddy coupon, unpolished manner, plain diction, doesn't like a fuss, slips the grandweans full-fat Irn-Bru when their mammy isn't looking. (Speaking later to a journalist, he said: 'The only high greater than this was when my grandson Adam was born six weeks ago.' Bless.) His victory speech had obviously been written for him by a press officer and if his delivery was flat and unvaried, it was all this banal checklist of soundbites called for. There was, to be fair, one moment of wit. 'And for Ross,' Russell smirked, 'can you see me noo?' Ross Lambie, his Reform opponent, had branded Russell 'the invisible man' after he failed to show for a televised hustings. Labour's decision to keep their man away from the debate was a canny one. Russell is not a seasoned public speaker. He would have opened himself to awkward questions about Labour policies at Westminster. The potential for gaffes would have been too great. With any luck we'll see more pushback against this alien American interloper into our democracy. TV debates are show-business, not politics, and unless you have a showbiz candidate, they should be avoided. The outcome was as dazzling for Labour as for everyone else. As Anas Sarwar made a valiant attempt to explain the result to Sky News, over his shoulder Labour whip Martin McCluskey had an expression I've only ever seen on someone coming off a three-day bender. What was happening? Was it actually happening? Is it possible to hallucinate off the back of three cups of lukewarm tea? TV cameras caught Sarwar, gape-jawed and gripping Jackie Baillie by the elbows, before breaking into a smile. This victory belonged as much to him as to anyone. Beating the SNP is one thing, but he had triumphed over Scottish Labour's most fearsome foe: Keir Starmer. The Prime Minister threw everything he could at Russell's campaign — Universal Credit changes, Winter Fuel Allowance cuts, uncontrolled immigration — but somehow Scottish Labour managed to clinch victory from the jaws of Starmer. In the wee small hours of Friday there was already speculation that Sarwar could turn around the polls in time to win Holyrood 2026. But, wait, where was John Swinney in all this? He was the face of the SNP's campaign in Hamilton. He made the poll a choice between his genre of politics and that of Nigel Farage. Yet when the chips, not to mention the ballots, were down he was nowhere to be seen. On STV, it was put to Baillie that the First Minister had been adamant that Hamilton was a straight fight between the SNP and Reform. She grinned like the cat that not only got the cream but had sent the milkman to A&E in the process. 'The First Minister is adamant about a lot of things,' she purred. On Friday, Swinney finally found his way to a TV camera and asserted that, while the SNP had come second, it had nevertheless 'made progress'. If losing a constituency the SNP had held uninterrupted since 2011 is the First Minister's definition, may his party make much, much more progress over the next 12 months

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store