ACT MP Welcomes Changes To Anti-Stalking Bill, Calls For Urgent Action On Newer Forms Of Abuse
Press Release – ACT New Zealand
Patterns of abusive behaviour deserve to be recognised by the law, and these changes will help victims seek justice, ACT MP Laura McClure.
ACT MP Laura McClure is welcoming changes made at select committee to strengthen the proposed anti-stalking law, but says more must be done to protect New Zealanders from modern forms of digital abuse, particularly sexually explicit deepfakes.
'I'm pleased to see the Government respond to public concern about stalking with more robust and practical legislation,' says McClure.
'Patterns of abusive behaviour deserve to be recognised by the law, and these changes will help victims seek justice.
'But we can't stop here. As technology evolves, so do the tools of harassment and abuse. Sexually explicit AI-generated deepfakes made without consent are a fast-growing threat, especially to young people and women.
'I have a members' bill in the ballot that would create a specific offence for the creation and distribution of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake content. This should be adopted as a Government Bill.
'Deepfakes are harming real people today, and the law is failing to keep up.
'The same commitment to protecting stalking victims should extend to those targeted by synthetic sexual abuse. We need clear, targeted laws so police can act, courts can prosecute, and victims can get justice.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
'Look Busy – The People Are Angry' In The Face Of Genocide – Government Brings Shame On Us All
The government's decision to sanction Israeli cabinet ministers is a cynical diversionary gesture, according to the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa. New Zealand has joined the UK, Australia, Canada, and Norway in banning the entry of Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. PSNA Co-Chair, Maher Nazzal, says the just announced move is simply to placate New Zealanders angry at the government's complicity with the mass killing of Palestinians and deliberate starvation of Occupied Gaza. 'The New Zealand government statement was quite explicit that the sanctions were 'not designed to sanction the wider Israeli government' of which Ben-Gvir and Smotrich are ministers.' 'The New Zealand government's official statement is laying the blame for Israeli barbarity on just two ministers. Our government is pretending that they alone are responsible for the military violence in the Gaza Strip, and Israel's annexation of Palestinian land, expanding settlements, and forced displacement.' 'All these war crimes are supported and stated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. These measures are all being carried out by the Israeli government. These two ministers are quite rabid, but they are not just freelancers or 'bad apples'.' 'Netanyahu himself is wanted for trial on war crimes charges, so why does he escape the travel ban?' Nazzal says Ben-Gvir and Smotrich would never plan to come to New Zealand anyway. 'The last time such an individual visited in 2006 the Auckland District Court issued a warrant for his arrest to face war crime charges.' (That was Israeli General Moshe Ya'alon – the 'Butcher of Qana'. The warrant was quashed by the then Attorney-General Michael Cullen) 'Even if the government sanctioned the entire Israeli cabinet, it would be meaningless.' 'Israel has made Gaza hell on earth for Palestinians, and is making it worse by the hour. We should be cutting trade ties – including military technology, which might be finding its way to Israel, or sending up satellites from Mahia used by Israel to spy on Gaza. 'New Zealand has bilateral agreements with Israel over science and movie-making. They should stop.' 'The government needs to ban Israeli soldiers coming here for genocide holidays, instead of Winston Peters going out of his way to welcome them.' 'And it goes without saying that the Israeli ambassador should be booted out.' Nazzal says the forced starvation in Gaza has reached a crisis point. 'The choice for the international community is stark. Let tens of thousands starve to death in the next few weeks, or impose a no-fly zone over Gaza and provide military protection for UNRWA aid convoys.' 'In that context, by limiting the travel options for two Israeli politicians our government feels like it's conveying a message of 'Look busy – New Zealanders are angry, we must be seen to be doing something, but really, we don't care.'
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Stand Up For Our Seniors: Age Concern NZ Marks World Elder Abuse Awareness Day
On 15 June, Age Concern New Zealand will join the global community in recognising World Elder Abuse Awareness Day (WEAAD), a time to shine a light on the mistreatment of older people and to call for collective action to ensure dignity, respect, and safety for all older New Zealanders. Elder abuse is a serious and often hidden issue in New Zealand. Each year, Age Concern supports thousands of older people who are experiencing various forms of abuse — including emotional, financial, physical, and neglect — often at the hands of those they trust most. In the 12 months from 1 July 2023 - 30 June 2024, Age Concern was involved in 2817 cases of elder abuse. 88% of alleged people who caused harm were family members, of which 50% were adult children or grandchildren. 'Elder abuse is not just a private issue — it's a community issue,' says Karen Billings-Jensen, Chief Executive of Age Concern NZ. 'On World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, we urge all New Zealanders to learn the signs of abuse, speak up, and support older people in their lives and communities.' This year, Age Concern's theme is 'Spot the Signs'. It calls on individuals, whānau, community groups, organisations, and businesses to help raise awareness and take appropriate action. How You Can Help: Learn to spot the signs of elder abuse and how to respond. Check in with older friends, neighbours, and whānau. Support Age Concern's work through donations Attend local events during 15-22 June, listed on Share messages of support on social media using #WEAAD and #AgeConcernNZ If you or someone you know is experiencing elder abuse, contact Age Concern's Elder Abuse Response Service at 0800 65 2 105 (weekdays 8.30am-4.30pm) or the national 24-hour helpline at 0800 EA NOT OK, for free, confidential support. Let's work together to create a society where older people are safe, respected, and empowered.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Free Speech Union Warns Stalking And Harassment Bill Risks Abuse, Changes Make It Worse
The Crimes Legislation (Stalking and Harassment) Amendment Bill suffers from the common fault of slogan laws with good intentions, without realism about the risks of misuse. The announced expansion of what is considered a 'specified act' goes in the wrong direction, says Stephen Franks, Council Member of the Free Speech Union. 'We've already seen the broad and vague terminology in the Harmful Digital Communications Act being used to silence legitimate dissent many times. This Bill is likely to be similarly abused. 'Truth should be a defense for 'damaging, or undermining [a person's] reputation, opportunities, or relationships'. That would save the centuries-long principle that protects the public interest in learning home truths about powerful people and wrongdoers. It is not enough to say the Bill lets you argue that truth is for a proper purpose. We know that courts have not held that telling the truth is presumptively a proper purpose. 'The broad definition of 'specified acts' as inducing fear or distress, combined with the low threshold for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour', already leaves wide scope for misuse against legitimate surveillance, and dissent. Likewise, the inclusion of 'contacting or communicating with a person' is vague and has the potential to be weaponised. 'By prioritising the term 'fear or distress' without a clear objective override, the Bill raises similar issues to 'hate speech' legislation. The law does not recognise that some people ought to be ashamed ('distressed') by exposure of their own conduct. 'The Government's decision to increase the timeframe for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour' from contact twice over 12 to 24 months also widens the net, making it more likely that isolated or infrequent expressions of dissent could be criminalised. 'We submitted our concerns in February, urging the Justice Select Committee to narrow their definitions, to clarify 'specified acts', and to provide better defences that would let the courts protect free speech. We call on the Minister of Justice to protect Kiwis' speech rights as well as victims of stalking and harassment.'
