logo
Mentorship will grow the next generation of leaders

Mentorship will grow the next generation of leaders

Fast Company2 days ago
Effective mentorship will be the secret recipe to grow the next generation of leaders. I'll be the first to admit that this isn't a new concept, but it's extremely hard to get mentorship right. I've seen organizations toss mentorship into internal and external communications content as a vague component of professional development, with no real structure.
Similarly, I know too many wildly talented, well-intentioned executives who are fully on board with the concept of mentorship but stop short of adopting it as a core element of their lives. The same goes for those just starting out in their careers: Being or finding a mentor is an afterthought, a 'nice to have,' something to consider when their to-do list gets shorter. Spoiler alert to those starting a career: Your to-do list never gets shorter.
Mentorship is a foundation
The word 'mentor' is a noun, describing a person who mentors, but it's also a verb — an action you to do.
I'm passionate about this because I wholeheartedly believe that mentorship is the key to breaking down self-imposed artificial barriers and unlocking our true potential as professionals, and as people.
Before I go any further, here's a critical point: Mentorship is traditionally characterized as benefitting the mentee, as altruism on the part of the mentor who's 'doing a favor' for the person who is less advanced in their career.
Please, if you take nothing else from reading this, hear me on this one: Mentorship doesn't just break through barriers for the mentees. Done right, mentors too, will find themselves reimagining what's possible.
This may sound like Pollyanna-style thinking, but I am speaking from my own experience and from observing countless other mutually beneficial mentor/mentee relationships.
Break self-imposed ceilings
Here's why mentorship matters so much. Most of us construct invisible barriers that limit our potential. That applies even to those who are—or believe they are—at the so-called 'top' of their careers. These self-imposed ceilings manifest in surprising ways, not just in career aspirations but in how we approach work itself.
I've placed limitations on myself, too. And I had every reason not to—my mother was an executive, picking me up from gymnastics practice in a suit, typically the last one to arrive. I've seen what climbing the corporate ladder looks like. But there's a difference between seeing it and immersing yourself in what's possible, because the latter requires confronting your real goals.
Consider how many talented departmental leaders hesitate to pursue paths beyond the head of their department. How often do we see a CMO who wants to become CEO? There's nothing inherently wrong with 'topping out' at anycareer level, but it should be because that's where you want to be, not because that's where you think your path is supposed to end. In so many cases, the stopping point isn't due to capability gaps but because of internalized assumptions about where your career should plateau based on your background or expertise.
Rethink what's possible
This is where mentorship comes in. Effective mentorship creates space to examine and challenge these self-constructed limitations. When someone asks the right questions and provides consistent support, seemingly fixed boundaries suddenly become permeable.
Clearly, this is important for mentees who are rising through the ranks in their careers. I've found that serving as a mentor forces you to confront your own path, assumptions, and limitations. You might never dream of telling a mentee, 'This is where your path should end; don't explore any lateral moves to a different area of expertise, and don't pursue a role that most people with your background would consider too 'advanced.'' And yet, we—subconsciously or blatantly—tell that to ourselves all the time.
Cross-functional experiences build leaders
Many of the limitations we place on ourselves are constructed from a traditional perception of career paths.
And yet, my own path taught me that leadership excellence requires perspective from multiple angles. My first job involved fulfilling collateral packages for inside sales. And while my career has been centered around marketing, I've branched out the last few years by embracing customer success and renewals.
This diversity of experience has done more than build my resume—it completely changed how I understand business. Each role offered a different vantage point on the same organizational challenges, creating a comprehensive picture impossible to see from a single department.
When mentoring emerging professionals, I encourage similar exploration beyond their comfort zones. Breaking down silos between departments improves organizational efficiency and develops leaders with a fuller understanding of how businesses function. Win-win!
You don't have to stay in your lane to advance. The most effective leaders combine deep expertise with broader business acumen gained through varied experiences.
Making membership work
It's a misconception that mentor/mentee relationships must be someone from an older generation mentoring someone from a younger generation, or that they must be at opposite ends of a traditionally linear career path.
An effective mentor/mentee relationship encourages people with different experiences and perspectives to share and grow together. Find someone with whom you click, who challenges you, who holds you accountable, and who has a similar level of commitment to the relationship.
For the mentees, show up with something to offer, whether that's a useful perspective or even just a high level of preparation so you're making the best use of your mentor's time. I encourage my mentees to come prepared with clear agendas for our discussions—ensuring we address priorities efficiently whether we have five minutes or 30.
From mentorship to legacy
I have benefited tremendously from mentors throughout my career. And my commitment to developing the next generation of diverse business professionals has become central to my leadership philosophy. I measure success not only by my achievements but by the growth of those I've mentored and the ripple effects their advancement creates.
Again, mentoring isn't about doing favors—it's about building something larger than individual careers. It's about creating pathways for others to follow while simultaneously expanding your own vision of what's possible.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Economic Forum Clears Schwab, Names Fink as Co-Chair
World Economic Forum Clears Schwab, Names Fink as Co-Chair

Bloomberg

time33 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

World Economic Forum Clears Schwab, Names Fink as Co-Chair

By Updated on Save The World Economic Forum has cleared Klaus Schwab of ' material wrongdoing ' after a law firm conducted a review into potential misconduct of the institution's founder. The body also said Blackrock Inc. 's Larry Fink and Roche Holding AG vice chairman Andre Hoffmann will take over the leadership of the WEF board of trustees on an interim basis as co-chairs, according to a statement late Friday. Interim chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is stepping down.

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store