New tourist tax in Glasgow approved by councillors
It is expected the fee could bring in about £16 million annually after costs and will apply to hotels, hostels, guest houses, B&Bs and self-catering accommodation.
Speaking at the city administration committee today, city treasurer Ricky Bell said he and leader Susan Aitken 'had been lobbying the Scottish Government for some time to give us more powers to be able to raise our own revenues and this is the start of what I hope will be a continuation of those powers being devolved to local government.'
It is proposed that hotel operators keep 1.5% of the amount collected to make up for any costs incurred. Organisations who don't comply would face penalties.
READ MORE: Councillor Ricky Bell: 'Visitor levy in Glasgow could grow city's tourism offer'
Councillors approved the visitor levy at the city administration committee this morning.
Cash generated would go towards the look and feel of the city with investment in infrastructure and the 'built and natural environment', as well as culture and events and marketing of the city as a destination to grow visitors.
A visitor levy forum is also to be set up to provide advice to the council relating to the scheme and it is proposed those involved in the visitor sector and representatives from communities would have a key role.
Employees are to be appointed at Glasgow City Council to handle the process and annual costs are estimated to be about £750,000 to £950,000 – with initial set up expected to be £400,000.
Scottish Green councillors moved an amendment at the committee relating to accommodation provider costs stating that they 'may only retain money under this rebate scheme for three years' and providing more details on penalties if they don't pay.
The amendment was rejected by Labour, the SNP and a Conservative councillor.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
14 minutes ago
- Sky News
Child sexual exploitation victims 'not in scope' of violence against women and girls strategy
Victims of child sexual exploitation are "not explicitly within the scope" of the Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy being drafted by the government, Sky News can reveal. Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation (CSEA) is a form of child abuse, described by police as a "critical threat" to women and girls. It includes crimes such as grooming, and can involve both physical contact, such as rape, or non-physical - like forcing children to look at sexual images. Sky News has been shown an internal Home Office document presented to various stakeholders in the sector. It's titled "Scope of the Strategy... Our draft definition of VAWG", and says that while it recognises "links" between VAWG and child sexual exploitation, it is not "explicitly within the scope of the strategy". "VAWG is Violence Against Women and Girls. If you take child sexual abuse out of it, where are the girls?" Poppy Eyre told Sky News. Poppy was sexually abused and raped by her grandfather when she was four. It wasn't until she was 11, after a PHSE lesson on abuse at school, that she understood the enormity of what had happened. "I remember very vividly when the police came round and told me… this is what we're charging him with," said Poppy. "We're charging him with sexual abuse and rape. And I remember being like, I had no idea that's what it was, but I know that's really bad." Poppy's grandfather was convicted and died in prison. She questions how authorities would police crime if child sexual abuse is excluded from an umbrella strategy to tackle violence against women and girls. "Are they holding child sexual abuse at the same level of importance as they are with violence against women? You'd hope so, but potentially not, because it doesn't need to be in the figures", she said. The government has pledged to halve VAWG within a decade, by 2035. "If the government are measuring themselves against halving violence against women and girls - if they're not looking at the scale of child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation within that - that will mean we are failing many young victims of abuse," said Andrea Simon, director of campaign group End Violence Against Women. The Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse, which is funded by the Home Office, estimates 500,000 children in England and Wales are sexually abused every year. 'Danger' of having separate plan Rape Crisis told Sky News that "for any strategy to be effective" it "must include all forms of gender-based violence against all women and girls", suggesting there is a "danger" in having a separate plan for child sexual abuse. Its chief executive, Ciara Bergman, said it could create a "problematic and potentially very unhelpful" distinction between victims of domestic abuse, expected to be covered by the strategy, and child sexual abuse. "Some perpetrators of domestic abuse also sexually abuse their children," she told Sky News. The government insists the strategy will include action to tackle child sexual abuse, but says it also plans to create a distinctive programme to address its specific crimes. "Sexual abuse is violence against a child," said Poppy's mother, Miranda Eyre, who now works as a counsellor specialising in trauma. "It is violence against girls… and you can't separate it out," she said. "I'm speechless to be honest… it does make me quite angry." A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News it is "working tirelessly to tackle the scourges of violence against women and girls and child sexual abuse". "These issues are complex and run deep within the fabric of society," they added.
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Large drop in number of pupils studying Welsh at A-level since 2005, data shows
More than 500 fewer students studied Welsh to a high level this year than in 2005, the latest data shows. The drop has come despite the Welsh Government having set a target of one million Welsh speakers by 2050. Around 538,000 people can speak the language in Wales. Data examined by the PA news agency shows some 372 students took Welsh as a first or second language at A-level this year, down from 927 in 2005. The lowest year on record was 2023, when just 353 pupils took the subject. This year has been the lowest year for people taking Welsh as a first language, with 185 entries, compared with 260 in 2020. Some 187 pupils took the subject as a second language, with 209 having taken it in 2020. Efa Gruffudd Jones, the Welsh Language Commissioner – an officer appointed by the Welsh Government to oversee an independent body aiming to promote the use of the Welsh language – described the drop as a 'matter of concern'. Speaking to PA, Ms Gruffudd Jones said she supported calls from the Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol (Welsh National College) for Welsh to become a protected subject. She said: '(This would) make sure that every educational institution post-16 offers the course. 'What I hear from people who get in touch with my office, if only you know three or four people want to study it, then schools don't offer the subject at all. 'I believe they need 12 before they decide to run the course. I don't think that's right. 'I think it should be offered at every educational institution post-16.' Ms Gruffudd Jones also said the qualification itself is under review, and the content needs to be made more attractive and relevant to students. She added: 'The other thing is that you can study many more courses through the medium of Welsh now than you used to be able to. 'You can study psychology, criminology, etc, through the medium of Welsh. 'Maybe people in the past who would have wanted to study through the medium of Welsh chose Welsh, but now they have a wider range of choice.' The commissioner stressed that Welsh is not the only language to have seen a decline, with many European languages having seen a drop across the UK. Total entries for French, German, and Spanish were down by 20% from 443 to 352 in Wales this year, with Ruth Cocks, director of British Council Wales, describing the drop in interest in international languages as a 'concerning story'. Ms Gruffudd Jones said the reason for the move away from studying languages was unclear, but may be due to pupils being encouraged to study more Stem subjects. 'I understand that we need people with technical ability, but I would argue that you also need linguistic ability in order to communicate with people in workplaces, to articulate yourself well in future,' she said. 'I would argue that literature gives you some insight into the world. 'I don't think really that it should be either or. 'What's important is that it doesn't go any lower, and we continue to make efforts to attract people to learn Welsh to a high standard.' The Welsh Government's aim to have one million Welsh speakers by 2050 was first set out in 2017. Earlier this year, a new five-year plan was unveiled by the commissioner to help achieve the goal. And the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Bill, which aims to close the gap in Welsh speaking ability among pupils from different schools, passed in the Senedd. Figures from the 2021 census showed a decline in the number of people who can speak Welsh compared with a decade earlier. Around 538,000 people in Wales – roughly 17% of the population – said they could speak Welsh, compared with 562,000 in 2011, around 19% of the population. Recent years have seen Welsh place names take prominence over English as the default, with Eryri replacing Snowdonia on official communications from the national park authority. In response to the decline in A-level entries, a Welsh Government spokesperson said: 'We would like more learners to take Welsh as a subject. 'A consultation is taking place to look at creating new Welsh AS and A-levels, making them engaging and attractive to learners. 'We see the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Act 2025 as a means to provide more children and young people with access to the language within the education sector than ever before. 'We want all young people to leave school with better Welsh skills, regardless of whether they do A-level Welsh or not.'
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
JK Rowling was wrong to label Sturgeon a 'destroyer of women's rights'
Depressingly, it echoed the trans activists' habit of framing this debate as a zero-sum game, where one side's victory entails the other's destruction, when a more constructive tone was plainly required. Sturgeon was already being personally targeted over self-ID by other politicians, but Rowling's actions ratcheted up the pressure to another level. Whether it marked the moment 'rational debate' became 'impossible', as Sturgeon claims, is more contestable, but it almost certainly made the debate more toxic. Then again, I thought exactly the same about Nicola Sturgeon's own comments, when she linked concerns around self-ID to transphobia in an apparent attempt to discredit critics. Read more In one interview I saw at the height of the controversy, she was asked about women's worries around gender reforms. She claimed that of course the Scottish Government took women's concerns seriously, but then insisted fiercely and pointedly that there was a great deal of transphobia in the debate. Stressing transphobia when asked about women's concerns became the standard Scottish government response, not just from Sturgeon but from other ministers like Patrick Harvie. It seemed like an unambiguous attempt to smear their opponents. As someone who had often agreed with Sturgeon, I was taken aback. There are transphobes in the debate, as we can see more clearly now than ever – and misogynists on the other side too – but the repeated emphasis ministers put on this point did an injustice to the majority whose views were motivated by concern for women's rights. Like Rowling's T-shirt, it just further poisoned the climate. Did Nicola Sturgeon really take women's concerns seriously? She had by then already made clear her lack of sympathy with those objections, saying they were 'not valid' and insisting rather patronisingly that campaigners should focus on the 'real threat' to women – 'abusive and predatory men' – instead of trans people. She studiously ignored what deep down she must have known: that it was precisely those 'abusive and predatory men' that women's campaigners were most concerned about. The Scottish Government was backing a gender ideology that was much contested but relentlessly enforced by an activist community online and in person. Women had been hounded out of their jobs simply for dissenting from the orthodoxy. Those who disagreed that a trans woman and a woman were one and the same, or questioned someone's gender identity, were and still are framed as bigots and liable to find themselves and their employers the target of public campaigns of humiliation. In that climate, it would take a brave person to challenge someone's claim to be female in a women's only space. How, with a government that appeared to back gender ideology wholesale, could women's only spaces possibly be policed to keep out bad actors? Sturgeon seemed oblivious to these concerns. SNP MSPs even voted against an amendment by one of their own colleagues which would have halted the granting of a gender recognition certificate to rapists. Liberalism is not about placing the rights of one discriminated against group above that of another; it's about balancing interests fairly. This felt like the politics of the far left. Ultimately it was the controversy around Isla Bryson – who as Adam Graham had been charged with two counts of rape before declaring himself female and being remanded in a women's prison – that decisively destroyed trust in the Scottish Government's reassurances that gender self-ID was wholly benign. So yes, Nicola Sturgeon, like JK Rowling, has poured petrol on the flames. But, credit where it's due, she has also now held up her hands to being part of the problem. She told ITV: 'We'd lost all sense of rationality in this debate. I'm partly responsible for that.' She has also said that she wishes she'd paused the gender recognition act legislation to find consensus. Nicola Sturgeon has reignited the row (Image: PA) In their different ways, Nicola Sturgeon and JK Rowling have both tried to stand up for a vulnerable group, but we have watched them become increasingly radical, probably as a consequence of having to defend themselves constantly against those who monster them. They exist, as we all do, in a truly horrible climate of so-called debate. Rowling was accused without evidence of transphobia from the first moment she dared raise her head above the parapet, and has been on the receiving end of death and rape threats since. These days she seems less measured. She's described the nurse Sandie Peggie, no poster girl for tolerance, as a 'heroine'. She has continued to attack Sturgeon. Sturgeon for her part became more intransigent as opposition to her position on trans rights increased, closing her ears to pleas to moderate her approach. It did not help either women or trans people. Many trans people now feel they are in a worse position than before Sturgeon's attempt at gender recognition reform. Both women have gone too far. Both women bear some responsibility for the bitterness of the debate. But both women could also be part of a reset, if they chose to be. Arguably, Sturgeon is showing a willingness to try. It would take a dramatic change of tone and approach, but God knows, it's needed. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
