logo
Divorce court case: Husband claims wife squandered millions on gambling

Divorce court case: Husband claims wife squandered millions on gambling

IOL News3 days ago
A husband wanted his divorcing wife to lose her half of their joint estate, claiming that she gambled their money away.
Image: File
A divorcing husband asked the Western Cape High Court to order that his wife forfeit her share of their assets upon divorce, as he claimed she squandered millions of rand they have accumulated in assets over the years on gambling.
The wife, in turn, said she only gambled for entertainment, and she told the court that she only spent small amounts on this pastime. The wife turned to court to obtain a divorce from her husband, a medical doctor, and she asked that their estate be divided equally, as they are married in community of property.
The husband, in a counterclaim, asked that because of her gambling, she either forfeited her half or a portion of the joint assets. While the wife alleged abuse by her husband for the break-up of the marriage, the husband, in turn, said it was because of her 'compulsive gambling addiction".
The wife testified how, at various stages of the marriage, she has contributed financially to their joint estate, and she said it was only when they encountered financial problems that the marriage went sour.
She conceded that she started gambling socially around 2012 when her son turned three and was at school. At that point, she had won about R4,000 from the R500 her mother had given her. The wife said that gambling became an enjoyable habit for her to have fun. She could not give a definitive figure of the amounts gambled over time in total.
She admitted taking money from the business she ran to fund her gambling habits. She said she used her winnings towards household expenses. The husband's evidence was that his wife's gambling has resulted in significant financial losses to the joint estate. He said she withdrew and gambled substantial sums from the joint accounts and the business accounts.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
According to him, the gambling losses ran into millions of rands. He testified that his wife would be unduly benefited if she were to receive half of the joint estate, given her conduct and limited contribution to the growth of their joint estate. He said, 'one cannot claim or get what they do not deserve or work for".
In countering his claims of her 'gambling addiction,' the wife said he also likes to try his hand at gambling on occasions. According to her, he further uses household money to play the Lotto.
Counsel for the husband argued that using the wife's own testimony, where she said she only went to the casino about three times a week, at an average of R5,000 per visit for approximately the past five years, this equates to a minimum of R3.9 million in gambling expenditure. It was argued that this figure equates to a substantial portion of the joint estate that was wasted by gambling.
The court accepted that the wife, by her own admission, gambled. Evidently, this gambling was probably more than social, as the wife would have the court believe, but the court said there was no proof that this habit was an addiction which impacted on the estate.
It was found that there is not a basis for a court to order forfeiture. 'The evidence which this court accepts is that both spouses, to a greater and lesser extent, gambled or alternatively tended to go to gambling areas,' the court concluded.
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns
Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns

TimesLIVE

time2 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns

The Paarl magistrate's court has fined former Springbok rugby player Schalk Burger Sr and his company Welbedacht Wines for failing to submit VAT, pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) and income tax returns. The court fined the company R6,000 on each count of failing to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023 and a monthly employer declaration return for March 2023. Burger, 69, was convicted on 14 counts, which included failure to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023, a monthly employer declaration (EMP201) return for March2023 and IT12 income tax returns for the period 2011 to 2022. He was fined R6,000 or 12 months imprisonment on each count, of which R2,000 or four months imprisonment was suspended for five years. 'This amounts to a payable fine of R56,000, or 112 months imprisonment and a further R28,000 or 56 months imprisonment suspended for five years on specific conditions,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said. Burger successfully requested the court to grant him a deferred fine and was ordered to pay the R56,000 in instalments of R6,000 per month and a final payment of R8,000. The accused entered into a plea and sentence agreement with the state. The court confirmed the agreement and convicted and sentenced him accordingly. According to the agreement, Burger admitted that Welbedacht Wines was registered for VAT and PAYE at the Paarl office of the South African Revenue Services. Burger failed to submit the returns on behalf of the company. In addition, Burger, in his personal capacity, was registered for income tax at the Paarl Sars office . 'Following his successful registration for e-filing in 2011, he failed to submit his IT12 income tax returns for the tax years of 2011 to 2022. This was despite Sars' best efforts to encourage all taxpayers to submit their income tax returns.' It was only after the institution of a prosecution and his being summoned to appear in court that he submitted all outstanding returns relating to himself and his company, and both are currently tax compliant. 'The accused's son, Christiaan Francois Burger, was on July 21 also convicted and sentenced on 12 counts of failing to submit his IT12 personal income tax returns for the 2011 to 2022 period.' The 40-year-old was sentenced to a fine of R48,000 or 96 months imprisonment, and a further R24,000 or 48 months imprisonment, suspended for five years on conditions. The NPA said the sentence sent a strong message of deterrence. 'With the filing season for income tax currently under way, this is a clear message that failure by persons and juristic persons to file their Income Tax returns will not be tolerated. It is a serious offence that impacts negatively on the fiscus,' he said.

Former Springbok rugby legend Schalk Burger Snr and wine farm sentenced for tax return failures
Former Springbok rugby legend Schalk Burger Snr and wine farm sentenced for tax return failures

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Former Springbok rugby legend Schalk Burger Snr and wine farm sentenced for tax return failures

Former Springbok rugby player, Schalk Willem Petrus Burger has been sentenced for tax evasion. A former Springbok rugby player, Schalk Willem Petrus Burger, and his wine farm, Welbedacht Wines (Pty) Ltd, have been convicted and sentenced after failure to submit Value Added Tax, Pay as You Earn and Income Tax Returns. Burger, 69, was sentenced by the Paarl Magistrate's Court on Wednesday. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said he was fined R6,000 or 12 months' imprisonment on each count, and R2,000 or four months' imprisonment was suspended for five years. "This amounts to a payable fine of R56,000, or 112 months' imprisonment, and a further R28,000 or 56 months' imprisonment suspended for five years on specific conditions. He successfully requested the court to grant him a deferred fine and was ordered to pay the R56,000 in instalments of R6,000 per month and a final payment of R8,000," Ntabazalila.

25 years in jail for man who damaged essential infrastructure, stole cables
25 years in jail for man who damaged essential infrastructure, stole cables

TimesLIVE

time3 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

25 years in jail for man who damaged essential infrastructure, stole cables

The Booysens magistrate's court has convicted and sentenced Mxolisi Ntshulayilo to 15 years' imprisonment for tampering with and damaging essential infrastructure. The court also sentenced Ntshulayilo, 30, to an additional 10 years for the theft of copper cables belonging to Telkom on December 3 2024. The Johannesburg K9 Unit members, which were patrolling Tiger Moth Road in Aeroton, noticed the accused emerging from a manhole near a box belonging to fibre internet provider Openserve. The man was carrying a sack and a bag. Upon searching the suspect, police discovered rolls of copper cables. 'A check of the manhole revealed that cables had been cut. The accused was arrested and charged,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane said. In court, prosecutor Ronnie Nomcebo Xulu said the accused had been convicted of a serious and prevalent offence affecting the entire country. Xulu said the accused's actions disrupted communication services in an industrial area, resulting in business losses. 'The state also called a Telkom official to testify, who confirmed that the damage caused required repairs costing about R100,000.' Mjonondwane said the court condemned the accused's actions, highlighting that tampering with essential infrastructure is a national crisis with far-reaching consequences. The court said disruptions to communication services affected businesses and hindered critical services such as hospitals and courts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store