logo
Underground with America's nuclear-missile crews

Underground with America's nuclear-missile crews

Hindustan Times3 days ago
THERE ARE no big red buttons in the underground bunkers, or 'capsules', that control America's nuclear missiles. Instead, launching an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) involves decrypting and verifying orders, receiving the appropriate codes and then many hands turning many keys and levers at the same time: two per officer or 'missileer', two missileers per capsule and at least two separate capsules must act in unison. The redundancies ensure that no rogue missileer or crew can fire a weapon—or block a launch.
Your correspondent went through the procedures in a simulator at the F.E. Warren air-force base in Cheyenne, Wyoming, home to the 90th Missile Wing. Even in a make-believe setting the dread was real enough. After turning the levers, there is no going back. Little squares on a grid on the console, each representing an ICBM silo, change colour, from red (ready) to yellow (launch confirmed).
And then you wait. If you still have missiles, you stand ready to fire more. If you are out of weapons, you relay messages to other launch facilities. Above all, you wait for the enemy's nukes, which are almost certainly coming your way. You might strap yourself into your chair, put on a hard hat and pray that you avoid a direct hit. You hope that the survival features—60 feet of earth above; blast doors; springs and shock absorbers all around; and supplies, backup power and air scrubbers within—will keep you alive. And if you eventually make it back to the surface, what would you find?
The mind-bending logic of mutual assured destruction, which holds that being ready to unleash a nuclear apocalypse serves to prevent it, faded from public attention after the cold war. Yet the terrifying questions of nuclear war are returning in a new age of big-power rivalry. The last treaty limiting American and Russian nuclear weapons, New START, will expire in February, with no replacement in sight. Russia has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons. China is fast building up its arsenal. It will have perhaps 1,000 warheads by the end of the decade, according to the Pentagon (fewer than the 5,000-odd that America and Russia each possesses).
In turn America is modernising all parts of its 'triad' of land-, sea- and air-launched nuclear weapons, parts of which are half a century old. Minuteman III ICBMs will be replaced with Sentinel ones; B-2 bombers with the B-21s; and the Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarines (SSBNs) with the Columbia-class subs. The government is also debating whether it needs more nuclear warheads. The most contentious element is the Sentinel programme, whose cost has exceeded its budget, raising questions: why has the air force botched its estimates, does America really need ICBMs and would arms control be the better answer?
America's ICBM infrastructure is vast, with 400 missiles deployed in 450 silos scattered across the great plains. A spider's web of cables connect them to 45 'missile-alert facilities' (MAFs), each consisting of a peanut-shaped capsule below and a support building 'topside' above. Maintenance teams tour the unmanned silos and, when necessary, pull ICBMs apart 'like Lego pieces', as one put it, to be worked on back at base. Armed teams in Humvees and helicopters keep the sites secure.
In 2024 the estimated costs of Sentinel jumped to $141bn, more than 80% higher than the previous projection. For critics such as Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association, a campaign group, the overrun amounts to rank incompetence. Having originally ruled out extending the life of the Minuteman III as uneconomical, the air force is having to do just that because of the delays to Sentinel, which was supposed to begin entering service in 2030 but may not do so until 2038.
General Andrew Gebara, the air force's point-man on nuclear policy, says development of the Sentinel missile itself is progressing well. The problem is that the infrastructure to support it dates to the 1960s and 1970s, and is in worse shape than expected. The original plan had envisioned reusing existing facilities after a light refurbishing, but such are the problems with weakening cement and water infiltration that it would be 'cheaper and faster to just dig a new silo'. Similarly, other officers note, replacing old copper cables with fibre-optic ones would allow more data to flow and reduce the number of MAFs (from 45 to 24).
Replacing the current facilities sooner rather than later brings other advantages, the air force adds. New silos will more easily fit Sentinel, which is expected to be larger than the Minuteman III. And separate systems would make it easier to operate both old and new missiles as Sentinel is phased in.
A new control centre and warhead-handling facility are under construction at Warren. To save money and minimise disruption the air force will try to dig new facilities within existing sites, or on land it already owns.
Does America need ground-based ICBMs at all? Mr Kimball argues that they are destabilising. Instead America should rely on a 'dyad' of missiles launched from air and sea. The location of ICBM silos is no secret, he notes, and they would be a priority target, giving a president a few minutes to decide whether to use the missiles or risk losing them. 'That vastly increases the risk of miscalculation,' says Mr Kimball; better to rely on submarine-launched nukes, which are nigh impossible to find and provide an assured second-strike capability.
Eric Edelman, a former Pentagon official, retorts that, on the contrary, ICBMs are stabilising. Without them an enemy might be tempted to try to decapitate America's deterrent by striking the handful of nuclear-bomber and submarine bases, and command-and-control nodes. Moreover, new hypersonic missiles are harder to spot. With ICBMs in silos, an enemy must fire hundreds of missiles at the American heartland, which would undoubtedly be detected and invite massive retaliation. 'Why would you want to simplify your adversary's targeting problem?' asks Mr Edelman. China, which has built hundreds of silos in recent years, seems to accept such logic.
Some argue that America should complicate the targeting even further by making at least some ICBMs mobile, as China and Russia do. A congressionally appointed bipartisan commission in 2023 recommended examining the possibility. This would revive cold-war programmes such as the Midgetman, a small ICBM carried on a road-mobile launcher, and the Peacekeeper railway garrison, a large missile carried on special railway carriages. Both missiles forces were intended to be dispersed across America's transport network in times of crisis, but the idea was abandoned with the end of the cold war. General Gebara says it was studied anew and rejected because it would be both expensive and unpopular.
Beyond the cost and mix of nuclear weapons, a broader question looms. With the expiry of New START, America and Russia will no longer be bound by the ceiling of 1,550 'strategic' (long-range) warheads each. Some experts say the two sides should continue to abide by the limit informally, pending new arms-control negotiations.
President Donald Trump has spoken about his desire for 'denuclearisation', and for talks with China and Russia to halve defence spending. But neither power seems interested. James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think-tank, reckons nuclear policy is anyhow likely to be decided by the bureaucracy. 'Among the majority of the Republican national-security establishment that thinks about these issues there's a pretty clear view that we need more nukes,' he notes.
As wonks debate, ominous responsibility rests on the shoulders of young officers on alert in the capsules, usually lieutenants and captains in their 20s. They typically work 24-hour shifts every three days, locked away in pairs, taking turns to sleep and work. In quiet moments they stream television and send text messages via a computer topside (no personal electronic devices are allowed). Many use the long hours to study for postgraduate degrees.
On the day your correspondent visited the Foxtrot-01 capsule near Kimball, the two women on duty spoke of the hours of camaraderie underground, watching episodes of 'Friends', and their pride in keeping America safe. On a wall someone had drawn a whale with a spout in the shape of a mushroom cloud—a reference to the 'Moby Dick' squadron of second-world-war bombers to which their unit, the 320th missile squadron, traces its origins. Next to it were words that summed up a mission they hope never to carry out: 'Death from Below'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bus falls into gorge in Himachal Pradesh's Mandi; 8 dead, 21 injured
Bus falls into gorge in Himachal Pradesh's Mandi; 8 dead, 21 injured

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Bus falls into gorge in Himachal Pradesh's Mandi; 8 dead, 21 injured

KULLU: Eight people died and 21 others were injured when a Himachal Roadways Transport Corporation bus plunged into a gorge in Mandi district Thursday morning. Six of the dead were elderly. The accident occurred at a sharp bend near Maseran, 160km from Shimla, around 9.45am. According to eyewitnesses, the driver had edged slightly off the road, and the retaining wall gave way, plunging the bus into a 50ft-deep gorge. Locals immediately clambered down the steep slopes and began a rescue effort. They helped bring the injured out of the bus after calling medical and emergency services. The injured were first taken to Sarkaghat govt hospital, 85km away, from where those in serious condition were referred to AIIMS-Bilaspur and GMCH, Nerchowk, in Mandi district. According to a police officer, five people died on the spot, three others succumbed in hospital. The deceased, which included four women, were identified as Geeta Devi, 65, Doma Devi, 70, Klasi Devi, 60, Barfi Devi, 80, Antariksh, 17, Balbir, 60, and Suman Kumar, 33. All the victims were residents of Sarkaghat sub-division in Mandi district. Prakash Chand, 70, who was referred to AIIMS Bilaspur, also succumbed. Local MLA Dilip Thakur, who met the injured, said that the govt must improve the infrastructure at Sarkaghat govt hospital, which doesn't have "requisite ambulances or ultrasound machines". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Deputy chief minister Mukesh Agnihotri also visited Sarkaghat and met the injured at the hospital. Expressing grief over the bus accident, chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu directed the Mandi district administration to provide ex gratia to the next of kin of the deceased and the best treatment to the injured. Agnihotri said a judicial probe had been ordered into the accident. Agnihotri, who met the injured and inspected the accident site, said a technical team from the transport department is working to determine the cause of the accident. The government has announced immediate relief assistance of Rs 25,000 each for the families of the deceased and Rs 5,000 each for the injured.

End of an Era: MiG-21 to retire after over 60 years of service
End of an Era: MiG-21 to retire after over 60 years of service

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

End of an Era: MiG-21 to retire after over 60 years of service

India's first supersonic fighter jet, the MiG-21, is set to take its final flight in September 2025—ending an unmatched six-decade journey in the Indian Air Force. Often dubbed the 'flying coffin' due to its high crash record, the MiG-21 is still remembered as a symbol of power, valour, and diplomacy. It helped shape Indo-Russian defence ties and played a key role in historic missions, especially in the 1971 war against Pakistan. Defence expert Sandeep Unnithan explains how this jet—once cutting-edge and always fearless—transformed India's air defence history. #MiG21 #Supersonic #FighterJet #IndianAirForce #IAF #IndiaNews

Passenger plane crashes in Russia killing all 48 people on board, officials say
Passenger plane crashes in Russia killing all 48 people on board, officials say

New Indian Express

time8 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Passenger plane crashes in Russia killing all 48 people on board, officials say

MOSCOW: A passenger plane crashed Thursday in Russia's Far East, killing all 48 passengers and crew on board, officials said. The Angara Airlines flight disappeared from radar, and searchers later found the burning wreckage of the plane on a hillside south of its planned destination in Tynda, more than 7,000 kilometers (4,350 miles) east of Moscow, Russia's Emergency Situations Ministry said. Regional Gov. Vasily Orlov said in a statement that all 48 people aboard were dead, and announced three days of mourning in the Amur region over what he called a 'terrible tragedy.' It wasn't immediately clear what caused the crash. Russia's Interfax news agency said there were adverse weather conditions at the time of the crash, citing unnamed sources in the emergency services. Several Russian news outlets also reported that the aircraft was almost 50 years old, citing data taken from the plane's tail number. The Soviet-designed twin turbo prop plane had initially departed from Khabarovsk before making its way to Blagoveshchensk on the Russian-Chinese border and onwards to Tynda. Images of the reported crash site circulated by Russian state media show debris scattered among dense forest, surrounded by plumes of smoke. Orlov said rescuers had struggled to reach the site due to its remote location, 15 kilometers (9 miles) south of Tynda. An earlier statement from the governor said that 49 people had been onboard the flight, but that number later was updated to 48. The reason for the discrepancy was not immediately clear. The transport prosecutor's office in the Far East said in an online statement that the plane was attempting to land for a second time when it lost contact with air traffic control and disappeared from radars. The authorities launched a probe on the charge of flight safety violations that resulted in multiple deaths, a standard procedure in aviation accidents. Aviation incidents have been frequent in Russia, especially in recent years as international sanctions have squeezed the country's aviation sector.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store