
Underground with America's nuclear-missile crews
Your correspondent went through the procedures in a simulator at the F.E. Warren air-force base in Cheyenne, Wyoming, home to the 90th Missile Wing. Even in a make-believe setting the dread was real enough. After turning the levers, there is no going back. Little squares on a grid on the console, each representing an ICBM silo, change colour, from red (ready) to yellow (launch confirmed).
And then you wait. If you still have missiles, you stand ready to fire more. If you are out of weapons, you relay messages to other launch facilities. Above all, you wait for the enemy's nukes, which are almost certainly coming your way. You might strap yourself into your chair, put on a hard hat and pray that you avoid a direct hit. You hope that the survival features—60 feet of earth above; blast doors; springs and shock absorbers all around; and supplies, backup power and air scrubbers within—will keep you alive. And if you eventually make it back to the surface, what would you find?
The mind-bending logic of mutual assured destruction, which holds that being ready to unleash a nuclear apocalypse serves to prevent it, faded from public attention after the cold war. Yet the terrifying questions of nuclear war are returning in a new age of big-power rivalry. The last treaty limiting American and Russian nuclear weapons, New START, will expire in February, with no replacement in sight. Russia has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons. China is fast building up its arsenal. It will have perhaps 1,000 warheads by the end of the decade, according to the Pentagon (fewer than the 5,000-odd that America and Russia each possesses).
In turn America is modernising all parts of its 'triad' of land-, sea- and air-launched nuclear weapons, parts of which are half a century old. Minuteman III ICBMs will be replaced with Sentinel ones; B-2 bombers with the B-21s; and the Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarines (SSBNs) with the Columbia-class subs. The government is also debating whether it needs more nuclear warheads. The most contentious element is the Sentinel programme, whose cost has exceeded its budget, raising questions: why has the air force botched its estimates, does America really need ICBMs and would arms control be the better answer?
America's ICBM infrastructure is vast, with 400 missiles deployed in 450 silos scattered across the great plains. A spider's web of cables connect them to 45 'missile-alert facilities' (MAFs), each consisting of a peanut-shaped capsule below and a support building 'topside' above. Maintenance teams tour the unmanned silos and, when necessary, pull ICBMs apart 'like Lego pieces', as one put it, to be worked on back at base. Armed teams in Humvees and helicopters keep the sites secure.
In 2024 the estimated costs of Sentinel jumped to $141bn, more than 80% higher than the previous projection. For critics such as Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association, a campaign group, the overrun amounts to rank incompetence. Having originally ruled out extending the life of the Minuteman III as uneconomical, the air force is having to do just that because of the delays to Sentinel, which was supposed to begin entering service in 2030 but may not do so until 2038.
General Andrew Gebara, the air force's point-man on nuclear policy, says development of the Sentinel missile itself is progressing well. The problem is that the infrastructure to support it dates to the 1960s and 1970s, and is in worse shape than expected. The original plan had envisioned reusing existing facilities after a light refurbishing, but such are the problems with weakening cement and water infiltration that it would be 'cheaper and faster to just dig a new silo'. Similarly, other officers note, replacing old copper cables with fibre-optic ones would allow more data to flow and reduce the number of MAFs (from 45 to 24).
Replacing the current facilities sooner rather than later brings other advantages, the air force adds. New silos will more easily fit Sentinel, which is expected to be larger than the Minuteman III. And separate systems would make it easier to operate both old and new missiles as Sentinel is phased in.
A new control centre and warhead-handling facility are under construction at Warren. To save money and minimise disruption the air force will try to dig new facilities within existing sites, or on land it already owns.
Does America need ground-based ICBMs at all? Mr Kimball argues that they are destabilising. Instead America should rely on a 'dyad' of missiles launched from air and sea. The location of ICBM silos is no secret, he notes, and they would be a priority target, giving a president a few minutes to decide whether to use the missiles or risk losing them. 'That vastly increases the risk of miscalculation,' says Mr Kimball; better to rely on submarine-launched nukes, which are nigh impossible to find and provide an assured second-strike capability.
Eric Edelman, a former Pentagon official, retorts that, on the contrary, ICBMs are stabilising. Without them an enemy might be tempted to try to decapitate America's deterrent by striking the handful of nuclear-bomber and submarine bases, and command-and-control nodes. Moreover, new hypersonic missiles are harder to spot. With ICBMs in silos, an enemy must fire hundreds of missiles at the American heartland, which would undoubtedly be detected and invite massive retaliation. 'Why would you want to simplify your adversary's targeting problem?' asks Mr Edelman. China, which has built hundreds of silos in recent years, seems to accept such logic.
Some argue that America should complicate the targeting even further by making at least some ICBMs mobile, as China and Russia do. A congressionally appointed bipartisan commission in 2023 recommended examining the possibility. This would revive cold-war programmes such as the Midgetman, a small ICBM carried on a road-mobile launcher, and the Peacekeeper railway garrison, a large missile carried on special railway carriages. Both missiles forces were intended to be dispersed across America's transport network in times of crisis, but the idea was abandoned with the end of the cold war. General Gebara says it was studied anew and rejected because it would be both expensive and unpopular.
Beyond the cost and mix of nuclear weapons, a broader question looms. With the expiry of New START, America and Russia will no longer be bound by the ceiling of 1,550 'strategic' (long-range) warheads each. Some experts say the two sides should continue to abide by the limit informally, pending new arms-control negotiations.
President Donald Trump has spoken about his desire for 'denuclearisation', and for talks with China and Russia to halve defence spending. But neither power seems interested. James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think-tank, reckons nuclear policy is anyhow likely to be decided by the bureaucracy. 'Among the majority of the Republican national-security establishment that thinks about these issues there's a pretty clear view that we need more nukes,' he notes.
As wonks debate, ominous responsibility rests on the shoulders of young officers on alert in the capsules, usually lieutenants and captains in their 20s. They typically work 24-hour shifts every three days, locked away in pairs, taking turns to sleep and work. In quiet moments they stream television and send text messages via a computer topside (no personal electronic devices are allowed). Many use the long hours to study for postgraduate degrees.
On the day your correspondent visited the Foxtrot-01 capsule near Kimball, the two women on duty spoke of the hours of camaraderie underground, watching episodes of 'Friends', and their pride in keeping America safe. On a wall someone had drawn a whale with a spout in the shape of a mushroom cloud—a reference to the 'Moby Dick' squadron of second-world-war bombers to which their unit, the 320th missile squadron, traces its origins. Next to it were words that summed up a mission they hope never to carry out: 'Death from Below'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
How a Kerala village beat alcoholism with the game of chess
Marottichal, Kerala – Half a century ago, this forest-fringed village in northern Kerala was best known for something far less noble than strategy and sportsmanship: bootleg liquor and backdoor gambling dens. Today, it holds an Asian record for the highest number of people playing chess simultaneously. The transformation wasn't driven by policy, policing, or public shame—but by a quiet revolution on a chequered board, started by a teenager with a fascination for Bobby Fischer. Back in the 1970s, C. Unnikrishnan, now fondly known as 'Chess Maaman,' was just 16 when he discovered the American grandmaster. Hooked instantly, he travelled to nearby towns to learn the Indian precursor chaturanga and modern chess. Years later, he returned to his hometown, which was then drowning in alcoholism, to open a modest teashop. But it wasn't just cups of chai that Unnikrishnan was serving. He brought with him the board and the game he had grown to love. And as illicit brewing threatened to crush families, he began teaching his customers chess—offering them not just entertainment, but a distraction, a discipline, and ultimately, a lifeline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Read more: Crime index 2025: 10 least safe countries in the world; check full list There was little space to play outdoor sports, as there were rubber plantations all around, Unnikrishnan once explained. But since a chessboard fits anywhere, that became our playground, he added. At the time, the villagers had also formed the Madhya Nirodhana Samiti, a grassroots anti-alcohol movement. With women of the village secretly informing on brewers and gamblers, and Unnikrishnan introducing chess as a replacement high, the change came swiftly and deeply. Today, chess boards form an integral part of this place. The village bus stop isn't bustling with commuters, but spectators watching roadside matches. Drivers play against conductors before their shifts. Shopkeepers challenge customers between sales. On Sunday evenings, Unnikrishnan's home is filled to the brim with neighbours, shoulders brushing, eyes locked on boards scattered across benches, verandas, and floors. Read more: Old-school India: 6 places that are pure vintage vibes A recent local survey revealed that two-thirds of Marottichal's 6,000 residents play chess daily. This renaissance isn't limited to adults. At the local primary school, rows of children huddle over chessboards during recess. Many of them learned the game in under a week and insisted on bringing boards from home to practice. The local association is now pushing for chess to be introduced into the official school curriculum. Despite Kerala's progressive but often contentious liquor policy, villagers here believe they've found their own solution. The village's commitment has even caught the eye of international visitors, from Germany to the United States, keen to experience this grassroots model of reform. If there is any doubt that technology might erase this culture, you will easily get to see a group of teens absorbed in their devices, only to reveal they're locked in online chess battles. In Marottichal, the game isn't over. In fact, it's just getting started.


News18
a day ago
- News18
At 102, This WWII Veteran Is Finally Having His Bar Mitzvah. What Is It And Why Now?
Last Updated: Set to celebrate his birthday next month, World War II stalwart Harold Terens is planning his Bar Mitzvah ceremony next year. A 102-year-old World War II veteran is looking forward to celebrating his birthday, while also planning to undergo the Bar Mitzvah ceremony at the Pentagon for the first time in his life. According to Jewish culture, the Bar Mitzvah refers to a coming-of-age ceremony for boys at the age of 13, which marks their transition to adulthood and also their obligation to follow the Jewish commandments. However, Harold Terens, who will be celebrating his 102nd birthday amid family and friends in Florida on August 6, said he never underwent the Jewish ceremony in his childhood, even as his brother took part in the Bar Mitzvah. The WWII stalwart believes it is never too late for him to fulfil his wish to go through the transition, and he is planning for the ceremony next year at the Pentagon outside Washington. 'I mentioned that I would like to be bar mitzvahed at 103, and he's the rabbi of the Pentagon, so that's my next bucket list. I am going to be bar mitzvahed in the Pentagon," he added. As per Terens' account of WWII contribution, the veteran official played an influential role, helping repair planes returning from France so that they could rejoin the battle. Twelve days after D-Day, Terens went to France and brought the Germans and American prisoners of war back to England. In June 2024, the war veteran was honoured by the French government at the 80th anniversary of the country's liberation from the cruel Nazis under their inhumane leader Adolf Hitler. Apart from his war credentials and reward, Terens also hit the news for marrying 97-year-old Jeanne Swerlin last year. 'I thought my wedding in Normandy last year was the highlight of my life," he said, adding, 'Number one of all the moments of my life. You know, that's the saying, that life is not measured by how many breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." view comments First Published: July 28, 2025, 09:52 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
US man warns ‘America is crumbling', urges others to diversify life abroad
An American man has stirred conversation on social media after posting a video in which he suggests the United States is in decline and urges others to prepare for an uncertain future by diversifying their lives globally. A US man sparked debate online by advising people to stop depending solely on America.(Instagram/trvlking) (Also read: 'Sample of racism': American woman lists absurd things trolls say to foreigners married to Indians) The user, identified as Adam, shared a clip on Instagram featuring himself, with a text overlay that reads: "America is crumbling before our eyes. You need to diversify: - Remote income - Second residency - New passport - International banking." Alongside the video, he shared a detailed caption that expands on his concerns. He wrote, 'The USA seems to be falling apart. You need to diversify your life instead of depending on America for everything. There are poor countries today that were great just 100 years ago. You'd be naive to think that it could never happen to the US. You need to diversify your life to protect yourself and your family. You're in the right place.' Take a look here at the clip: Social media reacts The video received a range of reactions, with many users agreeing with Adam's viewpoint. One user commented, 'India gets 130 billion dollars every year from the US by Indians working.' Another joked, 'You forgot international wifey bro.' (Also read: American woman leaves 'average' life in US for extraordinary journey in India, calls it life-changing) Some showed agreement across national lines, with one saying, 'This is true,' while another added, 'As an American, I also agree with you man.' Another user chimed in, 'Even if everything in the US somehow went 'back to normal' tomorrow, the trust has been lost.' One more said, 'I agree with each word of yours.' While some may see the post as alarmist, others viewed it as a timely reminder to think globally and prepare personally.