Norway tackles deforestation by implementing EU rules
Preserving rainforests and other tropical forests is essential for addressing global climate challenges, the government emphasized. Under the new policy, Norway will introduce stricter requirements for products with a high risk of contributing to deforestation, including wood, coffee, cocoa, rubber, and palm oil.
"Deforestation is a major global issue. The conversion of forests into agricultural land accounts for nearly 90 percent of global deforestation," said Minister of Climate and Environment Andreas Bjelland Eriksen. "Consumers should be confident that the products they buy do not contribute to the destruction of critical natural areas. This is why we are imposing clear requirements on products such as wood, coffee, and cocoa."
The Norwegian government has decided to incorporate the EU Deforestation Regulation into the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement. This step will ensure that the regulation's EEA-relevant parts will apply in Norway, aligning the country's environmental standards with those of the EU.
"Incorporating the EEA relevant parts of the regulation will provide predictability and is beneficial for the private sector," said Minister of Agriculture and Food Nils Kristen Sandtroen. "The government places a strong emphasis on long-term security and cohesive solutions, which are reflected in this initiative."
Norway will not apply the regulation to agricultural products such as beef and soy, nor to exports to countries outside the EEA, as these fall outside the scope of the EEA Agreement. However, national regulations for these products will be considered.
The government plans to submit a proposal on the national implementation of the EU Deforestation Regulation for public consultation. At the same time, it will explore ways to achieve the regulation's environmental objectives through domestic measures covering areas not regulated by the EEA Agreement.
The EU Deforestation Regulation was adopted in 2023 and will take effect on Dec. 30, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Exclusive-Meta, X and LinkedIn appeal unprecedented VAT claim by Italy
FILE PHOTO: EU flag and Meta logo are seen in this illustration taken, May 22, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo MILAN (Reuters) -U.S. tech giants Meta, X and LinkedIn have lodged an appeal against an unprecedented VAT claim by Italy that could influence tax policy across the 27-nation European Union, four sources with direct knowledge of the matter said on Monday. This is the first time that Italy has failed to reach a settlement agreement after bringing tax cases against tech companies, resulting in a fully-fledged judicial tax trial being launched. According to the sources, this came about because the case went beyond agreeing on a settlement figure and sought to establish a broader approach focused on how social networks provide access to their services. Italian tax authorities argue that free user registrations with X, LinkedIn and Meta platforms should be seen as taxable transactions as they imply the exchange of a membership account in return for a user's personal data. The issue is especially sensitive given wider trade tensions between the EU and the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Italy is claiming 887.6 million euros ($1.03 billion) from Meta, 12.5 million euros from X and around 140 million euros from LinkedIn. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, Elon Musk's social network X and Microsoft's LinkedIn filed their appeals with a first instance tax court after mid-July, when the deadline for responding to a tax assessment notice issued by Italy's Revenue Agency in March passed. According to several experts consulted by Reuters, the Italian approach could affect almost all companies, from airlines to supermarkets to publishers, who link access to free services on their sites to users' acceptance of profiling cookies. It could also eventually be extended across the EU where VAT is a harmonised tax. In a statement to Reuters, Meta said that it had cooperated "fully with the authorities on our obligations under EU and local law". It added that the company "strongly disagrees with the idea that providing access to online platforms to users should be subject to VAT". LinkedIn said it had "nothing to share at this time". X did not respond to a request for comment from Reuters. ROME SEEN SEEKING EU ADVISORY It is uncertain whether a full trial of the matter, which involves three levels of judgement and takes an average of 10 years, will go ahead. Following discussions with the three companies, Italy is preparing as a next step to seek an advisory opinion from the European Commission, the sources said. The Italian Revenue Agency will have to prepare specific questions, which the Economy Ministry will then send to the EU Commission's VAT Committee, which meets twice a year. Rome aims to submit its questions for the meeting scheduled to be held by early November, in order to receive the EU's comments in time for the following meeting in spring 2026. Italy's Economy Ministry and Revenue Agency declined to comment. The EU Commission's VAT Committee is an independent advisory group. While its assessment will be non-binding, a "No" could prompt Italy to halt the case and ultimately drop the criminal investigation by Italian prosecutors, according to the sources. The dispute is one of several between Europeans and U.S. Big Tech. On July 11 Reuters exclusively reported that Meta would not be tweaking its pay-or-consent model further despite the risk of EU fines. According to a Financial Times report on July 17, the European Commission has stalled one of its investigations into Musk's platform X for breaching its digital transparency rules while it seeks to conclude trade talks with the U.S. ($1 = 0.8588 euros) (Reporting by Emilio Parodi, editing by Giselda Vagnoni and Keith Weir, Kirsten Donovan)
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
French farm bill sparks record-breaking petition signatures
FILE PHOTO: Tractors are parked in front of the French parliament, the Assemblee Nationale, as French farmers gather for a protest to call on lawmakers to adopt a bill that would loosen restrictions on pesticide and water use in farming, in Paris, France May 26, 2025. REUTERS/Abdul Saboor/File Photo PARIS (Reuters) -A petition against a French farm bill loosening environmental rules for farming, including over the use of a pesticide accused of harming bees, has set a record for signatures, increasing pressure on the government to revisit the law. Launched by a 23-year-old student this month, the petition poses a fresh challenge for President Emmanuel Macron, already under strain over his cost-cutting budget. It had gathered 1.3 million signatures by Monday morning, becoming the first petition on the National Assembly website to surpass 500,000. In France, petitions with over half a million signatures can prompt a parliamentary debate, but do not require a new vote. National Assembly chairwoman Yael Braun-Pivet and former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal are among those who have said they would back a debate. The draft law, proposed by conservative Laurent Duplomb, would reauthorise the use of neonicotinoid pesticide acetamiprid, one of a group that European food safety agency EFSA has assessed as representing a risk to bees. It also aims to simplify approvals for livestock breeding facilities, and to ease irrigation rules. The petition, however, calls it a "scientific, ethical, environmental, and health aberration". French farmers protested in Paris in May against amendments filed by opposition lawmakers to the bill, which it said would help them compete with EU peers. France is the EU's top sugar beet grower and home to major producers such as Tereos and Cristal Union. Growers argue that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, is vital to fight yellows disease, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output. "We need to maintain our means of production, and I believe there's a lot of exaggeration in the comments being made," the head of France's largest farm union FNSEA Arnaud Rousseau told franceinfo radio. The government defended the bill, but acknowledged the outcry. "We must listen (to this petition)," government spokesperson Sophie Primas said. "Perhaps we haven't explained or reassured enough. The aim of this law is to put French farmers back on an equal footing with their European counterparts." (Reporting by Sybille de La Hamaide and Elizabeth Pineau; Editing by Jan Harvey)
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
EU considers wider retaliation as US tariff deal hopes fade
BRUSSELS: The European Union is preparing to expand its retaliation options against the United States as hopes for a favourable trade agreement dwindle, according to EU diplomats. With negotiations faltering, Germany and other member states are pushing for the use of the bloc's 'anti-coercion' instrument, which could target US services, procurement, and financial markets. The European Commission had initially aimed for a deal that would maintain a 10% US tariff on most EU exports, with minor concessions. However, prospects dimmed after President Donald Trump threatened to raise tariffs to 30% by August 1. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic described such a hike as effectively blocking transatlantic trade. During recent talks in Washington, US officials presented conflicting proposals, including potential baseline rates exceeding 10%. 'Each interlocutor seemed to have different ideas. No one can tell (Sefcovic) what would actually fly with Trump,' one diplomat said. The US has also rejected an EU request for a 'standstill' agreement preventing further tariffs post-deal, citing national security concerns under Section 232. This has shifted sentiment among EU nations, which now favour stronger countermeasures despite preferring a negotiated solution. The EU has already suspended tariffs on €21 billion ($24.5 billion) of US goods until August 6, with a decision pending on additional measures covering €72 billion in US exports. Discussions have intensified over deploying the 'anti-coercion' instrument, originally designed to counter economic pressure from China. France has long supported using the tool, while others view it as a last resort. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen cautioned that the mechanism was meant for 'extraordinary situations,' adding, 'We are not there yet.' However, Germany and other nations are increasingly open to the idea, signalling growing support for tougher action. - Reuters
