logo
The secret to how the SNP turned Scotland into a one-party state

The secret to how the SNP turned Scotland into a one-party state

Is Doctor Faustus a secret member of the SNP's inner circle? You'd be forgiven for imagining that the party forged a pact with the Devil, that Mephistopheles promised them decades in power in return for the souls of every First Minister.
No matter what the SNP does – or increasingly doesn't do – there's barely a dent in support. It's remarkable. No party is so teflon in Britain.
To many – especially hardline unionists – it's baffling. How, they wonder, can a party still be in power after it was rocked by scandals, caught up in police investigations, failed to honour promises on everything from health and education to policing and the environment, got itself embroiled in culture war firestorms, and ditched multiple policies whenever it suited?
Well, if you paid attention to events this week you'd have divined the answer to this seeming mystery. For this week, the SNP did precisely nothing and yet it still continues secure in the knowledge that Holyrood is an easy win come 2026.
Read more from Neil Mackay:
Even when the SNP sits on its hands, even when it rows backwards, even when it simply repeats the same lines it's been repeating for years, it remains safe.
Why? The hard truth for unionists is that Labour and the Tories are so dysfunctional that the SNP can do zilch, nada, absolutely zero, and still look better than the big beasts of Westminster.
The answer to the mystery is no more complicated than that. It's long been argued that the only path to independence is for the SNP to govern well and wait until support for Yes rises into the mid-50s or 60s.
There's truth there, sure, but it's also true that as long as Labour and the Tories fail so badly as political vehicles for the hopes of the people then all is well in SNP-world.
The SNP will remain in power forever, as long as Labour and the Tories behave as they do. The only way to break the spell is for the government and opposition in Westminster to grow up.
So Scotland has become a one-party state effectively – or at least a state where only one party gets to govern – but that's not due to any great endeavour by the SNP, it's due to chaos and cruelty from London.
The SNP sits in permanent opposition to the London government. As long as the government in London isn't working, the SNP reigns supreme in Scotland.
Perhaps there will be some bounce for Labour in the wake of the US-UK trade deal, but don't hold your breath. Scottish voters aren't stupid. The deal was far from 'big and beautiful' in terms of serving British interests.
The Financial Times said on its front page: 'The scope of the deal is limited, many details have yet to be ironed out, and the end result still leaves Britain facing a tougher trading relationship with the US than before Trump began his global trade war.'
Only Labour's most cultish supporters will cheers this to the rafters.
So the SNP can do what it does best: sit back, relax, and let London stagger around aimlessly.
That's certainly the impression John Swinney has given lately. His Programme for Government was more a programme for nothing.
Swinney announced a 'new plan' for child poverty, only it's not a new plan. His plan has been enshrined in law since the Child Poverty Act 2017. So unless the word 'new' now means 'eight years old', the announcement is meaningless.
John Dickie, director of Scotland's Child Poverty Action Group, made just that criticism when he said the plan wasn't 'new' but already 'a statutory requirement'.
The SNP has also gone into the negative. The government isn't just doing nothing, it has also stopped with the plans it promised to enact.
Legalisation to outlaw misogyny and conversion therapy have been dropped ahead of the election as the party clearly wishes to never find itself in another culture war again.
On its flagship project, independence, matters are just as tired. In comments that the SNP sought to portray as reigniting the independence debate, Swinney said that a 'democratic majority' of pro-Yes MSPs after the next Scottish election was the path to another referendum.
Spoiler alert: there's already a pro-independence majority in Holyrood – and that has done precisely naff all in getting anywhere down the road towards indyref2.
So it's been nothing, followed by nothing, with a side order of nothing and then some more nothing as dessert. Yet still the SNP is impregnable.
The Tories and Labour are being cannibalised by Reform north and south of the border. Yet polling for the SNP has barely changed since the autumn of 2023 for both the constituency and regional vote at Holyrood.
Today, it remains around 33% and 29% respectively. Meanwhile, the inroads Reform has made into Labour and Tory figures are brutally apparent.
Labour has slumped from the mid-30s to the late-teens. The Tories are on 11% for the constituency vote and 12% for the regional. Reform's figures are 19% and 20% – all its gains are made at the expense of Labour and the Tories.
This may be a hell of a weird way to run a country – that a party of government need do nothing, even less than nothing to succeed – but you can't blame the SNP.
There is no Faustian pact with Mephistopheles, there's just free wins to be earned thanks to Westminster failure.
Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

Leader Live

time23 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A US justice department spokesperson declined to comment. Judge Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to his ruling, no victims gave evidence before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay'. The agent gave evidence over two days, on June 18 and July 2 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Judge Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the justice department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of US President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Judge Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the justice department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, and the house oversight committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, representative James Comer, the committee chairman, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Mr Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.

Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

South Wales Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts

The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A US justice department spokesperson declined to comment. Judge Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to his ruling, no victims gave evidence before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay'. The agent gave evidence over two days, on June 18 and July 2 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Judge Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the justice department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of US President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Judge Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the justice department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, and the house oversight committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, representative James Comer, the committee chairman, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Mr Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.

JD Vance booed as he awkwardly greets National Guard at DC's Union Station: ‘We give you hamburgers'
JD Vance booed as he awkwardly greets National Guard at DC's Union Station: ‘We give you hamburgers'

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

JD Vance booed as he awkwardly greets National Guard at DC's Union Station: ‘We give you hamburgers'

Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Vice President JD Vance faced boos and derisive chants from protesters as he greeted National Guard troops at Union Station in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. Meeting with the troops at Shake Shack, Vance thanked them, saying, 'You guys bust your ass all day and we give you hamburgers — not a fair trade, but we're grateful for everything you do.' 'Hey, guys, at ease,' Vance said as he arrived at the train station fast food restaurant, where the Guard members were already not standing at attention. 'So, we decided to bring the Secretary of Defense and Stephen Miller,' said Vance to a seemingly unfazed group of National Guard troops as protesters booed the vice president. Speaking to the press, Miller said the White House would 'add thousands more resources' to the effort of cracking down on crime in the nation's capital, calling the protesters 'stupid white hippies' and 'communists.' open image in gallery Stephen Miller, Pete Hegseth and JD Vance visited National Guard troops at a Shake Shack burger joint at Union Station in Washington, D.C. ( AP ) Vance was asked if the White House was set to extend federal control of the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Department, to which the vice president said that 'if the president of the United States thinks that he has to extend this order to ensure that people have access to public safety, that's exactly what he'll do.' He went on to claim that crime statistics 'all over the country' have been 'massively underreported.' When Vance was asked what proof he had that MPD data was inaccurate, he said that the statistics from the Department of Justice and the FBI 'back it up.' 'It's kind of bizarre that we have a bunch of old, primarily white people who are out there protesting the policies that keep people safe when they've never felt danger in their entire lives,' Vance insisted. The vice president also said he was 'highly skeptical' of polling showing that a majority of D.C. residents don't support the presence of the National Guard or the federal takeover of the city's police department, adding that maybe they were 'the same polls that said Kamala Harris would win the popular vote by 10 points.' Protesters frequently drowned out Vance as he spoke, as they chanted 'shame,' 'this is our city,' and 'we want the military out of our streets,' CNN noted. 'You hear these guys outside. They appear to hate the idea that Americans can enjoy their communities,' said Vance, referring to them as 'crazy protesters.' Without evidence, Miller suggested that the protesters were 'not part of the city.' Vance claimed on several occasions that Union Station had been taken over by 'drug addicts,' 'vagrants,' as well as the 'chronically homeless.' open image in gallery Vance claimed on Wednesday that Union Station had been taken over by 'drug addicts,' 'vagrants,' and the 'chronically homeless' ( AP ) 'We have changed so much in nine days, and I thought it important to highlight how great of a space this could be, how easy it could be to actually enjoy something like Union Station if you just had politicians who stopped prioritizing violent criminals over the public citizens who deserve public safety in their own communities,' said Vance. Vance's earlier interaction with the troops in Union Station initially seemed as awkward as his campaign stop to a southern doughnut shop last summer. The then-senator went viral during the 2024 presidential campaign when he seemed to have a hard time interacting with workers at Holt's Sweet Shop in Georgia last August. As Vance thanked a woman behind the counter for allowing them pop in, she told him, 'I don't want to be on film.' 'She doesn't wanna be on film, guys, so just cut her out of anything,' Vance told his entourage. Vance then looked at the doughnut display before saying, "I'm JD Vance, I'm running for vice president, good to see you." 'Okay,' the woman said, seemingly unimpressed. Then he seemed to be unable to pick out a variety of pastries for his entourage. 'We're gonna do two dozen. Just a random assortment of stuff here,' he continues while browsing the donuts in the display cases. 'Everything. A lot of glazed here. Sprinkle stuff. A lot of cinnamon rolls. Just whatever makes sense,' Vance said. As the worker fills up his box of donuts, Vance struggled to make small talk by asking workers behind the counter how long they had been working there. He asked one worker how long the place had been around, and was told it had been in business for four years. 'About four years? Okay,' Vance said. 'Well, we selected this place. I didn't know if it had been here for 20 years or four years. You never know.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store