logo
The secret to how the SNP turned Scotland into a one-party state

The secret to how the SNP turned Scotland into a one-party state

Is Doctor Faustus a secret member of the SNP's inner circle? You'd be forgiven for imagining that the party forged a pact with the Devil, that Mephistopheles promised them decades in power in return for the souls of every First Minister.
No matter what the SNP does – or increasingly doesn't do – there's barely a dent in support. It's remarkable. No party is so teflon in Britain.
To many – especially hardline unionists – it's baffling. How, they wonder, can a party still be in power after it was rocked by scandals, caught up in police investigations, failed to honour promises on everything from health and education to policing and the environment, got itself embroiled in culture war firestorms, and ditched multiple policies whenever it suited?
Well, if you paid attention to events this week you'd have divined the answer to this seeming mystery. For this week, the SNP did precisely nothing and yet it still continues secure in the knowledge that Holyrood is an easy win come 2026.
Read more from Neil Mackay:
Even when the SNP sits on its hands, even when it rows backwards, even when it simply repeats the same lines it's been repeating for years, it remains safe.
Why? The hard truth for unionists is that Labour and the Tories are so dysfunctional that the SNP can do zilch, nada, absolutely zero, and still look better than the big beasts of Westminster.
The answer to the mystery is no more complicated than that. It's long been argued that the only path to independence is for the SNP to govern well and wait until support for Yes rises into the mid-50s or 60s.
There's truth there, sure, but it's also true that as long as Labour and the Tories fail so badly as political vehicles for the hopes of the people then all is well in SNP-world.
The SNP will remain in power forever, as long as Labour and the Tories behave as they do. The only way to break the spell is for the government and opposition in Westminster to grow up.
So Scotland has become a one-party state effectively – or at least a state where only one party gets to govern – but that's not due to any great endeavour by the SNP, it's due to chaos and cruelty from London.
The SNP sits in permanent opposition to the London government. As long as the government in London isn't working, the SNP reigns supreme in Scotland.
Perhaps there will be some bounce for Labour in the wake of the US-UK trade deal, but don't hold your breath. Scottish voters aren't stupid. The deal was far from 'big and beautiful' in terms of serving British interests.
The Financial Times said on its front page: 'The scope of the deal is limited, many details have yet to be ironed out, and the end result still leaves Britain facing a tougher trading relationship with the US than before Trump began his global trade war.'
Only Labour's most cultish supporters will cheers this to the rafters.
So the SNP can do what it does best: sit back, relax, and let London stagger around aimlessly.
That's certainly the impression John Swinney has given lately. His Programme for Government was more a programme for nothing.
Swinney announced a 'new plan' for child poverty, only it's not a new plan. His plan has been enshrined in law since the Child Poverty Act 2017. So unless the word 'new' now means 'eight years old', the announcement is meaningless.
John Dickie, director of Scotland's Child Poverty Action Group, made just that criticism when he said the plan wasn't 'new' but already 'a statutory requirement'.
The SNP has also gone into the negative. The government isn't just doing nothing, it has also stopped with the plans it promised to enact.
Legalisation to outlaw misogyny and conversion therapy have been dropped ahead of the election as the party clearly wishes to never find itself in another culture war again.
On its flagship project, independence, matters are just as tired. In comments that the SNP sought to portray as reigniting the independence debate, Swinney said that a 'democratic majority' of pro-Yes MSPs after the next Scottish election was the path to another referendum.
Spoiler alert: there's already a pro-independence majority in Holyrood – and that has done precisely naff all in getting anywhere down the road towards indyref2.
So it's been nothing, followed by nothing, with a side order of nothing and then some more nothing as dessert. Yet still the SNP is impregnable.
The Tories and Labour are being cannibalised by Reform north and south of the border. Yet polling for the SNP has barely changed since the autumn of 2023 for both the constituency and regional vote at Holyrood.
Today, it remains around 33% and 29% respectively. Meanwhile, the inroads Reform has made into Labour and Tory figures are brutally apparent.
Labour has slumped from the mid-30s to the late-teens. The Tories are on 11% for the constituency vote and 12% for the regional. Reform's figures are 19% and 20% – all its gains are made at the expense of Labour and the Tories.
This may be a hell of a weird way to run a country – that a party of government need do nothing, even less than nothing to succeed – but you can't blame the SNP.
There is no Faustian pact with Mephistopheles, there's just free wins to be earned thanks to Westminster failure.
Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'
Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

South Wales Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

The Chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, while Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. Ms Reeves will use Wednesday's spending review to allocate tens of billions of funding for major infrastructure projects over the rest of the decade. Officials hope SMRs will be cheaper and quicker to build than traditional power plants, and projects could be connected to the grid by the mid-2030s. Ms Reeves said: 'The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow with Rolls-Royce SMR as the preferred partner for this journey.' The SMR project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear. Tuesday's announcement of Rolls-Royce as the preferred bidder came after the Government confirmed financial support for Sizewell C. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the Sizewell move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Alison Downes, of Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. She said: 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?' The Government has also promised £2.5 billion over five years for fusion energy research and £6 billion of investment for the industrial base supporting the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine fleet.

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'
Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

Leader Live

time34 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

The Chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, while Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. Ms Reeves will use Wednesday's spending review to allocate tens of billions of funding for major infrastructure projects over the rest of the decade. Officials hope SMRs will be cheaper and quicker to build than traditional power plants, and projects could be connected to the grid by the mid-2030s. Ms Reeves said: 'The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow with Rolls-Royce SMR as the preferred partner for this journey.' The SMR project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear. Tuesday's announcement of Rolls-Royce as the preferred bidder came after the Government confirmed financial support for Sizewell C. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Trade unions welcomed the Sizewell move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Alison Downes, of Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. She said: 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?' The Government has also promised £2.5 billion over five years for fusion energy research and £6 billion of investment for the industrial base supporting the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine fleet.

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'
Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

South Wales Argus

time44 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Reeves says nuclear investment shows UK ‘back where it belongs'

The Chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, while Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. Ms Reeves will use Wednesday's spending review to allocate tens of billions of funding for major infrastructure projects over the rest of the decade. Officials hope SMRs will be cheaper and quicker to build than traditional power plants, and projects could be connected to the grid by the mid-2030s. Ms Reeves said: 'The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow with Rolls-Royce SMR as the preferred partner for this journey.' The SMR project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear. Tuesday's announcement of Rolls-Royce as the preferred bidder came after the Government confirmed financial support for Sizewell C. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. A general view of the Sizewell nuclear power plant in Suffolk (James Manning/PA) Trade unions welcomed the Sizewell move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance' (Kin Cheung/PA) Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Alison Downes, of Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. She said: 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?' The Government has also promised £2.5 billion over five years for fusion energy research and £6 billion of investment for the industrial base supporting the Royal Navy's nuclear submarine fleet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store