logo
Toronto private college, director fined more than $400,000 for failing to pay wages to 14 employees

Toronto private college, director fined more than $400,000 for failing to pay wages to 14 employees

CTV Newsa day ago

A private college in Toronto and its director are each facing significant fines for failing to pay almost $185,000 in wages owed to 14 employees.
In a May 28 court bulletin, the Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development identified the business in question as Ontario International College Inc./College International De L'Ontario Inc., located at 16 Wellebourne Cres. in Toronto.
The workplace of the corporation's director, Anchuan Jiang, is 3550 Victoria Park Ave. in North York, it said.
According to the ministry, Ontario International College Inc. 'failed to comply with orders to pay wages,' which was issued by an employment standards officer (ESO) under section 103(8) of the Employment Standards Act, 2000, which is an offence under section 132 of the Act.
It further said that Jiang failed, as the corporation's director, to comply with a director order to pay issued by an ESO under section 106 of the Act, which is an offence under section 136.
The orders to pay the unpaid wages were issued between October 2019 and October 2020. However, the corporation did not comply, nor did it seek a review of the orders to pay, the ministry said.
The ESO then issued a direct order to pay to Jiang, who also did not follow through with the order, nor did he apply for a review.
At that point, the ministry took the corporation and its director to court for failing to comply with the respective order to pay wages.They were both convicted on March 28 following guilty verdicts on all counts in the Provincial Offences Court in Toronto.
Justice of the Peace Ruby Wong fined Ontario International College Inc. $270,000 and its director, Anchuan Jiang, $140,000. This amount does not include the owed wages.
The court has also imposed a 25 per cent victim fine surcharge on the defendants, as required by the Provincial Offences Act. This surcharge will go to a special provincial government fund that helps victims of crime.
Dave Simpson and Alexsis Qi served as the provincial prosecutors for both cases.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five things you need to know as Trump's tariffs go back to court
Five things you need to know as Trump's tariffs go back to court

Toronto Star

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Star

Five things you need to know as Trump's tariffs go back to court

WASHINGTON - The world buckled up for another roller-coaster ride of uncertainty this week as U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff agenda made its way through the courts. A federal appeals court on Thursday granted the Trump administration's emergency motion to temporarily stay a decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade that blocked many of the president's tariffs. The lower court on Wednesday ruled that Trump's use of an emergency powers law to impose tariffs exceeded his authority. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Here's a quick look at what it all means for Canada. — What's happening with tariffs The federal appeals court granted the Trump administration's emergency motion, essentially freezing a decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade blocking the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties for now. They include 25 per cent tariffs on all Canadian imports not compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, with a lower 10 per cent levy on energy and potash. The appeals court said the request for a stay was granted 'until further notice while this court considers the motions papers.' It said the plaintiffs have until June 5 to reply to the administration's motion for a stay, while the administration 'may file a single, consolidated reply in support' of the motion no later than June 9. George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin said in an online post that it was a 'a brief temporary stay intended to give the court time to consider whether a longer stay should be imposed.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, represents American small businesses in the case against the tariffs. — What the White House argued In its emergency motion to the appeals court, the Trump administration argued the U.S. Court of International Trade's injunction blocking the tariffs was 'unprecedented and legally indefensible.' The motion said blocking the tariffs threatens 'to unwind months of foreign policy decision-making.' It said agreements with multiple countries could 'be immediately unravelled.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Trump's administration argued that if a stay was not granted, it would seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court on Friday. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier Thursday that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' She maintained that Trump had the legal authority to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to implement tariffs. — The U.S. Court of International Trade's decision on IEEPA Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, to implement his most sweeping tariffs. While the national security statute gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency, it had never previously been used for tariffs. The U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. The trade court wrote that 'because of the Constitution's express allocation of the tariff power to Congress … we do not read IEEPA to delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President.' 'We instead read IEEPA's provisions to impose meaningful limits on any such authority it confers,' it added. Mona Paulsen, an associate international economic law professor at the London School of Economics, said the decision is significant because it shows there are limits to the main tool Trump's administration had used in its attempts to realign global trade. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW — What the lower court said about tariffs Trump declared emergencies at the United States' northern and southern borders linked to the flow of fentanyl to hit Canada and Mexico with economywide tariffs. He later declared an emergency over trade deficits to impose his retaliatory 'Liberation Day' duties on most nations. The trade court wrote that 'the Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs.' It separately found that 'the Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders.' — Which tariffs aren't affected by this court ruling Trump is hitting Canada, and the world, with 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum. The president has also implemented 25 per cent duties on automobiles, with a partial carveout for cars compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Those vehicles are being slapped with tariffs on their non-American components. Trump used the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties. The president has launched trade investigations to use the same tool to tariff other imports, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, in the future. Leavitt said Trump will also look at other tools to continue his wide-ranging tariff agenda. This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025.

Offence Awakens: Blue Jays belt four homers in 12-0 rout of Athletics
Offence Awakens: Blue Jays belt four homers in 12-0 rout of Athletics

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

Offence Awakens: Blue Jays belt four homers in 12-0 rout of Athletics

Blue Jays slugger Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (27) hits a two-run home run against the Athletics in the second inning of a Major League Baseball game in Toronto on Thursday, May 29, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette TORONTO — Any lingering thoughts of the offensive woes that hampered the Toronto Blue Jays on their recent six-game road trip vanished over an inning to remember on Thursday night. Ernie Clement and Vladimir Guerrero homered and the Blue Jays batted around in an eight-run second frame en route to a 12-0 romp over the Athletics at Rogers Centre. Bo Bichette and George Springer added homers in the third inning as Toronto won its fourth straight home game and returned to the .500 mark at 28-28. "It was a little bit contagious today in that second inning," said Blue Jays manager John Schneider. "That's about as best as you can draw it up." The 12 runs scored doubled the team's six-run total output from a 2-4 road trip that saw the Blue Jays go 4-for-45 with runners in scoring position. In the opener of a seven-game homestand, Toronto seemed to hammer the ball at will against a struggling Athletics side (23-34) that extended its road losing skid to eight games. Clement smacked a three-run shot and added a two-run double later in the second inning. Guerrero's two-run rainbow blast left him tied for the team lead with eight homers this season. "It's just nice to take a deep breath and not (be) fighting (in) a 0-0 game like we were all series (in) the last week or so," Clement said. "But I just think we've got to use it as momentum and keep doing it." It was the most runs Toronto has scored in an inning since a nine-run frame against Tampa Bay nearly two years ago. It was also the 14th time in franchise history that the Blue Jays scored 11 runs over the first three innings. "What I really liked is not taking your foot off the gas after you score eight, and you continue to add on," Schneider said. Athletics starter Jacob Lopez (0-3) was chased after recording just five outs. He gave up six hits, a walk and seven earned runs. Bichette scored twice and drove in three runs. Clement and Alejandro Kirk had three hits apiece as Toronto pumped out 18 hits in all. Blue Jays starter Jose Berrios (2-2) was in full control over his six-inning appearance. He allowed two hits, two walks and had nine strikeouts. "Nothing was bothering me out there," Berrios said. "So (I was) just competing, having fun and executing my pitches." Mason Fluharty and Jose Urena completed the four-hit shutout. Announced attendance was 23,853 and the game took two hours 31 minutes to play. SCHERZER STRIDES Blue Jays right-hander Max Scherzer is scheduled to throw a live batting practice session on Friday. The 40-year-old starter, who has been limited to one appearance this season due to a thumb injury, plans to throw 20-25 pitches. Reliever Erik Swanson (forearm) pitched a scoreless inning for the Triple-A Buffalo Bisons on Thursday. WALKER DEALT After the game, the Blue Jays traded left-hander Josh Walker to the Philadelphia Phillies for cash considerations. He did not record a decision over three relief appearances for Toronto this season. COMING UP Right-hander Chris Bassitt (4-3, 3.38) is tabbed to start for Toronto on Friday against left-hander Jeffrey Springs (5-3, 3.97). The Blue Jays have yet to confirm their starter for Saturday. Right-hander Kevin Gausman (5-4, 3.68) will get the nod for Sunday's series finale. This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025. Gregory Strong, The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store