Six guilty of attacks including torching prison staff cars in Edinburgh and Lothians
The men will be sentenced next month.The charges had been said to have had a connection with serious organised crime, but this aggravation was deleted by prosecutors at the end of the evidence.The judge, Lord Mulholland, however, said the men had been found guilty of "out of control gangsterism".
Machete attack
Their first victim was attacked in Bilston, Midlothian in December 2022 when a gang attacked his car and smashed it up with bladed weapons.He told a 999 call they had tried to "chop him up".Another man was targeted by a machete-wielding assailant near his home in Edinburgh's Pilton area on 5 January, 2023.He said he attempted to fend off the attacker after he pulled up in a car and began striking him with the weapon.His hand was almost completely severed in the attack, after which he was rushed to hospital and spent 12 hours in surgery.The man said he thought he was "dying on the doorstep".
Another man was targeted in a "high speed chase" between Edinburgh and Dalkeith.He was forced off the road and his car smashed into a wall. The man was left with a "large gaping wound" to his arm after he was struck with machetes.He also needed a number of operations, has been left scarred for life and remains physically affected by the incident.On 7 January, 2023, six cars belonging to staff at HMP Addiewell in West Lothian were set on fire late at night.Later that month, another of the gang's victims was ambushed by masked attackers in the Ferniehill area of Edinburgh.His injuries were so severe he ended up in intensive care and a coma.
'Sinister' crimes
The court heard all six men had lengthy criminal pasts.They were caught thanks to CCTV and forensic evidence, as well as a handwritten note branding a potential witness "a grass".McGovern, 33, fled Scotland via Campbeltown in Argyll and Bute and onto Dublin.He went on travel to the Netherlands before going to Cambodia, VIetnam, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates before being caught and extradited back to Scotland.He was cleared of attempted murder, but was found guilty along with Heeps, Ridgway and Mullen of being involved in the blazes at Addiewell.Heeps, 34, was convicted of eight charges including three attempted murders.Ridgeway, 32, was involved in three of the attempted murders and was convicted of eight charges.Jurors found Bauld, 33, was involved in two of those attacks and Mullen, 26, one of them.Murray, 25, was convicted of five charges, including two attempted murders.
Lord Mulholland told them: "You have been convicted, to varying degrees, of a number of serious charges which can only be described as out-of-control gangsterism."This was attacking a number of people with machetes to the extent one nearly had his hand chopped off."You also travelled to HMP Addiewell where you set fire to six prison officers cars – a sinister crime against the very people tasked with executing the orders of the court.He added: "This was clearly intended to intimidate and send a message to those that worked at the prison."
Det Supt Paul Grainger said the level of violence in the attacks was "completely unacceptable".He added: ""Although these were all targeted attacks, those involved showed absolutely no regard for the communities affected."These incidents could have had much more serious consequences, and I want to make it clear this behaviour will not be tolerated."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I was CO of the SAS. Here are four words our Special Forces need to hear from the PM
With war in Europe and new threats to this country around every corner, from autocratic tyrants like Putin, jihadists and deranged activists, we should be supporting and encouraging those who keep us safe not seeking new legal ways to artificially transform their past acts of military necessity into alleged human rights violations. The US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth spoke recently at the US Special Operations Forces (SOF) week outlining his nation's rock-solid support and admiration for those conducting complex counter-terrorist operations alongside their many allies, including the UK. For emphasis, and in recognition of the new threat of state-sponsored 'lawfare' against these guardians of our collective security, he passed on a personal note to their commander from President Trump which simply stated: 'I have your back'. This is exactly the unequivocal message our protectors need to hear as they advance towards a suspected suicide-capable terrorist hiding within a civilian population, without the blessing of perfect intelligence, time and resources. Contrast this to the way that our own leaders – political and military – stand silent as our own Special Forces are pursued by a toxic combination of creative journalists and lawyers, each keen to prove that historical state-directed operations in Northern Ireland, Iraq and Afghanistan were done in ways that should now be presented to the Crown Prosecution Service. This in many cases not due to any new evidence, incidentally – that would be reasonable – but simply because of a crafty interpretation of international laws created far from our sovereign legislature and sponsored by those that have no respect for either the realities of close quarter combat, or our need to defend ourselves. To the general dismay of potential volunteers to our armed forces and of our American allies, our public or parliamentary debate seems to dismiss the blood-stained experience of veterans as unreasonable or even fanciful. Self-effacing descriptions of the realities of combat are dismissed as mere cartoon stories and trumped by the creative opinions of human rights lawyers who seem to value the lives of our enemies ahead of those of our soldiers sent to defeat them. Energetic, combative and very well paid, these legal professionals demonstrate great skill at retrospectively transforming descriptions of close quarter combat into revisionist suggestions of human rights violations and even war crimes. No wonder recruiting numbers are falling or that our soldiers start to hesitate, fearing the long-term legal consequences of taking decisive action in a combat situation. To the many practitioners within the vital transatlantic counter-terrorism alliance it appears that the UK's application of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to the British way of war is starting to critically restrict its ability to stop terrorists and other bad actors from attacking our citizens or those of our allies. Can these staunch allies of ours still rely on the UK to deal with these common threats or are we becoming that type of fearful partner that simply prefers others to do the dirty work? To them, have we become nothing but a soft, compromised underbelly to be watched rather than the respected, self-sufficient bastion of old; a vulnerability rather than a strongpoint? Have we become a risky partner in sensitive operations, whose participation in joint operations carries the risk of inviting follow-on lawfare back into the courtrooms of our allies, even the USA? Such are the whispered and worried questions being asked in the global targeting rooms when considering UK potential contributions to today's fight. In the confusing and murky world of counter-terrorism where threats fade in and out of view in an instant, hesitation always leads to failure and death. This is a brutal reality known to both enemies and allies alike; exploited by the former, feared by the latter. There are never any second chances, and this is no place for unreliable, indecisive or gun-shy allies. Recognising this, let us hope that our own national leaders can offer the same reassuring support to our forces as shown by the US President in that simple but powerful promise to his team: 'I have your back'. For without it, they risk allowing the effect of this escalating lawfare to weaken the hand and confidence of our very special guardians just when we need them the most.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The Farm lead singer's son is jailed for 10 years after he was identified as £1.3million drug dealer when he sent picture of his pop star dad to criminal pal on EncroChat
The son of an iconic 1990s pop star has been jailed for 10 years after being identified as a major drug dealer when he sent a photo of his father on EncroChat. Thomas Hooton, 30, brokered drug deals worth £1.3million for organised criminals using the encrypted messaging service. But police were able to identify the criminal - who used the handle 'Ownraptor' - by references to his father Peter Hooton, 62, lead singer of The Farm. This included a picture the Liverpool fan sent of his father with the Champions League trophy. He also spoke in messages about driving a Black Audi A3 and that his 'arl fella' arranged his insurance. Hooton, of Crosby, was jailed for 10 years and eight months on Friday for conspiring to supply heroin, cocaine, cannabis and ketamine. He had 41 different EncroChat contacts, and ran county lines routes to criminals in Scotland, the north east and the south of England. At the very minimum, he was involved in the supply of 42.5kg of cannabis, 3.25kg of heroin, 10 kg of cocaine and 1kg of ketamine. His messages said he was in possession of around £400,000 and owed £258,000. The offending was committed between 26 March and 4 June 2020. The Merseyside Organised Crime Partnership, which arrested Hooton in April, is made up of officers from the National Crime Agency and Merseyside Police. Peter Hooton founded The Farm in 1983, with the band releasing a string of hits including their best known song, All Together Now. Charles Lander, defending, told the court that Thomas came from a 'close knit and loving family' but had 'lost his way and began mixing with the wrong crowd'. A string of 'prominent individuals', including West Derby MP Ian Byrne offered character references showing 'another side to the defendant' and his 'genuine remorse'. Mr Landler told the court: 'His parents, grandparents and partner are all adjusting to the fact that he will not be around for a number of years. 'I ask the court to reflect on the positive features that your honour knows about him. This is a defendant who has begun the first steps of rehabilitation. He is determined to lead a law abiding lifestyle and not trouble the courts again.' Judge Denis Watson KC said: 'Remorse and personal circumstances can play a significant part in the determination of sentences at the lower end, but, for crimes of the seriousness involved here, the part that they can play is much more limited. 'Lest anyone overlook this, all drug supply offences are offences of significant gravity and seriousness. 'These offences result in degradation and human misery for those who take the drugs, and for their families and the wider community. 'So much crime, and the impact of that crime on victims and society, generally flows from drug supply and the consequences of it.' Detective Chief Inspector Lynsay Armbruster said: 'It's clear Hooton was involved in organised crime for a long time before he was charged. 'His criminal and geographical reach will have taken considerable time to establish. 'His drug supply operations were on an almost daily basis, they were sustained and spanned the UK working with high level criminals.' EncroChat was infiltrated and taken down in 2020 by a European taskforce. The NCA leads Operation Venetic – the UK's response to the takedown. Merseyside OCP officers are committed to protecting the public by stopping the flow of firearms and drugs into Merseyside's criminal markets and county lines networks. Thomas Hooton will appear before Liverpool Crown Court later this year for a proceeds of crime hearing.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gregg Wallace says 'I am not a flasher' and says he is horrified to be compared to Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards as he again blames autism for not wearing underwear
Disgraced presenter Gregg Wallace has hit out at critics for comparing him to Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards, insisting he is 'not a groper, sex pest or a flasher'. The former MasterChef host, 60, tearfully apologised to anyone he had hurt in the wake of dozens of allegations of inappropriate behaviour, including claims that he dropped his trousers in front of staff. In his first interview since being sacked by the BBC in light of the complaints, Wallace broke down in tears as he spoke of the 'hurt' suffered by him and his family, insisting he had been unfairly treated in the media spotlight. He told The Sun that he understood some of his actions may have offended people and 'weren't socially acceptable' but denied being a 'wrong-un'. 'I'm not a groper. People think I've been taking my trousers down and exposing myself - I am not a flasher. People think I'm a sex pest. I am not,' he added. Wallace said that being discussed in the same breath as notorious sex offenders Savile and Edwards was 'horrific' and admitted he was scared to go outside in case people 'abuse' him in the street. Wallace insisted he is 'not trying to play the victim' and claimed his autism diagnosis was partly responsible for some of his alleged behaviour as it means he struggles 'to read people' and can be perceived as 'odd' at times. He also again defended allegations - which he claims have been 'sexualised' - that he would not wear underwear while working on the cooking show, saying it was due to his 'hypersensitivity' as a result of the condition. Wallace stepped down from the hit BBC cooking show after complaints were made about his behaviour and following a report into his conduct, in which 45 of 83 complaints were upheld. In total, 41 people complained. The review concluded that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour'. It added that 'a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated', with 'one incident of unwelcome physical contact' also substantiated. The ex Eat Well for Less? presenter told the Sun that while he didn't deny being guilty of some of the claims, he believed things had been 'perceived incorrectly'. Wallace claimed that he had worked with around 4,000 people, meaning that just 0.5% of those he has worked with 'found fault with me'. He said his actions were the result of learned behaviour and workplace culture and claimed that his recent autism diagnosis also played a role. 'I know I am odd. I know I struggle to read people. I know people find me weird. Autism is a disability, a registered disability,' he said. Wallace has faced backlash from autism charities over similar claims, with some accusing him of using autism as an excuse for his alleged inappropriate behaviour. Seema Flower, founder of disabilities consultancy Blind Ambition, told BBC News there was 'no excuse' for being inappropriate to people in society. 'Where does it leave us if we use autism as excuse to behave in whatever way we like?' she asked. Emily Banks, founder of neurodiversity training body Enna, also condemned Wallace. She said: 'To be clear: being autistic is never an excuse for misconduct. It doesn't absolve anyone of responsibility, and it certainly doesn't mean you can't tell the difference between right and wrong.' While Dan Harris, who runs the charity Neurodiversity in Business and is himself autistic, said people like him 'may miss social cues autism is not a free pass for bad behaviour.' 'Comments like this stigmatise us and add an unfortunate negative focus on our community.' Wallace has previously said he felt the BBC failed to provide enough support for his condition during his 20 years working on Masterchef. 'My neurodiversity, now formally diagnosed as autism, was suspected and discussed by colleagues across countless seasons of MasterChef,' Wallace said. 'Yet nothing was done to investigate my disability or protect me from what I now realise was a dangerous environment for over 20 years.' During the interview, Wallace also defended his sacked former co-host John Torode, telling the paper he is 'not a racist'. Torode was the subject of an allegation about using racist language that was upheld as part of a review carried out by law firm Lewis Silkin into the alleged behaviour of co-presenter Wallace. Torode said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. Pointing to the allegation against Torode, Wallace told the Sun: 'I've known John for 30 years and he is not a racist.' 'There is no way that man is a racist. No way. And my sympathies go out to John because I don't want anybody to go through what I've been through,' he added. Torode never defended his MasterChef colleague when allegations against him first emerged in December last year. Wallace was said to be 'furious' with his former co-star and unfollowed him and his wife Lisa on Instagram. Wallace admitted that he and Torode 'never really did get on that well', insisting they are 'two very, very different characters'. But he went on to say they had made 'bloody good telly together for 20 years'. Wallace's comments come after it was revealed that the BBC would air its amateur 2025 series of MasterChef. In the nine months since the hit BBC programme finished filming last Autumn there have been questions over whether it would ever be broadcast following allegations of inappropriate behaviour against presenters Wallace and Torode. Now the corporation has revealed that the amateur series of MasterChef filmed last year, before allegations against Gregg and John were upheld, will be broadcast on BBC One and BBC iPlayer from August 6. The MailOnline understand that the BBC have told the MasterChef production company Banijay that the show should reduce Gregg and John's screen time to a minimum in light of the report's findings. A source said: 'The BBC have made it clear that it should limit the amount of airtime the presenters have in the editing of the new series, with a bigger focus on the contestants who are at the heart of the competition.' 'Neither Gregg nor John will appear in BBC iPlayer thumbnails and they will not be doing any promotional activity around the latest series.' 'All of the brilliant new contestants were consulted on whether the series should be broadcast, and no one objected.' 'Everyone involved is very keen to promote the hard work of the contestants and that will be our priority.' The BBC said it had taken the decision to broadcast the unaired series 'after careful consideration and consultation with the contestants'. In a statement, the corporation said: 'MasterChef is an amazing competition which is life-changing for the amateur chefs taking part. The focus of it has always been their skill and their journey.' The BBC also said it had not yet taken a decision on the completed celebrity series and Christmas special, filmed with Torode and food critic Grace Dent. In its statement, the BBC said: 'This has not been an easy decision in the circumstances and we appreciate not everyone will agree with it. 'In showing the series, which was filmed last year, it in no way diminishes our view of the seriousness of the upheld findings against both presenters. We have been very clear on the standards of behaviour that we expect of those who work at the BBC or on shows made for the BBC. 'However, we believe that broadcasting this series is the right thing to do for these cooks who have given so much to the process. We want them to be properly recognised and give the audience the choice to watch the series.' The BBC concluded its statement by describing MasterChef as 'a brilliant, much-loved programme which is bigger than any one individual'.
