
$300 billion Trump crypto rally re-ignites reserve fight
A cryptocurrency reserve held by the U.S. government would not necessarily require taxpayer money for the feds to set up a stash of several billion dollars' worth, but that doesn't mean everyone — even everyone in the crypto industry — thinks it is a good idea.
Why it matters: President Trump, who calls himself America's "first crypto president," stoked a $300 billion cryptocurrency rally this past weekend with a social post about a reserve that would include several major cryptocurrencies.
Friction point: There's a lot of blowback to the whole idea, particularly if it were funded by taxpayers.
"I think reserves actually make no sense," Latif Peracha, general partner at early stage venture fund, M13, which has invested in many crypto-connected companies, including many with a bitcoin focus, told Axios.
While he acknowledges that such a program would be good for some of his investments, he doesn't think the idea holds up to geopolitical scrutiny, especially if it undermines U.S. Treasuries as the go-to safe haven for other nations.
"I think that's long term a potential risk to a dollar-first global order," Peracha said. Instead, he said, the Trump administration should put all its political capital into advancing stablecoins rather than diverting some of it to this reserves idea, he said.
Yes, but: Perarcha's view isn't necessarily the blockchain consensus.
Many CEOs and leaders in the industry support the general concept — though they tend to diverge on just how many flavors of crypto assets the U.S. should hold.
"The reserve going beyond bitcoin to also include the key crypto assets ethereum, XRP, Solana and Cardano shows that the Trump administration is serious about this," Mena Theodorou, a co-founder at the crypto exchange Coinstash, said in a statement sent to Axios.
Others differ. "Bitcoin is the only one that makes sense to hold in a strategic reserve," Zach Burks, CEO of Mintable, an NFT creation platform, wrote in a statement.
Reality check: Andrew O'Neill, managing director of digital assets for S&P Global Ratings, wrote that Bitcoin has some of the same properties as gold, giving it a reasonable narrative as a national reserve asset.
But, for a nation-state, the other "assets differs significantly from BTC and tech venture investment is less common for sovereigns."
What they're saying: The chief of crypto and AI for the White House, David Sacks, has urged critics to wait and see what the administration actually plans to propose.
"Nobody announced a tax or spending program," Sacks wrote on social media.
Even still, critics like crypto researcher Molly White argue that any such initiative will only benefit those who already hold the chosen crypto assets, "rather than benefit all Americans."
Between the lines: A strategic reserve still raises the fundamental question: What's the strategy?
Bharat Ramamurti, the Biden-era deputy director of the National Economic Council, now with the the American Economic Liberties Project, noted to Axios that past strategic reserves had to be created with an act of Congress.
As Ramamurti explained, the U.S. has reserves in commodities like petroleum in order to take action in the market when costs are hurting Americans. Bitcoin is not so widely used by Americans that such market operations would be easy to justify.
The other problem that has to be addressed is how to actually get the coins in question for a reserve.
The United States already holds over $17 billion in crypto assets that it seized from criminals in various operations.
The US could just use seized assets, redirect revenue to buying additional assets, or seek appropriations to buy crypto assets from Congress.
So far, the White House has not described its planned approach.
💭 Our thought bubble: Sitting on seized digital assets is passive investment, government style.
If the feds start trading those assets to hit certain allocation targets, that's not passive. It's a recipe for drama among Trump's supporters and fodder for his critics.
What's next: Last week, the administration announced a summit devoted to cryptocurrency for this Friday, and the reserve is on the agenda. "More to come at the summit," Sacks tweeted.
An administration spokesperson directed Axios to these tweets from Sacks rather than provide further details about its plans.
Emily Peck contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week
IQVIA Holdings experienced a 10% rise in share price over the last week, correlating with its recent developments, notably the dosing of the first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and its strategic alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute to optimize oncology trials. These initiatives likely provided a positive sentiment boost, aligning well with the broader market momentum, as indices such as the S&P 500 also reached new highs. The market's anticipation over US-China trade talks and overall strong corporate earnings have supported the upward trend, further enhancing IQV's market performance. We've identified 1 warning sign for IQVIA Holdings that you should be aware of. Uncover 18 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. The recent 10% rise in IQVIA Holdings' share price has been influenced by important developments like the dosing in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and a key alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute. These initiatives are expected to potentially drive revenue growth, particularly as the strategic alliance optimizes oncology trials. The company's past performance, with total returns of 10.45% over five years, suggests modest growth in investor value. However, compared to the US Life Sciences industry's one-year return of 27% decline, IQVIA's recent rise highlights positive market sentiment. These initiatives, combined with FDA reforms and NVIDIA collaboration, may lower operational costs and have a favorable impact on earnings forecasts. Analysts predict revenue to grow by 5.2% annually over the next three years, which is somewhat cautious compared to the general expectations for the life sciences sector. The recent share price movement to US$146.2 remains below the consensus price target of US$216.31, indicating potential for future appreciation if the projected growth in revenue and earnings materializes. Click here to discover the nuances of IQVIA Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:IQV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data