
Detail in how young people walk that predicts if they'll suffer a deadly health problem in your 60s, experts reveal
Scientists can now predict how likely you are to suffer a potentially deadly fall in your 60s based on how you walk in your 20s.
Falls are a major cause of injury and death among older people in the UK.
Official data suggests a third of over 65s suffer a fall in Britain each year and the accident is the most common cause of death from injury among this group.
Falls are also the leading cause of A&E visits for older people in the nation, and treating them costs the NHS an estimated £2billion each year.
But now scientists say they may have found a way to identify people at increased risk of life-threatening falls decades before they reach an advanced age.
In the study, experts from Stanford University in the US found they were able to accurately predict fall risk from three simple measurements.
These were how variable the width between steps was when walking, how different the timing of each step was, and how consistently they placed their feet on the ground.
Writing in the Journal of Experimental Biology, the authors said each of these measurements was 86 per cent accurate in predicting if someone would fall later in the experiment.
In the study, the researchers had 10 healthy volunteers aged between 24 and 31 walk on a treadmill in front of 11 special cameras.
Using these, scientists were able to capture precise data on how exactly each person walked from every angle.
In the second stage, each of volunteers was asked to walk on the treadmill again but this time while wearing heavy ankle bracelets, a vision impairing mask, and destabilising air jets.
This combination of gear was designed to mimic the loss of balance and reaction speed to falls that comes with older age.
Analysing the results, they found participants with the highest variance step width, step timing, and where they placed their feet in the first stage were more likely to fall in the second.
The team highlighted how, in many countries, medics typically only assess how people walk and their potential fall risk after they start showing mobility issues.
Jiaen Wu, lead author of the paper, said data like that gathered in their study could be used to help predict falls among older people before they are at risk.
'One big challenge is that small balance impairments can go unnoticed until someone actually falls,' they said.
They added that stopping falls before they occur would potentially save many lives and healthcare systems billions in costs.
The new research follows a recent study that showed elderly people who have a positive attitude towards ageing were more likely to recover better if they have a fall.
About one in three people aged 65 years and over have a fall at least once each year, increasing to one in two people aged 80 years and over, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Official data show there were almost 220,000 falls-related A&E hospital admissions among people aged 65 years and over in England in the last financial year.
Falls can cause older people to suffer fractures to their hips, which in turn can lead to worsening mobility and a greater risk of future falls and further injury.
Older people are more vulnerable to falls due to a general weakness and frailty that come with age which also makes it more challenging for them to recover.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Blood test for Alzheimer's disease is highly accurate, researchers say
Researchers say a new blood test for Alzheimer's disease has been shown to be highly accurate in detecting people with early symptoms. Scientists looked for two proteins - amyloid beta 42/40 and p-tau217 - and found the test was 95% accurate in identifying patients with existing cognitive impairment linked to the condition. The US study involved 509 patients in an outpatient memory clinic in Florida and was published in the medical journal Alzheimer's and Dementia. The test, which has already been approved by the US regulator, was also 82% accurate for specificity, which means it could rule out people without dementia. Dr Gregg Day, who led the study, said the test was as good as existing, but more invasive, tests. He said the next step was to extend the test to a wider range of patients, including those with early Alzheimer's who do not have any cognitive symptoms. Scientists say the two proteins, which they have identified in blood plasma, are associated with the buildup of amyloid plaques. Amyloid protein can be found in our brains, but in Alzheimer's disease, amyloid sticks together and forms abnormal deposits, which are thought to be toxic to brain cells. Dr Richard Oakley, associate director for research and innovation at the Alzheimer's Society in the UK, said the results "suggest this test is very accurate". "Blood tests will be critical to accelerate diagnosis and give more people access to the care, support and treatments they desperately need faster than ever before," he added. In the UK, the Blood Biomarker Challenge is a multi-million-pound research programme supported by the Alzheimer's Society, Alzheimer's Research UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Research. 1:09 Its goal is to bring blood tests for dementia diagnosis to the NHS by 2029. Dr Julia Dudley, head of research at Alzheimer's Research UK, said: "We urgently need to improve how we diagnose dementia and it's great to see international research working towards this goal." She said the studies like the Blood Biomarker Challenge are a "crucial part of making diagnosis easier and faster, which will bring us closer to a cure". "The study is testing blood tests, including p-tau217, in thousands of people from sites across the UK," she added.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE EXPOSED: How restaurants are lying to you about their hygiene ratings. STEVE BOGGAN'S investigation reveals the shocking truth about those green stickers - and exactly what the owners had to say when confronted
Are you from food hygiene? It was an odd question to be asked, but 46-year-old restaurateur Sameh Houeidi seemed anxious to know. I was looking at the official hygiene rating sticker on the window of his Lebanese restaurant near Aldgate in London.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer goes all in on NHS with PM set to hand health service £30bn spending boost at expense of other public services
Sir Keir Starmer will pump money into the NHS at the expense of other public services. The government is putting all its eggs in one basket as it lines up the Department for Health for a £30billion cash boost at next week's spending review. However, health chiefs have warned the prime minister's promise to 'turbocharge delivery' could lead to difficult compromises elsewhere in services from the police to councils. It comes after the party's unexpected victory in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election - though as the threat of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK still looms large. The Department for Health will be handed an increase of around £200billion to its budget by 2028 - a £17billion rise in real terms. Its day-to-day budget is set to increase by 2.8 per cent in real terms annually over the three-year spending review period. Sir Keir has also pledged to have 92 per cent of NHS patients treated within 18 weeks by the next election, a target that has remained unmet for a decade. Currently, under 60 per cent are seen within this time with waiting lists rising to 7.4million last month. There are even fears NHS bosses may not hit an interim goal of 65 per cent next year. Chancellor Rachel Reeves' prioritisation of health has forced cuts in other departments and prompted protestations from other cabinet members like Yvette Cooper, the home secretary and Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary. Both have warned Ms Reeves the cuts will put some of the government's crime and housing targets at risk amid 'robust negotiations'. But the chancellor has maintained 'not every department will get everything they want'. Overall, the health budget, which stood at £178billion as Labour took office, will exceed £230billion by the next election. The increase means health is set to account for 41 per cent of all day-to-day departmental spending - up from 39 per cent. Ben Zaranko, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said Ms Reeves's cash boost was 'a serious, meaningful increase in health funding'. But Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, warned the funding increase 'is not going to enable us to achieve recovery and reform' without big changes to the way the health service treats patients. He said the government's plan to withhold the budget for infrastructure simultaneously would also make 'combining recovery and reform' impossible.