Australian supermarket chicken nuggets taste test: from ‘mushy' and ‘yuck' to ‘super good'
Though a handful suggested I make my own, most understood the assignment: the appeal of a chicken nugget lies not in Nara Smith-ing it but in its convenience, especially during school holiday chaos. To that end, on the first day of winter break, I rounded up good friends, compliant siblings (including a 34-year-old nugget connoisseur-sister who still orders kids' meals) and their respective children to rate frozen supermarket offerings for their overall appeal, their texture and flavour.
Nuggets were cooked in an oven according to their packet instructions, but the consensus was that almost all the nuggets needed longer cook times. The battered nuggets, which came out on top, tended to stick to the baking paper, and some tasters felt that an air fryer would definitely produce a superior crispiness.
With 10 testers under 10, we learned fast that kids under seven are a little remiss in their paper scoring (lots of 10s and even more zeros, often for the same nugget) but great at verbalising feedback, so I prioritised their audible reactions and the scores of older children and adults as I pulled together the results.
Just as we were wrapping up, one child went screeching through the kitchen yelling 'I NEED WATER'. I felt the sodium levels too, palming the leftovers off and declaring I'd be fine never seeing another chicken nugget again. My sister, meanwhile, sent me a picture of a small bowl of nuggets the very next day, with the message 'Chicken Nuggets for life'.
Steggles Tempura Chicken Dino Snacks, 1kg, $13.50 ($1.35 per 100g), available at major supermarkets
Score 7.9/10
It's easy to assume that these came out on top simply for their novelty. A cheer went out as they were brought to the table – surprising since we were six varieties in at that point. One little tester proudly declared she'd had three by the time I'd scouted everyone else's reaction.
Get our weekend culture and lifestyle email
Younger kids declared them 'really soft and nice' and 'super good'; older kids said they were 'just right' in both texture and flavour. The adults concurred, finding they had a 'crispy outside', 'delicious and tender' inside and an overall 'taste and texture that was consistent'.
Their listed ingredients have one of the highest percentages of chicken (not breast) at 52% and a tempura coating of 26%.
Could it be the shape? It's possible, one tester said, that the dino shape contributes to an exterior that is crispier in some parts and softer than others, making the overall experience a little better.
Farmwood Chicken Breast Tempura Nuggets, 1kg, $9.29 ($0.92 per 100g), available at Aldi
Score: 6.7/10
Across many of the nuggets we tried, we found the exterior texture and flavour weighted a nugget up or down more than the inside flavour and texture, which was relatively consistent no matter the brand.
These budget versions from Aldi are a case in point: though three of the adults found they had a gummier inside than the other tempura varieties, they still ranked highly for inside taste, and exterior taste and texture.
While some of the batter came off during baking, younger testers gave them a thumbs up on the whole, with one noting their taste and 'good exterior'. A similar ingredient makeup to the top scorer (52% RSPCA-approved chicken breast, 27% tempura coating) likely helps.
Sign up to Saved for Later
Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips
after newsletter promotion
Steggles Tempura Chicken Nuggets, 1kg, $13.50 ($1.35 per 100g), available at all major supermarkets
Score: 6.6/10
These are essentially the same as their dino counterparts, with only a small variation in the ingredients (49% chicken and 30% tempura), yet testers found them 'soft' and 'bland' on the inside, with a superior outside thanks to their 'crispy texture'. One tester said the tempura layer tasted 'bread-like' and felt 'thin', which could suggest the dino shape theory has legs (pardon the pun).
Ingham's Chicken Breast Nuggets Tempura, 1kg, $11 ($1.10 per 100g), available at all major supermarkets
Score: 6/10
These were my pick of the bunch, but other tasters found the inside to be better than the outside, describing them as 'well-seasoned' and 'peppery and salty'. But they were short on the crispy exterior that makes a nugget what it is. Despite their lower chicken content (48%) these nuggets are made from chicken breast, with a much-lower tempura coating of just 22% that allows the taste of real chicken to come through.
Woolworths Chicken Breast Crumbed Nuggets, 1kg, $9 ($0.90 per 100g), available at Woolworths
Score: 5.9/10
Adult testers found these to be 'crumbly' or 'sandy' in texture, but found their inside taste and texture redeemable: 'flavourful' and 'soft'. Younger testers were overwhelmingly negative, blaming a 'no flavour inside taste' for their rejection of a second or third bite.
On checking the ingredients after the taste test, these had a whopping 41% crumb coating, but the highest percentage of RSPCA-approved chicken breast at 59%. Their ingredient panel was also more specific than many, naming flavours like paprika and cumin over the more abstract 'seasoning'.
Coles Crumbed Chicken Nuggets, 1kg, $11 ($1.10 per 100g), available at Coles
Score: 5.1/10
Younger testers described the inside of these nuggets as 'weird' and 'not nice'; older ones as 'eggy' and 'bland'. The outside fared a little bit better: although some described the exterior as 'too crumbly', others found it to be the best in flavour.
They do their job on a basic level, tasting sufficiently chicken-adjacent with a crispy enough outside, though coming out overall as kind of 'mid'.
Farmwood Chicken Nuggets, 1kg, $6.49 ($0.65 per 100g), available at Aldi
Score: 3.3/10
At 25c cheaper per hundred gram than the nearest competitor, these tied for lowest-cost nuggets. Their results were divisive. Some praised their 'good taste' and 'nice crumb', but one tester went so far as to say they should go 'in the bin'. It was the 'mushy' texture that let them down, with one person saying: 'If you'd told me these were made of potato, I would have believed you.'
Black & Gold Australian Chicken Nuggets, 500g, $3.25 ($0.65 per 100g), available at independent grocers
Score: 0.9/10
Although tied for first place on low price, this was the only variety I spat out. Testers also concluded they 'felt sandy', 'tasted horrible', were 'too hard' and had 'no flavour'.
They have the lowest percentage of chicken at just 34% (and not specifically chicken breast), which I suspect affects the flavour. The rough, uneven crumb, noted as soon as they came out of the oven (and inferred when they were removed from the freezer), can't help.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Man who put up 'hideous' 8ft privacy fence around his garden to block out Tesco shoppers finally loses war with council
A man has lost his battle with the council and been ordered to lower the 'hideous' and 'ugly' eight-foot-high fence he built at his grade II listed home. Matt Hubbard and his wife are devastated by the criticism, telling one neighbour: 'It is so sad, we felt we had done everything right and by the book.' The couple and their daughter moved into the charming cottage in Mickleover, Derbyshire, three-and-a-half years ago which they had bought for £330,000 after 'falling in love with it.' For decades, the garden to the side of the 19th century property had become a wilderness with trees blocking out the light, bushes straying onto the road and litter tossed into it from the neighbouring Tesco. The pair had spent thousands of pounds cleaning up the garden and built the fence for privacy and to ward off fly-tippers. But he hadn't sought planning permission and when there were some complaints he was ordered to take it down. The fence was described as 'hideous' and 'ugly' by planners, who said it was a 'harsh and incongruous feature of the street scene.' They said it was 'excessively tall and bulky' and 'out of character.' Online criticism suggested the householders had been 'blind' and 'ignorant' for breaching planning rules. One stated: 'When you purchase a Grade 2 listed property you should expect to have to jump through hoops with planning approvals. 'You can't go into something like this blind and ignorant. The point of this is that it should all be in keeping with the property.' The owners were aware they needed planning consent for any changes to the property itself but did not know that it included a fence which was not attached to the building. They tried to seek retrospective permission but this was refused, and later took it to appeal in 2023 whey they lost. 'What it has done is make a mockery of our planning system with people building what they want then applying for retrospective planning permission and then holding out for the correct outcome you want. 'There would have been no where near as much waste of council money if in the first place the correct channels were followed.' Another wrote: 'Perhaps if the owners had knuckled down and effectively managed the screen hedge that used to be on this boundary, rather than ripping it out, they could have had what was needed for privacy without all of the hassle that they complain about.' After a long running dispute the owners and council have recently come to an amicable resolution, where Mr Hubbard must lower the fence in height by five panels - about two feet - and plant in front of it to fully screen it. The fence was erected in November 2022 and they have been given until the next planting season in spring 2026 to make the changes. However the council's verdict has created a divide among neighbors, as many were grateful the fence had made the area much more presentable. One local told the Daily Mail: 'They are a lovely family and we're all very grateful they've cleared the garden up. It had been left in a disgusting state and we all have to walk by it as a short cut up the steps to the Tesco supermarket behind. It was like a tip. 'The couple had found condoms, underwear, drug paraphernalia and even a stolen bag.' The woman, who declined to be named and has lived in the neighbourhood for 20 years, added: 'We feel it is very unfair of the council to impose so many do's and dont's on them. 'All they are trying to do is make the property a lovely home. 'The couple cut down unruly trees and bushes which had been seeping sap and making the steps up to Tesco very slippery and dangerous, especially for the pensioners. 'They put up a high fence to protect their privacy and stop people throwing over litter and junk. 'They've done a great job, we all think, but now they're being told to rip down the fence - or least a quarter of the height of it - which means they'll be overlooked and maybe targeted by litter louts again.' Fennel Cottage in Limes Avenue was once part of the old village of Mickleover which dates back to the Doomsday Book and because it is listed is subject to stricter planning rules and regulations. But urban sprawl means it is now bordered by two low-rise blocks of flats to one side with a superstore to the rear. Neighbour Elaine said: 'We're on their side and don't think they should have to knock the fence down. It looks much better since they moved in. 'A couple had lived there for years but the man died and the woman apparently moved out so the property was left empty, unloved and untended for some time. 'Now the owners are trying too do the right thing. They know the council are not trying to be awkward and they don't want to upset them. 'But it has been a long tough fight and they have been extremely upset by the criticism from planners and some objectors.' Helena Warner, 73, who lives across the road, said: 'If the Council thought what was there before was acceptable and this is not, then they need their heads testing' Anther resident said: 'The house has been done up and tidied top and the whole area looks much cleaner and tidier and feels safer too. 'They thought the fence was in keeping and felt it was ridiculous that they had to take it down but now just lower it. 'They kept the original front gate and other features, but the council made them take down the hanging baskets nailed to the front wall and which were there when they moved in. 'They were told that watering flowers could cause damage and erosion to the brickwork. 'It's a contradiction really because there's BT wires along one side of the house and a Virgin box near the front door, already there, so how is that allowed? 'They had to remove a Sky dish down which had been a bit of an eyesore.' One local said that by being forced to lower the fence it was as if the family 'was not entitled to any privacy.' He added: 'When lorries go into the Tesco car park I bet they can see right into their back garden and probably the top rooms, and it will be worse when the fence is two feet lower. 'They're proud of their historic cottage and want any changes to comply. They join in litter picks some others, and we all care for the area we live in.' Retired military man Kev Creasy, 69, who lives opposite, said: 'It is absolutely ridiculous what they've been through with the council but they've come to a solution now.' Helena Warner, 73, who lives across the road, added: 'If the council thought what was there before was acceptable and this is not, then they need their heads testing. 'There was no light because of all the trees, I didn't even know the cottage had a separate annexe because it was all submerged in undergrowth.' Julie Woodhouse, who manages a residential home in the street, said: 'I don't know what street scene the council were looking at. They allowed Tesco a great big blue sign that overlooks their garden and they did nothing when it was an eyesore. 'The couple have done a fabulous job. The council need to get a grip. There are potholes so bad on the road to the home that it's not safe.' Mr Hubbard, previously speaking to the Daily Mail, said: 'The garden was such a state when we moved and that clearing it and making it liveable was a priority. 'I knew the listed status meant getting permission for any changes to the property so we left in the original side gate. I didn't know this applied to a fence.' Before coming to a resolution he said: 'We are going to have to make some alterations to the fencing at the front of the property but not the fencing to the back, next to Tesco. 'They say the property needs to be seen more clearly from the street so they want some of the panels removed at the front. 'The Council have also said they will put in double-yellow lines because there are times when it is impossible for us to drive out because of parked cars and the angle required to turn.' The couple said the necessary work would be carried out and that they had already started a planting scheme. A spokesperson for Derby City Council said: 'The landowner's appeal against our refusal for retrospective planning permission was dismissed. 'The Planning Inspector noted that solid fencing along part of the front boundary is harmful to the character and appearance of the area and the setting and significance of Fennel Cottage, a Grade II listed building. 'Our aim is to remove the fence by agreement with the landowner, but we have the powers to take formal enforcement action if a voluntary solution isn't reached. No fines have been issued. 'It has now been decided and agreed for some hedging to be planted in front of the fence facing Limes Avenue to soften its appearance and to help it blend in with the street scene.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Tim Dowling: my wife takes the dog to be spayed. It's best I don't go with her
The new dog – now just 'the dog', I guess – has an appointment to be spayed. Thanks to a number of unforeseen events the procedure has already been cancelled once, and my wife is keen not to miss our Friday morning slot. When it's time to leave she comes out to my office shed with the dog following. 'We're off,' she says. 'Do you want me to come?' I say. 'Why?' she says. 'Do you want to come?' 'Not really,' I say. 'I'm just offering.' 'What possible use would your presence serve?' she says. 'I'm being polite,' I say. 'If I thought there was a risk of you saying yes, I wouldn't have asked.' My wife goes to the supermarket after dropping the dog off. In total she is gone for about three hours. During this time I pace back and forth between my office and the kitchen. At one point, to keep myself busy, I wash up a bowl, drop the bowl, break the bowl and, in a belated bid to catch the bowl, cut my hand open on one of the larger shards. I am thinking about what possible use my presence might serve when my wife walks in with two full bags of shopping. 'How was that?' I say. 'A nightmare,' she says. 'The vet?' I say. 'No, Sainsbury's,' she says. 'The vet was fine. She loves it there.' 'When do you pick her up?' I say. 'Not until 4.30. There are more bags in the car, by the way.' By the afternoon I am fretting about the dog's operation to the extent that I take myself to bed with a book to calm down. I don't wake up from this activity until the front door opens at 5.15. The dog staggers into the bedroom dressed in a snug short-sleeved onesie printed with a peculiar pattern, like pyjamas for a very long toddler, or a canine prison uniform. She is at sea – too groggy to climb on to the bed, and too wary to be lifted. 'She doesn't like the vet any more,' my wife says. 'Nice suit,' I say. 'It's instead of the head cone,' my wife says. 'She wasn't having the cone.' 'How long does she have to wear it?' I say. 'A week to 10 days,' she says. 'She looks depressed,' I say. 'I think she feels a bit betrayed,' my wife says. 'Yeah,' I say, looking at the dog. 'But not by me, right? As far as you know, I played no part in this.' The dog looks up at me, forlorn, confused and dressed for bed. After a long sleep the dog regains most of its former joie de vivre. After two days she appears to have fully recovered. After four days of not being allowed off the lead, she is bouncy and dangerously under-exercised. Weirdly, however, the dog never raises any objections to the onesie, or makes even a half-hearted attempt to get out of it. This is an animal that has effectively eaten three dog beds, that regularly reduces dog toys to their smallest constituents, that chews up pillows, blankets, plastic flower pots, footballs, shoes and anything with a handle. 'It's like you fancy yourself in it,' I tell the dog. 'Even though it would be fair to say it does nothing for you.' The dog's tail wags through the little hole at the back of the suit. 'I hate that thing,' my wife says. 'But when I suggested taking it off early the vet told me grim stories about dogs chewing their stitches out.' According to the advisory letter that came with the dog's medication, it's acceptable to remove the onesie in order to wash it, provided you keep your dog in your sights the whole time. But after six days the dog will not allow anyone to undo the snaps running along the top. She seems to have forgotten about life before wearing pyjamas all day. 'It's been a week,' my wife says. 'You can take her to the park with a ball if you like.' 'No thanks,' I say. 'Are you embarrassed by her outfit?' 'No,' I lie. On the afternoon of the eighth day the dog spends a happy hour rolling around in the wet garden. When she comes back in with the onesie covered in dark mud, my wife grabs her by the collar, undoes all the back snaps, and wrestles it off her. 'Do you want me to keep an eye on her while you wash that,' I say. 'That won't be necessary,' my wife says, flinging the onesie in the bin. The dog looks on, naked and bereft.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Bedridden woman was trapped as her Massachusetts apartment burned. Then two cousins jumped into action
Two cousins jumped into action to save a bedridden woman who was trapped in her burning apartment, according to local reports. Crews responded to reports of a fire in an elderly woman's apartment at Bradford Condominiums in Woburn, Massachusetts early Friday morning, the local fire department said. The resident was bedridden, and witnesses could hear her calling for help as smoke filled the second-floor apartment, local outlet Boston 25 News reports. That's when two cousins jumped into action. Sadush Brahimaj and Narti Qato heard the woman screaming for help and managed to climb up onto her porch, WCVB reports. "It was so dark, it was so dark and smoky, we couldn't see anything, just hearing her voice, 'Help, help,' all the time," Brahimaj told WCVB. "We didn't think anything else, we just went inside." The cousins tried twice to get inside the apartment building. The first attempt was 'too much,' so Brahimaj said he used his jacket to cover his face like a mask. 'The second time we got her,' he told the outlet. That's when other residents joined in, shining their flashlights to help guide the men and the woman to safety, WCVB reports. Crews arrived after the pair had pulled the resident from her burning bedroom onto the balcony, the local fire department said. Firefighters used a ground ladder to carry the woman down. The woman was taken to Massachusetts General with burns and smoke inhalation injuries, NBC Boston reports. The two cousins were also hospitalized and released soon afterward, WCVB reports. Woburn Fire Captain Bill Stukey praised their rescue efforts, Boston 25 News reports. 'A couple of the guys were able to get up onto the porch, get in through the slider,' Stukey said. 'They went in the back and crawled through the smoke and actually dragged her out. They did a good job.' The cause of the fire is under investigation, and the Red Cross is now assisting residents impacted by the fire, according to Boston 25 News.
