
'Fortnite' unavailable on Apple devices worldwide
Hit game "Fortnite" was unavailable on Apple's digital App Store around the world on Friday, in the latest episode of a battle between the tech titan and publisher Epic Games.
While Fortnite with its millions of daily players was already unavailable to iPhone users in the United States, the block on downloads of the cartoonish multiplayer shooter now affects the entire globe.
"Apple has blocked our Fortnite submission... sadly, Fortnite on iOS will be offline worldwide until Apple unblocks it," Epic posted on X.
Apple did not immediately respond to AFP's request for comment.
Epic has for years battled tech giants over the commissions they charge for software downloaded through the official stores on operating systems like Apple's iOS and Google's Android.
These are historically the only way for most users to install programs onto their devices.
Although it has secured wins in US courts and European Union digital regulations, Epic on Friday effectively accused Apple of slow-walking the vetting process it enforces before making an app or game available for users to download.
Epic said last week that it had submitted "Fortnite" for review for listing in the App Store in the United States.
As well as being "blocked" there, the publisher added that "Fortnite" was also unavailable in the European Union.
Fans there can usually download the game through the company's own app store as the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), which went into effect last year, requires Apple and other US tech giants to open up their platforms to competition.
Epic did not immediately respond to AFP's questions about why "Fortnite" was unavailable in Europe.
- 'Junk fees' -
"Fortnite" is a heavyweight of the gaming world, with Epic claiming around 500 million users in 2023.
But players have grown used to upsets as the publisher has filed legal cases against both Apple and Google over what it calls "junk fees".
Apple's commissions for App Store purchases, which can range as high as 30 percent, come "at the expense of consumers and developers", the company wrote on X last week.
Epic has faced off against Apple in US courts since 2021, when "Fortnite" was banned from the App Store over what Apple said was an attempt to get around the iPhone maker's payment system.
A judge found that the App Store was anticompetitive as it forbade developers from offering alternative avenues for payment.
But the conflict has endured past the US court order and the EU's requirement that Apple and Google allow third-party app stores on their operating systems.
A US federal judge said earlier this month that Apple was failing to comply with her three-year-old order that emerged from Epic's case, which requires the iPhone maker to allow other avenues for users to buy content or services.
Epic quickly capitalised on the new court action, submitting Fortnite afresh to be vetted for inclusion in the App Store.
"We don't have an update on our Fortnite submission to the App Store. Apple has neither accepted nor rejected it," chief executive Tim Sweeney wrote on X Thursday.
- Revenue stream -
Apple had made a priority of building up its services business as the Silicon Valley titan tries to reduce its reliance on iPhone sales for revenue.
The unit, which includes Apple's television and music streaming services along with iCloud data storage and App Store income, now accounts for more than a quarter of the company's revenue.
Apple last week sought to delay a part of the court order that blocks it from charging commissions on transactions outside the App Store, Bloomberg reported.
The App Store changes include letting app makers use alternate payment systems free or charge or commission.
Epic had cast the order as an opening of the floodgates to allow other software developers to escape Apple's fees.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Believe in Better: WWF photo competition calls on South Africans to capture the good around them
Believe in Better: WWF photo competition calls on South Africans to capture the good around them The World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) calls on all South Africans to Believe in Better – and to share that belief through the lens of their camera. As part of its global movement to inspire optimism and positive change, WWF has launched a Believe in Better photographic competition in South Africa. The goal? To showcase the beauty, hope and resilience that exists in our communities and natural surroundings. Whether you're a seasoned photographer, an amateur with a passion, or simply someone who notices the good in everyday life, this competition is for you. Your photo could help spark a ripple of positivity – one image at a time. You could win a photographic safari. But hurry, the closing date is Friday, 6 June. What's the idea? WWF wants to shift the focus from doom and gloom to hope and possibility. By encouraging people to believe in better, the organisation hopes to highlight the powerful stories and simple moments that remind us that things can change for the better. So, grab your camera or phone, head outdoors, and start capturing the inspiring, the joyful and hopeful moments in your world. Your entry might just be the spark someone else needs to believe in better too. Visit: for all the T's and C's. Don't have the ZO app? Download it to your Android or Apple device here: HAVE YOUR SAY Like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter. For news straight to your phone invite us: WhatsApp – 060 784 2695 Instagram – zululand_observer


The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Google Open Buildings helping strengthen community resilience
Google's Open Buildings dataset, maps more than 1.8 billion structures and is helping frontline projects close service gaps and strengthen community resilience. Google released the open-access dataset containing locations & footprints of buildings across the African continent. This is Braamfontein in Johannesburg. Picture: Screengrab Google says its artificial intelligence (AI) models are being trained to extract optimal information on building footprints from satellite imagery. The search giant shared the impact of AI through its 'Open Buildings' data set during a virtual briefing on Tuesday. Fresh, on-the-ground evidence from health planners and climate analysts in Rwanda, Nigeria, and South Africa demonstrates how the Open Buildings dataset, which maps more than 1.8 billion structures, is helping frontline projects close service gaps and strengthen community resilience. 'Open Buildings' Google West Africa's Communications and Public Affairs Manager, Taiwo Kola-Ogunlade, said the improvements made over time extend beyond just the building's footprint. 'We are evolving to include building height and temporal data so you can see not just the place at one point in time, but across various years now, and this dataset is open today. We have a couple of stories with real-life organisations that have used this information to improve their operation 'Over 1.8 billion building detections across the global south have been in fact to date, and we have a dataset that stretches close to six years, from 2018 until last year, 2024, and all of this information is publicly available to date,' Kola-Ogunlade said. ALSO READ: Google I/O 2025: More AI in Gmail, Gemini, Search and Android XR [VIDEO] Real world Kola-Ogunlade added that the 'Open Buildings' data set has mostly been reactive and open. 'But we're trying to be more intentional about telling the stories so that other organisations, countries, governments, entities, can figure out how to improve their planning, their execution and their service delivery'. Google said that across the African continent, AI tools are transitioning from pilots to public-service workhorses, powering everything from crop price forecasts to live language translation. The search giant said Open Buildings—developed by researchers at Google Research Africa—is part of that shift, proving that open, locally guided AI can turn sparse data into timely decisions without locking African problem-solvers behind paywalls or proprietary gates. 'The World Resources Institute (WRI) has already applied this flood-risk modelling in Dire Dawa, Kigali, Musanze, Gqeberha and Johannesburg, combining two-dimensional hydraulic simulations with building footprints to create block-by-block exposure maps. 'The need is pressing: Nairobi is still recovering from the May 2024 floods that displaced more than 278 000 residents, while Johannesburg's rapid growth along the flood-prone Jukskei River continues to heighten vulnerability,' Google said. Africa Google said the projects tackle challenges felt across the continent. Africa still has about 8.7 million 'zero-dose' children who receive no routine vaccines each year, while the urban population is projected to almost double to nearly one billion people by 2035, forcing new homes into high-risk floodplains and informal settlements. 'By giving ministries, city engineers and NGOs a street-level view of where communities are growing and how they change over time, the Open Buildings dataset lets limited budgets flow to the people and places that need them most,' Google said. Expertise Google Research Africa Research Scientist and Head, Dr Aisha Walcott-Bryant, said the projects demonstrate what happens when local expertise meets open, scalable technology. 'Mothers reach clinics sooner, children receive long-overdue vaccines, and city planners get ahead of the next flood. We're thrilled to stand beside partners who turn data into decisive action, proving that AI's highest calling is to solve real-world challenges.' 'From lifesaving clinics to climate-smart cities, these projects show how open AI is fast becoming Africa's quiet engine for equitable progress,' Walcott-Bryant said. The Open Buildings dataset—along with sample code, tutorials and its new 2.5D layer—is freely available at Open Buildings. ALSO READ: Google launches cloud region in Johannesburg [VIDEO]


Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
In the age of AI, content is everywhere — but are we still telling stories that matter?
Content might be multiplying, but is it connecting? Is it resonating in the way great stories once did – not just engaging but anchoring us? Last week on Substack, AI marketing expert Charlie Hills penned a sharp, clear-eyed provocation: Content is Dead. Long Live Connection. It caught me off guard and held me there. Not because content is dead (it's not – it's alive, omnipresent, flooding our screens in formats we couldn't have imagined five years ago), but because Charlie is right to point us towards the deeper issue: connection. Content might be multiplying, but is it connecting? Is it resonating in the way great stories once did – not just engaging but anchoring us? That question has never been more urgent. We're living through a supercharged shift – a reformatting of reality – as artificial intelligence enters its next act. The race to create has become a sprint. With just a few prompts, almost anyone can make anything. Art. Music. Dialogue. Essays. Sales decks. Songs. Films. It's dazzling. And yet – it's also flattening. Because what we're seeing now isn't just a technological leap. It's a philosophical one. One where the difference between originality and replication, between human thought and predictive patterning, is collapsing in plain sight. The race to the bottom of the brainstem 2.0 Back in 2017, Tristan Harris – former Google design ethicist turned activist and leading voice of the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma – warned of a phenomenon he called the race to the bottom of the brainstem. Platforms weren't just competing for time or clicks, he argued. They were competing for the most primitive parts of our brain: our instincts, our fears, our compulsions. Whatever could trigger outrage or anxiety – that's what won the attention war. The consequences are now well known: fractured focus, polarisation, social fatigue, and perhaps most disturbingly, a generation trained to skim, not think. But what's unfolding now feels like a spiritual sequel to that. A new race. This time, not towards the base of the brain, but towards the end of originality. Because AI doesn't think. It predicts. It doesn't dream or deliberate or dissent. It calculates likelihoods – what's most probable, based on patterns of the past. It does this with extraordinary sophistication, but its engine is built not on insight, but inference. And so, just as Harris warned us about platforms hijacking attention, today we face the subtle creep of something just as worrying: the erosion of human uniqueness through the mass rehashing of content. Is content dead? Its intentions appear warped To be clear: content isn't dead. It's thriving in volume. We have never had so much access to ideas, essays, videos, podcasts and posts. But the question is no longer how much, but how meaningful. Because when content is generated by tools designed to mimic – not originate – we have to confront a brutal truth: intention matters. In the past, 'content' was less polished but had raw, unpolished soul. We sought stories – in church, around the fire, at the pub – to make sense of life. It feels like now we are just 'wading through' a river that has broken its banks. Today, we scroll. We skim. And increasingly, we wonder: who wrote this? Did anyone? The horse bolted. What now? Perhaps the horse has indeed bolted. The tools are here. Anyone can now produce passable content – indistinguishable at a glance from the real thing. But 'passable' is not the same as 'powerful'. And this is where our opportunity lies. It is possible – and urgent – to use AI not to replace creativity, but to amplify time. Let the machines handle the mundane. Let them assist, support, scaffold. And then use the time you get back, not to produce more noise, but to reconnect with the very essence of being human. It's not easy when someone hands you a magic wand to stop tapping things, I know. But time is a wonderful thing. Time to think, to read or for a long-overdue lunch with friends. The greatest threat AI poses is not to employment, but to enchantment – to the spontaneity and serendipity that defines art, love, humour and originality. And we must see that our kids will need this mentorship in connection and relationship as time goes on. LinkedIn's demise Nowhere is this shift more visible than on LinkedIn. What once felt like a platform for raw professional reflection – real people, real ideas – is slowly becoming an uncanny valley of templated inspiration and machine-stitched leadership. You can sense the AI-ness. The bland polish. The synthetic sincerity. It sounds right, but it feels wrong. The solution isn't to quit. It's to reclaim tone. To sound like yourself. To say things that don't sound like anyone else could say them. To use tools for acceleration, but let you do the speaking. The real winners in this AI era will not be those who extract the purest margins or fastest output. They'll be those who master the balance: AI and humanity. Efficiency and empathy. Data and depth. They'll be the ones who deploy the extra time AI gives them to become more human – not less. That could mean more family time. Or mentoring. Or writing something messy and bold. Or just watching a film without checking your phone. Whatever it is, it's the redeployment of time towards meaning that will mark the new creative class. Final thoughts: A call to be seen This isn't a Luddite's lament. This is a call to awareness. We're at a cultural fork in the road. AI is here, and it's extraordinary. But it is not us. It can assist, but it cannot replace. And if we let it mimic the soul out of our storytelling, we will look back and realise we lost something irreplaceable – the texture of being alive. So no, content isn't dead. It's dynamic and alive, its production value is better than ever, but will anyone care if they think it's fake. We will be digging harder than ever for connection. That's the new gold in marketing over the next few years. Much harder to mine, but more valuable than ever. My business partner and CEO, Mike Butler, doesn't lean on AI much at all. He doesn't need to. He is a master of caring about people's outcomes, asking questions, probing for strategic insights and value and for nurturing relationships. He unlocks the most value in our AI business, ironically. Our entire team would agree. I would have my kids use AI well but drive with Mike's foundation for how to relate to people. Let's not settle for attention. Let's fight for connection, which will mean that humans adapt to bring the elements of what we see, what we read between the lines, by dialling up human insight and relationships and humour. DM