Some flights resume at London's Heathrow after huge fire
Some flights resume at London's Heathrow after huge fire
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Heathrow Airport closes due to fire at electrical substation
A fire at an electrical substation near the airport knocked out power, causing major travel disruptions globally.
London's Heathrow Airport, one of the busiest in the world, closed Friday after a fire at a nearby electrical substation caused a power outage.
The closure, which is expected to last until 11:59 p.m. British Time on Friday, will likely cause significant disruptions to global flight schedules.
Airlines are offering to rebook Heathrow travelers without penalty, but the impact of the closure is expected to last for several days.
Some flights at Heathrow Airport in London are resuming after the facility was closed following a fire at a nearby electrical substation that knocked out power to the airport.
The airport said in a statement on social media that flight operations will be limited on Friday, but the operators are working to restore the normal schedule for the weekend.
"We're now safely able to restart flights, prioritising repatriation and relocation of aircraft. Please do not travel to the airport unless your airline has advised you to do so," the statement said.
As the busiest airport in Europe and one of the busiest airfields in the world, Heathrow's closure is likely to affect passengers and flight operations around the globe.
Flights disrupted
Industry experts warned that some passengers forced to land in Europe may have to stay in transit lounges if they lack the visa paperwork to leave the airport. Global flight schedules will also be affected more broadly, as many aircraft will be out of position.
"Heathrow is one of the major hubs of the world," said Ian Petchenik, spokesman for flight tracking website FlightRadar24. "This is going to disrupt airlines' operations around the world."
Travel experts said the disruption would extend far beyond Heathrow and could have ripple effects past Friday.
Airlines' carefully choreographed networks depend on airplanes and crews being in specific locations at specific times. Dozens of carriers will have to hurriedly reconfigure their networks to move planes and crews around.
"The other question is, 'What will airlines do to deal with the backlog of passengers?' " said travel industry analyst Henry Harteveldt with Atmosphere Research Group. "It's going to be a chaotic couple of days."
More: Heathrow Airport in London closed after electrical substation fire cuts power
Airlines, including British Airways, Virgin Atlantic, American, Delta, United and JetBlue, are offering to rebook Heathrow travelers without penalty. All impacted travelers should check with their airline before leaving for the airport.
According to Cirium, hundreds of arriving and departing flights are likely to be affected on Friday. The aviation data firm said there were 665 departures and 669 arrivals scheduled at Heathrow, and flight tracking website FlightAware shows that 72% of departures and 52% of arrivals have been canceled as of 11:15 a.m. ET.
Cirium's data shows that New York-JFK has the most flights to Heathrow on Friday of any global airport, with 21 departures representing 5,387 seats scheduled to fly on that route alone.
It will likely take airlines a few days to fully recover their operations, especially British Airways, which uses Heathrow as its main hub.
The Metropolitan Police in London said they continue to investigate the incident, though it is no longer being treated as suspicious.
"The investigation into the cause of the fire remains in its early stages. After initial assessment, we are not treating this incident as suspicious, although enquiries do remain ongoing," Commander Simon Messinger of the Met Police said in a statement. He added that the department's counterterrorism command continues to lead the investigation because of the location of the substation, the impact of the incident and the unit's specialist resources and capabilities.
Contributing: Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
14 hours ago
- CNBC
Why it's getting even harder to get into airport lounges now
Airplane tickets are getting cheaper, but it's getting more expensive to bring your family to an airport lounge. Capital One is the latest company to limit access to booming airport lounges to combat overcrowding. Starting Feb. 1, Venture X and Venture X Business cardholders will no longer be able to automatically take a guest into lounges or bring authorized second card users. They will instead have to pay $125 annually for each additional cardholder to keep their lounge access, $45 per adult guest per visit and $25 per guest 17 or younger. The $125 fee also includes second cardholder access to a network of Priority Pass lounges. "As airport lounges continue to grow in popularity across the industry, we've seen our customers increasingly encounter wait times to enter them," Capital One said in a statement. "It is important to us that we maintain a great airport lounge experience for our Venture X and Venture X Business customers, while continuing to deliver best-in-class premium travel cards at an accessible price point." Primary cardholders will have to spend at least $75,000 per calendar year to bring up to two complimentary free guests to Capital One lounges and one guest to Capital One Landings, smaller lounges built for travelers who tend to spend less time at the airport, like those heading to short flights. The $75,000 spending requirement for complimentary guests matches what American Express announced two years ago, also a measure to minimize crowding and keeping the clubs feeling exclusive. Credit card companies have ramped up their airport lounge networks in recent years, opening new locations to handle demand. And airport lounge access has been a central perk attached to rewards cards, which generally come with an annual fee. The Venture X card, which launched in 2021, is $395 a year, less than the $695 a year American Express charges for its Platinum card or the $550 JPMorgan Chase charges for the Chase Sapphire Reserve, both of which come with airport lounges. "When it comes to lounges, Capital One is a challenger brand; they're an underdog," said Henry Harteveldt, founder of Atmosphere Research Group. Capital One has lounges at Denver International Airport, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport and Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. It plans to open one this year at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and one of its Landings at LaGuardia Airport. But the new restrictions show Capital One isn't immune to its popularity leading to big crowds. "Like Amex, like Chase, these lounges have become victims of their own success," Harteveldt said. "No lounge operator wants them to be as overrun as the public areas of the airport." Airlines have also raised prices to access airport lounges and built larger ones to accommodate the influx. Delta Air Lines, for example, has made sweeping changes to its lounge access policies, like getting rid of unlimited visits in favor of annual caps. And last summer, Delta unveiled its first Delta One lounge, dedicated for customers in its highest class of cabin. It plans to open a new one in Seattle later this month. American Airlines and United Airlines have also expanded their airport lounges and opened new top-tier ones for customers traveling in premium classes on long-haul flights.
Business Insider
18 hours ago
- Business Insider
American Airlines sent a plane from the US to Italy that was too big for its destination airport and wasn't allowed to land
A transatlantic American Airlines flight diverted, and passengers were transported by bus, after the carrier seemingly sent a plane that was too big for its destination. Monday's Flight 780 departed Philadelphia at 7:42 p.m. and was supposed to land in Naples, Italy, at 10 a.m. local time. However, data from Flightradar24 shows how seven hours later, the Boeing 787-9 abruptly turned around over the Tyrrhenian Sea, west of the Italian mainland. It was only about 70 miles away from Naples International Airport before it diverted north to Rome Fiumicino Airport. An American Airlines spokesperson told Business Insider that the flight diverted due to "operational limitations." Historical flight data shows that the airline usually sends a Boeing 787-8 on flights to Naples. While these two Dreamliner variants are pretty similar, with the same wingspan, the 787-9 is actually 20 feet longer. Documents from Boeing and the International Civil Aviation Organization show how this means the two planes have different requirements for rescue-and-firefighting services (RFFS). The 787-8 is small enough to land at an airport with a Category 8 RFFS, but the 787-9 needs a Category 9 RFFS airport. Data from AviationWeek's Acukwik indicates that Naples Airport falls under the former classification. Aviation enthusiast @xJonNYC, who first shared the incident on X, reported that the airport authority said 787-9 planes can't land in Naples. The Naples and Rome airport authorities didn't immediately respond to requests for comment sent by BI outside Italian working hours. After landing at Rome Fiumicino Airport around 9:45 a.m., passengers were transported to Naples by bus, the airline spokesperson told BI. "We apologize to them for this disruption to their journey," they added. The two airports are around 145 miles away by road, which would take more than two hours. Meanwhile, the 787-9 departed Rome two-and-a-half hours later, operating Flight 111 to Chicago, per Flightradar24. This wasn't the only time this week that a diversion forced passengers to travel the remainder of their journey by bus. On Wednesday, a Ryanair flight diverted after a thunderstorm caused severe turbulence that injured eight people, three of whom were taken to a local hospital. Passengers were put on a bus from Memmingen, Germany, to Milan, a roughly four-and-a-half-hour journey.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump brings the BOOM! New order opens skies across US to supersonic flights
President Donald Trump has ordered the Federal Aviation Administration to scrap a longstanding ban on supersonic air travel across the U.S. and replace it with a to-be-determined set of regulations that will allow faster-than-sound travel so long as the sonic booms it creates do not breach certain noise limitations. In an executive order signed on Friday, Trump directed the FAA administrator to begin the process of repealing a section of the Code of Federal Regulations that prohibits anyone in the United States from flying a civilian aircraft 'at a true flight Mach number greater than 1.' That regulation was imposed in April 1973, at a time when the British and French governments were jointly developing Concorde, a supersonic airliner that had a cruising speed in excess of Mach 2, or twice the speed of sound. Because aircraft that break the sound barrier create shockwaves that produce loud sounds, known as sonic booms, the U.S. government banned supersonic flight over the U.S. out of concern over disruptive noise from supersonic jets criss-crossing the country. As a result, Concorde was limited to subsonic speeds when arriving or leaving American airports, only crossing the sound barrier during transit over the Atlantic Ocean on routes between New York's JFK airport and London. Michael Kratsios, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters that Trump's order 'seeks to revolutionize supersonic aviation in the United States' by allowing for modern aircraft to fly faster than sound over the continental U.S. 'The US used to be the global leader in this technology, but stifling regulations have grounded progress for generations. The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' he said. Kratsios added that 'advances in aerospace engineering, material science and noise reduction' by new startups working on faster-than-sound passenger aircraft can make supersonic travel 'safe, sustainable and commercially viable' and noted that the longstanding American ban on such flights had ' grounded supersonic passenger flight and weakened our global competitiveness in aviation.' 'Today's order fixes that,' he said. Trump's order comes just weeks after a pair of Republicans in Congress, Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas and Senator Ted Budd of North Carolina, introduced legislation to direct the FAA to repeal and replace the current supersonic flight ban within a year. That legislation will no longer be necessary, as the Trump executive order directs the FAA to withdraw the ban within 180 days and launch a notice-and-comment period for replacement regulations that would be based on a noise standard rather than a strict speed limit. According to a senior administration official, the function of the new regulations would be 'to replace the effective speed standard with instead an interim noise standard, and then to have a longer term process to publish a Notice of Proposed Rule Making to result in a final rule.' That process would be 'coordinated through the White House [and] through the National Science and Technology Council' and would be based on research and development that has been going on at NASA, the Department of Defense, and 'elsewhere within the federal government,' the official said. Trump's effort to enable supersonic flight across the U.S. follows the success of the first flight of a civilian supersonic aircraft since Concorde 216 (registered as G-BOAF) made its' final flight to Bristol Filton Airport in 2003. In January, Boom Supersonic's XB-1 aircraft reached a speed of Mach 1.122 during a 34-minute flight over California's Mojave Desert. The test flight, just eight days into Trump's second term, produced no audible sonic boom — or at least not one that was heard from the ground during the flight. The company says its' proposed Overture passenger jet will cut a trip from Los Angeles to Washington to three hours and 15 minutes, more than an hour less than the current duration of such a flight, while producing no sonic booms that are audible from the ground. It attributes this to atmospheric effects that cause the sound to reflect off layers in the atmosphere and travel upward, rather than downward. It also claims to be able to cut flights over water by even more time by reaching even higher speeds.
