Opinion - Republicans' shocking about-face on Russia
The last two weeks leave no question about President Trump's feelings toward Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The speed and totality of Trump's policy shift shocked our foreign allies and divided congressional Republicans, culminating in his surprise decision to pause all military aid to Ukraine even as the country faced a heavy new round of Russian air raids.
America's pivot to a pro-Russian foreign policy isn't Trump's doing alone, though/ Across the federal government, we are witnessing a coordinated Republican effort to realign American foreign policy away from the world's liberal democracies and toward gangster regimes like Putin's.
But for this to succeed, Trump must change Americans' overwhelmingly negative opinion of Russia.
Sadly, plenty of Republican leaders are willing to whitewash Putin's brutality for political gain. Trump's frontal assault began in earnest this week when he joined Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to demand Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's resignation. Calling for regime change against an American ally is a hugely destabilizing move, made even worse by a Republican media blitz intended to portray Zelensky not as the victim of unprovoked Russian aggression but as a dictator and aggressor.
That was too much for Rep. John James (R-Mich.), who joined 'Face the Nation' to flatly reject Johnson's and Trump's warped view of history. 'Russia is the aggressor,' James told Margaret Brennan, adding that Putin is a 'war criminal' hardly deserving of American sympathy. In response, Trump supporters flooded James's social media accounts with the bitter recriminations and threats that have become the MAGA movement's bleak trademark.
The effort to portray Zelensky as the villain in the Russo-Ukrainian War goes beyond just revisionist history amplified by partisan media outlets. Last month, the U.S. opposed a G-7 statement labeling Russia as the war's aggressor, just days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth slammed the door on Ukraine's entry into NATO — an announcement celebrated by Russian state media outlets as a victory nearly as valuable as winning the ground war itself.
Before Trump can have his own Nixon-in-China moment in Red Square, he'll need to unwind decades of economic sanctions Russia earned through financial crimes, human rights violations and state sponsorship of terrorism. The White House took its first steps toward removing those sanctions on Monday, when Trump requested the State and Treasury departments draft plans for normalizing economic relations with Putin.
Removing those sanctions would put the U.S. in the bizarre position of stage-managing Russia's return from economic and political exile — not as a reformed liberal democracy but as an anti-democratic alternative to Europe and the West. This would shred nearly a century of post-World War II collective security and torch the trust of America's most essential allies. This is a path to ruin.
Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that Trump's pro-Russia psy-op is beginning to turn public opinion against Ukraine and Zelensky. A CBS News-YouGov poll found that Trump enjoyed a 2-point net approval on his handling of Russia and Ukraine, compared to Biden's 22-point net disapproval rating at the end of 2024. Even so, a majority of Americans still support Ukraine's side of the conflict — though those numbers are fading fast, as more voters open up to the idea of a compromise.
Voters are also acutely aware that their president has a soft spot for Russia. Forty-six percent of respondents said Trump's actions clearly favored Russia, compared to just 11 percent who said his actions favored Ukraine. The Republican Party's newfound fondness for Putin has led many Americans to question their own opinions about Russia, with the country now evenly split between viewing Russia as an enemy and an ally.
By eliminating sanctions against Putin's corrupt oligarchs and erasing the horrific history of war crimes that earned Russia its economic isolation, Trump hopes to cleanse America's cultural memory of the atrocities we've witnessed over the course of decades. His new diplomacy aligns the U.S. with the struggling illiberal regimes of the world and endorses their criminal practices. It's a nightmarish future both for America and for the world.
It is pointless to guess at Trump's motivations in linking arms with Putin and the other wretched autocrats with whom he finds common cause. What's easier to understand is the immense cost of the foreign policy shift Trump and his cronies are trying to inflict on our country. If Republicans have any serious foreign policy voices left, they're running out of time to speak up.
Max Burns is a veteran Democratic strategist and founder of Third Degree Strategies.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A legal win for immigrant protections — but the clock is still ticking
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The program allows people whose home countries have experienced natural disasters, war, or civil strife to live in the United States and apply for work permits. Ending the protections is supposed to be based on whether it's safe to return, but the Trump administration seems intent on revoking it out of racism and spite. Related : 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream,' Thompson wrote. 'That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees.' One of the plaintiffs is Maria Elena Hernandez, a Nicaraguan immigrant who arrived in the United States nearly three decades ago. She was visiting her brothers in Florida when 'We are not criminals, we are not illegal, we are not undocumented, and we work legally with the permit that TPS gives us,' Hernandez, 67, told me in an interview. She has worked as a janitor in a Florida university for the past 18 years. 'We contribute economically because we have always paid our taxes. We have always respected the laws of this country and have always lived with the promise that if our countries are not safe, they will protect us here.' Jackey Baiza, who came to the United States from Honduras at age 2, spoke during a rally in solidarity with TPS holders from Honduras, Nepal, and Nicaragua during a vigil on July 29 in Boston. Danielle Parhizkaran/Globe Staff Thompson's ruling also acknowledges the broader consequences of terminating Temporary Protected Status. Many of the plaintiffs, she noted, are 'long-standing employees' who have built lives and livelihoods over decades in the US. 'Termination of TPS for Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua will result in a $1.4 billion loss to the United States economy,' the federal judge wrote. Hernandez said she decided to join the lawsuit because she wanted to fight the Trump administration's unjust attempts to end the program. 'It would be very devastating for me' to move back to Nicaragua, she told me, 'not only because it would separate me from my family, but also because I would lose my Social Security, to which I have contributed for so many years, and my health insurance, which I need so much because I have chronic asthma and a heart condition.' Advertisement Lest we forget, the US government itself The fight to preserve the protections is far from over, but the reality is grim. The Trump administration seems intent in decimating the program, which as of Sept. 30 was protecting Still, for Guerline Jozef, executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, a nonprofit advocacy organization based in Southern California, it is vital to highlight Thompson's ruling as a powerful affirmation that 'our communities matter,' she said in an interview. Indeed, Thompson's ruling offers a clear-eyed assessment of what's really driving the push to end temporary protections: It isn't national security; it's racialized fear. Unless Congress steps in with a permanent solution (here's hoping against hope) decades of contribution and belonging can still be wiped out with the stroke of a pen. Advertisement Marcela García is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
New York Post
29 minutes ago
- New York Post
Fleeing Texas Dems side with Newsom as redistricting standoff continues: ‘All out war'
Advertisement California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he is ready to fight 'fire with fire' as state Republican lawmakers try to enact redistricting in Texas, opposing the move though promising to pursue similar measures if needed. At a press conference on Monday, Newsom said he supports independent redistricting, as well as a national framework, and a proposal being advanced in the legislature reinforces what he supports. 'The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established,' the governor said. 'Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire.' When asked about a meeting between California Democrats on Sunday night, during which time they drafted or were almost done with the draft of redistricting maps, and whether he had seen those maps, Newsom said he had not. Advertisement But he said there has been an ongoing series of conversations into the evening last night, which continued on Monday morning and will continue until Democrats land on a process. 'That process has to have the concurrence, the support of two-thirds of the legislature,' he said. 'The maps, we believe, should be transparent. They should be provided in a transparent way to the public, and as a consequence, those maps are being processed and will be brought to light.' 6 California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference with Texas lawmakers at the Governor's Mansion on July 25, 2025 in Sacramento, California. Getty Images At the end of the day, though, Newsom said the people of California will have the ultimate say. Advertisement 'We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward,' Newsom said. 'I'll reinforce that we believe it should be a national model, independent national redistricting, and it would revert back to its original form, but it's done in response to the existential realities that we're now facing. Things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change.' 'They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire, but we're going to do so not just punching with the weight of the fourth largest economy, the most populous state in our union, the size of 21 state populations combined,' he continued. 'We also will punch above our weight in terms of the impact of what we're doing, and I think that should be absorbed by those in the Texas delegation. Whatever they are doing will be neutered here in the state of California, and they will pay that price.' 6 California Gov. Gavin Newsom met with Texas lawmakers to push back on Texas's redistricting maneuver that aims to tilt the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and on how California plans to respond. Getty Images California GOP Chairwoman Corrin Rankin told Fox News Digital that Newsom's actions could threaten the constitutional rights of Californians while also setting a dangerous precedent. Advertisement 'While Governor Newsom frames this redistricting as a defensive move, it undermines California's nationally respected, voter-approved Citizens Redistricting Commission, and if successful, sets a dangerous precedent that voters' choices can be overruled whenever politicians find it politically convenient,' Rankin said. 'Our primary concern is safeguarding Californians' constitutional rights against partisan manipulation disguised as defending democracy; true democracy means empowering voters, not politicians, to decide representation.' Dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state and went to Chicago and New York on Sunday night in an effort to block a redistricting vote on Monday. 6 President Donald Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott participate in a round table event at the Hill Country Youth Event Center to discuss last week's flash flooding on July 11, 2025 in Kerrville, Texas. Getty Images Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has since threatened to arrest and expel the lawmakers if they do not return by Monday afternoon. Shortly after Abbott released his statement, the Texas House Democratic Caucus issued a simple response, writing: 'Come and take it.' The statement also described Republicans' proposed districts, which would potentially secure five new GOP US House seats in next year's midterm elections, as a 'racist mid-decade redistricting scheme.' Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that 'real Texans don't run from a fight.' On Monday evening, Illinois lawmakers hosted Texas Democrats for a press conference, during which time none of the lawmakers took a single question from the press. Advertisement 6 Abbott speaks to a group of event attendees for his Parent Empowerment Night event where he advocated for school choice and vouchers at Temple Christian School in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 6, 2025. TNS Still, Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., welcomed her colleagues and said they could stay as long as they wanted because they believed in what they were doing. 'What you're doing and what…they're trying to do in Texas affects you guys, but it affects the whole country,' she said. 'When you want to remove five Democrats…that hurts us in the House.' She explained that when there are not enough Democrats, things like the Big Beautiful Bill, or as she referred to it as 'the Big Ugly Bill,' and other Republican initiatives get through. Advertisement 'They are trying to destroy our democracy, destroy fairness in our country,' Kelly said. 'And unfortunately, they're starting with Texas. But we want you to know, we stand by your side.' Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., accused Abbott of not stepping up for the people affected by devastating floods in the Hill Country region of Texas. 6 The Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Monday, Aug. 4, 2025. Bloomberg via Getty Images Specifically, he accused Abbott of not having a special session to help families rebuild, but instead of doing 'the bidding' of President Donald Trump to 'banish Democrats' from the federal delegation. Advertisement Krishnamoorthi then directed his comments to Abbott, saying, 'don't mess with Texas,' because the people standing with him represent Texas. 'You can silence them. You can smear them. You can saddle them with debts and fins. But you cannot intimidate them,' Krishnamoorthi said. 'You can gerrymander the hell out of that map. Guess what? Two can play that game. That's right. Other states will do exactly the same thing and neutralize what you're trying to do in Texas.' Other lawmakers standing side-by-side in Illinois chose to accuse Trump's policies of being race-driven. Texas State Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos said Trump's policies hurt working families. Advertisement 'That is nothing short of racism,' she said. 'He is coming after all of us who don't look like him and his Republican colleagues in the Texas House.' Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, followed Rodriguez Ramos with more accusations of racism, saying Republicans are doing what Trump has insisted be done. 'I want you to know that we didn't introduce the race card when this message was sent by and through the Justice Department to the State of Texas, to our attorney general,' he said. 'They mentioned the race card because they talked about racial gerrymandering. They brought it up, and when they brought it up, they did it, knowing that this was a buzz word. It was a trigger.' 'They know that that's a buzz word that people would respond to in Texas, but we are going to respond to that buzz word by telling them that your racism is not going to change democracy in the state of Texas,' Green continued. 'In the United States of America, racism is going to be met with our taking a stand for democracy. You take a stand for racism, we will stand for democracy, and we will win.' 6 Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that 'real Texans don't run from a fight.' Bloomberg via Getty Images Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, said she was pleased that states like California and New York were standing up for Texas Democrats because, once it happens in Texas, it will spread to other states. She called the issue a 'national war,' and 'an all-out war' in which everything is on the table. 'We come from a state of great pride, and I never thought as a Texan, as an elected member of the Texas House of Representatives and now as an elected member from Texas to the United States House of Representatives, that I would see the governor of the proud state of Texas bend a knee to a felon from New York,' Johnson added. 'I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are.' Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, was also standing with fellow Democrats in Illinois and accused Abbott of talking 'a lot of noise.' She also accused Republicans of being 'weak.' 'The difference is they expect Democrats to kind of be the nice guys that we are,' Crockett said. 'They expect us to take the punch and say thank you. Well, I am here to tell you not only are we going to punch back, but we about to beat you down.' Still, Abbott told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday that Texas is doing what it is allowed to do by law. He also accused state Democrats of doing something 'un-Texas' by turning their back on Texans and not dealing with the flooding issues still echoing across the state. Abbott said four of the five seats that could change because of redistricting will be primarily Hispanic. 'These are seats where Democrats are having to come to grips with reality,' he said, explaining that Democrats are losing votes to Hispanics and Black voters in Texas. He also said Democrats are 'freaking out' because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict. 'Texas will continue to fight for what is right,' Abbott said. Fox News Digital's Anders Hagstrom and Elizabeth Pritchett contributed to this report.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remove lawmakers who left the state?
The Texas Legislature attempted to meet Monday to consider a redistricting plan that would favor Republicans, but Democratic members who left the state over the weekend did not return, denying the quorum needed to convene the session. Gov. Greg Abbott vowed to take steps to remove those lawmakers from their seats, and Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he had signed civil arrest warrants for the absent Democrats. Republicans "can make idle threats, but as long as they are out of state, there's really nothing that they can do," said Mark Jones, a Rice University political science professor. More than 50 Texas House Democrats left the state on Sunday, leaving the chamber short of the two-thirds quorum needed to bring a vote to the floor. Democrats are protesting the President Trump-led effort by Republicans to redraw the state's U.S. House congressional map, which could net the GOP up to five more seats. "We are fighting for representative democracy, and whether or not that will continue, and so we're willing to face whatever consequences may come our way," Democratic state Rep. James Talarico told CBS News. "This House will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people," Burrows said Monday. To assist Burrows, Abbott said Monday that he had ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans." But the Texas DPS does not have jurisdiction to arrest them out of state. Rep. Ann Johnson, a Houston Democrat, told CBS News' Ed O'Keefe in an interview Monday that "a quorum break is written into the Texas Constitution," and "the threat of arrest is something that should be an alarm for a lot of folks." Abbott claimed Monday on Fox News that the Democrats could face bribery charges if their costs while out of state are being covered by others. "I think based upon comments made by legislators themselves, they face a possibility of facing bribery charges, which is a second-degree felony in the state of Texas, there's one way to cure that, and that is if they get back to the state of Texas and make quorum today at a hearing that we have at 3 o'clock, they can cure themselves of any quid pro quo that would subject them to potential bribery charges," Abbott said. But Jones noted that "Texas, compared to other states, has very loose ethics laws." "The governor is certainly welcome to make that argument, and theoretically it has a limited level of potential to move forward, but at the end of the day, if you look at Texas ethics law and look at all of the things that are allowed under Texas ethics law … we would rank receiving money to pay a fine at the lower end at the potential for an ethics violation, let alone things that are illegal," Jones said. Abbott said Sunday that if members didn't return by 3 p.m. CT Monday, he'd "invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House." Abbott was citing a 2021 opinion from Texas' Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, which was written after a previous walkout when Democratic lawmakers left the state to protest a change in the voting laws. The opinion, which is nonbinding, says a "district court may determine that a legislator has forfeited his or her office due to abandonment and can remove the legislator from office, thereby creating a vacancy." But Jones noted that the only legal ways to remove a Texas lawmaker is either for the person to be expelled by a vote of two-thirds of the Legislature — which happened when legislators voted to expel Republican Rep. Byron Slaton over misconduct in 2023 — or by voters at the ballot box. Republican state Rep. Briscoe Cain posted on social media Monday that he would file a bill to declare a seat vacant if a legislator missed seven consecutive days of a session. But since there is no quorum, that bill can't receive a vote — at least for now. Abbott called a special session last month to take up the redistricting effort, along with 17 other issues, including relief for Texas flood victims, a review of the flood warning system and emergency preparedness, and a THC ban. Congressional redistricting, however, was to be considered first. Texas has a part-time legislature which meets for 140 days every other year. The governor has the right to call a 30-day special session to address certain topics. The current special session started on July 21. Abbott can call as many special sessions as he wants, which means that if Democrats run out the clock on this special session, he could call another one as soon as it ends. How safe is our Social Security safety net? Full Interview: 3 Democratic Texas lawmakers on fleeing state amid GOP redistricting push Number of butterflies decreasing across U.S. Solve the daily Crossword
