Legal Watchdog Files Bar Complaints Against Career Justice Dept. Lawyers
The accusations by the group, the Legal Accountability Center, were formally filed with the grievance committees of bar associations in Washington and other cities where the lawyers lived or practiced. The move represented a rare attempt to seek professional sanctions against rank-and-file department lawyers who have appeared in court on behalf of the federal government.
'The rule of law is under direct assault right now, and its greatest threat comes when those within the legal system fail to do their duties and stand up against the attack,' said Michael Teter, the executive director of the group. 'The message that needs to be heard by all attorneys representing the government is that even though the Trump administration isn't interested in following the rules, we are watching.'
The bar complaints against the three lawyers — Eric J. Hamilton, Brad P. Rosenberg and Liam C. Holland — came at an extraordinary moment of tension between the Justice Department and many of the federal judges who have been hearing challenges to President Trump's policies.
Judges across the country have repeatedly called out department lawyers for violating their orders and even for destroying the bonds of trust that the government has traditionally been afforded when its representatives appear in court. The administration and its allies have often responded with lacerating verbal attacks, including threats of impeachment.
Just this week, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on social media that the department had filed its own misconduct complaint against Judge James E. Boasberg, the chief judge of Federal District Court in Washington who has handled several prominent cases involving Mr. Trump.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
3 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Acting NASA Chief Tells Agency to Build a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon, Before China Does It First
NASA's acting administrator Sean Duffy is fast-tracking the agency's plans to build a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface, a move that highlights the Trump administration's focus on human spaceflight and establishing a long-term presence on the Moon. Duffy issued a directive to expedite the timeline for the reactor, aiming for a launch date to the Moon by 2030, Politico first reported. In the directive, Duffy mentions China and Russia's joint plan to put a nuclear reactor of their own on the Moon in the mid-2030s, citing a concern that the two countries could 'potentially declare a keep-out zone' that would hinder NASA's ability to do the same. 'To properly advance this critical technology to be able to support a future lunar economy, high power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly,' Duffy wrote in the directive, which was sent out on Thursday, July 31. NASA has been working on a Fission Surface Power System for the Moon since 2022, when the agency awarded three $5 million contracts to its commercial partners to develop initial concept designs for a small reactor. At the time, NASA specified that the reactor should stay under 6 metric tons and be able to produce 40 kilowatts of electrical power, enough to power around 33 households. In the new directive, however, Duffy not only wants NASA to move fast on its project, but he also specified that the reactor should produce 100 kilowatts of power, enough for about 80 households. With the ongoing Artemis program, NASA wants to establish a sustainable human presence on the Moon. Building a habitat on the lunar surface would prove tricky without power, and relying on solar energy alone would likely be insufficient. The day-night cycle on the Moon lasts for about a month, with roughly two weeks of sunlight followed by two weeks of darkness that would leave solar arrays without its energy source. On the other hand, fission reactors can operate around the clock, even in the Moon's shadowy craters and during the long lunar nights. Establishing a power source on the Moon is crucial for human exploration, an aspect of NASA's objectives that the current administration is especially keen on. NASA is preparing for severe budget cuts under the White House's proposed budget for 2026, which threaten several of its robotic missions to space. Under the proposed budget, NASA's planetary science budget would drop from $2.7 billion to $1.9 billion. On the other hand, the agency's human space exploration budget would receive an additional $647 million compared to the 2025 budget. The recent directive is part of the administration's push to send humans to the Moon and Mars and to establish dominance in the new space race with China and Russia. The directive orders NASA to designate an agency official to oversee the project within 30 days and for it to issue a request for proposals from commercial partners within 60 days.
CNN
4 minutes ago
- CNN
A California plan is likely the Democrats' best option in the redistricting wars
Congressional newsFacebookTweetLink Follow As Texas Republicans move ahead with redistricting to protect or even expand the GOP's slim majority in the US House, Democratic-run states, led by California, are pushing forward with their own efforts to draw new maps and add Democratic seats. No Democratic states can shift the balance of power as dramatically and quickly as Texas, where Republican lawmakers can enact new maps giving them as many as five more GOP-controlled seats as soon as they establish a quorum, which state Democrats have denied them by fleeing the state. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative in November, sources told CNN. Newsom said the plan would go forward only if Texas completes its redistricting effort. 'Things have changed. We're reacting to that change,' the governor said at a news conference Monday. 'They've triggered this response, and we're not going to roll over.' Texas' mid-decade redistricting, undertaken at President Donald Trump's behest, has brought together a Democratic Party beset by infighting and facing historically low approval ratings. Even as party leaders vow to fight back against Texas and other Republican states discussing redrawing their maps, they are limited in how much they can retaliate. In several of the 15 states where Democrats hold the governorship and both chambers of the legislature, including New York, Washington and Colorado, maps are drawn by independent or bipartisan redistricting commissions, which are meant to thwart the sort of partisan gerrymandering Democrats are now seeking to advance. In other blue states — including Maryland and Illinois — Democrats have already drawn aggressively gerrymandered maps. Republicans have pointed to Illinois' map to argue they are within their rights to redraw lines in Texas. Meanwhile, Republicans, who have trifectas in 23 states, have more ground to gain in a redistricting tug-of-war. GOP lawmakers in states such as Missouri and Florida have also expressed openness to new maps. Ohio, where lawmakers must redraw their maps under state redistricting laws, could also yield additional seats. 'There's not a scenario where we don't have more seats that we can go flip than they do,' a Republican close to the GOP redistricting process told CNN. Those hurdles haven't stopped Democratic leaders from pushing ahead. 'I'll look at our laws, I'll find a path because we cannot take this lying down,' New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul said at a news conference Monday. 'We can't surrender when we have a fight for our lives.' Here's what Democratic leaders say they plan to do to respond to Texas' redistricting push: If voters approve Newsom's plan, California would retain its independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and new maps would stay in place only through 2030. Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 congressional districts. A new map could endanger California Republicans such as Rep. Kevin Kiley, who said he would introduce legislation Tuesday prohibiting mid-cycle redistricting. 'Gavin Newsom is trying to subvert the will of voters and do lasting damage to democracy in California,' Kiley said in a press release, adding that his bill would 'stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country.' Other Republicans whose seats might be targeted include Reps. David Valadao, Darrell Issa, Doug LaMalfa and Ken Calvert, according to the sources. In New York, where legislative maps are drawn by an independent commission, Democratic leaders introduced a proposed constitutional amendment last week that would allow lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional map mid-decade if another state does so first. At best, New York Democrats wouldn't be able to change their maps until the 2028 election. The measure would need to pass in two consecutive legislative sessions and be approved by voters in 2027 before state lawmakers could redraw their congressional maps. Illinois' maps are drawn by the legislature and approved by the governor, which means Democrats in the state have a clear path to redraw their maps. Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker has expressed openness to redistricting, saying lawmakers must put 'everything on the table.' But the state's maps are already heavily tilted toward the party. Illinois' 2021 redistricting effort shifted additional seats to Democrats, who now hold 14 of the state's 17 congressional districts. Maryland House of Delegates Majority Leader David Moon has introduced legislation that would automatically redraw the state's map if another state redraws their own outside of the once-a-decade custom. But Maryland lawmakers face a similar dilemma as Illinois: While they don't face the same procedural hurdles as states like New York, they don't have much room to maneuver either. Democrats already control seven of the state's eight districts. It's also not clear a new map would be approved. A Maryland judge threw out a Democrat-backed congressional map drawn in 2021 that would have threatened the state's lone Republican lawmaker, Rep. Andy Harris. Harris won his 2024 reelection bid with nearly 60% of the vote. In New Jersey, where Democrats hold nine of 12 districts, they would need to change the state constitution to do off-cycle redistricting and disempower the state's bipartisan commission. In Colorado, the state legislature asked voters to approve the formation of an independent redistricting commission in 2018. The measure passed overwhelmingly. Additionally, the state Supreme Court ruled in 2003 that redistricting can happen only after the census. And in Washington state, it would take Republican votes to reconvene the state's bipartisan redistricting commission. It's unlikely Democrats in the state, who control eight of 10 districts, would be able to turn one more seat blue. 'There's literally no way to get the results they are talking about before the 2026 election,' Washington's state Senate majority leader, Jamie Pedersen, told the Washington Standard. 'We have already done our share to get Democrats in the House. There's no juice to squeeze in the lemon here.' CNN's Fredreka Schouten contributed to this report.
CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Statue of Confederate General Albert Pike, toppled by protesters in 2020, is being reinstalled in Washington, D.C.
A bronze statue of a Confederate general that was toppled by protesters five years ago will be restored and reinstalled in Washington, D.C., the National Park Service said. The restoration of the statue of Confederate Brigadier General Albert Pike "aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and re-instate pre-existing statues," the park service said in a news release Monday. The agency, which shared a photo showing restoration work on the statue, said it is aiming to have the monument reinstalled by October. The statue had stood in Judiciary Square — several blocks from the White House — since 1901. It was Washington, D.C.'s only outdoor statue of a Confederate general when protesters tore it down and set it on fire in June 2020, CBS affiliate WUSA reported. That year, protesters across the country called for the removal of Confederate statues and symbols amid wider calls for racial justice after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. President Trump, who was serving his first term at the time, had expressed opposition to removing them, and called for the protesters in the Albert Pike statue case to be arrested immediately. The Council of D.C., a local governing body for the district, said it had been calling for the removal of the statue for years and that it unanimously renewed its call to Congress to remove it in 2017. The National Park Service said on Monday that the statue has been in "secure storage" since it was removed in 2020 and that the agency's Historic Preservation Training Center is restoring it. "Originally authorized by Congress in 1898 and dedicated in 1901, the statue honors Pike's leadership in Freemasonry, including his 32 years as Sovereign Grand Commander of the Ancient Rite of Scottish Freemasonry," the park service said. Work to repair the statue's base at the site where it stood will start "shortly," it said. D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton has advocated for the statue to be displayed in a museum but not on public land. In a statement to WUSA on Monday, Norton condemned the decision to reinstall the statue, noting that "Pike served dishonorably" and he "resigned in disgrace after committing a war crime and dishonoring even his own Confederate military service." "A statue honoring a racist and a traitor has no place on the streets of D.C.," Norton said.
