logo
14th century Shem Tov Bible comes home to Jerusalem

14th century Shem Tov Bible comes home to Jerusalem

Yahoo28-05-2025
The Shem Tov Bible, a stunning 14th-century manuscript created by the renowned kabbalist Rabbi Shem Tov ben Abraham Ibn Gaon, will be displayed in the National Library of Israel.
The National Library of Israel proudly announced this month the arrival and public display ofthe Shem Tov Bible, a stunning 14th-century manuscript created by the renowned kabbalist Rabbi Shem Tov ben Abraham Ibn Gaon. This extraordinary codex—both a work of biblical scholarship and an artistic masterpiece—is now exhibited as part of the Library's permanent collection.
Created in 1312 in Spain, the Shem Tov Bible reflects the rich spiritual and intellectual life of Sephardic Jewry during the medieval period. Combining deep kabbalistic insight, meticulous Masoretic tradition, and exquisite illumination, the manuscript offers a unique window into Jewish mysticism and textual transmission.
Rabbi Shem Tov himself embarked on a journey to the Land of Israel shortly after completing the manuscript, settling there by 1315 and continuing his scholarly work until his death around 1330. Over the centuries, the Bible traveled throughout the Middle East and North Africa, where it gained a reputation for mystical powers, especially among women seeking a safe childbirth.
In the modern era, the manuscript passed through notable private collections, including that of David Solomon Sassoon in the early 20th century, and later European collectors. In 2024, the Bible was auctioned at Sotheby's and purchased by Terri and Andrew Herenstein, who generously loaned it to the National Library for long-term public display.
Sallai Meridor, Chairman of the National Library of Israel, emphasized the profound symbolism of the Bible's return to Jerusalem, especially coinciding with Shavuot, the festival commemorating the giving of the Torah. 'Having journeyed from Spain to Jerusalem, Baghdad, Tripoli, London, and Geneva, the Shem Tov Bible has come full circle and is now back home in the land where Rabbi Shem Tov lived and intended for it to be,' Meridor said. He also expressed deep gratitude to the Herenstein family for making this historic loan possible.
Dr. Chaim Neria, curator of the Haim and Hanna Solomon Judaica Collection at the Library, highlighted the Bible's scholarly importance. 'This manuscript represents the pinnacle of biblical and kabbalistic scholarship from the medieval period,' he said. He noted its detailed adherence to the Sefer Tagei, a traditional guide for sacred scribal practices, and its unique references to now-lost earlier texts such as the Hilleli Codex from 600 CE.
Beyond its textual significance, the Shem Tov Bible is celebrated for its artistic beauty. Its richly decorated pages feature gothic arches, arcades, birds, beasts, and gilded frames surrounding the biblical verses, inspired by the artistic languages of both Islamic and Christian traditions of the time, yet adapted to Jewish ritual aesthetics.
The Shem Tov Bible was unveiled to the public on May 8, 2025, as part of the National Library's 'A Treasury of Words' exhibition in the William Davidson Permanent Exhibition Gallery. The Herenstein family also announced plans to digitize the manuscript to enable worldwide access for scholars and enthusiasts alike.
'The Shem Tov Bible stands as a unique cultural artifact,' the family said. 'We are delighted that it will be preserved, studied, and admired by future generations.'
For more information about the manuscript and to view images, visit theNational Library of Israel's website.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pennsylvania ranked top ten ‘most religious states' in new study
Pennsylvania ranked top ten ‘most religious states' in new study

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pennsylvania ranked top ten ‘most religious states' in new study

PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — With more than two-thirds of adults being religiously affiliated nationally, a new study shows that Pennsylvania ranks within the top ten of 'most religious states.' The study, conducted by SmileHub, compared all 50 states based on 13 key metrics. The data set ranges from the number of faith and religious support charities per capita to the share of people who pray at least daily. The report also focused on three key dimensions: religious interest and places of worship, religious education and careers and religion-affiliated organizations. Pennsylvania ranked overall in spot 10, with a total score of 52.16. In the aforementioned categories, the Commonwealth ranked: Religious interest and places of worship: 24 Religious education and careers: 10 Religion-affiliated organizations: 7 The top nine spots were secured by Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina, Mississippi, Indiana and Georgia, respectively. New Hampshire was ranked last, with Maine ranking in 49 and Vermont ranking 48th. Pennsylvania residents predominantly identify as Christians, with 62% of residents reporting they practice the religion from 2023-2024. Other religions reported in the Commonwealth include Jewish (2%), Muslim (1%) and Buddhist (less than 1%). 30% of Pennsylvanians reported being religiously unaffiliated, with 20% identifying as 'nothing in particular,' 5% identifying as Atheist and 5% identifying as Agnostic. Interestingly, in 2014, 73% of Pennsylvania residents identified as Christians, with an even higher number of 82% being logged in 2007. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

My Work Disrespected Me During a Religious Holiday. I Held My Tongue, But I'm Mad.
My Work Disrespected Me During a Religious Holiday. I Held My Tongue, But I'm Mad.

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

My Work Disrespected Me During a Religious Holiday. I Held My Tongue, But I'm Mad.

Good Job is Slate's advice column on work. Have a workplace problem big or small? Send it to Laura Helmuth and Doree Shafrir here. (It's anonymous!) Dear Good Job, I work in an office. A few months ago, something happened that I can't seem to get over. We had an all-hands meeting in person with some sensitivity training for everyone. It was pretty bog-standard HR generated stuff, reminding you not to openly discriminate against people in ways that could get the company sued. That's all well and good I suppose, but the meeting did have some food provided, a variety of dishes from around the world which was supposed to showcase outreach or something. The training was held during Passover and I am Jewish, meaning I had a pretty restricted set of things I was religiously allowed to eat at that moment. Before taking anything on offer, I asked the two ladies running the workshop whether or not anything there was pesadik. They did not even know what that meant, so I figured that nothing was and declined to eat anything. That led to me being lectured, in front of my coworkers, for my 'insularity' and how this is how that sort of xenophobia they were just warning against gets started. I am aware of the irony, and also quite upset with how this turned out. My immediate, emotional response was to complain to either my boss, HR, or both. But a louder part of me said that the overall economy isn't good and that I might just be putting a target on my back by complaining about it. But it's been months now, and I keep thinking about it. Should I have complained? And if so, is it too late to say anything? —Insensitivity Training Dear Insensitivity Training, Oh yes, the irony of being lectured for 'insularity' during an anti-discrimination workshop is just too rich. Are people truly this un-self-aware? I have to believe that something about your request made them feel defensive so this was their response, but yeesh. I'm with you that their reaction was completely inappropriate, and I don't think it's too late to say anything. One approach, since you're mindful of not wanting a target on your back and you don't want to come across like you've been stewing over this for months, would be to wait until the month or so before Passover and then send a note to your boss and/or HR reminding them that Passover is approaching, and because you'd like to avoid the misunderstanding that happened last year, this is what you can and cannot eat during the holiday. Which brings me to my next point. I'm truly not trying to blame the victim here (to be clear, you are the victim!), but as a fellow Jew, I try not to assume that anyone has knowledge of Jewish traditions. You say you 'asked the two ladies running the workshop if anything was pesadik,' aka kosher for Passover, aka made without wheat, barley, oats, rye, and spelt. But I think it may have been unrealistic to expect that they knew what 'pesadik' meant (which, for what it's worth, is a term I haven't heard most Reform Jews use either). You wrote 'They did not even know what that meant' and so you didn't eat anything, but I think it's worth giving people grace in these moments and explaining what it means. Yes, it's annoying that it's on you to educate people, but next time, I would probably just send an email to the organizers ahead of time, explaining that you observe Passover, it runs for eight days, and during that time you cannot eat anything leavened that is made with these five grains. And if you ever get a similar response as you did during the workshop, please do not wait to bring it up to your boss and/or HR. If the workplace is serious about sensitivity training, then they should be receptive to your feedback. Laura Helmuth and Doree Shafrir want to help you navigate your social dynamics at work. Does your colleague constantly bug you after hours? Has an ill-advised work romance gone awry? Ask us your question here! (It's anonymous!) I am a few months into my first full-time job. It's exacting and rewarding, with multiple pathways for advancement. Our team is almost exclusively women who have seamlessly incorporated me into their community. I also really liked my cubicle partner—well, my former cubicle partner. Last week I realized that my department may not have extended the same welcome to everyone. One evening I got a terse email that it was my cubicle partner's last day— his desk had already been completely cleared out by the time I got to work the next morning. Then during our department meeting, the boss shared a long 'team-building' PowerPoint that emphasized how no work environments were inherently toxic, that pre-conceived negative attitudes can turn imagined slights into reality, and that the best way to resolve interpersonal conflicts was to speak one on one with the other person and only elevate to management in dire circumstances. We were also told not to gossip, so clearly asking for details is inappropriate, but I have a sinking feeling that I know why an otherwise close-knit, largely white and female department had to sit through that presentation. My former cubicle partner (who quit? Was fired?) had been the third most recent hire, but was the only Black man (indeed the only Black person) in the entire company. I have belatedly realized that I was the only person who ever chatted or ate lunch with him and realized that my other colleagues only mentioned him in unflattering contexts (e.g. he was out-of-touch for bringing up that he enjoyed nonfiction books when several people had just been talking about the romance novels they were reading, that pretentious for sharing that he enjoyed visiting art museums on his days off). His unceremonious disappearance from the office, combined with the weirdly pointed presentation and my coworkers' seemingly collective agreement to pretend he never existed, is raising my hackles. In comparison, two white women with less than two years experience also recently left the company, but were each celebrated with cupcakes at lunch and drinks after work. I have polled some friends who have been working longer in similar fields and they agree that the weird PowerPoint was likely the HR response to a scathing exit interview from my now ex-colleague. I realize that I am not privy to any more information, and that maybe this guy said or did something horrible before I was hired that elicited a chilly attitude from literally everyone (but was not egregious enough to get him fired on the spot). What is the best way forward given that the details are seemingly confidential? Without any more context, I am now suspicious that my coworkers are racist and/or sexist and that my bosses are unwilling to resolve conflicts, whereas just two weeks ago I thought I'd scored a jackpot in terms of a first job. —Suddenly Dubious Dear Suddenly Dubious, Your company's reaction to the departure of this colleague is bizarre! And anyone with any awareness of human nature should know that if you tell people not to gossip about something, that will be the first thing they want to gossip about! So I completely understand where you're coming from in wanting to know what happened, and I also appreciate that you are sensitive to the racial and gender dynamics at play here. That said, I think that you have to let this particular situation go and just try to do your job well. As you pointed out, something may have happened with this guy that led to him being fired that you were not aware of. And I hate to sound like a wizened old crone, but this is going to be just the first of many jobs you'll have over the course of your life where people get fired or quit for reasons that you are not looped in on. Most workplaces have their problems! I also don't think it's necessarily fair to assume that your coworkers are racist and/or sexist, but it's certainly something to keep an eye on, and if you feel like your workplace has turned toxic for you, maybe it's time to look for a new job. —Doree My husband and I were married seven years before he unexpectedly died. He was from overseas and told me he didn't have much in the way of family since his parents died. He lied. When I finally mustered up enough courage to go through his old boxes, I found photos, letters, and documents. My husband had been married and then divorced in his home country. Worse, there were pictures of him with his five children. The man that I loved, that was trying to build a family with, left his five young kids behind without a look back. He never breathed a word about them to me. He certainly never financially supported them. The entire foundations of my world have been shaken. Is it wrong to go looking for his family? Solve the daily Crossword

Library book returned after 82 years. Note says, 'Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'
Library book returned after 82 years. Note says, 'Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Library book returned after 82 years. Note says, 'Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore'

SAN ANTONIO (AP) — A library book has been returned nearly 82 years after it was borrowed from the San Antonio Public Library. It came with a letter noting that "Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore.' The book is 'Your Child, His Family, and Friends' by marriage and family counselor Frances Bruce Strain. It was checked out in July 1943 and returned this past June from a person in Oregon, the library said in a news release. 'After the recent death of my father, I inherited a few boxes of books he left behind,' the person wrote in a letter that was shared by the library on Instagram and signed with the initials P.A.A.G. The book was a guide for parents on helping their children navigate personal relationships. It was checked out when the person's father was 11 years old. 'The book must have been borrowed by my Grandmother, Maria del Socorro Aldrete Flores (Cortez),' the person wrote. 'In that year, she transferred to Mexico City to work at the US Embassy. She must have taken the book with her, and some 82 years later, it ended up in my possession.' The book had received write-ups in various newspapers at the time. The Cincinnati Enquirer described it in June 1943 as a 'complete guidebook to the personal relationships of the child with his family and the outside world." The New York Times noted a month later that Strain was a psychologist and mother of two who was 'best known for her wise, sensitive, but unsentimental presentation of sex education.' The person who returned the book wrote in the letter: 'I hope there is no late fee for it because Grandma won't be able to pay for it anymore.' The library said in a news release that it eliminated overdue fines in 2021. The inside cover of the book was stamped with the warning that the fine for overdue books was three cents a day. Not accounting for inflation, the penalty would amount to nearly $900. Three cents in July 1943 amounts to 56 cents in today's money, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Inflation Calculator. That would add up to more than $16,000. The library noted that the book is in 'good condition.' It'll be on display in the city's central library through August. It will then be donated to the Friends of San Antonio Public Library and sold to benefit the library. Eight decades may seem like a long time for an overdue library book, but it's nowhere near the record. Guinness World Records says the most overdue library book was returned to Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge, England, in 1956. It was borrowed in 1668, some 288 years earlier. No fine was extracted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store