
3 leaders at English hospital where a nurse was convicted of murdering babies are arrested
The unnamed suspects being investigated for gross negligence manslaughter were arrested after a corporate manslaughter probe was expanded following Letby's 2023 convictions for the infant deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital in northwestern England, said Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes of the Cheshire Constabulary. The three were released on bail.
'This focuses on senior leadership and their decision-making to determine whether any criminality has taken place concerning the response to the increased levels of fatalities,' Hughes said.
Letby, 35, is serving multiple life sentences after being convicted of seven counts of murder and attempting to murder seven other infants between June 2015 and June 2016 while working as a neonatal nurse at the hospital.
Prosecutors said she harmed babies in ways that left little trace, including injecting air into their bloodstreams, administering air or milk into their stomachs through nasogastric tubes, poisoning them with insulin and interfering with breathing tubes.
Letby, who testified that she never harmed a child, has continued to proclaim her innocence and support for her has grown as legal and scientific experts have questioned the circumstantial and statistical evidence used at her trial. A panel of international medical experts disputed the evidence against her and her lawyer said she was wrongly convicted.
A judge who oversaw a public inquiry seeking accountability of staff and management at the hospital is expected to publish her findings this fall. Justice Kathryn Thirlwall said at the outset of the inquiry that she would not review Letby's conviction, but take a deeper look into how failures led babies to repeatedly be harmed at the hospital.
As that inquiry was underway earlier this year, an independent panel of more than a dozen medical experts issued a report that found no sign of a crime and concluded natural causes or bad medical care led to the demise of each of the newborns.
'In summary, then, ladies and gentlemen, we did not find any murders,' Dr. Shoo Lee, a retired neonatologist from Canada, said at a London news conference in February.
Letby's lawyers and three former executives at the hospital unsuccessfully petitioned Thirlwall to halt the public inquiry after the medical panel released its findings. They argued that if the convictions are overturned, the inquiry might reach the wrong conclusions and waste more than 10 million pounds ($13.8 million) in taxpayer funds.
Letby, who lost two bids to appeal her convictions, now has her case before the Criminal Case Review Commission, which reviews possible miscarriages of justice and could lead to one another shot at an appeal.
The Crown Prosecution Service has said two juries convicted Letby and three appellate judges had rejected her arguments that the prosecution expert evidence was flawed.
While the medical panel said there was no evidence Letby intentionally harmed any babies, they did find that medical workers at the hospital were not properly skilled in resuscitation and inserting breathing tubes, lacked an understanding of some basic procedures, misdiagnosed ailments and acted slowly in treating acutely ill babies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know as Lucy Letby may face more murder charges
Convicted baby killer nurse Lucy Letby could face more criminal charges after murder squad detectives passed evidence of further allegations related to baby deaths and collapses at the hospitals where she worked. The number and exact nature of the potential new offences has not been made public yet and it could take weeks before a decision is made by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on whether to charge Letby with more offences. A Cheshire police spokeswoman said: 'We can confirm that Cheshire Constabulary has submitted a full file of evidence to the CPS for charging advice regarding the ongoing investigation into deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of both the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital as part of Operation Hummingbird.' News of the potential new charges comes after three people who were part of the senior leadership team at the hospital where Letby worked were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. The suspects, who occupied senior positions at the Countess of Chester Hospital (CoCH) between 2015 and 2016, were arrested on Monday. Following the lengthy trial and conviction of Letby in August 2023, the police force launched an investigation into corporate manslaughter, and later gross negligence manslaughter, at the hospital – leading to the latest arrests. Police have said investigations at the Countess of Chester are continuing and that the probe does not impact Letby's multiple murder and attempted murder convictions. Here's what we know so far. The three suspects, who occupied senior positions at the CoCH between 2015 and 2016, were arrested on 30 June on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. All three have since been bailed pending further inquiries, the force added. Police said corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter probes are continuing. Cheshire Constabulary said it launched its investigation into senior management at the hospital in October 2023, a few months after Letby's conviction. Its corporate manslaughter probe is focusing on "senior leadership and their decision-making to determine whether any criminality has taken place concerning the response to the increased levels of fatalities", Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes said. In March 2025 the scope of the investigation widened to also include gross negligence manslaughter – a separate offence which "focuses on the grossly negligent action or inaction of individuals", police added. Police are yet to reveal the identities of the three people who were arrested, as it is standard for authorities to only name suspects publicly once they have been formally charged. While we know that the three suspects were part of the hospital's senior leadership team, it is not clear exactly what jobs they held, or what their working relationship was with Lucy Letby. The investigation followed Letby's convictions, but it is not known whether the alleged cases of gross negligence are directly linked to the 35-year-old former nurse's actions at the CoCH. A spokeswoman for CoCH reiterated it 'would not be appropriate' for the hospital to comment 'due to the Thirlwall Inquiry and the ongoing police investigations'. According to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), gross negligence manslaughter is committed where the death is a result of a grossly negligent (though otherwise lawful) act or omission on the part of the defendant. Circumstances where this can occur are "almost infinitely variable", the CPS says, but here are some examples that could apply: Death following medical treatment or care; the offence can be committed by any healthcare professional, including but not exclusively doctors, nurses, pharmacists and ambulance personnel. Deaths in the workplace the offence can be committed by anyone who is connected in some way to a workplace of any nature. The context is wide ranging but can include offices, factories, ships, airports, aeroplanes, construction sites, oil rigs, farms, schools and sporting grounds. The deceased victims may be employees, contractors, sub-contractors, and members of the public visiting or passing by the workplace when a fatal incident happens. Death in custody – a death in custody is a generic term referring to deaths of those in the custody of the state. In this context the offence can be committed by police or prison officers, dedicated detention and other custody assistants, and by healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of those detained in a custodial setting. According to the Sentencing Council, gross negligence manslaughter is triable only on indictment, and carries a sentencing range of 1 – 18 years in custody. The length of sentence for this offence is determined by a scale of culpability (category A being the highest and D being the lowest), as shown on the council's website. Repeated negligence, blatant disregard for high risk of death and motivation by financial gain are all considered for higher penalties. Read more NHS will use AI to prevent next Letby scandal (The Telegraph) Nurse loses appeal against 2008 convictions for murder of four patients in Leeds (The Guardian) Repeated failings by the nursing regulator demand a new approach (The Independent)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
8 ways to manage your child's weight as first 1,000 days of life found to be critical
Experts have warned that child obesity has risen to "alarming" levels and are calling for action to prevent unhealthy lifestyles setting in among babies and toddlers. The first 1,000 days of a child's life – from pregnancy through to their second birthday – are paramount when it comes to their health trajectory, the experts stated, and this period is "critical to development and health across the life-course." From their observations, academics at the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the Italian National Academy of Sciences also noted how difficult it was to change that trajectory once a child reaches five years of age. "The overall goal should be to establish and maintain a healthy body-weight trajectory that avoids excess gain early in life," they said. It comes after another study earlier this year, which also warned that being overweight as a child could double the risk of being obese as an adult. The research, which tracked the body mass index (BMI) of thousands of children in the Netherlands, not only found that the first five years of a child's life are vital in preventing excess weight gain in the future, but also that the BMI of six-year-olds was the most reliable indicator of obesity later on in life. More than a quarter of children (26.8%) aged two to 15 are overweight or obese in England, according to government figures. Experts have suggested the number of obese children and adults in the UK will rise substantially by 2050, with kids aged five to 14 bearing the brunt. Girls in this age group will see a 53% rise in obesity levels, per the global analysis, and boys a 57% rise. So, what can parents do at home to help reduce the risk of obesity in their children? Mindful eating techniques, such as eating more slowly, have been proven to help children and adults digest their food properly. They also improve nutrients absorption and promote healthier relationships with food, encouraging a better appreciation of food, and helping people establish when they are full. Other mindful eating techniques for children include: Limiting distractions while they eat Asking for hunger cues before, during and after they eat Engaging all fives senses when they eat Discussing how different foods impact their mood, feelings and productivity Studies have shown that snacking is more prevalent among those who are obese, but grazing can have other implications. Of course it depends on what your child is eating and how often they are picking, but snacking also affects their appetite and often includes ultra-processed foods, which can be harmful in other ways. Alarmingly, a recent study by UCL published in the European Journal of Nutrition found that nearly half (47%) of the calories obtained by toddlers in the UK are from UPFs and 59% of calories obtained by those aged seven are derived from UPFs. Portion size is also key. Children should not be eating adult-sized meals. So, as well as reducing the amount of food you are giving them, assess the crockery you are using – smaller plates will help you establish child-appropriate servings. Your little one may have an aversion to broccoli or Brussels sprouts, but there are smarter ways to incorporate veggies into their diets that don't involve mealtime meltdowns. For example, nutritionist Emily English (known as Em the Nutritionist online) has a viral five-a-day lasagne that involves mincing mushrooms, celery and other vegetables into a pulse, to add to the meat (optional). You cannot taste the individual vegetables disguised in the dish, but they add goodness and mean your whole family is benefiting from a healthier meal. Just as we cannot expect our kids to put their phones and tablets down if we're forever glued to our screens, we cannot expect them to eat healthily and adopt positive lifestyle changes if we're not leading by example. So, as well as ensuring the entire family is sticking to a healthy, balanced diet, be mindful of how you discuss food and exercise around them. Speaking of exercise, a great way to get your kids going is to adopt more active approaches as a family. Whether it's weekend walks, daily runs to the park with the dog or team sports – adding regular exercise to their week can really go a long way. Setting strict bedtimes and establishing a nighttime routine is beneficial. Not only does good quality sleep help bolster their mood and productivity, it can impact their weight and overall health. Discuss with your child realistic targets for them – and your whole family – to achieve, and ensure you reward positive behaviour and give encouraging feedback as they go. With both diet and exercise, the main thing is consistency – in terms of what you eat and do, how often you do it, and when you do it. Sticking to the same mealtimes, having designated exercise slots and creating consistent portions and meal types will help establish healthy habits – both in the short- and long-term. Read more about children's health and parenting Seven signs your child could be struggling with their mental health (Yahoo Life UK) How to spot anxiety in your child and how to help them (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read) Six things parents should know about Sabrina Carpenter's Short N' Sweet tour (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read)


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
MRI Reveals Distinct ICI-Induced Joint Inflammation Patterns
TOPLINE: The whole-body MRI revealed similar inflammation levels in both patients with new arthralgia and those with new inflammatory arthritis after exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), showing three distinct patterns of inflammation. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a prospective imaging study from 2021 to 2024 including 60 patients (mean age, 65 years; 57% men; all White) from regional oncology services at a UK hospital who developed new musculoskeletal symptoms — arthralgia or inflammatory arthritis — after exposure to ICIs. Those with no history of rheumatologic autoimmune disease, active cancer, or recent joint pain served as healthy control individuals (n = 20; mean age, 62 years; 60% men). Participants underwent whole-body MRI to assess joint, tendon, bursal, entheseal, and spinal lesions, with imaging patterns analyzed over a 6-month follow-up. Imaging phenotypes were analyzed, applying a semiquantitative scoring system for synovitis, tenosynovitis, erosions, bursitis, and enthesitis, and compared between patients and healthy individuals. Scans were categorized into four groups on the basis of imaging patterns: polymyalgia rheumatica, peripheral inflammatory arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, and no specific pattern. TAKEAWAY: MRI showed no significant differences between patient groups but showed higher levels of inflammation and erosions in patients with arthralgia and those with inflammatory arthritis than in healthy control individuals, with median joint synovitis scores of 9.0 and 10.0 vs 2.0 and median joint erosion scores of 2.0 for both groups vs 0.0, respectively. After exposure to ICIs, the commonly affected joints were acromioclavicular (77%), glenohumeral (75%), wrist (73%), and metacarpophalangeal (59%) joints, with knee joint synovitis being more prevalent in patients with inflammatory arthritis than in those with arthralgia (67% vs 29%). Three distinct MRI patterns were identified: There was a polymyalgia rheumatica pattern in 12% of patients; peripheral inflammatory arthritis pattern in 37% of patients, with varying joint involvement (23% small joints, 32% large joints, and 45% both); and a pattern of overlap of both polymyalgia rheumatica and peripheral inflammatory arthritis in 20%. A total of 31% of patients did not meet any specific pattern criteria. Four of the five patients who required disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to manage their symptoms were in the peripheral inflammatory arthritis group. IN PRACTICE: 'The finding of inflammation and erosions in patients with arthralgia without visible joint swelling suggests that clinical examination is insensitive and that the incidence of joint inflammation induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors is likely to be underestimated,' the experts wrote in a related comment. SOURCE: This study was led by Kate Harnden, MB ChB, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, England. It was published online on June 10, 2025, in The Lancet Rheumatology. LIMITATIONS: The imaging of feet and ankles was excluded from MRI scans owing to time constraints, which may have overlooked inflammation in those areas. The short follow-up period of 6 months limited the ability to capture long-term outcomes. Including patients with prior autoimmune diseases may have affected the results, and the predefined MRI patterns based on classical arthritis forms may have led to nonspecific pattern labeling. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. One author reported receiving a bursary travel award, and another was supported by a fellowship program by AbbVie. One author disclosed receiving honoraria, and another received research grants and consulting fees from various sources including Gilead, Lilly, AbbVie, and Deepcare. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.