Gareth Ward 'fixed us drinks' on night of alleged assault, trial hears
The second man to give evidence in the trial of NSW MP Gareth Ward has described how the politician "fixed us drinks" on the night of the alleged assault.
The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was 17 when he first met Mr Ward at an event in late 2012.
In their opening, the Crown alleged Mr Ward indecently assaulted the man, then 18, at his Meroo Meadow home in 2013, including touching his buttocks and scrotum and mounting his back.
The independent MP for Kiama and former Liberal minister has pleaded not guilty to charges involving the younger complainant, as well as additional charges, including sexual intercourse without consent, involving an older complainant.
Mr Ward denies all allegations.
After hearing evidence from the first complainant, the trial continued into its 16th day with testimony from the second.
Giving evidence in the NSW District Court from a remote location, the younger complainant described how he met the MP thinking they had become "mates" and their association a "friendship".
In February 2013, after a party where he had been drinking and there had been tension with his girlfriend, the complainant said he left feeling low and sat drinking alone.
He told the court Mr Ward phoned him, expressed concern and offered to pay for a taxi to his house.
Arriving at the Meroo Meadow property, the complainant said the atmosphere was noticeably different to previous gatherings.
"I remember being instantly taken aback by how different the vibe was compared to the last time I had been there with a lot of people," he said.
The man said they sat at Mr Ward's kitchen bench drinking.
"He was fixing us drinks," he said, including what might have been coffee vodka, which was a "fixture in his [Mr Ward's] freezer at the time".
The court heard they later moved outside, where the complainant jokingly pretended to pass out on the grass.
The trial continues tomorrow, when the younger complainant is expected to give further evidence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
14 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘You're on your own': Tradie's $17,000 scam nightmare
A tradie has been left gutted after losing over $17,000 in an elaborate spoofing scam. Bradley Turner runs a cementing company called Pure Deco and he never thought that he would become a scam victim. On June 1st on a lazy Sunday Mr Turner, who lives in Sydney with his wife and young child, received a text message that appeared to be from his bank ANZ. He believed the message was legitimate because it appeared in an already-established message chain he had with the bank. The message alerted him that his voice ID had been updated and that if he didn't request this change, he should contact the number written below immediately. The 33-year-old panicked because he hadn't updated any verifications with the bank and it was for his business account. The tradie insisted he never would have rung the number if he had just received a text message from a random number, but because it appeared to be from ANZ on his phone and was alongside other official messages, he fell for it. 'I'm pretty clued in,' Mr Turner told 'The guy made me panic. I spoke to three people, they make you panic.' Mr Turner was unaware that scammers are becoming more sophisticated and using state-of-the-art technology to 'spoof' their numbers and get into established texting threads. When the tradie rang the number included in the text, he was told that someone was trying to scam his account from New Zealand and he needed to immediately transfer his money to a new secure account. He was then sent a follow-up text with his new bank details and, once again, the text appeared on his previous ANZ text chain. From his perspective, it all sounded legit. If anything, he thought he was preventing himself from being scammed. Mr Turner transferred two separate payments, one totalling $16,941 and another payment of around $7000, to the new bank account. At first, he didn't think anything was wrong and even felt relieved that he had seen the text and been able to resolve the situation quickly. Then, by chance, a mate rang and Mr Turner told him he'd had a stressful morning dealing with his bank. When he explained what had happened his friend immediately told him to call his bank and double-check. 'I've never dealt with a scam or fraud call before. There were a couple of red flags, but of course, you don't think about it until you're finished,' he said. 'I rang ANZ and was told it was a scam. I had to report it to the police.' Even though he contacted the bank only an hour and a half after he made the transfers, it was already mostly too late. ANZ was able to stop the $7000 transfer, but the almost $17,000 sum was already with another bank. Mr Turner was horrified after realising what had happened. 'It felt horrendous. I felt like I'd been violated. You feel so violated that someone has managed to trick you,' he said. He argued that losing that amount of money is serious and can derail a person's life, saying $17,000 is 'a lot no matter who you are'. The bank reportedly told Mr Turner that there was no way to recover his money, with the tradie claiming the message was basically 'you're on your own', which left him fuming. 'They make it like you should know about this already. This (scam) was really well done and scamming is getting a lot bigger,' he said. Ultimately, he was told that, because he completed the initial transfer, it was basically on him and the money was gone. When asked about Mr Turner's experience, ANZ said in a statement it was unable to comment on individual customers. 'We always attempt to recover funds customers have lost to scams or fraud,' it said. 'However, the ability to recover funds depends on a number of factors including how quickly it is reported to us, whether they are transferred to another financial institution, and the speed in which funds are then on-transferred by scammers. In many instances, cyber criminals on-transfer funds within minutes, or use them to purchase cryptocurrency.' Mr Turner said he wants the bank to take responsibility for the fact the scammers were able to successfully get into the same texting chain and spoof their official communications. 'It came through their feed and it is so frustrating. I don't see how they can wipe their hands of it,' he said. 'If it was through a random number I'd understand.' At the end of the day, he feels ANZ should take more responsibility and he feels his trust in the bank has been broken. 'They've let me down and now they just want to palm me off,' he said. The tradie believes he isn't fully at fault because it comes down to ANZ not having the 'right security' and, as a result, there should be a way for him to get his money back. Losing the $17,000 stung badly because the money was there to pay his workers and now it is just gone. 'Things are expensive. You're trying to run a business. It was from my business account, and I have seven employees. That is a couple of weeks of wages. Do I send the boys to collect the wages from (ANZ)?' he asked. Mr Turner isn't alone. In February, reported an eerily similar story about another Aussie tradie who lost $58,000 in a spoofing scam. Furkan Colak, from Melbourne, was in the process of trying to buy a house while also saving up for his dad's knee surgery when he received a text message that looked to be from ANZ but was actually from a scammer. Mr Colak previously told that the whole experience left him 'shaking' and it has been tough to get over losing so much money. 'It comes to the point where you're almost over it and then you think what you could have done with the money,' he said.
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
Canberra man jailed for raping customer in shopping centre art shop where he worked
A man accused of raping a customer in a Canberra shopping centre art shop where he worked is behind bars after an ACT Supreme Court jury found him guilty within four hours. It is the second time Abhishek Timalsina has been tried for the crime, which occurred in the Westfield Belconnen store's staff room in November 2022. The first jury was unable to reach a verdict, but yesterday another jury found Timalsina guilty of two counts or rape and four acts of indecency. The original case was significant because it was the first test of the ACT's new affirmative consent laws, which apply a different standard to the evidence. Consent is now required to be both free and voluntary, and has to be communicated to the other party. That means consent can no longer be presumed. The woman had gone to the shop to enquire about a refund when the pair began talking about her art and his photography. The events were not disputed. But on Timalsina's version, the pair were flirting, and the woman had been laughing and smiling when he leaned in and kissed her. The court heard Timalsina asked her if she "wanted to do something crazy". He told the court they had been "vibing", and he thought he had consent and that the woman was enjoying the attention. The woman later told a friend that during the incident her brain had "checked out". She admitted she had kissed him back, but as things escalated, she stopped reacting. The woman took herself to hospital in the immediate aftermath, to be examined. Timalsina's bail has been revoked, and he was taken away to jail. He will be sentenced in August.
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
What cost of living crisis? Barr government goes for broke with revenue grab
Every Canberran could sense in February the abject implosion of the ACT's finances that apparently only dawned on the Barr Labor government sometime after its re-election in October. Only now, in the sheer breadth, size, and audacity of its lunge for new revenue, coupled with persistent deficits for another four years, can we truly appreciate the extent of its fiscal desperation. How else to explain the head-spinning array of higher fees, levies, and taxes the new ACT Treasurer, Chris Steel, has conjured in his first budget? Hiking land rates, business taxes, parking fees, and vehicle regos, while painful, are standard and obvious 'go-to' targets for cash-strapped treasurers peering at oceans of red ink on the books. Showing a flair for creativity, Mr Steel has gone so much further in his 2025/26 debut. False fire alarm activations? Ka-ching. Volunteers helping coach kids' sporting teams? A new fee. Dumping an old tyre? Up by more than 200 per cent. These charges will be annoying to many, but they pale in policy significance when compared to the novel 'health tax' every household in the territory is about to be hit with. Not that any government would use or accept the term 'health tax'; the Barr government has opted for the more banal "levy to support the public health system". Whatever Canberrans might feel about paying it — some may see it as an entirely reasonable contribution — this non-means-tested annual $250 impost is a most 'un-Labor' thing to do. It challenges our federation's compact that Medicare and federal health funding grants funnelled back to the states and territories — even if inadequate — are the bedrock guarantee of universal, fee-free access to health care in public hospitals. For ACT residents forced to pay it, the new 'tax' is akin to a compulsory 'co-payment' for hospital services. A 'co-payment' charged whether they use public hospital services or not, applied to a population already more likely to pay out-of-pocket fees if they visit a GP, with nationally lagging bulk-billing rates. Where were ACT Labor MLAs between January and the May 10 federal election when Anthony Albanese pulled out his own Medicare card, extolling Australia's unique health-funding system as "a declaration of Australian values" and railing against anything that resembled an extra payment to access services? The Barr government argues the $205 million 'tax' (the total to be collected) is temporary, conveniently expiring in the fiscal year in which the next territory election is held, in 2028/29. This assumes several entrenched flaws in the ACT's health services are resolved by then — that demand stabilises, growth in costs slows, and, most importantly, that the Albanese government succumbs to pressure from all states and territories and generously expands total national hospital funding of $34 billion per year. Chris Steel would be supremely, perhaps dangerously, optimistic if he banked on the Commonwealth suddenly coming to the rescue at a time when it's running its combined deficits of almost $180 billion through to 2028/29. The ACT's tax' also has the potential to disadvantage Andrew Barr in crucial negotiations at federal cabinet. Having uniquely and unilaterally taken the plunge into what's called 'own source' hospital revenue for the first time, why wouldn't the feds then discount the $200 million the territory's raising from whatever future offer it makes to the chief minister? In this respect, the ACT is isolated because it's unlikely any of the six states would create their own version of a hospital tax, in view of the constitutional questions it could create. An equity argument arises with NSW, too. Unless there's to be a matching increase in cross-border payments for its residents using the Canberra Hospital, aren't territory residents doing more of the heavy-lifting relative to those coming from elsewhere for treatment? If, as is likely, none of these underlying problems are resolved when we reach fiscal year 2028-29, what then? Would the next territory government have to extend the charge? Index it? Increase it? Stepping back from the Steel budget's biggest surprise on hospital funding, under the heading 'sustainable revenue,' this budget scrapes together more than half a billion dollars in new or higher taxes and charges over four years. Not all of them are applied directly onto individuals, as is the case with land rates; some go via employers (payroll tax) or companies, including telcos and electricity networks. Either way, a significant proportion of the tax hikes could find their way onto residents' bills. This budget effectively signals that we've passed 'peak cost-of-living' thinking among the politicians and treasury officials who wrote it. While inflation was sitting in the seven per cent range a couple of years back, as much as they reasonably could, governments across the land deliberately shied away from politically unpalatable revenue increases that might have pushed indebted households to the brink. In the steely resolve to go so hard in his inaugural budget, the ACT treasurer seems to be suggesting those days are over.
