
Anthony Albanese's Government to convene at roundtable to hatch plan to propel Australia into stronger future
Business groups are cautiously optimistic about a productivity roundtable Treasurer Jim Chalmers will host but will head in eyes wide open after feeling like they were burned by the outcomes of Labor's first-term jobs and skills summit.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Tuesday the Government would convene the roundtable in August to hear ideas from all quarters about how to tackle stagnating productivity and propel Australia into a stronger future.
'We want to build the broadest possible base of support for further economic reform to drive growth, boost productivity, strengthen the budget and secure the resilience of our economy, in a time of global uncertainty,' he told the National Press Club in a speech laying out his second-term agenda.
'We will be respectful. We want people to participate in the spirit of goodwill in which we're making this suggestion.'
Dr Chalmers has labelled flatlining productivity one of the biggest challenges Australia faces.
He's already tasked the Productivity Commission to do a sweeping review of how best to tackle the long-run challenges, with 15 priority areas now under closer exploration.
Business groups have welcomed the focus, with Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox lamenting the fact boosting productivity was barely mentioned during the election.
'Current policy settings at both national and state levels are clearly not working. This summit is therefore ideally timed, and needs to focus on immediate reforms that can promptly turn our productivity performance around,' Mr Willox said.
But there is caution after the September 2022 jobs and skills summit was used to rubber-stamp industrial relations changes that industry says are now hampering productivity.
Mr Albanese said that, as a Labor prime minister, he would always support unions existing but he respected the role of business too, pointing out there wouldn't be any union members without successful employers.
He insisted he wasn't pre-empting any outcomes but wanted genuine discussion around where there were win-wins on productivity.
'I want people to be able to have a discussion … without screaming headlines saying, you know, this is going to happen because someone has raised it,' he said.
Business Council of Australia head Bran Black said his organisation was already working with groups across society on ideas to boost productivity in order to drive up living standards for Australians.
'These policies include red tape reduction, faster approvals on major projects, harnessing the potential of AI, advancing research and development, undertaking broad tax reform, unlocking more trade and investment and delivering the energy transition,' he said.
'At the same time, we will continue to be very clear about policies that the business community believes will be counterproductive to improving productivity.'
Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien and shadow productivity minister Andrew Bragg said the proposal sounded like a talkfest and came after the Prime Minister had 'saddled the economy with thousands of new regulations in the last Parliament'.
'If this change of heart by Labor is true, it will be akin to turning around the Titanic,' they said in a joining statement, while insisting they were open to being constructive.
Senator Bragg has already written to major industry associations seeking suggestions for deregulation as the Coalition shapes its policy agenda in the new term.
It's unclear yet if the Coalition will be invited to the roundtable.
HOUSING
A key sector where the productivity stagnation is hurting Australians is housing, where the slowdown in construction has led to a supply and affordability crisis.
Mr Albanese said plainly it was 'too hard' to build houses and governments had to work together to make it easier.
'Developers say that it's just too complex, (that) adds to costs as well,' he said, taking aim at 'unnecessary regulation'.
'I want to make sure that housing is fit for purpose and all of that. But if we can cut through on some of the red tape, then that will reduce costs.'
Across the board, governments had to do the basics better, target duplication of processes and remove barriers to investment.
But Mr Albanese also said there were some challenges where governments had to step up, not back, such as speeding up infrastructure builds and investing more in education and skills.
DEFENCE
Mr Albanese travels to Fiji, the US and Canada later this week for the G7 leaders' summit and an anticipated meeting with US President Donald Trump.
Ahead of the expected discussions, he has faced repeated questions about Australia's spending on defence after the Trump administration made it clear it wants its partners to step up.
The Prime Minister has resisted nominating a target level of GDP but insisted on Tuesday he would always support any requests for more money for specific capabilities.
'Arbitrary figures … lead to a cul-de-sac. And we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that Defence spends results in actual assets,' he said.
'We will always provide for capability that's needed.'
He reiterated his red lines in any discussion with Mr Trump, saying he wouldn't budge on the under-16s social media ban, biosecurity, subsidised pharmaceuticals or plans to make large tech companies pay for news content.
POLITICAL CULTURE
Mr Albanese also urged people to 'chill out' about old social media posts made by aspiring political candidates.
He revealed Labor doesn't go through its candidates' old posts, saying it was up to individuals to be accountable for what they had said or done in the past but also there had to be a recognition that the world had changed with the advent of social media.
'If people are held to account for what a 21-year-old has on social media in 10 years' time, then we won't have anyone willing to put their hand up in public life,' he warned.
'I understand the pressures that young people are under, which is very different from the pressures that were on (older generations)... I wouldn't particularly appreciate everything being documented when I was in young Labor, let me tell you.'
Mr Albanese said he was focused now on delivering what Labor had promised people at the election because he believed ensuring people's interactions with government went smoothly was key to boosting faith in democracy.
To aid this delivery, he announced Steven Kennedy would move from Treasury to head up his department while Jenny Wilkinson, who has been running the Finance Department, will become the first female Treasury secretary.
He pledged to continue a consultative style in Parliament, revealing he had already met with new Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Nationals leader David Littleproud.
'We have 94 votes, but that actually doesn't make a difference compared with 78 – because 78 wins and 94 wins (in the lower house),' he said.
'You don't win bigger, you win, you pass legislation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
28 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Coalition probes Israel sanctions amid AUKUS review
The Coalition is questioning if the Albanese government sanctioning two senior Israeli ministers prompted the Trump administration's AUKUS review. Australia on Wednesday joined Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK in slapping travel bans and financial blocks on Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich 'for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank'. The move has been criticised by the opposition and condemned by Israel and the US. It is also the latest sign of a White House increasingly at odds with Canberra on major foreign policy positions. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said on Thursday the AUKUS review 'came out of the blue and there are very serious questions the government and Defence Minister need to answer'. 'Was the government position on sanctioning two Israeli ministers a contributor to triggering the timing or existence of this review in the first place?' Mr Taylor asked while fronting reporters in Canberra. 'The truth is many things could have triggered this review, I have outlined some, and … there are different views within the United States, the administration, and these things can happen through triggers that happen on the day. 'I do not know the answers, but we deserve answers.' He added that the opposition 'would strongly welcome a briefing' on private AUKUS talks so Labor and the Coalition could 'work on a bipartisan basis'. Sussan Ley has also slammed the sanctions as 'counter-productive'. 'It's unprecedented to as a government take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government, and it appears that Penny Wong acted unilaterally on this,' the Opposition Leader told Sky News. 'We want an enduring peace for the people of the region, we all want that more than ever, and the US has explained that these actions are actually counter-productive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that.' Indeed, the Trump administration was scathing in its response to Wednesday's sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying they 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. 'We reject any notion of equivalence,' Mr Rubio said. 'Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. 'We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is. 'The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel.' Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has defended sanctions, saying the Albanese government 'worked very carefully in relation to taking this step over a period of time … in co-ordination with other like minded countries'. 'At the end of the day, we stand for the maintenance of humanitarian law,' Mr Marles said, also speaking to Sky. 'We want to see a ceasefire, we want to see humanitarian assistance flow to Gaza, we obviously want to see a return of the hostages to Israel, and all of us want to work towards a place of peace and that's the focus of the way in which we're exercising our international voice.' He also said he knew about the AUKUS review 'for some time'. The sanctions came after the Israeli government announced last month that it would build nearly two dozen new settlements in the West Bank along a key highway connecting Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. It also said it would legalise some settlements built in the Palestinian territory without the green light from the government. Both Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich are also known for their hard-line stances on Gaza, with Mr Ben-Gvir publicly backing forced migration of Palestinians from the war-torn strip. In a statement, the foreign ministers of the Western sanctioning countries said the penalties 'do not deviate from our unwavering support for Israel's security and we continue to condemn the horrific terror attacks of 7 October by Hamas'.


West Australian
29 minutes ago
- West Australian
Coalition probes Israel sanctions amid AUKUS review
The Coalition is questioning if the Albanese government sanctioning two senior Israeli ministers prompted the Trump administration's AUKUS review. Australia on Wednesday joined Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK in slapping travel bans and financial blocks on Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich 'for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank'. The move has been criticised by the opposition and condemned by Israel and the US. It is also the latest sign of a White House increasingly at odds with Canberra on major foreign policy positions. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said on Thursday the AUKUS review 'came out of the blue and there are very serious questions the government and Defence Minister need to answer'. 'Was the government position on sanctioning two Israeli ministers a contributor to triggering the timing or existence of this review in the first place?' Mr Taylor asked while fronting reporters in Canberra. 'The truth is many things could have triggered this review, I have outlined some, and … there are different views within the United States, the administration, and these things can happen through triggers that happen on the day. 'I do not know the answers, but we deserve answers.' He added that the opposition 'would strongly welcome a briefing' on private AUKUS talks so Labor and the Coalition could 'work on a bipartisan basis'. Sussan Ley has also slammed the sanctions as 'counter-productive'. 'It's unprecedented to as a government take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government, and it appears that Penny Wong acted unilaterally on this,' the Opposition Leader told Sky News. 'We want an enduring peace for the people of the region, we all want that more than ever, and the US has explained that these actions are actually counter-productive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that.' Indeed, the Trump administration was scathing in its response to Wednesday's sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying they 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. 'We reject any notion of equivalence,' Mr Rubio said. 'Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. 'We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is. 'The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder to shoulder with Israel.' Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has defended sanctions, saying the Albanese government 'worked very carefully in relation to taking this step over a period of time … in co-ordination with other like minded countries'. 'At the end of the day, we stand for the maintenance of humanitarian law,' Mr Marles said, also speaking to Sky. 'We want to see a ceasefire, we want to see humanitarian assistance flow to Gaza, we obviously want to see a return of the hostages to Israel, and all of us want to work towards a place of peace and that's the focus of the way in which we're exercising our international voice.' He also said he knew about the AUKUS review 'for some time'. The sanctions came after the Israeli government announced last month that it would build nearly two dozen new settlements in the West Bank along a key highway connecting Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. It also said it would legalise some settlements built in the Palestinian territory without the green light from the government. Both Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich are also known for their hard-line stances on Gaza, with Mr Ben-Gvir publicly backing forced migration of Palestinians from the war-torn strip. In a statement, the foreign ministers of the Western sanctioning countries said the penalties 'do not deviate from our unwavering support for Israel's security and we continue to condemn the horrific terror attacks of 7 October by Hamas'.

Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Senior federal politicians questions US presence in Australia after Pentagon launches formal review into AUKUS partnership
The Albanese government has been urged to reconsider the joint US secretive military base Pine Gap and the presence of US troops in Australia as the Trump administration questions the AUKUS pact. Greens senator and defence spokesman David Shoebridge has called on the Albanese government to 'put a stop' to de facto US territories in Australia amid the AUKUS review. The US announced a formal review of the $300 billion AUKUS arrangement after the Albanese government resisted demands to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Shoebridge told Sky News that Australia should stop 'bankrolling' US defence facilities in Darwin, and the secretive Pine Gap facility. 'Australia has for too long allowed Pine Gap and Defence facilities in Darwin to operate as de facto US territories, it's time we put a stop to that,' he said. 'Labor and the Coalition say having US troops stationed here makes us safer. The Greens say it is a major national security risk. 'Donald Trump is erratic, reckless and careless of America's allies and alliances but he does have one fairly constant trait, he puts US interests first. 'If only Australian decision makers did the same for us.' Mr Shoebridge said the US decision to review AUKUS should be met with Australia's own review. 'It's time for Parliament to launch a full inquiry into this dud deal, and allow critics of AUKUS a seat at the table, not just a nodding bunch of Labor and Coalition members.' Several other federal politicians outside of the major parties have also called into question whether the AUKUS deal served the national interest. Independent Senator David Pocock told Sky News he did not have full confidence in the US administration in relation to the AUKUS agreement. 'I think we should take this as an opportunity to actually do a review ourselves. It's long overdue,' he said on Thursday. Teal MP Monique Ryan also said it was 'not surprising' the Trump administration was considering an end to AUKUS, and suggested Mr Albanese should 'do the same'. 'Nations act in their own best interests. Spending $400 billion on subs which may never arrive might well not be in our best interest,' she said on X. Tasmanian Senator Jacqui Lambie recently called into question the Pine Gap facility and said it should be closed in response to Trump's controversial tariffs. 'We don't owe the United States anything. It's time these leaders stood up … It's about time you started hitting them back where it hurts,' Ms Lambie told the ABC. 'I can tell you, if they do not have access to Pine Gap and the communications there, then they are not gathering any intelligence over this side of the world. 'Tell them they've got seven days to remove their US Marines off Australian soil. That will really hurt .' Ms Lambie said Australia had shown the US 'loyalty and our mateship' in various wars, and it was time to show them 'we mean business'. 'We can no longer trust our US allies … with everything that we've given to them over the years, the loyalty, the mateship, the sacrifice … we don't owe the United States anything,' she said. Mr Shoebridge echoed Ms Lambie's sentiment, saying that despite 'all the mateship talk', Australia was not an equal partner but a 'useful patsy for US power projection'.