logo
How rising US national debt impacts the average American

How rising US national debt impacts the average American

Newsweeka day ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The federal debt in America is rising, and financial analysts are warning that it could have a substantial impact on everyday Americans.
The U.S. national debt stands at 36.9 trillion today. While many Americans may not think about how the federal deficit affects their lives, America's excessive borrowing can drive up interest rates and increase the risk of inflation.
Why It Matters
The federal debt plays a role in interest rates, which can have significant effects on the larger U.S. economy. If the government is forced to print more money to handle its debt, inflation can skyrocket for Americans as well.
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, DC.What To Know
Concerns over the budget deficit have been increasing for Americans in recent years. A 2023 Pew Research survey found that 57 percent believed reducing the budget deficit should be a 'top priority,' a 12-point jump from just the year prior.
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, said not all deficits are bad, but America's has surpassed that level.
"A government deficit often leads to a private sector surplus—meaning more money in the hands of consumers. That dynamic can work well as long as inflation stays in check and interest rates remain low, keeping the cost of servicing the debt manageable," Thompson told Newsweek.
"Right now, however, the cost of servicing the debt has surpassed even the cost of funding our military—and it's only getting worse as interest rates stay higher for longer."
For the average American, the debt will likely be a "pain point" as investors demand a higher rate of interest on their economic debt, forcing mortgage rates higher.
"The tax debate is pivotal since the majority of government inflows come from those very taxes, and if we continue to lower taxes or keep them low, we won't have the money to cover the outlays, which will invariably increase. This will have to be resolved with higher future taxes to bring down the deficit—effectively robbing the future to pay for today," Thompson said.
With President Donald Trump in office, many are waiting to see how new Republican leadership could affect America's looming debt pile.
In the Pew Research poll, Republicans were far more likely to prioritize reducing the debt at 71 percent compared to Democrats at 44 percent.
A more recent Gallup poll discovered that 53 percent of Americans say they worry about the budget deficit a "great deal" in March. Meanwhile, 28 percent said they worried about it "a fair amount."
However, the debt is already likely hitting Americans' wallets, said Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com.
"That grocery trip that used to run $100? We're talking about losing $300 to $1,250 in actual buying power over the last few years," Ryan told Newsweek. "It's not just you, it's not just inflation. It's partly because when the government keeps borrowing money, it drives up prices for everything."
Those looking to buy a house will also face higher mortgage rates as a result of the deficit, but fixing it would likely require higher taxes, according to Ryan.
"The job market will get tighter," Ryan said. "When businesses have to pay more in taxes and deal with higher interest rates, they hire fewer people and give smaller raises. So even if you keep your job, that promotion or raise you're hoping for? It will be harder to come by."
Retirement accounts would also likely experience a "rollercoaster" as the government gets back on track.
"We're basically stuck between a rock and a hard place. Keep ignoring the debt, and it slowly strangles everything. Higher prices, fewer opportunities, less money in your pocket," Ryan said.
Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is predicted to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt, likely exacerbating the concerns over interest rates and the larger economy.
"The Congressional Budget Office just confirmed that Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is, in Elon Musk's words, a 'disgusting abomination,'" Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said in a statement. "This independent analysis blows a hole through Congressional Republicans' lies—this bill will rip health care away from millions of people and still jack up the debt to fund trillions in tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations."
When it comes to Americans' views on Trump's proposed tax cuts in the past, 52 percent said that the tax cuts in 2017 would increase the deficit in the long run because the government would take in a lot less money that it won't be able to recover.
Meanwhile, 38 percent believed the tax cuts would decrease the deficit in the long run because they would stimulate the economy and bring in more money for the government, according to Gallup.
What People Are Saying
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Government spending is contributing to our national debt as tax revenues and economic growth aren't keeping pace with rising outlays, leading to increasing deficits over time."
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: "You know that feeling when looking at your credit card bill, wondering how you're gonna dig out of this hole? That's basically where we are as a country. And just like when you're drowning in debt at home, we've got two main choices: make more money or spend less."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The national debt is in many ways a phantom thief, as it slowly steals away buying power by being a key contributor to inflation over time even if Americans don't physically see its effects. In past decades, the impact of the deficit was more muted, as relatively small amounts of additional funding were needed to keep the government functional. In recent years, however, this has escalated dramatically due to multiple wars, the Great Recession, and the pandemic which called for additional government spending."
What Happens Next
As the debt continues to grow, future Americans may suffer, financial analysts warn.
"The longer-term implications may be dire for future generations, having to be saddled with monumental debts they cannot outrun and becoming a debtor nation," Thompson said. "I know it sounds like some Orwellian nightmare, but if we continue down this path, this is the future we are destined to become. All once-great nations come to an end—it will just happen more quickly for the U.S. if this continues."
For many Americans, it's a situation of "the longer we wait, the more painful it will be," Ryan said.
"The debt isn't some abstract problem for future generations to worry about," Ryan said. "It's in your grocery bill today, your mortgage payment this month, and your tax return next year. And when we finally get around to dealing with it—and we will, because math always wins in the end—it's gonna cost you even more."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Ever Happened to Carbureted Engines?
What Ever Happened to Carbureted Engines?

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What Ever Happened to Carbureted Engines?

What happened to carbureted engines? Once the most popular option amongst classic car enthusiasts and garage mechanics everywhere, it's been a few decades since we last saw one, as they're now reduced to a nostalgic commodity in cars, though they do still exist on small engines, such as lawn mowers. Back in the good old days, however, carburetors were found on some of the most exciting classic sports cars, and they were a reasonable option for owners and drivers looking to wrench on their vehicles. If this method of fuel delivery was so beloved, why did it drop to the wayside? As the popularity of fuel injection grew, we started to see the end of mass-produced vehicles with carbureted engines. Carbs, while simpler to work on and maintain and also more affordable, had some unfortunate downsides compared to the newer tech of fuel injection. As RSP Motorsports points out, fuel injection offered better fuel economy as it could optimize fuel delivery based on real-time engine conditions, as opposed to the fixed jets of a carburetor. This was due in part to the rise of electronic control units (ECUs), which gave cars computers that could calculate and make adjustments — although they also added a layer of expense and complexity. Because of adjustable fuel delivery, fuel injection was also more efficient, providing a more precise air-fuel mixture that reduced emissions compared to carburetors. By the mid-1980s, we were nearing the end of the carbureted engines in everyday cars on U.S. production lines as the world witnessed the rise of fuel injection. Fuel injection may be more complex, but its benefits made it more marketable to some consumers. American car enthusiasts might remember the carburetor sitting under the hood of their sports car, but these systems weren't exclusive to the U.S. market. On the global market, carbureted engines had a longer life span for many automotive brands, according to the Ask Car Guys subreddit. These markets focused less on fuel economy and efficiency, and also didn't see the consequences of laws and regulations cracking down on emissions. European, Asian, and African car markets continued to see cars produced with carbureted engines into the mid-1990s. Just because they've been phased out of production doesn't mean people don't still love cars with carbureted engines. Without the need for complex electronics we have in today's modern cars, carb engines were much simpler to work on, as stated by — and, for many people, more enjoyable. You could work on your car in the garage without concern for complex ECUs, and they could be manually tuned and adjusted if you knew what you were doing, without the need for expensive, complicated software. Outside of simplicity, many fans of the carbureted engine just enjoy the engine sound and feel. They have a distinct sound, throttle response, and feel that is very dissimilar to cars we have in production today, making many people loyal to this now nostalgic form of fuel delivery. Carburetors were easy to make adjustments and tuning changes to, as they didn't require fancy computers and knowledge to figure out, but Electronics for Imaging (EFI) provided arguably smoother throttle response and wasn't as annoying to try to start on a cold day — a struggle anyone who has owned a carbureted car probably knows well after messing around with a manual choke on a cold winter day. Just because we don't see cars with carburetors coming off the assembly line doesn't mean they are off the road. Many car collectors and classic car enthusiasts still enjoy wrenching, owning, and driving carbureted cars today. They may be "gone," but they will never be forgotten — there will always be something tried and true about a carbureted engine that enthusiasts will always have an appreciation for.

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time17 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

Israel says it has killed leader of Palestinian militant group that took part in October 7 attack
Israel says it has killed leader of Palestinian militant group that took part in October 7 attack

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Israel says it has killed leader of Palestinian militant group that took part in October 7 attack

The Israeli military says it has killed the leader of a Palestinian militant group that took part in the October 7, 2023, terror attacks on southern Israel. Asaad Abu Sharia, who led the Palestinian Mujahideen Movement and its armed wing the Mujahideen Brigades, was killed in a joint operation with Israel's Shin Bet security agency, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said on Saturday. His death and that of his brother Ahmed Abu Sharia were confirmed by the militant group hours after Gaza's Civil Defense reported that an Israeli airstrike had hit their family home in the Sabra area of Gaza City. Hamas run Al-Aqsa TV said the strike killed at least 15 people and injured several. Video showed people searching through the debris of a demolished four-story house. The Mujahideen Brigades took part in the October 7 attacks alongside Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups and took hostage some of the most high-profile captives, including a family whose suffering became a symbol of the attack. According to the Israeli military, Sharia was among the militant leaders who stormed Kibbutz Nir Oz, a small Israeli community near the Gaza border where many residents were killed or taken hostage during the brutal terror assault that led to Israel's war in Gaza. Despite not being aware of Hamas' plans in advance, fighters from the jihadist group joined in the cross-border assault 'as an extension of the Hamas attack,' the Israeli military said. According to Israel, Sharia was directly involved in the abduction and murders of Shiri, Ariel and Kfir Bibas – a family that became one of the most recognizable victims of the attack, partly because of the young ages of Kfir and Ariel, who were nine months and four years old respectively at the time. Kfir was the youngest hostage kidnapped into Gaza and the youngest to have been killed. The boys' mother, Shiri, was 32 at the time of her kidnap. Their father Yarden was also captured, but was released alive in February after 484 days in captivity. Reacting to news of Sharia's killing, the Bibas family expressed their 'heartfelt gratitude' to the Israeli military, saying his death was 'another step on the journey towards closure.' 'While Shiri, Ariel, and Kfir cannot be brought back, we find some measure of comfort knowing these despicable murderers will not harm another family,' the Bibas family said in a statement shared via the Hostages and Missing Families Forum. Israel's military said Sharia was also involved in the abduction of the Israeli-American couple Gad Haggai and Judi Lynn Weinstein Haggai and the abduction and killing of Thai national Nattapong Pinta. The Israeli-American couple were killed near their home in Kibbutz Nir Oz during the attack in 2023. The body of Nattapong, an agricultural worker who was abducted alive on October 7, was recovered from southern Gaza in a military operation on Friday. Israel said it believes the Mujahideen Brigades are still holding the body of an additional foreign national. The group has previously denied killing their captives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store