Red flag! Small-cap stocks rally adds ₹9 lakh crore in 2 months despite earnings miss. Time to turn cautious?
Small-cap stocks: There's a popular adage in the stock market —Prices are a slave to earnings. But this doesn't seem to hold true in the case of the small-cap stocks that have been in an upward trend for four straight months despite a sharp miss in the March quarter earnings.
The overall PAT for the small-cap stocks was down 16% year-on-year, significantly worse than the already muted expectations. Despite that, in the financial year 2025-26 alone (FY26), the BSE Smallcap index has gained nearly 15%, adding over ₹ 9 lakh crore to investor wealth, according to Bloomberg data, raising concerns that the current bullish trend is likely built on shaky ground. Potential for high returns in a short period has powered the small-cap rally.
However, this has deprived investors of valuation comfort, with the one-year forward P/E for BSE Smallcap trading at 33x, which is well above its long-term average of 19-20x.
The small-cap segment also remains a popular category among mutual fund investors, garnering the second-highest net inflow of ₹ 17,535 crore up to April, as per data from Morningstar. This sustained investor interest underscores the strong appeal of the segment, likely driven by the robust returns small-cap funds have delivered over the past few years, Himanshu Srivastava, Associate Director – Manager Research at Morningstar India, said.
The earnings miss was notable, especially amid positive surprises across large and mid-cap names. Domestic brokerage Motilal Oswal Financial Services (MOSL) said that not only was the segment a laggard, but it also recorded a notable PAT decline, influenced materially by weakness in the financials sector, underlining the challenges for smaller BFSI players during the quarter.
According to Prashanth Tapse, Senior Vice President of Research at Mehta Equities, small-cap companies have historically exhibited greater earnings volatility, making them more vulnerable to macroeconomic shifts. As a result, even flat or slightly weak earnings can lead to disproportionate price corrections, amplifying volatility, he cautioned.
However, he expects a rebound in corporate profitability among fundamentally strong small-cap businesses, driven by a favorable macroeconomic environment like declining interest rates (following RBI rate cut), which are expected to reduce borrowing costs, benefiting small-cap firms with higher sensitivity to credit conditions, and cooling inflation that is likely to ease raw material and operational costs, supporting margin expansion in upcoming quarters.
Since the small-caps remain a barbell segment, capable of both strong rebounds and deep corrections, analysts believe stock selection is critical.
"From a valuation standpoint, any correction in small-cap stocks would make price reasonable, improving the risk-reward profile for long-term investors. While a cautious and informed approach, emphasising on quality and diversification, can help navigate the complexities of this segment," Tapsee added. He advised investors not to just focus on short-term earnings, but try and spot businesses with low debt, consistent cash flows, and sectoral tailwinds, while avoiding companies where promoters have high pledging history, rising debt levels, or working capital issues, with concerns on corporate governance.
Vaqarjaved Khan, Sr. Fundamental Analyst, Angel One, also said that one must not completely exit small-caps as a strategy but should remain selective going forward. Earnings miss by a big margin, such as 10-25%, coupled with highly stretched valuations, make picking small-cap stocks relatively tricky, according to Khan. Against this backdrop, he advised staying away from cyclical sectors such as textiles, paper and overleveraged small NBFCs trading at premium valuations. He further added that it's better to stay away from frothy names and churn positions from small-caps to mid and large-caps.
While small-cap stocks, by nature, are more volatile and sensitive to economic cycles, they can see sharper earnings downgrades during uncertain phases. However, this same segment has historically shown the ability to deliver outsized returns over long investment horizons, especially as some of these companies evolve into future market leaders.
"Despite the volatility, small-caps continue to be seen as high-risk, high-reward engines of long-term growth; they demand patience, discipline, and a strong stomach for risk. From a portfolio construction standpoint, small-caps can act as a return kicker, enhancing long-term portfolio growth when included in moderation. That said, the allocation to small-cap funds should be calibrated based on an investor's risk appetite, time horizon, and overall financial goals," said Srivastava of Morningstar.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Chinese carmakers commit to 60-day supplier payments amid regulatory pressure
China's leading state-owned automakers — Dongfeng Motor Group , Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. (GAC), and China FAW Group — have pledged to standardize payment periods to suppliers at 60 days. The announcements, made on Tuesday, follow growing regulatory scrutiny over delayed supplier payments and opaque financing practices in the automotive supply chain , reports Bloomberg. The move aims to improve capital flow and financial transparency in the industry, which has been caught in a domestic price war leading to aggressive cost-cutting and extended payment cycles. Delayed Payments Functioning as Quasi-Debt Amid fierce competition, many Chinese carmakers have been delaying payments to suppliers for several months, effectively using them as a form of quasi-debt financing. This trend has sparked concerns from regulators, including the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), which recently held discussions with top electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers. Officials warned that the practice is unsustainable and poses risks to smaller suppliers who often lack the financial buffer to absorb prolonged payment delays. New Rules to Protect Small and Medium Enterprises To address these issues, Chinese authorities in March issued new regulations requiring large companies to settle bills within 60 days. The rules also prohibit firms from coercing suppliers into accepting non-cash payments such as promissory notes as a way to delay settlement. These regulations officially come into force this June. The latest pledges from major carmakers appear to be in line with these new rules and are seen as a step toward cleaning up the industry's financial practices. BYD's Financing Tactics Under Spotlight Leading EV maker BYD Co. has been particularly noted for its reliance on a promissory note system called Dilian (or Dilink in English), which it uses to pay suppliers at a later date. As of May 2023, BYD had issued 400 billion yuan ($55.7 billion) worth of such notes. Bloomberg data shows BYD took an average of 275 days to pay its suppliers in 2023. A report by GMT Research estimates the company's real net debt at 323 billion yuan — significantly higher than the 27.7 billion yuan it reported — primarily due to these deferred payments. Industry Shift Toward Financial Discipline The commitments by major state-backed automakers could signal a broader industry shift toward financial discipline and more equitable supply chain practices. As the new payment rules take effect, regulators are expected to closely monitor compliance to ensure that small and medium suppliers are protected in China's rapidly evolving auto sector.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Chinese Carmakers Agree to Standardize Supplier Payment Periods
(Bloomberg) -- Several of China's state-owned automakers have pledged to standardize bill payment periods for their suppliers to 60 days after authorities raised concerns about supply chain financing. At least three carmakers, including Dongfeng Motor Group Co., Guangzhou Automobile Group Co. and China FAW Group Co. issued similar statements on Tuesday saying their payment plans are aimed at promoting efficient capital flows across supply chains in the automotive industry. Chinese carmakers, embroiled in a domestic price war, have been seeking lower-cost components and delaying payments to suppliers by months, creating a form of quasi-debt financing. Regulators including the Ministry for Industry and Information Technology last week addressed the issue of supply chain financing with the heads of major electric vehicle manufacturers on concerns the price war was becoming unsustainable. Chinese authorities issued new rules in March to protect small and medium enterprises, stipulating that bills should be paid within 60 days and that large firms shouldn't force smaller businesses to accept non-cash payments such as promissory notes or use these methods to delay payments. The regulations will take effect in June. Supply chain financing is common in the auto industry. BYD Co., China's best-selling car brand, has a promissory note system called Dilian, or Dilink in English, that it uses as a form of payment to its suppliers and can be redeemed at a later time. The platform had issued 400 billion yuan ($55.7 billion) worth of notes as of May 2023, the last time that BYD disclosed such information. BYD took an average of 275 days to pay suppliers in 2023, Bloomberg compiled data show. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research puts BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan, compared with the 27.7 billion yuan listed on its books as of the end of June 2024, through delaying its payments to suppliers and other related financing. More stories like this are available on
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
‘Donald Trump administration may restore funding to Harvard University if...,' says Education Secretary McMahon
Education Secretary Linda McMahon stated that Harvard and other universities might have their federal funding, previously reduced by the Trump administration, reinstated if they revise their current policies, Bloomberg reported. 'It would be my goal that if colleges and universities are abiding by the laws of the United States and doing what we expect of them, that they can expect taxpayer-funded programs,' the secretary said at a Bloomberg News event on Tuesday. McMahon said the administration was 'making progress in some of the discussions' with Harvard, despite ongoing legal fights, according to a report by Bloomberg. The secretary said federal funds have a role to play in academic research. 'I think if we look at our research as for the public good, which I think is intended, then taxpayers are willing to see their tax dollars to support that kind of really good research. And so I'm sure that would continue at the university level,' she said. US President Donald Trump has halted over $2.6 billion in federal research funding to Harvard University—the nation's oldest and wealthiest institution—and is seeking to terminate its federal contracts. The administration frames these measures as part of a broader initiative to eliminate antisemitism on college campuses. Harvard has taken its fight to court with two lawsuits against the administration, challenging both the loss of federal funding and a decision by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke its license to admit international students. The administration requested that the university provide records detailing misconduct by international students on campus, but claims the institution has not provided sufficient information. Meanwhile, a judge has temporarily halted the government's attempt to ban the university's foreign students and researchers from entering the US, with another hearing scheduled for June 16. The secretary said consent decrees have been floated as a tool to resolve the administration's concerns with universities, referencing a binding legal agreement that could put schools under observation by a court-ordered monitor. Trump has routinely singled out Harvard since taking office, taking aim at its perceived left-leaning biases and its hiring and admissions practices. He has mused that its federal funding should be funneled to trade schools and calling for its tax-exempt status to be taken away. Trump recently said that Massachusetts-based schools were 'starting to behave.' A group of 18 colleges backed Harvard's case against the government over federal research dollars, arguing that the terminations 'inflict grievous harm' on universities. Harvard has rejected demands from the administration to implement 'viewpoint diversity' on campus in its hiring and admissions practices. Conservatives have long argued that elite campuses don't foster environments where their perspectives are represented or welcome. It would be my goal that if colleges and universities are abiding by the laws of the United States and doing what we expect of them, that they can expect taxpayer-funded programs. Columbia University, which has lost approximately $400 million in federal funding, notably refrained from joining the 'friend of the court' brief. Additionally, its accreditation has come under threat after the administration informed the university's accreditor that Columbia was found to be in violation of Title IX regulations. (With inputs from Bloomberg)
