US, Colombia recall top diplomats as rift deepens
Washington went first, recalling its charge d'affaires John McNamara "following baseless and reprehensible statements from the highest levels of the Government of Colombia", State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said, without giving specifics.
In addition to McNamara's recall, Bruce said the United States "is pursuing other measures to make clear our deep concern over the current state of our bilateral relationship".
She did not detail the actions.
Within hours, Colombian President Gustavo Petro announced he was calling home his top diplomat in Washington in response.
Ambassador Daniel Garcia Pena "must come to inform us of the development of the bilateral agenda", Petro wrote on X, such as tapping South America's "great potential for clean energy" and the fight against "drug lords and their international finances".
The diplomatic spat came on the heels of the resignation of Colombia's foreign minister earlier Thursday - the latest top-ranking official to exit Petro's government.
"In recent days, decisions have been made that I do not agree with and that, out of personal integrity and institutional respect, I cannot support," Laura Sarabia, who was also Petro's former chief of staff, wrote on X.
PLOT INVESTIGATION
Colombia was until recently one of the United States's closest partners in Latin America. But ties have sharply deteriorated.
Colombian prosecutors opened an investigation this week into an alleged plot to overthrow Petro with the help of Colombian and American politicians, following the publication by the Spanish daily El Pais of recordings implicating former foreign minister Alvaro Leyva.
"This is nothing more than a conspiracy with drug traffickers and apparently, the Colombian and American extreme right," Petro said on Monday.
During a speech in Bogota on Thursday, Petro said he did not think US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom he had previously linked to the alleged overthrow attempt, was "in the midst of a coup d'etat" against his government.
"I don't believe that a government that has Iran as its enemy and nuclear weapons pointed at it ... is going to start fooling around with a coup d'etat" in Colombia, he said.
In late January, the United States briefly suspended consular services to retaliate for Petro's refusal to allow US military planes to return Colombian migrants to their homeland.
Petro accused the United States of treating the migrants like criminals, placing them in shackles and handcuffs.
The pair issued threats and counter threats of crippling trade tariffs of up to 50 per cent.
A backroom diplomatic deal involving the deployment of Colombian Air Force planes to collect the migrants averted a looming trade war at the eleventh hour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Musk's SpaceX, others win US court challenge to labor board's structure
A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday agreed with Elon Musk's SpaceX and two other companies that the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's structure is likely unlawful and blocked the agency from pursuing cases against them. The ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the first by an appeals court to find that a law shielding NLRB administrative judges and the board's five members from being removed at will by the president is likely illegal. The 5th Circuit on Tuesday said the protections from removal prevent the president from exercising his power to control the executive branch. "Because the executive power remains solely vested in the President, those who exercise it on his behalf must remain subject to his oversight," wrote Circuit Judge Don Willett, an appointee of Republican President Donald Trump. A series of similar cases challenging the board's structure are pending, and the Trump administration is making the same arguments after the president fired a Democratic member of the board in January and she sued to get her job back. The 5th Circuit upheld decisions by three judges in Texas that blocked NLRB cases alleging illegal labor practices by SpaceX, pipeline operator Energy Transfer, and Aunt Bertha, which operates a social services search engine, pending the outcome of their lawsuits. "The Employers have made their case and should not have to choose between compliance and constitutionality," wrote Willett. The board and the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk was a top adviser to Trump, spearheading an effort to drastically shrink the federal workforce and slash government spending, until the two men had a public falling out in May. SpaceX has a separate pending lawsuit against the NLRB seeking to block a different board case. The NLRB is the only federal agency that hears private-sector labor disputes. The agency's general counsel can issue complaints against employers or unions that are heard by administrative judges, whose decisions can be appealed to the board. The five-member board has been paralyzed and unable to issue decisions since Trump in January fired Member Gwynne Wilcox. The NLRB was designed by the U.S. Congress to be independent from the White House, and before Wilcox no board member had ever been removed by the president.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
NATO military leaders to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine
BRUSSELS: NATO military leaders are expected to meet on Wednesday (Aug 20) to discuss Ukraine and the way forward, US and NATO officials said, as Washington and European capitals work out details of what security guarantees might look like for Kyiv. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by US President Donald Trump's pledge of security guarantees during a summit on Monday, but many questions remain. As military planners start to work on what options might exist for security guarantees, Trump ruled out sending US troops into Ukraine but suggested that Washington could provide some type of air support. US Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, who oversees all NATO operations in Europe, will brief chiefs of defence on the results of Trump's Alaska meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chairman of NATO's military committee, said there would be a video conference on Wednesday. 'As diplomatic efforts to secure peace in Ukraine progress, looking forward to (Grynkewich's) update on the current security environment,' Dragone wrote on X. SECURITY GUARANTEES IN FOCUS Officials said the talks were taking place under unique circumstances and expected security guarantees to be a central issue. A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was expected to attend, though plans could still change. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The British government said the so-called Coalition of the Willing, which met virtually on Tuesday, had agreed that planning teams would meet US counterparts in the coming days to advance security plans for Ukraine. ZELENSKIY EXPECTS PLAN IN 10 DAYS Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said after his White House meeting with Trump and European leaders that a framework for security guarantees would likely be worked out within 10 days. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump again ruled out sending US troops to Ukraine and gave no specifics about the guarantees he has previously said Washington could offer under any post-war settlement. But in the same interview with Fox News, Trump suggested that Washington could provide air support to Ukraine. 'When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground, we're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air because nobody has stuff we have, really they don't have,' Trump said. He did not provide any further details. There are a wide variety of ways the US could provide air support. It could be as simple as providing more air defence systems to Ukraine or a more involved US role that includes US fighter jets enforcing some sort of no-fly zone.
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
US wants equity stake in Intel for cash grants approved under Biden
WASHINGTON :U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday the government wanted an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved during the administration of former President Joe Biden. Separately, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any U.S. investment in Intel would be aimed at helping the troubled chipmaker stabilize. Asked about reports that the U.S. was considering taking a 10 per cent stake in Intel, Bessent told CNBC's "Squawk Box" program: "The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilize the company for chip production here in the U.S." Bessent gave no details about the size or timing of any U.S. stake in Intel, but said any investment would not be aimed at forcing U.S. companies to buy chips from Intel. Bessent's comments were the first official response from the Trump administration after Bloomberg News reported on Monday the U.S. government is in talks to take a 10 per cent Intel stake in exchange for $7.9 billion in grants that were approved for the U.S. chip company during the Biden administration. "We should get an equity stake for our money," Lutnick told CNBC. "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away." Lutnick said the U.S. does not want control of the company. "It's not governance, we are just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity for the Trump administration for the American people." He suggested any stake would be "non-voting," meaning it would not enable the U.S. government to tell the company how to run its business. He made his comments a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2 billion into the chipmaker, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer,'" Lutnick said. Intel and TSMC, a Taiwan-based chipmaker, did not immediately comment.
